Correlation of Activation Site and Number with the Clinical Response to Bronchial Thermoplasty

Pretreatment asthma control test score as a predictive score for clinical remission after bronchial thermoplasty in younger patients with severe asthma and preserved lung function

OBJECTIVE

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) decreases the incidence of asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations among patients with severe asthma. Predictors of BT effectiveness remain unclear as its mechanism of action and invasiveness remain obscure. This study aimed to identify factors that could predict BT outcomes.

METHODS

Two respiratory physicians treated 20 consecutive patients with severe asthma using BT. The patients were assigned to groups based on clinical remission following an expert consensus proposed in 2020. Predictors of clinical remission were analyzed using asthma control test (ACT) score, pulmonary function and blood tests, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.

RESULTS

At baseline, the median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 31.0-52.8), and pre-bronchodilator (pre-BD) percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (%FEV1) was 85.9% (IQR, 74.8-100.5). Six (30%) patients achieved clinical remission. Among the patients treated with biologics, 20% had clinical remission, and 20% discontinued biologic therapy. The pre-BT ACT score was significantly lower in the group with than without remission (11.0 [IQR, 8.0-14.5] vs. 15.0 [IQR, 11.0-17.3], p = .016). Adverse events did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use clinical remission as a criterion for evaluating BT efficacy. The pre-BT ACT score might a the predict response to BT in younger adult patients with severe asthma and pre-BD %FEV1 ≥ 70%.

Use of Quantitative CT Imaging to Identify Bronchial Thermoplasty Responders

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a treatment for patients with poorly controlled, severe asthma. However, predictors of treatment response to BT are defined poorly.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do baseline radiographic and clinical characteristics exist that predict response to BT?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal prospective cohort study of participants with severe asthma receiving BT across eight academic medical centers. Participants received three separate BT treatments and were monitored at 3-month intervals for 1 year after BT. Similar to prior studies, a positive response to BT was defined as either improvement in Asthma Control Test results of ≥ 3 or Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire of ≥ 0.5. Regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between pretreatment clinical and quantitative CT scan measures with subsequent BT response.

RESULTS

From 2006 through 2017, 88 participants received BT, with 70 participants (79.5%) identified as responders by Asthma Control Test or Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire criteria. Responders were less likely to undergo an asthma-related ICU admission in the prior year (3% vs 25%; P = .01). On baseline quantitative CT imaging, BT responders showed less air trapping percentage (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .03), a greater Jacobian determinant (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11), greater SD of the Jacobian determinant (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04-3.26), and greater anisotropic deformation index (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.06-8.86).

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to evaluate baseline quantitative CT imaging and clinical characteristics associated with BT response. Our results show that preservation of normal lung expansion, indicated by less air trapping, a greater magnitude of isotropic expansion, and greater within-lung spatial variation on quantitative CT imaging, were predictors of future BT response.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01185275; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Bronchial thermoplasty for severe asthma: potential mechanisms and response markers

Severe asthma (SA) poses a significant challenge to management and treatment, leading to a reduced quality of life and a heavy burden on society and healthcare resources. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) has emerged as a non-pharmacological intervention for SA, demonstrating its efficacy and safety in improving patients' quality of life and reducing exacerbation rates for over a decade. In particular, BT encounters various obstacles in its clinical application. Since asthma is characterized by high heterogeneity, not all patients derive effective outcomes from BT. Furthermore, current knowledge of markers that indicate response to BT remains limited. Recent research has shed light on the intricate mechanism of action of BT, which extends beyond simple smooth muscle ablation. Therefore, to enhance the clinical practice and implementation of BT, this paper aims to elucidate the mechanism of action and identify potential markers associated with BT response.

Patient profiling to predict response to bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma

Bronchial thermoplasty is the only device-based nonpharmacological treatment approach for severe asthma. Current guidelines are cautious in recommending bronchial thermoplasty because of unknown patient response prediction. Recent research on bronchial thermoplasty includes up-to-date, state-of-the-art, and recent-advances reviews. However, these reviews provide a broad and general discussion on equipment, technique, patient selection, and patient management, with little evaluation of the predictors of a beneficial response. Predicting an optimal response to bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma remains elusive. The lack of reliable predictive markers means that bronchial thermoplasty remains a last-line treatment and makes profiling for predicting the response or efficacy a topic of study. Genetic changes are associated with airway remodeling. A gap in the literature exists regarding patient profiling to predict the response to bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma. Therefore, recently published omics data and genetic associations regarding the response to bronchial thermoplasty therapy should be reviewed. We present an up-to-date review of recent publications profiling the response to bronchial thermoplasty in patients with severe asthma.