Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence, Fecal Incontinence, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Health Technology Assessment

Background

Stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse are common forms of pelvic floor dysfunction. Pelvic floor muscle training is used to improve pelvic floor function, through a program of exercises. We conducted a health technology assessment of pelvic floor muscle training for people with stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, or pelvic organ prolapse, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, and the budget impact of publicly funding pelvic floor muscle training, and patient preferences and values.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using the ROBIS tool, for systematic reviews, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, for randomized controlled trials, and we assessed the quality of the body of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search but did not conduct a primary economic evaluation. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding pelvic floor muscle training in adults with stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of pelvic floor muscle training as a treatment, we spoke with people with stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse.

Results

We included 6 studies (4 systematic reviews and 2 randomized controlled trials) in the clinical evidence review. In comparison with no treatment, pelvic floor muscle training significantly improved symptom severity and increased patient satisfaction in women with stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse (GRADE: Moderate). For men with stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy, pelvic floor muscle training yielded mixed results for symptom improvement (GRADE: Very low). For adults with fecal incontinence, pelvic floor muscle training did not improve symptoms in comparison with standard care (GRADE: Very low).In the economic literature review, we included 6 cost-utility analyses that had evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training as a treatment for people with pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. We did not identify any economic studies on pelvic floor muscle training for women or men with fecal incontinence or men with pelvic organ prolapse. The analyses included in our review found that, for women with stress urinary incontinence, pelvic floor muscle training was likely cost-effective in comparison with other nonsurgical interventions. For men with urinary incontinence after prostate surgery, pelvic floor muscle training was likely not cost-effective in comparison with standard care. For women with pelvic organ prolapse, the cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in comparison with no active treatment was uncertain.The average cost of pelvic floor muscle training was approximately $763 per patient. Publicly funding pelvic floor muscle training for women with stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse would result in additional costs over 5 years of $185.3 million, $275.6 million, and $85.8 million, respectively. Publicly funding pelvic floor muscle training for men with stress urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence would result in additional costs over 5 years of $10.8 million and $131.1 million, respectively. The people we spoke with reported that stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse limited their social and physical activities, taking a huge emotional toll. Many were hesitant or even fearful of surgery, and most people with experience of pelvic floor muscle training reported that it relieved most or all of their symptoms and allowed them to return to normal daily activities.

Conclusions

Pelvic floor muscle training is likely more effective (with respect to symptom improvement and patient satisfaction) than no treatment for women with stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic floor muscle training may yield mixed results with respect to symptom improvement for men with stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy and have little to no effect on symptom improvement for adults with fecal incontinence. We estimate that publicly funding pelvic floor muscle training for adults with pelvic floor dysfunction (stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse) in Ontario would result in a substantial budget increase over the next 5 years. People with stress urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse shared the negative impact these conditions have on their social and physical life and valued pelvic floor muscle training as a nonsurgical treatment option.

Conservative interventions for female exercise-induced urinary incontinence: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and synthesise what is known about the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical conservative interventions for the management of urinary incontinence (UI) experienced by women during physical exercise.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the following databases in September 2023: the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Studies were deemed eligible if population consisted of females who reported symptoms of UI while participating in physical exercise, and the interventions involved any non-pharmaceutical conservative treatment to manage symptoms during exercise. The primary outcome was severity of UI signs and symptoms. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022379138).

RESULTS

Of the 3429 abstracts screened, 19 studies were retained. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and intravaginal devices were the most commonly investigated modalities. Only two randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both among volleyball players, compared PFMT with no PFM exercise, showing a reduction in pad weight gain after the intervention in the experimental groups only. PFMT with and without biofeedback randomised among soldiers demonstrated a reduction in the frequency of urine leakage episodes in both groups, while supervised and unsupervised PFMT randomised among athletes from different sports showed pad weight gain reduction in the supervised group only. Seven single-arm studies suggested that PFMT alone or combined with other modalities may reduce UI severity in active women based on questionnaires, bladder diaries, and self-reported symptoms. A single-arm and a crossover study found pessary use beneficial in reducing urine leakage based on questionnaires and pad weight gain, respectively. When comparing pessary, tampon, and no intervention, two repeated-measures studies found tampons may reduce leakage more than pessaries in CrossFit exercisers and women performing aerobic exercises. A vaginal sponge also reduced pad weight gain during aerobic exercises. Other modalities (i.e., an intraurethral device, photobiomodulation, and combined therapies) were investigated using case series or single case studies. While all interventions showed some evidence of effectiveness, the results must be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations and high risk of bias. In particular, despite a high reliance on pad tests as a primary outcome, we identified inconsistencies in how pad tests were administered and interpreted.

CONCLUSION

Only the effectiveness of PFMT to reduce urine leakage during exercise has been evaluated through RCTs, with some evidence of effectiveness. We identified a clear need for higher quality studies, with better reporting on the interventions, and more judicious use and interpretation of outcome measures.

Comparison of Vaginal Pessaries to Standard Care or Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Treating Postpartum Urinary Incontinence: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

To compare three conservative treatment options, standard care, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), and vaginal pessaries, for postpartum urinary incontinence (UI) that are accessible to most patients and practitioners in a generalizable cohort.

Materials and Methods

A multicenter, open-label, parallel group, pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial comparing standard care, PFMT, and vaginal cube pessary for postpartum urinary incontinence was conducted in six outpatient clinics. Sample size was based on large treatment effects (Cramers' V > 0.35) with a power of 80% and an alpha of 0.05 for a 3 × 3 contingency table, 44 patients needed to be included in the trial. Outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Group comparisons were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square test as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 516 women screened, 111 presented with postpartum UI. Of these, 52 were randomized to one of three treatment groups: standard care (n = 17), pelvic floor muscle training (n = 17), or vaginal cube pessary (n = 18). After 12 weeks of treatment, treatment success, as measured by patient satisfaction, was significantly higher in the vaginal pessary group (77.8%, n = 14/18), compared to the standard care group (41.2%, n = 7/17), and the PFMT (23.5%, n = 4/17; χ 2 2,n = 52  = 14.55; p = 0.006, Cramer-V = 0.374). No adverse events were reported. SUI and MUI accounted for 88.4% of postpartum UI.

Conclusion

Vaginal pessaries were superior to standard care or PFMT to satisfyingly reduce postpartum UI symptoms. No complications were found.

Transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for assessing posterior pelvic injury and prolapse in postpartum women

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the association between transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound findings and posterior pelvic injury and prolapse in postpartum women.

METHODS

A total of 108 postpartum women received treatment from January 2020 and December 2022 were divided into 2 groups, with 53 cases in a pelvic floor disorder (PFD) group and 55 cases in the no PFD group according to whether they developed PFD after delivery. The relationship between ultrasound data and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) scores was analyzed by Pearson correlation. The diagnostic value of transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound for PFD was analyzed by using the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the relationship between transperineal pelvic floor ultrasound parameters and PFD was analyzed by using the RR hazard ratio.

RESULTS

The distance from the bladder neck to the posterior inferior border of the pubic symphysis, the distance from the cervix to the posterior inferior border of the pubic symphysis, and the shortening rate during retraction were shorter or lower in the PFD group than those in the no PFD group. Additionally, bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, anterior and posterior diameters of the static levator ani muscle (LAM), anterior and posterior diameters of the retracted LAM, anterior and posterior diameters of the LAM in the maximal Valsalva maneuver, and PFDI-20 scores in the PFD group were longer or higher than those of the no PFD group (P<0.01). Shortening rate during retraction, bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, and elongation at maximal Valsalva maneuver were positively correlated with the PFDI-20 score (R = 0.027, 0.053, 0.102, 0.002, 0.011, 0.123, respectively, all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of bladder descent, cervical subluxation, urethral rotation, shortening rate during retraction, and elongation at maximal Valsalva maneuver are closely related to the PFD I-20 score.

Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Unsolved Clinical Challenge

Stress urinary incontinence is still a frequent problem for women and men, which leads to pronounced impairment of the quality of life and withdrawal from the social environment. Modern diagnostics and therapy improved the situation for individuals affected. But there are still limits, including the correct diagnosis of incontinence and its pathophysiology, as well as the therapeutic algorithms. In most cases, patients are treated with a first-line regimen of drugs, possibly in combination with specific exercises and electrophysiological stimulation. When conservative options are exhausted, minimally invasive surgical therapies are indicated. However, standard surgeries, especially the application of implants, do not pursue any causal therapy. Non-absorbable meshes and ligaments have fallen into disrepute due to complications. In numerous countries, classic techniques such as colposuspension have been revived to avoid implants. Except for tapes in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women, the literature on randomized controlled studies is insufficient. This review provides an update on pharmacological and surgical treatment options for stress urinary incontinence; it highlights limitations and formulates wishes for the future from a clinical perspective.

Evaluating compliance and applicability of postpartum pessary use for preventing and treating pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

Pelvic floor disorders are common and associated with pregnancy and childbirth. For restitution of pelvic floor connective tissue and thereby therapy of postpartum pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, the Restifem® pessary is approved. It supports the anterior vaginal wall behind the symphysis, the lateral sulci and the sacro-uterine ligaments and stabilises the connective tissue. We evaluated the compliance and applicability of Restifem® use in women postpartum in a preventive and therapeutic approach.

METHODS

Restifem® pessary was handed out to 857 women. Six weeks after birth, they started the pessary use. After 8 weeks, 3 and 6 months postpartum, women received a questionnaire via online survey for evaluation of pessary applicability and efficacy.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks, 209 women answered the questionnaire. 119 women used the pessary. Common problems were discomfort, pain and the pessary use was to circuitous. Vaginal infections were rare. After 3 months, 85 women and after 6 months, 38 women still used the pessary. 3 months postpartum, 94% of women with POP, 72% of women with UI and 66% of women with OAB stated to have an improvement of their symptoms using the pessary. 88% women without any disorder felt an improvement of stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the Restifem® pessary in the postpartum period is feasible and accompanied with less complications. It reduces POP and UI and leads to an increased sense of stability. So, Restifem® pessary can be offered to women postpartum to improve pelvic floor dysfunction.

Medium-Term Outcomes of Conservative and Surgical Treatments for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Medicare Claims Analysis: Developed by the AUGS Payment Reform Committee

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the 3- to 5-year retreatment outcomes for conservatively and surgically treated urinary incontinence (UI) in a population of women 66 years and older.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used 5% Medicare data to evaluate UI retreatment outcomes of women undergoing physical therapy (PT), pessary treatment, or sling surgery. The data set used inpatient, outpatient, and carrier claims from 2008 to 2016 in women 66 years and older with fee-for-service coverage. Treatment failure was defined as receiving another UI treatment (pessary, PT, sling, Burch urethropexy, or urethral bulking) or repeat sling. A secondary analysis was performed where additional treatment courses of PT or pessary were also considered a treatment failure. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the time from treatment initiation to retreatment.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2013, 13,417 women were included with an index UI treatment, and follow-up continued through 2016. In this cohort, 41.4% received pessary treatment, 31.8% received PT, and 26.8% underwent sling surgery. In the primary analysis, pessaries had the lowest treatment failure rate compared with PT (P<0.001) and sling surgery (P<0.001; survival probability, 0.94 [pessary], 0.90 [PT], 0.88 [sling]). In the analysis where retreatment with PT or a pessary was considered a failure, sling surgery had the lowest retreatment rate (survival probability, 0.58 [pessary], 0.81 [PT], 0.88 [sling]; P<0.001 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

In this administrative database analysis, there was a small but statistically significant difference in treatment failure among women undergoing sling surgery, PT, or pessary treatment, but pessary use was commonly associated with the need for repeat pessary fittings.

A Novel Incisionless Disposable Vaginal Device for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Quality of Life

PURPOSE

This clinical study sought to evaluate the possible clinical effectiveness and practicality of URINO, an innovative, incisionless, and disposable intravaginal device, designed for patients suffering from stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial was carried out, involving women diagnosed with stress urinary incontinence who used a self-inserted, disposable intravaginal pessary device. Comparisons were made between the results of the 20-minute pad-weight gain (PWG) test at baseline and visit 3, where the device was applied. After 1 week of device usage, compliance, satisfaction, the sensation of a foreign body, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of 45 participants, 39 completed the trial and expressed satisfaction within the modified intention-to-treat group. The average 20-minute PWG of participants was 17.2±33.6 g at baseline and significantly dropped to 5.3±16.2 g at visit 3 with device application. A total of 87.2% of participants exhibited a reduction ratio of PWG by 50% or more, surpassing the clinical trial success benchmark of 76%. The mean compliance was recorded as 76.6%±26.6%, the average visual analogue scale score for patient satisfaction was 6.4±2.6, and the sensation of a foreign body, measured on a 5-point Likert scale, was 3.1±1.2 after 1 week of device use. No serious adverse events were reported; there was 1 instance of microscopic hematuria and 2 cases of pyuria, all of which recovered.

CONCLUSION

The investigated device demonstrated significant clinical effectiveness and safety for patients with stress urinary incontinence. It was easy to use, showing favorable patient compliance. We propose that these disposable intravaginal pessaries could potentially be an alternative treatment for patients with stress urinary incontinence who are seeking nonsurgical options or are unable to undergo surgery. Trial Registration: The study was registered as a clinical trial (KCT0008369).

Sports Medicine and the Pelvic Floor

ABSTRACT

The female athlete is seen as a specialist population meaning female considerations, such as pelvic floor dysfunction, are not widely taught within sports medicine. Females have unique anatomical characteristics compared with males including a wider pelvic diameter and an additional orifice in the form of the vagina. Furthermore, symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction are prevalent among female athletes and transitional periods in their lifespan. They also are a barrier to training and performance. Therefore, it is essential that sports medicine practitioners understand how to identify and manage pelvic floor dysfunction. This report aims to describe the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor, outline the types and rates of pelvic floor dysfunction, discuss evidence-based management, and raise awareness of perinatal bodily changes. Practical recommendations are made to aid sports organizations and sports medicine practitioners in supporting the female athlete and in using a proactive approach to manage the perinatal athlete.

The Clinical Trial Outcomes of Cranberry, D-Mannose and NSAIDs in the Prevention or Management of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Systematic Review

The use of antibiotics in the treatment of UTIs is contributing to resistance. Hence, the outcome of human clinical trials of nonantibiotic remedies for preventing or treating UTI is of significant interest. This systematic review aimed to identify, summarise and evaluate the evidence for the outcomes of different nonantibiotic options including cranberry, D-mannose and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched for manuscripts relating to nonantibiotic treatment of UTI including cranberry, mannose and NSAIDs. After title and abstract screening, data were extracted from 21 papers that were published in English and related to the treatment or prevention of uncomplicated UTI in adult women. We identified twelve papers examining the effects of cranberry, two papers examining D-mannose, two papers examining combination treatments (cranberry and D-mannose) and five manuscripts investigating the effects of NSAIDs. There is low-level evidence, from a small number of studies, supporting the use of D-mannose or combination treatments for potentially preventing UTIs in adult women without producing burdening side effects. However, larger and more randomised double-blinded trials are needed to confirm this. In comparison, the multiple studies of cranberry and NSAIDs produced conflicting evidence regarding their effectiveness.

Vaginal Laser Therapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review of Prospective Randomized Clinical Trials

The most common type of urinary incontinence in women is stress urinary incontinence (SUI) which negatively impacts several aspects of life. The newly introduced vaginal laser therapy is being considered for treating SUI. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal laser therapy for stress urinary incontinence in menopausal women. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases, Web of Science, clinical trial registry platforms, and Google Scholar, using the MeSH terms and keywords [Urinary Incontinence, Stress] and [(lasers) OR laser]. In our systematic review, prospective randomized clinical studies on women diagnosed with SUI as per the International Continence Society's diagnostic criteria were included. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool for randomized clinical trials was used to evaluate the quality of studies. A total of 256 relevant records in literature databases and registers and 25 in additional searches were found. Following a review of the titles, abstracts, and full texts, four studies involving 431 patients were included. Three studies used CO2-lasers, and one used Erbium: YAG-laser. The results of all four studies revealed the short-term improvement of SUI following both the Erbium: YAG-laser and CO2-laser therapy. SUI treatment with CO2-laser and Erbium: YAG-laser therapy is a quick, intuitive, well-tolerated procedure that successfully improves incontinence-related symptoms. The long-term impact of such interventions has not been well established as most trials focused on the short-term effects.

Rare complications of pessary use: A systematic review of case reports

Introduction

Pessaries are desirable for its overall safety profiles. Serious complications have been reported; however, there is little summative evidence. This systematic review aimed to consolidate all reported serious outcomes from pessaries usage to better identify and counsel patients who might be at higher risk of developing these adverse events.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature review using search terms such as 'prolapse', 'stress urinary incontinence' and 'pessary or pessaries or pessarium' on PubMed, Embase and CINAHL. A total of 36 articles were identified. Patient-level data were extracted from case reports to further describe complications on an individual level.

Results

Overall median age of the patients was 82 years (range 62-98). The most frequent complications were vesicovaginal fistula (25%, n = 9/36), rectovaginal fistula (19%, n = 7/36), vaginal impaction (11%, n = 4/36) and vaginal evisceration of small bowel through vaginal vault (8%, n = 3/36). In the vesicovaginal fistula cohort, none of the patients had a history of radiation, and two had histories of total abdominal hysterectomy (22%). In the rectovaginal fistula cohort, one patient had a history of pelvic radiation for rectal squamous cell carcinoma, and another had a history of chronic steroid use for rheumatoid arthritis. No other risk factors were reported in the other groups. Ring and Gellhorn were the most represented pessary types among the studies, 16 (44%) and 12 (33%), respectively. No complications were reported with surgical and non-surgical treatment of the complications.

Conclusion

Pessaries are a reasonable and durable treatment for POP with exceedingly rare reports of severe adverse complications. The ideal candidate for pessary should have a good self-care index. Studies to determine causative factors of the more serious adverse events are needed; however, this may be difficult given the long follow-up that is required.

The Role of Pessaries in the Treatment of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE

Pessaries are an important conservative therapy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but few studies have comprehensively evaluated their utility.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of pessaries for the treatment of SUI.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched for the terms "stress urinary incontinence" and "pessar/y/ies/ium" in PubMed, Embase, and Cinhal on June 10, 2020. Studies that characterized subjective and/or objective data were included. Studies performed in pediatric populations, pregnancy, and use of pessaries not for SUI were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed data quality and risk of bias according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Ten studies, including 376 patients, were included. In terms of subjective outcomes, 76% of 72 patients reported feeling continent after pessary treatment compared with 0% of 86 patients surveyed before pessary use (P < 0.0001). Both Urinary Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores decreased significantly by 46.7% (n = 155 baseline, n = 139 follow-up; P < 0.0001) and 67.8% (n = 139 baseline, n = 107 follow-up; P < 0.0001), respectively. Significant objective measures associated with pessary use included increased urethral closure pressure (n = 122; g = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to 1.77; P < 0.049) and decreased pad weight (n = 129 baseline; n = 118 follow-up; g = -0.89; 95% CI, -1.986 to 0.19; P = 0.009). Adverse events significantly decreased at greater than 6 months follow-up compared with less than 6 months follow-up, including pain (31.5%, n = 29/92 vs 14.3%, n = 5/35; P = 0.0513) and discomfort (50%, n = 46/92 vs 29.3%, n = 12/41; P = 0.0268).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on both subjective and objective measures, pessaries are an effective conservative treatment option for SUI. This supports pessary use, though larger studies with longer-term follow-up are warranted.

The Role of Pessaries in the Treatment of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IMPORTANCE

Pessaries are an important conservative therapy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but few studies have comprehensively evaluated their utility.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of pessaries for the treatment of SUI.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched for the terms "stress urinary incontinence" and "pessar/y/ies/ium" in PubMed, Embase, and Cinhal on June 10, 2020. Studies that characterized subjective and/or objective data were included. Studies performed in pediatric populations, pregnancy, and use of pessaries not for SUI were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened and assessed data quality and risk of bias according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Ten studies, including 376 patients, were included. In terms of subjective outcomes, 76% of 72 patients reported feeling continent after pessary treatment compared with 0% of 86 patients surveyed before pessary use (P < 0.0001). Both Urinary Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores decreased significantly by 46.7% (n = 155 baseline, n = 139 follow-up; P < 0.0001) and 67.8% (n = 139 baseline, n = 107 follow-up; P < 0.0001), respectively. Significant objective measures associated with pessary use included increased urethral closure pressure (n = 122; g = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to 1.77; P < 0.049) and decreased pad weight (n = 129 baseline; n = 118 follow-up; g = -0.89; 95% CI, -1.986 to 0.19; P = 0.009). Adverse events significantly decreased at greater than 6 months follow-up compared with less than 6 months follow-up, including pain (31.5%, n = 29/92 vs 14.3%, n = 5/35; P = 0.0513) and discomfort (50%, n = 46/92 vs 29.3%, n = 12/41; P = 0.0268).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on both subjective and objective measures, pessaries are an effective conservative treatment option for SUI. This supports pessary use, though larger studies with longer-term follow-up are warranted.

Toward a new generation of vaginal pessaries via 3D-printing: concomitant mechanical support and drug delivery

To improve patient adherence, vaginal pessaries - polymeric structures providing mechanical support to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) - greatly benefit from 3D-printing through customization of their mechanics, e.g. infill modifications. However, currently only limited polymers provide both flawless printability and controlled drug release. The current study closes this gap by exploring 3D-printing, more specifically fused filament fabrication, of pharmaceutical grade thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) of different hardness and hydrophilicity into complex pessary structures. Next to the pessary mechanics, drug incorporation into such a device was addressed for the first time. Mechanically, the soft hydrophobic TPU was the most promising candidate for pessary customization, as pessaries made thereof covered a broad range of the key mechanical parameter, while allowing self-insertion. From the drug release point of view, the hydrophobic TPUs were superior over the hydrophilic one, as the release levels of the model drug acyclovir were closer to the target value. Summarizing, the fabrication of TPU-based pessaries via 3D-printing is an innovative strategy to create a customized pessary combination product that simultaneously provides mechanical support and pharmacological therapy.

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Sonofeedback Method in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women-Preliminary Report

Urinary incontinence is a common problem that affects postmenopausal women. This ailment has a negative impact on many aspects of life, significantly limiting everyday functioning related to professional work, physical activity or the intimate sphere. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the sonofeedback method in reducing the severity of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women with a urinary incontinence problem. A total of 60 patients aged 45–65 with stress urinary incontinence, confirmed by a gynecologist, were qualified for the study. All persons qualified for the study were randomly assigned to study group A (n = 20), comparative B (n = 20) and control C (n = 20). Patients from group A were treated with sonofeedback of the pelvic floor muscles. In group B, the combined electrostimulation method was used with biofeedback training. Group C was a control group in which only the measured parameters were measured at the same time interval as those carried out in groups A and B. In all patients, three times: before the therapy, after the fifth procedure and after the end of the therapy, the incidence and severity of stress urinary incontinence were assessed—Gaudenz questionnaire and the intensity of urinary incontinence—a modified 1 h pad test. The obtained results have an application value giving the possibility of using effective therapy with sonofeedback in women in whom the recommended electrostimulation method cannot be used due to health and behavioral reasons.

Personalised urethra pessaries prepared by material extrusion-based additive manufacturing

Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing, commonly referred to as 3D-printing, is regarded as the key technology to pave the way for personalised medical treatment. This study explores the technique's potential in customising vaginal inserts with complex structures, so-called urethra pessaries. A novel, flawlessly 3D-printable and biocompatible polyester-based thermoplastic elastomer serves as the feedstock. Next to the smart selection of the 3D-printing parameters cross-sectional diameter and infill to tailor the pessary's mechanical properties, we elaborate test methods accounting for its application-specific requirements for the first time. The key property, i.e. the force the pessary exerts on the urethra to relief symptoms of urinary incontinence, is reliably adjusted within a broad range, including that of the commercial injection-moulded silicone product. The pessaries do not change upon long-term exposure to vaginal fluid simulant and compression (in-vivo conditions), satisfying the needs of repeated pessary use. Importantly, the vast majority of the 3D-printed pessaries allows for self-insertion and self-removal without any induced pessary rupture. Summarising, 3D-printed pessaries are not only a reasonable alternative to the commercial products, but build the basis to effectively treat inhomogeneous patient groups. They make the simple but very effective pessary therapy finally accessible to every woman.

A randomized trial comparing continence pessary to continence device (Poise Impressa®) for stress incontinence

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To conduct a multi-centered randomized trial evaluating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment based on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement score after 4 weeks using a continence pessary (CP) or a disposable intravaginal continence device (DICD). The null hypothesis is no difference in treatment success between cohorts.

METHODS

This parallel group, active treatment comparative effectiveness trial randomized women with SUI to either CP or DICD for 4 weeks in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, UTI, postmenopausal bleeding, neurogenic bladder, urinary retention, prolapse, contraindication to or prior treatment with CP/DICD, and prior SUI surgery. Assuming an 80% power, an alpha of 5% and 20% dropout, we needed 138 participants to detect 50% success with CP versus 25% with DICD. Due to slow enrollment, the study was stopped after 16 months with 50 participants enrolled.

RESULTS

Of the 50 women enrolled, 25 (50%) were randomized to CP and 25 (50%) to DICD. Thirty-five of 50 (70%) completed a fitting, and 22/50 (44%) completed 4-week and 17/50 (34%) completed 6-month follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar, and there was high treatment success in each cohort [80% (8/10) CP vs. 75% (9/12) DICD; p = 1.0]. DICD patients showed improvement on all questionnaires but had higher use of other therapies over 6 months. CP patients showed improvements except for lower sexual function scores at 4 weeks. No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Most women fitted with a CP/DICD experienced treatment success after 4 weeks without serious adverse events.

Transvaginal radiofrequency energy for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: A comparison of monopolar and bipolar technologies in both pre- and post-menopausal patients

AIM

A study to compare the effect of two different radio frequency energy models (mono polar and bipolar) for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review, which was conducted at 2 sites, 69 patients received treatment with a bipolar radiofrequency device. Out of those 69 patients, 13 patients received bipolar in conjugation with CO₂ laser treatment, while 32 patients received monopolar frequency. The study protocol normally consists of three sessions of treatment. Each session was four weeks apart with a whole 6-month duration follow-up. Results were evaluated by urogenital distress inventory (UDI)-6 questionnaire before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The bipolar group improved UDI-6 scores across time more so than did the monopolar group with some evidence suggesting that the bipolar radiofrequency treatment was more effective compared to the monopolar radiofrequency. Three months after treatment, the bipolar group UDI-6 values were lower than those of the monopolar group. Six months after treatment, the UDI-6 scores increased in both groups, suggesting decrease efficacy with time however, the bipolar group's UDI-6 scores were consistently lower than the monopolar group's scores.

CONCLUSION

This study shows benefit of both monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency device in patients with stress urinary incontinence and mixed UI, with bipolar RF more efficacious than monopolar RF. More randomized prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Safety and Efficacy of a Disposable Vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an over-the-counter device for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in females.

METHODS

A multicenter, interventional, single-arm study involving 5 different sites was conducted including women diagnosed with symptomatic SUI using a self-inserted pessary device. A 1-week baseline period was followed by a 2-week period of wearing the device. The main outcome of our study was to determine if the device was able to reduce at least 50% the number of leakage events and pad weight.

RESULTS

Across all study sites, 73 subjects were enrolled and 51 completed the study. Efficacy analyses were conducted on the modified intent-to-treat population (n = 48), whereas the safety analysis was conducted on all consented participants. The average pad weight gain was 0.9 g/h at baseline and 0.5 g/h during the treatment phase. The number of leakage episodes per day decreased from 2 at baseline to 0.9 during the treatment phase (P < 0.0001). Seventy-one percent of the study population experienced a more than 50% reduction in leakage volume, leakage episodes, or both. The quality of life scores improved from baseline to posttreatment phase by 4.35 points on average (P < 0.0001). A total of 40 adverse events were recorded, and only 4 subjects withdrew due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The self-deployable pessary device evaluated in this study is an alternative option for women seeking an over-the-counter method to manage symptoms of SUI. Further studies are required to determine the long-term effects and compliance using the device.

Novel polyester-based thermoplastic elastomers for 3D-printed long-acting drug delivery applications

To improve patient compliance and personalised drug delivery, long-acting drug delivery devices (LADDDs), such as implants and inserts, greatly benefit from a customisation in their shape through the emerging 3D-printing technology, since their production usually follows a one-size-fits-most approach. The use of 3D-printing for LADDDs, however, is mainly limited by the shortage of flawlessly 3D-printable, yet biocompatible materials. The present study tackles this issue by introducing a novel, non-biodegradable material, namely a polyester-based thermoplastic elastomer (TPC) - a multi-block copolymer containing alternating semi-crystalline polybutylene terephthalate hard segments and poly-ether-terephthalate amorphous soft segments. Next to a detailed description of the material's 3D-printability by mechanical, rheological and thermal analyses, which was found to be superior to that of conventional polymers (ethylene-vinyl acetates (EVA)), this study establishes the fundamental understandings of the interactions between progesterone (P4) and TPC and drug-releasing properties of TPC for the first time. P4-loaded LADDDs based on TPC, prepared via an elaborated solvent-immersion technique, enable the release of P4 at pharmacologically relevant rates, similar to those of marketed formulations based on EVA and silicones. Additionally, TPC demonstrated an exceptional 3D-printability for a wide selection of implant sizes and complex geometries.

Vaginal Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse or Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Health Technology Assessment

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the downward descent of the female pelvic organs into or through the vagina. The symptom that most strongly correlates with and is most specific for POP is a feeling of vaginal bulging. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is an involuntary loss of urine upon physical exertion or sneezing or coughing. Conservative (non-surgical) treatment options for both conditions include vaginal pessaries. We conducted a health technology assessment of vaginal pessaries for the treatment of POP and SUI, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding vaginal pessaries, and patient preferences and values.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using ROBIS, the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted a cost-utility analysis with a 10-year horizon from a public payer perspective. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding vaginal pessaries for individuals with pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence in Ontario. We explored the underlying values, needs, and priorities of those who have lived experience with POP and/or SUI, as well as the preferences and perceptions of both patients and providers of vaginal pessaries.

RESULTS

We included 15 studies in the clinical evidence review. Compared with no treatment for people with SUI, pessaries were associated with a significant improvement in some symptoms at 14 days follow-up (SUI subscore of Urinary Symptom Profile, mean difference -2.20; 95% CI -3.47 to -0.93; GRADE: Very low). Compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), pessaries were associated with no difference in improvement at 12 months follow-up for some symptoms (Urinary Distress Inventory subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, risk ratio = 0.86; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.16; GRADE: Low). For people with POP, pessaries were associated with a significant improvement in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score and in sexual function compared with PFMT plus feedback/electrical stimulation/lifestyle advice at 12- and 24-month follow ups (GRADE: Low). Pessary continuation rate at 12 months follow up was reported to be 60% (44/74 patients) (GRADE: Very low).When evaluating various POP and SUI treatments in sequential order, pessaries were within the most cost-effective treatment sequence; therefore, it is likely to be a cost-effective intervention for treating POP and SUI. There was a high degree of certainty that pessaries were cost-effective in a population with POP, and a moderate degree of certainty in a population with SUI. When the treatment sequence of pessaries and surgery was compared with surgery alone, the pessaries treatment sequence dominates surgery in the cohort with POP, and in the cohort with SUI pessaries had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,033 per QALY gained. The annual budget impact of publicly funding vaginal pessaries in Ontario over the next 5 years ranges from $0.3 million in year 1 to $0.5 million in year 5 for POP, and $0.2 million in year 1 to $0.3 million in year 5 for SUI.We included one study in our quantitative evidence review and spoke to 29 people in our direct patient engagement. The evidence indicated that patient preferences vary and that patients accept the risks of their chosen treatment option. The 24 people we spoke with who had direct experience with vaginal pessaries reported that their POP and/or SUI limited their social activities and restricted their activity levels, taking a huge emotional toll. Many were hesitant or even fearful of surgery due to side effects and perceived failure rate of the surgery. Most people reported that pessaries relieved most or all of their symptoms, allowing them to return to their normal daily activities. However, wait times for pessary fittings could be as long as 2 years, and out-of-pocket expenses could be a barrier for people without extended insurance.

CONCLUSIONS

For people with SUI, vaginal pessaries may improve symptoms compared with no treatment, but the evidence is very uncertain. Pessaries may result in little to no difference in longer-term improvement of SUI symptoms compared with PFMT. For people with POP, pessaries may improve some longer-term symptoms, as well as sexual function compared with PFMT. For people with symptomatic POP and SUI, vaginal pessaries may be a cost-effective intervention to be used within a stepped care model (a sequence of interventions followed after the current treatment proves ineffective). We estimate that publicly funding vaginal pessaries in Ontario would result in a total 5-year budget impact of $2.0 million for POP and $1.3 million for SUI. People with POP and/or SUI reported pessary use as being an effective treatment option to manage their symptoms.

A Vaginal Inlay for Reduction of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial and Four User Acceptance Studies

A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial and four postmarket user acceptance investigations were carried out to document the safety, performance, and user acceptance of Efemia Bladder Support, a novel vaginal inlay for the temporary reduction of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The clinical investigation enrolled 97 women diagnosed with SUI, randomized 3 : 1 to either treatment or standard care (control). The primary endpoint was reduction of urine leakage, measured as change in pad weight baseline week compared with treatment week. Secondary endpoints were treatment success, calculated as the percentage of subjects with >70% reduction in pad weight, reduction in incontinence episodes, and quality of life (QoL). 75 women (77%) completed the clinical investigation. No serious adverse events occurred. The treatment group reached a 55% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of total leakage compared to the control arm. A subanalysis, involving only leakage during provocation testing (coughing and jumping), showed a 67% (p < 0.001) mean reduction of leakage. No significant effect on QoL could be observed. 51% of the women answered “yes” to the question if they would use the device to reduce SUI. The user acceptance of the device was further investigated in four postmarket studies, using an improved device design with a slimmer centerpiece and a thinner handle, while keeping the effect achieving parts of the device unchanged. An average of 74% of the 102 participants in the postmarket studies reported that they were likely to continue using Efemia. The highest user satisfaction was seen in the two studies evaluating the use of Efemia during exercise, where 83% and 88% of the women were likely to continue using Efemia. It can be concluded that Efemia is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective alternative for reducing SUI, both in everyday life and during physical exercise.

TVT-O vs TVT-S for female stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and tension-free vaginal tape secur (TVT-S) are common surgeries for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the effects of TVT-O and TVT-S, yet the results remained inconsistent. Therefore, we attempted to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to analyse the role of TVT-O and TVT-S in patients with SUI.

METHODS

We searched PubMed databases from inception date to Jan 15, 2020 for RCTs that compared TVT-O and TVT-S in SUI patients. Two authors independently screened and extracted data from the published articles. Summary odd ratios (OR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for each outcome by fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with a total of 755 patients were identified, with 373 patients for TVT-O and 382 patients for TVT-S. TVT-O preceded TVT-S in the objective cure at 12 months (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.21-2.45), subjective cure (OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.08-3.62); but TVT-S have more advantage in the incidence of postoperative thigh pain (OR = 18.94, 95% CI 7.01-51.15); no significant differences on the duration of operative procedure (OR = -1.09, 95% CI -2.37-0.18), urinary retention (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.36-1.62) and urinary infection (OR = 1.80, 95% CI 0.63-5.13) were found.

CONCLUSIONS

TVT-O should be preferred for patients with SUI even though with higher risks of postoperative thigh pain when compared with TVT-S, more related studies are needed to identify the role of TVT-O and TVT-S for the treatment of SUI.

The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Strengthening Exercise on Urinary Incontinence and Quality of Life in Patients after Prostatectomy: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Introduction: Urinary incontinence is a common problem after Prostatectomy that affects patients' life. Nurses can assist patients in improving urinary problems. This study aimed to assess the effects of pelvic floor muscle exercises on urinary incontinence and the quality of life in patients after Prostatectomy. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 60 patients with suprapubic prostatectomy and urinary incontinence who had referred to urology department of Vali-e-Asr Hospital in Tehran. The subjects were selected and randomly divided into control and intervention groups. The control and intervention groups received standard care and pelvic floor muscles exercises after surgery, respectively. The data were gathered in the course of seven days; one, two and three months after surgery, using three questionnaires and a check list for the evaluation of urinary incontinence and assessing Quality of Life. The data were then analyzed, using SPSS ver.13, and statistical tests such as t-test, ANOVA and Chi- square. Results: The quality of life and urinary incontinence score before intervention were not significant between two groups. The findings showed that there was a statistically significant difference between two groups in the average scores of urinary incontinence and the quality of life after intervention. Conclusion: Pelvic muscles exercises reduced urinary incontinence and enhanced quality of life. It's recommended as a non-pharmacologic, non-invasive way to control urinary incontinence. Patients with adequate cognitive and mental abilities can easily be trained on pelvic floor muscle exercises.

Multidisciplinary management of women with pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms.A clinical and psychological overview

Although female sexual dysfunctions are common among women with urogynecological conditions, they have not been thoroughly studied and there are still many questions without an answer. The recent evidence on sexual disorders in women with urogynecological diseases shows a quite wide spectrum of therapeutic approaches, which require the physicians to take into account not only the primary symptoms, but also all the associated factors negatively affected. It has been widely underlined that gynecological diseases are often associated with high stress and have a negative impact on quality of life and psychological well-being of women affected. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach for the management of these diseases is highly recommended. Also in the case of urogynecological disorders, it is important to take into account psychological outcomes throughout the diagnostic and therapeutic process. In the light of these considerations, the aim of this short review is to evaluate the impact of the main urogynecological diseases and the currently available therapeutic options in order to improve quality of life and sexuality of these patients and to stress the need for a multidisciplinary approach in order to minimize the negative consequences of these diseases for the sexual well-being of women and their partners.

Evaluation of the IncoStress device for urinary incontinence: a feasibility study and pilot randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruitment to and outcomes from a pilot randomised study of the IncoStress device as an adjunct to conservative treatment for urinary incontinence.

METHODS

Women with urinary incontinence were randomised on a 2:1 basis to usual care (control) or usual care plus use of the IncoStress device (intervention). Process outcomes (retention and compliance) were recorded plus symptom outcomes (IQOL and ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaires). A sample of participants took part in an interview to understand the frequency of use of the device and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Eighty women (51 intervention, 29 control) were recruited. Follow-up responses were obtained from 34 intervention group (66.7%) and 17 (58.6%) control patients. Women used the device for a median 3 days a week (0-7), 18 out of 34 (53%) found it easy to use and 21 (61.8%) were satisfied with the device. Median IQOL score in the intervention group improved from a baseline of 42.4 (0-94) to 68.2 (5-98) at follow-up and in the control group from 45.5 (0-88) to 53.0 (0-94). Median ICIQ-FLUTS score in the intervention group improved from 14.5 (6-35) to 12.5 (4-26) and in the control group from 15.0 (5-35) to 14.0 (6-38).

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment and randomisation were feasible and robust. This study demonstrates that a large-scale RCT is feasible and the IncoStress has potential value.

Pessários vaginais na incontinência urinária: revisão integrativa

Objetivo: Analisar os tipos de pessários, as indicações e o impacto no tratamento da incontinência urinária (IU). Métodos: Trata-se de revisão integrativa com publicações de 2007 a 2017 indexadas nas bases de dados Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Scopus Info Site, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature e Web of Science. Resultados: Selecionaram-se oito artigos. Os pessários indicados foram prato, anel, Uresta® e Contiform®. A redução ou resolução da IU de esforço (IUE) em mulheres foi observada por análise de parâmetros objetivos, como avaliação urodinâmica e questionários de qualidade de vida. Destacou-se viabilidade econômica. Evidenciaram-se desajuste, dificuldades no uso, incômodo e manutenção de perdas urinárias entre os motivos de não adesão. Prolapso avançado e comprimento vaginal curto foram preditivos de insucesso. Identificaram-se eventos adversos em baixa incidência: retenção urinária e leucorreia. Conclusão: A terapia pessária é eficaz no tratamento da IUE quando acompanhada por profissionais capacitados. Características individuais e percepções sobre o dispositivo são determinantes no sucesso terapêutico. Estudos de maior amostragem, tempo de seguimento e qualidade, bem como estimulo a publicações nacionais, são necessários para investigação de medidas objetivas de IU, fatores clínicos e demográficos em relação ao sucesso do pessário.

Vaginal pessaries in urinary incontinence: integrative review

Objectives: To analyze the types of pessaries, indications and impact in the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI). Methods: This is an integrative review with publications from 2007 to 2017 indexed in the Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online databases, Scopus Info Site, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Web of Science. Results: Eight articles were selected. The pessaries indicated were the dish, ring, Uresta®, and Contiform®. The reduction or resolution of stress UI in women was observed by analysis of objective parameters such as urodynamic evaluation and quality of life questionnaires. Economic viability was highlighted. Disability, difficulties in use, discomfort, and maintenance of urinary losses were evidenced among the reasons for non-adherence. Advanced prolapse and short vaginal length were predictive of failure. Adverse events were identified in low incidence: urinary retention and leukorrhea. Conclusion: Pessary therapy is effective in the treatment of SUI when accompanied by trained professionals. Individual characteristics and perceptions about the device are determinants of therapeutic success. Studies of greater sampling, follow-up time and quality, as well as stimulation to national publications, are necessary for the investigation of objective measures of UI, clinical and demographic factors in relation to the success of the pessary.

Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence can affect 40% to 60% of people admitted to hospital after a stroke, with 25% still having problems when discharged from hospital and 15% remaining incontinent after one year.This is an update of a review published in 2005 and updated in 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults at least one-month post-stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence and Cochrane Stroke Specialised Registers (searched 30 October 2017 and 1 November 2017 respectively), which contain trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP and handsearched journals and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently undertook data extraction, risk of bias assessment and implemented GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 trials (reporting 21 comparisons) with 1338 participants. Data for prespecified outcomes were not available except where reported below.Intervention versus no intervention/usual careBehavioural interventions: Low-quality evidence suggests behavioural interventions may reduce the mean number of incontinent episodes in 24 hours (mean difference (MD) -1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.74 to 0.74; 1 trial; 18 participants; P = 0.26). Further, low-quality evidence from two trials suggests that behavioural interventions may make little or no difference to quality of life (SMD -0.99, 95% CI -2.83 to 0.86; 55 participants).Specialised professional input interventions: One trial of moderate-quality suggested structured assessment and management by continence nurse practitioners probably made little or no difference to the number of people continent three months after treatment (risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.02; 121 participants; equivalent to an increase from 354 to 453 per 1000, 95% CI 287 to 715).Complementary therapy: Five trials assessed complementary therapy using traditional acupuncture, electroacupuncture and ginger-salt-partitioned moxibustion plus routine acupuncture. Low-quality evidence from five trials suggested that complementary therapy may increase the number of participants continent after treatment; participants in the treatment group were three times more likely to be continent (RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.57 to 5.07; 524 participants; equivalent to an increase from 193 to 544 per 1000, 95% CI 303 to 978). Adverse events were reported narratively in one study of electroacupuncture, reporting on bruising and postacupuncture abdominal pain in the intervention group.Physical therapy: Two trials reporting three comparisons suggest that physical therapy using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) may reduce the mean number of incontinent episodes in 24 hours (MD -4.76, 95% CI -8.10 to -1.41; 142 participants; low-quality evidence). One trial of TENS reporting two comparisons found that the intervention probably improves overall functional ability (MD 8.97, 95% CI 1.27 to 16.68; 81 participants; moderate-quality evidence).Intervention versus placeboPhysical therapy: One trial of physical therapy suggests TPTNS may make little or no difference to the number of participants continent after treatment (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.04; 54 participants) or number of incontinent episodes (MD -1.10, 95% CI -3.99 to 1.79; 39 participants). One trial suggested improvement in the TPTNS group at 26-weeks (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.41) but there was no evidence of a difference in perceived bladder condition at six weeks (OR 2.33, 95% CI 0.63 to 8.65) or 12 weeks (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.29 to 5.17). Data from one trial provided no evidence that TPTNS made a difference to quality of life measured with the ICIQLUTSqol (MD 3.90, 95% CI -4.25 to 12.05; 30 participants). Minor adverse events, such as minor skin irritation and ankle cramping, were reported in one study.Pharmacotherapy interventions: There was no evidence from one study that oestrogen therapy made a difference to the mean number of incontinent episodes per week in mild incontinence (paired samples, MD -1.71, 95% CI -3.51 to 0.09) or severe incontinence (paired samples, MD -6.40, 95% CI -9.47 to -3.33). One study reported no adverse events.Specific intervention versus another interventionBehavioural interventions: One trial comparing a behavioural intervention (timed voiding) with a pharmacotherapy intervention (oxybutynin) contained no useable data.Complementary therapy: One trial comparing different acupuncture needles and depth of needle insertion to assess the effect on incontinence reported that, after four courses of treatment, 78.1% participants in the elongated needle group had no incontinent episodes versus 40% in the filiform needle group (57 participants). This trial was assessed as unclear or high for all types of bias apart from incomplete outcome data.Combined intervention versus single interventionOne trial compared a combined intervention (sensory motor biofeedback plus timed prompted voiding) against a single intervention (timed voiding). The combined intervention may make little or no difference to the number of participants continent after treatment (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.06 to 5.21; 23 participants; equivalent to a decrease from 167 to 92 per 1000, 95% CI 10 to 868) or to the number of incontinent episodes (MD 2.20, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.28; 23 participants).Specific intervention versus attention controlPhysical therapy interventions: One study found TPTNS may make little or no difference to the number of participants continent after treatment compared to an attention control group undertaking stretching exercises (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.38 to 4.72; 24 participants; equivalent to an increase from 250 to 333 per 1000, 95% CI 95 to 1000).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to guide continence care of adults in the rehabilitative phase after stroke. As few trials tested the same intervention, conclusions are drawn from few, usually small, trials. CIs were wide, making it difficult to ascertain if there were clinically important differences. Only four trials had adequate allocation concealment and many were limited by poor reporting, making it impossible to judge the extent to which they were prone to bias. More appropriately powered, multicentre trials of interventions are required to provide robust evidence for interventions to improve urinary incontinence after stroke.