Mirabegron in the Management of Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Effect of Mirabegron in Men With Overactive Bladder and Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

As it has been observed that the erect penis has been the epitome of virility for the male community for decades, it became necessary to search for alternative treatments for the cause. So, the study was performed to evaluate the potential impact of mirabegron in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED) and overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

It was a prospective, observational study that was carried out at the Department of Urology at Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, for a duration of two years and included a total of two hundred fifty patients. The individuals included had a diagnosis of mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED) along with symptoms of OAB. The overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) score and the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction-5 (IIEF-5) score were used, respectively, to measure the impact of mirabegron on ED and OAB. Then, the changes in ED and OAB were evaluated at two, four, eight, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Among the total 250 patients recruited, around 32.5% of them had mild ED, 17.5% were diagnosed with mild to moderate ED, and 50% suffered from moderate ED. The IIEF-5 scores improved by four points or more in 86.25%, 91.25%, and 71.25% of patients after four, eight, and 12 weeks, respectively. OAB-q scores were likewise shown to decline in the fourth (13.1 ± 4.3) and eighth (12.8 ± 4.2) weeks when compared to the baseline (17.4 ± 5.5). Also, adverse events reported did not hamper the progress of the study.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that mirabegron has a beneficial impact on controlling OAB symptoms among men diagnosed with mild to moderate ED. The effects last for only eight weeks, and then they decline. Furthermore, mirabegron was well-tolerated among patients and had no safety concerns with its use.

Risks of Dementia After Treatment with an Anticholinergic, Beta-3 Agonist, or Combination of Both for an Overactive Bladder: A Korean National Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

An overactive bladder (OAB) is primarily managed with behavioural therapy and using anticholinergics and beta-3 agonists. Reports have shown that the use of anticholinergics by OAB patients was associated with an increased risk of new-onset dementia compared with those using beta-3 agonists. This study compares the risks of dementia among patients with an OAB starting on a beta-3 agonist alone, an anticholinergic alone, or a combination treatment.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, we studied a nationwide population cohort comprising patients newly diagnosed with an OAB who initiated their OAB medications between 2015 and 2020. The treatment types were categorised as anticholinergics (oxybutynin, solifenacin, tolterodine, trospium, fesoterodine, flavoxate, and propiverine) alone, a beta-3 agonist (mirabegron) alone, and combination therapy (an anticholinergic plus the beta-3 agonist). To evaluate the impact of cumulative drug exposure, we quantified the cumulative exposure to solifenacin and mirabegron as cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) using proportional hazards regression analyses, adjusted for factors known to be associated with dementia.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Among the study's 3 452 705 patients, 671 974 were new users of a beta-3 agonist alone (19.5%), 1 943 414 new users of anticholinergics alone (56.3%), and 837 317 receiving combination therapy (24.3%). The most common anticholinergic used both alone and as part of a combination treatment was solifenacin (42.9% and 56.3%, respectively). There was an increased risk of dementia between the users of an anticholinergic alone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.213; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.195-1.232) and those taking a combination treatment (aHR = 1.345; 95% CI, 1.323-1.366) compared with the users of beta-3 agonists alone after the adjustment of covariates. However, the incidence of dementia was also significantly higher, with an increase in the cumulative dose of mirabegron (aHR = 1.062 [1.021-1.106] for 28-120 cDDDs and aHR = 1.044 [1.004-1.084)] for patients who received >121 cDDDs compared with those who received <27 cDDDs). A marked increased risk of dementia was associated with the use of solifenacin, tolterodine, fesoterodine, and propiverine, both separately and in combination with mirabegron.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In this large Korean cohort, the use of anticholinergics with or without a beta-3 agonist increased the risk of new-onset dementia compared with the use of a beta-3 agonist alone. Given that the risk of dementia was most significantly elevated with combination treatments, care should be taken when considering combination treatment for OAB patients with risk factors for dementia. Furthermore, there could be a possible association between beta-3 agonists and dementia, although future studies are needed.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study investigated the risk of dementia induced by overactive bladder (OAB) treatment in a large Korean cohort. Two representative OAB treatment drugs, anticholinergics and beta-3 agonists, both increased the risk of new-onset dementia. Clinicians should be cautious in using OAB treatment drugs since no drugs could be concluded as safe.

The combined effect of metformin and mirabegron on diet-induced obesity

Anti-obesity medications act by suppressing energy intake (EI), promoting energy expenditure (EE), or both. Metformin (Met) and mirabegron (Mir) cause weight loss by targeting EI and EE, respectively. However, anti-obesity effects during concurrent use of both have yet to be explored. In this study, we investigated the anti-obesity effects, metabolic benefits, and underlying mechanisms of Met/Mir combination therapy in two clinically relevant contexts: the prevention model and the treatment model. In the prevention model, Met/Mir caused further 12% and 14% reductions in body weight (BW) gain induced by a high-fat diet compared to Met or Mir alone, respectively. In the treatment model, Met/Mir additively promoted 17% BW loss in diet-induced obese mice, which was 13% and 6% greater than Met and Mir alone, respectively. Additionally, Met/Mir improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. These benefits of Met/Mir were associated with increased EE, activated brown adipose tissue thermogenesis, and white adipose tissue browning. Significantly, Met/Mir did not cause cardiovascular dysfunction in either model. Together, the combination of Met and Mir could be a promising approach for the prevention and treatment of obesity by targeting both EI and EE simultaneously.