Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Results from an Open-Label Interventional Clinical Trial

Trefoil factor 3 can stimulate Th17 cell response in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus

This study aims to evaluate the role of trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) peptides in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from an inflammatory perspective. The focus was on exploring how TFF3 affects the function of T cells. TFF3 overexpression model was constructed using lentivirus in Jurkat cell lines. We evaluated the impact of TFF3 on the proliferation, apoptosis, and IL-17A levels of Jurkat cells cultured in high glucose. The T2DM model was induced in TFF3 knockout (KO) mice through streptozotocin combined with high-fat diet. The measurements included glucose tolerance, insulin tolerance, inflammation markers, Th17 cell proportion, and pancreatic pathological changes. The T2DM modeling led to splenomegaly in mice, and increased expression of TFF3 in their spleens. Overexpression of TFF3 increased the proportion of IL-17+ T cells and the levels of Th17-related cytokines in Jurkat cells. There was no difference in body weight and blood glucose levels between wild-type and TFF3 KO mice. However, T2DM mice lacking the TFF3 gene showed improved glucose utilization, ameliorated pancreatic pathology, decreased inflammation levels, and reduced Th17 cell ratio. TFF3 may be involved in the chronic inflammatory immune response in T2DM. Its mechanism may be related to the regulation of the RORγt/IL-17 signaling pathway and its impact on T cell proliferation and apoptosis.

Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Renal Diseases: A Review of Animal and Human Studies

Background

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) has been suggested as a treatment for vascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease, diabetic foot ulcers, and erectile dysfunction. Primarily, LI-ESWT is known for its ability to stimulate angiogenesis and activation of stem cells in target tissues. Application of LI-ESWT in chronic progressive renal diseases is a novel area. The aim of the present review was to summarize available data on the effects of LI-ESWT used in the setting of renal diseases.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases for relevant studies. Our review included the results from preclinical animal experiments and clinical research.

Results

Eleven animal studies and one clinical study were included in the review. In the animal studies, LI-ESWT was used for the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy (n=1), diabetic nephropathy (n=1), or various types of ischemic renal injury (ie, artery occlusion, reperfusion injury) (n=9). The clinical study was conducted in a single-arm cohort as a Phase 1 study with patients having diabetic nephropathy. In animal studies, the application of LI-ESWT was associated with several effects: LI-ESWT led to increased VEGF and endothelial cell proliferation and improved vascularity and perfusion of the kidney tissue. LI-ESWT reduced renal inflammation and fibrosis. LI-ESWT caused only mild side effects in the clinical study, and, similarly, there were no signs of kidney injury after LI-ESWT in the animal studies.

Conclusion

LI-ESWT, as a non-invasive treatment, reduces the pathological manifestations (inflammation, capillary rarefaction, fibrosis, decreased perfusion) associated with certain types of renal disease. The efficacy of renal LI-ESWT needs to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

The Efficacy of Li-ESWT Combined With VED in Diabetic ED Patients Unresponsive to PDE5is: A Single-Center, Randomized Clinical Trial

INTRODUCTION

Phosphodiesterase type 5-inhibitors (PDE5is) are the first-line treatment for patients with diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction (DMED), however, some patients are non-responser to PDE5is. We performed a perspective, randomized, comparative study to explore the efficacy of low intensity extracorporeal shock wave treatment (Li-ESWT) combined with vacuum erectile device (VED) in the treatment of DMED patients who were unresponsive to PDE5is.

METHODS

One hundred and five eligible patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A (VED), group B (Li-ESWT) and group C (VED plus Li-ESWT). Follow-up was conducted at 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The erectile function was estimated by the international index of erectile function-erectile function domain (IIEF-EF), erection hardness score (EHS), sexual encounter profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3) and global assessment question 1 and 2 (GAQ1 and GAQ2) before and after treatment. The changes of five points in IIEF-EF were calculated as the minimal clinical important difference (MCID), which was considered as the main index of efficacy.

RESULTS

The MCID was achieved in 14.7%, 14.7% and 17.6% patients in group A at the follow up on 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively (36.4%, 39.4% and 36.4% in group B; 36.4%, 51.5%, and 66.7% in group C). There were significant differences in the percentage of MCID cases between group A and group C at the follow up on 12 weeks (P<0.001), as well as that between group B and group C (P=0.014). Additionally, comparison in MCID within group C showed that there were significant differences between 4 weeks and 12 weeks follow-up (P=0.014).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated the combined therapy Li-ESWT and VED was more beneficial to shift turn PDE5is non-responders to responders for moderate patients with DMED than VED or Li-ESWT monotherapy. Moreover, this study provided evidence that patients with DMED who failed after taking oral PDE5is could attempt to opt for an alternative physicotherapy (Li-ESWT or VED) prior to more invasive alternatives.