Sacral insufficiency fractures: a case of mistaken identity

Comparison of patterns and rates of cement leakage in percutaneous sacroplasty for sacral insufficiency fractures versus neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous sacroplasty is a minimally invasive procedure which utilises injection of bone cement into the sacrum for stabilisation of osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures (SIF) and neoplastic lesions to relieve pain and improve function. While effective, cement leakage is an important complication associated with the procedure. This study aims to compare the incidence and patterns of the cement leakages following sacroplasty for SIF versus neoplasia and discuss the various patterns of cement leakage and their implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analysed 57 patients who underwent percutaneous sacroplasty at a tertiary orthopaedic hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups of SIF (n=46) and neoplastic lesions (n=11) based on their indication for sacroplasty. Pre- and post-procedural CT fluoroscopy was used to assess for cement leakage. The incidence and patterns of cement leakage were both compared among the two groups. A Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven (19%) patients had cement leakage on post-procedural imaging. The most common sites of cement leakage were into the presacral region (6), followed by sacroiliac joints (4), sacral foramina (3) and posterior sacral (1). There was a statistically significant higher incidence of leakage in the neoplastic group in comparison to SIF group (P-value <0.05). The incidence of cement leakage in the neoplastic group was 45% (n = 5/11) versus SIF 13% (n=6/46).

CONCLUSION

There was a statistically significant higher incidence of cement leak in sacroplasties conducted for the treatment of neoplastic lesions compared to those with sacral insufficiency fracture.

[Trends in the surgical treatment of fractures of the pelvic ring : A nationwide analysis of operations and procedures code (OPS) data between 2005 and 2017]

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiological trends and incidences in inpatient pelvic surgery in the period from 2005 to 2007.

METHOD

Approximately 194 million anonymized diagnosis-related groups (DRG) inpatient records were collected by the German Federal Statistical Office between 2005 and 2017. These data were screened for pelvic procedures, gender and age of the patients. Statistical testing was performed using the χ²-test and Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2017 the number of closed reduction and internal fixation of the pelvic ring with screw fixation increased by +1116%. The use of screw fixation for closed reduction and internal fixation of the sacroiliac joint increased by +800%. The number of cases of open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the pelvic ring and pelvic rim increased by +185% and reposition with external fixator increased by +188%. In 2005 more surgical procedures were undertaken in male inpatients, whereas more surgical procedures were undertaken in female inpatients in 2017. In general, a large increase in the number of pelvic procedures was observed in the group of patients >50 years old.

CONCLUSION

There was an increase in the number of all analyzed pelvic procedures between 2005 and 2017. Especially the use of screw fixation increased. The introduction of new techniques (e.g. screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint) and progress and innovation in the field of three-dimensional navigation techniques, the demographic trend, greater mobility and higher demands on functionality of older patients might explain this increase in pelvic procedures.

Sacral fractures: issues, challenges, solutions

Sacral fractures are a heterogeneous group of fractures occurring in young people following road traffic accidents and falls from height, or in the elderly with osteoporosis following trivial trauma.This heterogeneity, combined with the low incidence of sacral fractures, determines a lack of experience amongst physicians, often leading to misdiagnosis, underestimation and inadequate treatment. The diagnosis should be made by assessing specific features during the clinical presentation, while computed tomography (CT) scan continues to be the choice of investigation.Sacral fractures can be treated non-operatively or surgically. Non-operative treatment is based on rest, pain relief therapy and early mobilization as tolerated. Surgical techniques can be split into two main groups: posterior pelvic fixation techniques and lumbopelvic fixation techniques. Anterior pelvic fixation techniques should be considered when sacral fractures are associated with anterior pelvic ring injuries, in order to increase stability and reduce the risk of posterior implant failure. To improve fracture reduction, different solutions could be adopted, including special positioning of the patient, manipulation techniques and use of specific reduction tools. Patients suffering from spinopelvic dissociation with associated neurologic lesions hardly ever recover completely, with residual lower-limb neurologic sequelae, urinary problems and sexual disfunction.Herein, we present issues, challenges and solutions related to the management of sacral fractures. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:299-311. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190064.

PELVIC INSUFFICIENCY: UNDERDIAGNOSED CONDITION, THERAPEUTIC DIAGNOSTIC REVIEW

ABSTRACT Objective: The importance of sacral fractures has recently been recognized. However, its diagnosis is difficult, both clinically and through image, but there are more options for comprehensive diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a literature review about its diagnosis and the treatments currently offered, and also to check which treatments had the best results. Results: Patients with pelvic insufficiency have limited mobility due to lumbar or pelvic pain. As radiculopathy is a neurologically stable condition, it has a reported incidence of only 5% and sphincter disorders. The pain improves when lying down and increases with load. The treatments vary from conservative to surgical. Discussion: The different treatments were compared, and the one that has more morbidity is the conservative, because it predisposes us to complications (pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, heart failure, decubitus ulcers); in the interventionists we observe a faster improvement to normal activity of these patients, the complications are minor and the pain improvement is noticeable and much faster. Conclusion: Fractures due to pelvic insufficiency are underdiagnosed. However, there are already better imaging techniques and combined with good exploration and clinical history we can suspect this condition and offer the best possible treatment, these being the invasive ones that have had better results with lower morbidity and recovery of activity much more quickly. Level of Evidence III; Review of therapeutic studies - Investigation of treatment results.

Osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fracture: An easily neglected disease in elderly patients

Sacral insufficiency fractures (SIFs) are easily neglected by clinical physicians.The incidence of SIFs remains unclear in patients with symptomatic osteoporotic compression fractures of the lumbar-sacral area.This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing the medical records and radiological reports and by reading magnetic resonance (MR) images from August 2013 to July 2016. We identified 1233 cases with symptomatic vertebral compression fractures for which surgical interventions were performed. A total of 1144 cases were eligible for this study. Neglected diagnoses by radiologists and clinical physicians were calculated, respectively.The MR imaging (MRI) findings of SIFs were divided into the body (S1, S2, S3, and S4 levels) and alar areas (unilateral, bilateral, transverse, and none).A total of 34 (3.00%) cases with SIFs were identified through MRI. A significant difference was observed between 19 (6.53%) patients aged >80 years and 15 (1.76%) aged <80 years (P < .0001). Eight (23.53%) and 26 (76.47%) cases of SIFs were neglected by radiologists and clinical physicians, respectively. The S2 and S3 levels were the predominantly involved area (23/34; 67.65%). Furthermore, the bilateral alar area was the most commonly involved (19/34; 55.88%), as observed in coronal views of MRI.While treating other levels of osteoporotic compression fractures, radiologists and clinical physicians should be aware of SIFs, particularly when the patients are aged >80 years. The coronal oblique MR images of the thoracolumbar region should be carefully read to avoid neglecting SIFs.