A Cross-Sectional Study on the Quality of Life in Women with Endometrioma

Evaluation of the Characteristics of Ovarian Endometriomas in Patients with Endometriosis: Efficacy of a Low-Dose Estrogen/Progestogen Combination

OBJECTIVES

Approximately 17-44% of women diagnosed with endometriosis have ovarian endometriomas (cysts). Although ovarian endometriomas may adversely affect quality of life and work performance, the associations among patient characteristics, cyst size, and pain in women with endometriosis have not yet been reported. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the association among age, cyst size, and pain in women with ovarian endometriomas.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective secondary analysis of pooled data from six randomized clinical trials on the use of low-dose estrogen/progestogen drugs for endometriosis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, AND METHODS

Data on 491 patients enrolled in four randomized and two nonrandomized trials between 2003 and 2017 were pooled. None of the participants had undergone surgical treatment before trial participation. We examined differences in dysmenorrhea score, menstrual pain score, analgesic score, and pelvic pain, as measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), by age and endometrioma size.

RESULTS

The mean dysmenorrhea, menstrual pain, and analgesic scores were 4.2, 2.2, and 2.0, respectively. The mean VAS for pelvic pain was 55, which decreased significantly with an increase in age. Age was not associated with endometrioma size, including volume and maximum diameter, or dysmenorrhea score. Additionally, endometrioma volume and maximum diameter were not associated with menstrual pain, analgesic score, or pelvic pain.

LIMITATIONS

The details of past treatment history were not available; therefore, these could not be considered in the analysis. Additionally, the assessment of pain is heavily influenced by psychological factors, making it difficult to assess the true extent of pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometrioma size was not associated with dysmenorrhea or pelvic pain measured using the VAS.

The impact of endometriosis on depressive and anxiety symptoms and quality of life: a systematic review

Introduction

Endometriosis is a common gynecological disorder affecting approximately 10-15% of women of reproductive age. The main complaints of patients with endometriosis are pain and fertility problems. Symptoms of endometriosis can impact the psychological functioning of the patients and significantly compromise their mental health.

Methods

The aim of this review was to assess the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms and quality of life in endometriosis patients. For this systematic review, we searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect electronic databases up to March 2023 to identify potentially relevant studies. The systematic review in the present paper is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance.

Results

Of four records identified, 18 were eligible to be reviewed on the association between endometriosis and symptoms of depression and anxiety. Of 8,901 records identified, 28 were reviewed on the association between endometriosis and quality of life. The reviewed articles showed a prevalence ranging from 9.8 to 98.5% for depressive symptoms and 11.5 to 87.5% for anxiety. The quality of life in patients with endometriosis was significantly impaired, regardless of the tool used for evaluation.

Discussion

This systematic review shows that endometriosis is associated with depressive and anxiety symptoms and impaired HRQoL. Broad correlating factors modulate mental health outcomes, indicating the complex relationship between the disease and the psychological health of the patients.

Cross-sectional study for derivation of a cut-off value for identification of an early versus delayed diagnosis of endometriosis based on analytical and descriptive research methods

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is a benign, hormone-dependent, chronic inflammatory gynecological disease accompanied by cyclic and acyclic pelvic pain and other complaints. The long lists of research recommendations in the AWMF guideline (Burghaus et al., Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 81:422-46, 2021) and ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline (ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Development Group, Endometriosis: Guideline of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, 2022) show that there is still a great need for research in all aspects of the disease. Diagnostic delay, defined as the mean time between symptom onset and confirmed diagnosis, is a particular problem associated with endometriosis. Some quantitative and qualitative studies have investigated possible reasons for this. A range of physician-related (Dixon et al., Br J Gen Pract 71:e668-e676, 2021; van der Zanden and Nap, Reprod Biomed Online 32:527-31, 2016) and patient-related factors (Sayer-Jones and Sherman, Health Psychol Behav Med 9:456-79, 2021) as well as stigmatization of the topic of menstruation by society have been identified (Kruckenberg, Frauenarzt 59:2-5, 2018; Seear, Soc Sci Med 69:1220-7, 2009). The consequences of the disease being diagnosed late (or too late) on the course of disease, the quality of life and the costs of the disease have already been documented in studies (Sims Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(15):8210, 2021; Surrey Adv Ther 37:1087-99, 2020). However, a systematically derived cut-off value that clearly distinguishes between short and long delay is still lacking. Therefore, the aim of our study was to derive a threshold value for the definition of a target corridor for endometriosis diagnosis based on descriptive and analytical methods.

METHODS

Since our review of the rather sparse publications on diagnostic delay did not yield satisfactory results, we used descriptive statistics and location parameters to calculate a cut-off value for German population data from the EndoCost study. Statistical methods were used for correlation analysis of shortDD versus longDD (correlation analysis and logistic regression) and group membership (discriminant analysis).

RESULTS

Five years was identified as the cut-off value that significantly differentiated between shortDD and longDD based on various disease-related variables. This suggests that endometriosis should be definitively diagnosed within less than five years to minimize the risk of an unfavorable course of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirmed that an early onset of endometriosis-related symptoms is the most important risk factor for a long diagnostic delay. Consequently, adolescent females should receive increased attention as an especially vulnerable group. Evidently, there is an urgent need to develop adequate concepts to improve the endometriosis education and care among this target group.