Research Progress of Design Drugs and Composite Biomaterials in Bone Tissue Engineering

Amorphous, Carbonated Calcium Phosphate and Biopolymer-Composite-Coated Si3N4/MWCNTs as Potential Novel Implant Materials

A biodegradable amorphous carbonated calcium phosphate (caCP)-incorporated polycaprolactone (PCL) composite layer was successfully deposited by a spin coater. In this specific coating, the PCL acts as a bioadhesive, since it provides a better adherence of the coatings to the substrate compared to powder coatings. The caCP-PCL coatings were deposited and formed thin layers on the surface of a Si3N4-3 wt% MWCNT (multiwalled carbon nanotube) substrate, which is an emerging type of implant material in the biomedical field. The composite coatings were examined regarding their morphology, structure and biological performance. The biocompatibility of the samples was tested in vitro with MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cells. Owing to the caCP-PCL thin layer, the cell viability values were considerably increased compared to the substrate material. The ALP and LDH tests showed numerous living cells on the investrigated coatings. The morphology of the MC3T3-E1 cells was examined by fluorescent staining (calcein and DAPI) and scanning electron microscopy, both of which revealed a well-spread, adhered and confluent monolayer of cells. All performed biocompatibility tests were positive and indicated the applicability of the deposited thin composite layers as possible candidates for orthopaedic implants for an extended period.

Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Antibiotic-Loaded Polymeric Tissue Scaffold and Bone Cement in the Regeneration of Infected Bone Tissue

Background Local antibiotic applications have been used in chronic osteomyelitis and have been defined as an adjunctive treatment method. Biodegradable materials are also used for the same purpose by adding antibiotics. The fact that it does not require additional surgery to be removed is an important advantage. In this study, we intended to develop a new biodegradable drug-loaded polymeric scaffold with good antibiotic release and compare the microbiological results with antibiotic-impregnated bone cement. Methodology A tissue scaffold containing poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) was prepared in our laboratory and loaded with ertapenem and daptomycin antibiotics. The surface morphology and pore geometries of drug-loaded and unloaded scaffolds were analyzed by a scanning electron microscope under vacuum. The dose-dependent antiproliferative effects of PHEMA scaffold, drug-loaded scaffold, cement, and drug-loaded cement on osteoblast cells were investigated. To evaluate drug release kinetics, the absorbance values of the scaffold loaded with ertapenem and daptomycin were measured with the spectrometer. For microbiological tests, ertapenem and daptomycin-impregnated cement and scaffold, as well as the control scaffold and cement samples, were investigated for their antibacterial activities on Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains using the disc diffusion method. These microorganisms are one of the most common microorganisms in osteomyelitis. Results The efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated scaffold and cement on both gram-negative and gram-positive microorganisms was investigated. The daptomycin zone diameter in S. aureus ATCC 29233 strain was 17 mm, whereas it was 24 mm for scaffold and 22 mm for cement. Scaffold was found to be more effective than cement against S. aureus strain. The K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-2814 strain was found to be resistant to ertapenem, but the zone diameter was 21 mm for scaffold and 20 mm for cement. Ertapenem-loaded scaffold was found to be more effective than cement. It was found that the antimicrobial activity of the scaffold was higher than cement. When we evaluated the release profiles, for the daptomycin-loaded cement group, 98% of daptomycin was cumulatively released within 30 minutes, and for the daptomycin-loaded scaffold group, 100% of daptomycin was cumulatively released in six days. To compare ertapenem-loaded cement and scaffold, 98% of ertapenem was cumulatively released within 10 minutes in the cement group. For the scaffold group, 100% of ertapenem was cumulatively released in 17 days. We found that the scaffold released the antibiotic more slowly and for a longer duration. Therefore, it was thought that the scaffold would be more effective on biofilm and the treatment of osteomyelitis would be more successful. Conclusions The produced scaffold was compared with cement, and it was concluded that the scaffold had better release and antimicrobial efficacy. Scaffold is more advantageous than cement because it is bioeliminable. Thus, there is no need for a second surgical intervention with the likely prevention of mortality and morbidity. Because of all these features, the scaffold seems promising in the local treatment of osteomyelitis.

3D and 4D printing hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and regeneration

The osseous tissue can be classified as a nanocomposite that encompasses a complex interweaving of organic and inorganic matrices. This intricate amalgamation consists of a collagen component and a mineral phase that are intricately arranged to form elaborate and perforated configurations. Hydroxyapatite, whether synthesized artificially or obtained from natural sources, has garnered considerable attention as a composite material in the field of bone tissue engineering due to its striking resemblance to bone in terms of structure and characteristics. Hydroxyapatite (HA) constitutes the predominant ceramic biomaterial for biomedical applications due to its ability to replicate the mineral composition of vertebrate bone. Nonetheless, it is noteworthy that the present biomimetic substance exhibits unfavorable mechanical characteristics, characterized by insufficient tensile and compressive strength, thus rendering it unsuitable for effective employment in the field of bone tissue engineering. Due to its beneficial attributes, hydroxyapatite (HA) is frequently employed in conjunction with various polymers and crosslinkers as composites to enhance mechanical properties and overall efficacy of implantable biomaterials engineered. The restoration of skeletal defects through the use of customized replacements is an effective way to replace damaged or lost bone structures. This method not only restores the bones' original functions but also reinstates their initial aesthetic appearance. The utilization of hydroxyapatite-polymer composites within 3D-printed grafts necessitates meticulous optimization of both mechanical and biological properties, in order to ensure their suitability for employment in medical devices. The utilization of 3D-printing technology represents an innovative approach in the manufacturing of HA-based scaffolds, which offers advantageous prospects for personalized bone regeneration. The expeditious prototyping method, with emphasis on the application of 3D printing, presents a viable approach in the development of bespoke prosthetic implants, grounded on healthcare data sets. 4D printing approach is an evolved form of 3D printing that utilizes programmable materials capable of altering the intended shape of printed structures, contingent upon single or dual stimulating factors. These factors include aspects such as pH level, temperature, humidity, crosslinking degree, and leaching factors.