New combination treatments in the management of asthma: focus on fluticasone/vilanterol

Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 92/22 µg once a day: a 12-month study on outcomes in mild to moderate asthma

Background:

Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/V) is an effective long-acting β2 agonist/inhaled corticosteroid combination for managing persistent bronchial asthma. The aim of the study was to assess the outcomes achievable in patients with mild to moderate asthma receiving FF/V 92/22 µg once daily for 12 months.

Methods:

Data were automatically and anonymously obtained from the institutional database: forced expiratory volume in 1 s predicted values; the exacerbation and hospitalization rates; days of hospitalization; general practitioner (GP) or specialist visits; days of inactivity; courses of systemic steroids or antibiotics were recorded at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. The overall adherence to treatment was also calculated. Analysis of variance was used for checking the trends of variables. The improvement in lung function was significant (p < 0.001) and time dependent. The mean (±standard error) exacerbation rate per patient changed from 1.05 (±0.16) at baseline to 0.28 (±0.07) after 3 months, 0.33 (±0.08) after 6 months and 0.18 (±0.08) after 12 months (p < 0.001). The mean hospitalization rate per patient changed from 0.30 (±0.07) at baseline to 0.08 (±0.04) after 3 months, 0.10 (±0.05) after 6 months and 0.03 (±0.03) after 12 months (p < 0.001). Also mean duration of hospitalization and days of inactivity were reduced over time (p < 0.001). GP visits were also reduced, together with specialist visits (both p < 0.001). Steroid and antibiotic courses dropped significantly (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, changes in all outcomes considered proved time dependent, particularly over the second semester. Finally, over time, adherence to treatment was high.

Conclusions:

The once-daily inhalation of combined FF/V 92/22 µg optimized systematically the exacerbation and hospitalization rates in mild to moderate asthma, together with all other outcomes over time. The effectiveness of FF/V 92/22 µg once daily proved to be time dependent over the period of the study.

Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol 92/22 μg once-a-day vs Beclomethasone dipropionate/Formoterol 100/6 μg b.I.D.: a 12-month comparison of outcomes in mild-to-moderate asthma

Background

Bronchial asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways. Beclomethasone dipropionate/Formoterol (BDP/F) and Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol (FF/V) are two of the most effective LABA/ICS combinations for managing persistent bronchial asthma. Aim of the study was to compare the outcomes achieved in mild-to-moderate asthma patients assuming BDP/F 100/6 μg b.i.d. (Group A) or FF/V 92/22 μg once-daily (Group B) for 12-months. No head-to-head long-term comparison is available at present.

Methods

Data were automatically and anonymously obtained from the institutional database: FEV₁% predicted values; the exacerbation and hospitalization rates; days of hospitalization; GP and/or specialist visits; days of inactivity; courses of systemic steroids and/or antibiotics were recorded at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months of both treatments. The overall adherence to treatments was also calculated. The propensity score method was used for matching and comparing the two cohorts of patients; Anova and Wilcoxon tests were used for checking the trends and time-to-time comparisons over the period; statistical significance was accepted for p < 0.05.

Results

The PS-matching process returned a cohort of 40 group A patients matched with 40 patients of group B, fully comparable for demographics, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities. The improvement in lung function was significant in both groups (p < 0.001), even if it was significantly higher and time-dependent in group B. The mean (±SE) exacerbation rate/patient changed from 0.63 (±0.13) at baseline to 0.53 (±0.12) after three; to 0.58 (±0.13) after six, and to 0.60 (±0.18) after twelve months in group A (p = ns), while from of 1.05 (±0.16) at baseline, to 0.28 (±0.07) after three; to 0.33 (±0.08) after six, and to 0.18 (±0.08) after twelve months in group B (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean hospitalization rate/patient changed from 0.25 ± 0.07 at baseline to 0.15 (±0.06) after three; to 0.08 (±0.04) after six, and to 0.13 (±0.05) after twelve months in group A (p = ns), while from 0.30 (±0.07) at baseline to 0.08 (±0.04) after three; to 0.10 (±0.05) after six, and to 0.03 (±0.03) after twelve months in group B (p < 0.001), respectively. Also mean duration of hospitalization and days of inactivity were in favour of FF/V treatment over time (in both cases p < 0.001). GP’s visits were reduced by both treatments (p < 0.007 in group A and p < 0.001 in group B, respectively, while Specialist’s visits only dropped during FF/V (p < 0.001). Steroid and antibiotic courses were significantly reduced by both treatments, even if more systematically in group B (p < 0.001 vs p < 0.007, and p < 0.001 vs p < 0.044, respectively). Moreover, changes in all outcomes considered proved time-dependent during the FF/V treatment only, particularly over the second semester. Finally, the overtime adherence to treatment was higher by 22 days during FF/V .

Conclusions

Both the ICS/LABA combinations proved effective, even if characterized by different patterns of effectiveness either in terms of lung function and of long-term clinical outcomes. Only the once-daily inhalation of combined FF/V 92/22 μg once-daily optimized systematically the exacerbation and hospitalization rates in mild-to-moderate asthma, together with all other outcomes over time. The effectiveness of FF/V 92/22 once-daily μg proved progressive and time-dependent over the twelve-month period of the study, and associated to a higher adherence to treatment.

The Salford Lung Study: a pioneering comparative effectiveness approach to COPD and asthma in clinical trials

The Salford Lung Study (SLS) of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a practical, community-based, randomized, open-label pragmatic study on the efficacy and safety of the once-daily dry powder inhaler that combines the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) with the long-acting beta₂ agonist vilanterol (VI). The asthma component of the SLS is not yet reported but the COPD component, done over a 12-month period, found a statistically significant 8.4% reduction in COPD exacerbations when compared to usual care. No differences in adverse events, including serious adverse events and pneumonia, were noted. The importance of real-world findings, such as those found in the SLS COPD trial with inhaled FF/VI, is discussed in comparison to classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with inhaled FF/VI in COPD patients. The real-world, community-based pragmatic RCT like the SLS provides additional generalizable data with direct clinical applicability and potential usefulness in the development of practice guidelines. The results from the SLS, along with those of large and small RCTs, are supportive of the use of once-daily FF/VI in COPD maintenance therapy.

Bronchial thermoplasty: implementing best practice in the era of cost containment

Increasing dependence on advanced technologies in the 21st century has created a dilemma between the practice and business of medicine. From information technology to robotic surgery, new technologies have expanded treatment possibilities and have potentially improved patient outcomes and safety. Simultaneously, their escalating costs limit access for certain patients and health care facilities. Nevertheless, medical decisions should not simply be based on cost. Input from physicians and other health care specialists as well as adherence to best practice position statements, are vital to implementing truly cost-effective strategies in medicine. Bronchial thermoplasty (BT), a US Food and Drug Administration approved bronchoscopy procedure in difficult-to-control persistent asthma, is a prime example of a new technology facing cost and implementation challenges. We discuss the specific indications and contraindications for BT and review recent real-world experiences that can provide the foundation for building a comprehensive asthma program that provides BT for difficult-to-control asthma patients who fail national guideline treatment recommendations after an adequate clinical trial of one. We also offer insight into the barriers to implementing a successful BT program and strategies for overcoming them.