Current Perspectives on the Systemic Management of Atopic Dermatitis

Methotrexate therapy for adult and paediatric moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of data from daily practice

Of the 15 eligible studies identified via electronic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL in November 2022 for methotrexate therapy of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, 12 were non-randomized controlled trial (non-RCT) studies with data from 437 patients (235 adults and 202 children). The response rates for short-term therapy were 77% [95% CI 55-99] (four studies; adults) - comparable to 81% [54-100] of RCTs (two studies; adults) (p = 0.63) - and 61% [43-79] (two studies; children), and for medium/long-term therapy were 88.9% [74.3-100.0] (four studies; adults) and 77.7% [61.5-94.0] (three studies; children). Children had a markedly lower rate of treatment discontinuation due to side effects [2.0% (five studies; children) vs. 14.9% (six studies; adults)], but were more likely to experience gastrointestinal disorders {relative risk (RR) 2.0 [1.44-2.71]}, fatigue (RR 2.3 [1.35-3.72]), headache (RR 2.8 [1.23-5.61]), and infections (RR 2.9 [2.18-3.58]). Other adverse events (children vs. adults) included hepatic disorders (32/176 vs. 35/305) and blood and lymphatic system/bone marrow disorders (25/148 vs. 19/184). Four serious adverse events were reported (children). Evidence from daily practice was limited by bias in the selection of participants in the study.

From neglect to spotlight: the underappreciated role of B cells in cutaneous inflammatory diseases

The skin, covering our entire body as its largest organ, manifests enormous complexities and a profound interplay of systemic and local responses. In this heterogeneous domain, B cells were considered strangers. Yet, recent studies have highlighted their existence in the skin and their distinct role in modulating cutaneous immunity across various immune contexts. Accumulating evidence is progressively shedding light on the significance of B cells in maintaining skin health and in skin disorders. Herein, we integrate current insights on the systemic and local contributions of B cells in three prevalent inflammatory skin conditions: Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and Atopic Dermatitis (AD), underscoring the previously underappreciated importance of B cells within skin immunity. Moreover, we address the potential adverse effects of current treatments used for skin diseases, emphasizing their unintentional consequences on B cells. These comprehensive approaches may pave the way for innovative therapeutic strategies that effectively address the intricate nature of skin disorders.

Review of Tralokinumab in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

OBJECTIVE

To review pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of tralokinumab in treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD).

DATA SOURCES

Literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published between January 2010 and May 2022.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles in English discussing tralokinumab in AD were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In one phase 2 trial, more subjects treated with tralokinumab 150 and 300 mg achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0/1 with minimum ≥2 point IGA reduction (23%), versus placebo (11.8%, P = 0.10). During 2 phase 3 trials, more subjects treated with tralokinumab achieved IGA success (ECZTRA 1: 15.8% and ECZTRA 2: 22.2%), versus placebo (7.1% and 10.9%, respectively; P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). During one phase 3 trial, in conjunction with topical corticosteroids (TCS), more subjects treated with tralokinumab 300 mg achieved IGA success (ECZTRA 3: 38.9%), versus placebo (26.2%, P = 0.015). During another phase 3 trial in subjects with resistance or contraindication to oral cyclosporine, more subjects treated with tralokinumab 300 mg achieved an Eczema Area Severity Index 75 (64.2%), versus placebo (50.5%, P = 0.018).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Tralokinumab is efficacious for moderate-to-severe AD, as monotherapy, in conjunction with TCS, and resistance or contraindication to cyclosporine. Although IL-4 and IL-13 are both implicated in AD's pathogenesis, IL-13 is overexpressed, and head-to-head trials are needed to assess efficacy of tralokinumab, versus dupilumab. Compared with upadacitinib and abrocitinib, tralokinumab is not associated with black-box warnings.

CONCLUSIONS

Tralokinumab is an efficacious and safe systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe AD.

Off-label medications in the treatment of hospitalized children with atopic dermatitis

Introduction

Off-label prescribing is defined as using medications outside conditions of the marketing authorisation including their licensed indications, dosage, age and route. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic skin condition in children which can be related to a high level of off-label prescribing.

Aim

To investigate the frequency of off-label prescribing and the medications involved in relation to indications and age in paediatric patients hospitalized for atopic dermatitis in a paediatric dermatology ward in 2019.

Material and methods

One hundred and seventy-five consecutive discharge letters of patients were analysed regarding gender, age and medications used during hospital stay and prescribed on discharge. Each medication was checked against the licensed age and indications.

Results

Altogether 564 medications were prescribed, including 289 topical and 275 systemic ones with 278 prescribed off-label (49.1%). Out of 289 topical medications, 113 (39.1%) were prescribed off-label regarding indications and 34 (11.76%) regarding the age of the patients. In the systemic medications group, 96 (34.53%) were prescribed off-label as AD was not a registered indication and 35 (12.73%) as the age of the patients was outside the marketing authorization. The most frequent medications prescribed off-label were antihistamines, antibiotics and corticosteroids.

Conclusions

Prescribing off-label in paediatric population is a common practice. Both topical and systemic medications are frequently used in AD patients off-label, therefore doctors should be familiar with the pitfalls of prescribing beyond the licensed indications and age.

Shedding light on key pharmacological knowledge and strategies for pediatric atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disease affecting over 20% of the pediatric population, with 85% of cases presenting before the age of five. Recently, therapeutic options in pediatric patients have evolved rapidly, following extensive development in adult treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This review will encompass relevant molecular drivers, along with an overlook on treatment modalities in pediatric AD, as well as a summary of pipeline treatments in clinical trials for pediatric patients from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to July 2022. Topical corticosteroids are the mainstay for AD flares in adults and children. Topical approved agents in pediatric AD are calcineurin inhibitors, crisaborolecrisaborole, and ruxolitinib. Dupilumab is the only FDA approved biologic for patients with AD from six months of age. A Janus kinase inhibitor, upadacitinib, is a systemic treatment approved for pediatric AD patients (age >12 years). Systemic immunosuppressants used in pediatric AD include methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporinecyclosporine, and mycophenolate mofetil.

EXPERT OPINION

Data regarding disease prevention are conflicting, however, an abundance of research has transpired regarding amelioration of symptoms and induction of disease clearance by targeting numerous pathological mechanisms. Understanding the pediatric AD phenotype will further advance the field and the development of improved therapeutics.

Combined application of dupilumab and mite allergen-specific immunotherapy in children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease that manifests in skin dryness, severe itching, and eczema, and can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Current treatment regimens do not prevent the recurrence of the disease and are associated with adverse effects. Here, we report two cases of moderate-to-severe AD in children that were treated with dupilumab, a dual inhibitor of IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, in combination with mite allergen-specific immunotherapy.

CASE SUMMARY

Both patients presented with the diagnosis of AD that was not adequately controlled by the conventional treatment regimen, including topical corticosteroids (TCS), topical calcineurin inhibitors, emollients, and the traditional Chinese medicine treatments. In both patients, AD-associated skin irritation impacted the quality of life, disturbed sleep patterns, and caused stress and anxiety.Patients received treatment with dupilumab and mite allergen-specific immunotherapy in addition to the baseline treatment regimen of external glucocorticoids (TCS) and oral antihistamines. Nine months after beginning of treatment, clinical symptoms, signs, medication scores, and evaluation scale scores of both children significantly improved, and the treatment was associated with an overall good tolerance.

CONCLUSION

A combination of dupilumab and mite allergen-specific immunotherapy in addition to the standard anti-AD treatment improves clinical symptoms and is not associated with increased incidence of adverse effects.

Impact of a Decade of Research Into Atopic Dermatitis

The last decade has seen an unprecedented pace of change, particularly of clinical research in atopic dermatitis (AD). This review summarizes some key discoveries. Over the last 10 years, nearly half of all studies investigated the efficacy and safety of novel therapeutic agents, particularly biologics and small molecules. Clear demonstration of benefit in clinical trials with no significant safety concerns provided strong evidence leading to subsequent Food and Drug Administration approval and routine use of the anti-IL-4 receptor alpha antagonist dupilumab in patients 6 months and older, the selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitors upadacitinib for patients 12 years and older and abrocitinib, the IL-13 antagonist tralokinumab, and the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib for adults 18 years and older. Several other drugs are in the pipeline. Other areas under the spotlight have been trials of skin moisturizers and probiotics in the prevention of AD, investigating the role of filaggrin and skin barrier function and the role of skin and gut microbiome, with Staphylococcus aureus second immunoglobulin-binding protein having been found to uniquely trigger allergic skin responses in AD. Skin microbiome, epidermal metabolites/structural components, and local inflammatory biomarkers are now commonly assessed using genomic and proteomic analysis of tape strips rather than more invasive biopsy to identify factors such as C-C motif chemokine ligand-17 that correlate with disease severity and response to therapy. Overall, the last decade has ushered in a new and exciting era in our understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of this common allergic skin disease.

IL-4 receptor blockade is a global repressor of naïve B cell development and responses in a dupilumab-treated patient

Here, we report a case of atopic dermatitis (AD) in a patient who received biweekly doses of dupilumab, an antibody against the IL-4 receptor α chain (IL-4Rα). Single cell RNA-sequencing showed that naïve B cells expressed the highest levels of IL4R compared to other B cell subpopulations. Compared to controls, the dupilumab-treated patient exhibited diminished percentages of IL4R+IGHD+ naïve B cells and down-regulation of IL4R, FCER2 (CD23), and IGHD. Dupilumab treatment resulted in upregulation of genes associated with apoptosis and inhibition of B cell receptor signaling and down-regulation of class-switch and memory B cell development genes. The dupilumab-treated patient exhibited a rapid decline in COVID-19 anti-spike and anti-receptor binding domain antibodies between 4 and 8 and 11 months post COVID-19 vaccination. Our data suggest that intact and persistent IL-4 signaling is necessary for maintaining robust survival and development of naïve B cells, and maintaining a long term vaccine response.

Systemic treatment of children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis aged ≥2 years: a Delphi consensus project mapping expert opinion in Northern Europe

BACKGROUND

Paediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) can be burdensome, affecting mental health and impairing quality of life for children and caregivers. Comprehensive guidelines exist for managing paediatric AD, but practical guidance on using systemic therapy is limited, particularly for new therapies including biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, recently approved for various ages in this indication.

OBJECTIVES

This expert consensus aimed to provide practical recommendations within this advancing field to enhance clinical decision-making on the use of these and other systemics for children and adolescents aged ≥2 years with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Nineteen physicians from Northern Europe were selected for their expertise in managing childhood AD. Using a two-round Delphi process, they reached full or partial consensus on 37 statements.

RESULTS

Systemic therapy is recommended for children aged ≥2 years with a clear clinical diagnosis of severe AD and persistent disease uncontrolled after optimizing non-systemic therapy. Systemic therapy should achieve long-term disease control and reduce short-term interventions. Recommended are cyclosporine A for short-term use (all ages) and dupilumab or methotrexate for long-term use (ages ≥6 years). Consensus was not reached on the best long-term systemics for children aged 2-6 years, although new systemic therapies will likely become favourable: New biologics and JAK inhibitors will soon be approved for this age group, and more trial and real-world data will become available.

CONCLUSIONS

This article makes practical recommendations on the use of systemic AD treatments for children and adolescents, to supplement international and regional guidelines. It considers the systemic medication that was available for children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD at the time this consensus project was done: azathioprine, cyclosporine A, dupilumab, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and oral glucocorticosteroids. We focus on the geographically similar Northern European countries, whose healthcare systems, local preferences for AD management and reimbursement structures nonetheless differ significantly.

When topical therapy of atopic dermatitis fails: a guide for the clinician

INTRODUCTION

While topical medications are the first line of treatment for mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis, they are ineffective in individuals with diffuse disease and moderate-to-severe atopic itch. For these individuals, as well as those who do not respond to topical treatments, systemic medicines are typically essential and helpful.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a review of the literature to identify established systemic therapies, novel biologic agents, and recent advances in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis. The review discusses these data, which show that the majority of atopic itch medications now in development target the type 2 immune axis and brain sensitization, two main etiologies of atopic itch. We emphasize the evidence, efficacy, and side effect profiles of currently available systemic medications for atopic itch, as well as future potential for tailored therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

We give our professional opinion on the current state of knowledge about atopic eczema pathogenesis and the innovative targets and therapies for atopic itch that include MRGPRX2, periostin, gabaergic medicines, and JAK/STAT inhibitors. Additionally, we discuss patient populations that stand to benefit the most from targeting these molecules or utilizing these drugs, as well as those who may face a disproportionate weight of adverse effects.