Characterisation of Disease Patterns of Dermatomyositis with Different Initial Manifestations

The differential role of SSa/SSb and Ro52 antibodies in defining clinical phenotypes in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

In idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, anti-SSa/SSb and anti-Ro52 are associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet few studies have compared their prognostic utility. Our study analyzes clinical phenotypes associated with anti-SSa/SSb and anti-Ro52 positivity in IIM and their association with ILD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of IIM patients >18-years-old, seen at Northwell Myositis Center 2007- 2018 who met 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria with available anti-SSa/SSb data. Patients who were anti-SSa/SSb(-) and anti-Ro52(+) were excluded from anti-SSa/SSb subgroup analysis but included in Ro52 subgroup analysis. Organ manifestations, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and comorbidities were recorded. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, Fisher's Exact, Wilcoxon Rank Sum, McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Of 94 patients included in the final analysis, 35% (33/94) were anti-SSa/SSb positive (+). Of 60 patients with anti-Ro52 data, 42% (25/60) were (+). ILD was more common in anti-SSa/SSb (+) versus anti-SSa/SSb negative patients and anti-Ro52(+) versus anti-Ro52 negative patients (58% vs 25%; p = 0.003 and 64% vs.26%; p = 0,004 respectively). Anti-SSa/SSb (+) was not associated with increased ILD severity based on PFTs. Anti-Ro52(+) group had lower DLCO than anti-Ro52(-) (47% vs 68%; p = 0.003). Anti-SSa/SSb positivity did not confer a difference in the frequency of other manifestations. Elevated rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (10%-12%) and osteoporosis (13-17%) were observed independent of anti-SSa/SSb or anti-Ro52 status.

CONCLUSION

In IIM anti-SSa/SSb or anti-Ro52 positivity is associated with higher ILD rate. Both assays are useful to confer ILD risk, but anti-Ro52 is more predictive of severe ILD. High frequencies of osteoporosis and VTE were observed in all subgroups.

Diagnosis of Thyroid Neoplasm-Associated Dermatomyositis in Ethiopian Woman

Background

Dermatomyositis is an inflammatory myopathies causing proximal muscle weakness accompanied by muscular inflammation and skin rash. Dermatomyositis patients have a higher incidence of malignancy as compared to the general population.

Case Report

A 52-year-old known female patient with a toxic multi-nodular goiter presented with insidious onset of itchy erythematous rash on her neck and bilateral hands and progressive muscle weakness of 4 months' duration. Associated with this, she had photosensitivity, and periorbital edema of 2 months' duration. On physical examination, she had an anterior neck mass, proximal muscle weakness, periorbital edema, and violaceous skin rash on her bilateral arms, shoulders and neck. Thyroid function tests were normal, creatinine kinase was elevated, and muscle biopsy revealed inflammatory myositis. Ultrasound of the anterior neck mass and analysis of fine needle aspiration suggested thyroid cancer.

Conclusion

A high index of clinical suspicion is usually required for early diagnosis of dermatomyositis in resource-limited settings in order to prevent adverse outcomes and identify associated malignancies.

Myofibrillar myopathies due to a novel mutation in exon 8 of the LDB3 gene

Myofibrillar myopathies (MFMs) are a group of genetically heterogeneous diseases affecting the skeletal and cardiac muscles. Myofibrillar myopathies are characterized by focal lysis of myogenic fibers and integration of degraded myogenic fiber products into inclusion bodies, which are typically rich in desmin and many other proteins. Herein, we report a case of a 54-year-old woman who experienced bilateral thigh weakness for over three years. She was diagnosed with MFMs based on muscle biopsy findings and the presence of a novel mutation in exon 8 of the LDB3 gene. Myofibrillar myopathies caused by a mutation in the LDB3 gene are extremely uncommon and often lack distinct clinical characteristics and typically exhibit a slow disease progression. When considering a diagnosis of MFMs, particularly in complex instances of autosomal dominant myopathies where muscle biopsies do not clearly indicate MFMs, it becomes crucial for clinicians to utilize genetic test as a diagnostic tool.