Efficacy of rFIXFc versus rIX-FP for the Treatment of Patients with Hemophilia B: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of B-LONG and PROLONG-9FP Trials

ORPHEE: A Real-World Study on rIX-FP Prophylaxis Use in Adolescent/Adult Patients With Hemophilia B

OBJECTIVES

To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of recombinant factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) in patients with hemophilia B (HB) in France.

METHODS

Data on dosing frequency, weekly consumption, and bleeds before-and-after switching to rIX-FP, were collected from December 2021 to February 2024. Annualized (spontaneous) bleeding rates [A(s)BRs] were calculated only in patients on prophylaxis with a follow-up ≥ 6 months.

RESULTS

This interim analysis focused on 77 patients ≥ 12 years; 62 (81%) had severe HB. After switching to rIX-FP, the infusion interval was 14 (7-14) days. Weekly consumption was 43 (35.5-53) IU/kg. ABRs and AsBRs were 0.5 (0-1.9) and 0 (0-0.7) (n = 63) at 18.2 (12.3-21.9) months of follow-up. Prophylactic efficacy of rIX-FP was considered 'Excellent'/'Good' in 65/68 (95%) patients. Among the 43 patients previously treated with rFIXFc, 21 increased the infusion interval from 7 (7-11) days with rFIXFc to 14 (7-14) days with rIX-FP; 33/43 (77%) reduced weekly factor IX (FIX) consumption from 59.95 (46.35-77.93) to 42.5 (35.88-50.25) IU/kg. Patients maintained good protection against bleeds.

CONCLUSION

This analysis confirmed that switching to rIX-FP allows for reducing injection frequency and FIX consumption while maintaining good bleed protection.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Recombinant Factor IX Albumin Fusion Protein Versus Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein for Weekly Prophylactic Treatment of Hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic treatment of hemophilia B with recombinant factor IX (rFIX) molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetics including rIX-FP (albutrepenonacog alfa; Idelvion©) and rFIXFc (eftrenonacog alfa; Alprolix©) have commonly been used in the clinic. In the absence of head-to-head comparative trials, the aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of rIX-FP versus rFIXFc using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs).

METHODS

MAIC analyses leveraged individual patient data from the PROLONG-9FP trial and published summary-level data from the B-LONG trial for subjects who received weekly prophylaxis regimens. Individual patient data were used to assign weights and balance subjects from PROLONG-9FP with subjects from B-LONG on baseline disease severity, age, prior FIX regimen, and body mass index (BMI). Six efficacy outcomes were analyzed including annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR), annualized joint bleeding rate (AjBR), and the proportion of subjects without bleeding events (for total, spontaneous, and joint bleeding events).

RESULTS

After adjustment for baseline disease severity, age, prior FIX regimen, and BMI, rIX-FP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in AsBR (rate ratio [RR] 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22, 0.82; P = 0.0107), and the proportion of patients without bleeding events (odds ratio [OR] 3.24; 95% CI 1.41, 7.45; P = 0.0057), spontaneous bleeding events (OR 3.47; 95% CI 1.56, 7.73; P = 0.0023), and joint bleeding events (OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.10, 5.26; P = 0.0274) compared with rFIXFc. Prophylactic treatment with rIX-FP was also associated with a numerically lower ABR (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.32, 1.75; P = 0.5095) and AjBR (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.37, 1.82; P = 0.6178).

CONCLUSION

The MAICs demonstrated that weekly prophylaxis treatment of severe hemophilia B with rIX-FP resulted in favorable efficacy outcomes as compared to rFIXFc. These findings suggest rIX-FP may offer improved clinical benefits over rFIXFc.

Indirect treatment comparisons of the gene therapy etranacogene dezaparvovec versus extended half-life factor IX therapies for severe or moderately severe haemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy for haemophilia B demonstrated superior efficacy at 24 months in reducing bleeds versus a ≥6-month lead-in period of prophylaxis with FIX products in the phase 3 trial, HOPE-B. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus FIX products, indirect treatment comparisons (ITC) can be used.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of etranacogene dezaparvovec versus rIX-FP, rFIXFc and N9-GP using ITC, and support HOPE-B results.

METHODS

Data were leveraged from Phase 3 pivotal trials: HOPE-B, PROLONG-9FP, B-LONG and Paradigm 2. Annualised bleeding rates (ABR), spontaneous (AsBR) and joint (AjBR) bleeding rates, percentage of patients with no bleeds, and FIX consumption were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting and matching adjusted indirect comparisons.

RESULTS

Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated statistically significantly lower bleeding rates versus all comparators. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rIX-FP were 0.19 (p < .0001), 0.08 (p < .0001) and 0.09 (p < .0001), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR, AsBR and AjBR versus rFIXFc were 0.14 (p < .0001), 0.13 (p = .0083) and 0.15 (p = .0111), respectively. Rate ratios for ABR and AsBR, versus N9-GP were 0.24 (p = .0231) and 0.13 (p = .0071), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec demonstrated significantly higher percentage of patients with no bleeds versus rIX-FP and rFIXFc; odds ratios: 17.60 (p < .0001) and 5.65 (p = .0037), respectively. Etranacogene dezaparvovec resulted in significantly lower FIX consumption than all comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

ITC suggests that etranacogene dezaparvovec offers patients with haemophilia B (≤2% of normal FIX expression) a single dose treatment that can significantly reduce bleeding rates and eliminate routine infusions associated with FIX therapies.

Recombinant factor IX Fc for major surgery in hemophilia B: factor IX plasma activity levels and effective hemostasis

Background

Major surgical procedures are associated with significant bleeding risk and infectious complications in patients with hemophilia, which may be minimized by factor replacement. Monitoring perioperative factor levels guides dosing to maintain adequate levels for hemostatic control.

Objectives

We report prospectively collected post hoc surgical data in patients with hemophilia B who underwent major surgery with extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) in phase 3 studies (B-LONG/Kids B-LONG and B-YOND).

Methods

Achieved FIX plasma levels were described for those who underwent major surgeries with ≥1 peak and/or predose FIX assessment available on the day of surgery (Day 0 [D0]) from the central laboratory. Dosing, injection frequency, adverse events, and hemostatic responses were assessed. Two representative cases were described further including blood loss, transfusions, and concomitant medication assessment.

Results

Of 35 major surgeries, 17 (N = 16 subjects) with sufficient FIX measurements were included in this analysis; 13 of 17 surgeries were orthopedic. On D0, a median loading (preoperative) dose of 101.1 International Units (IU)/kg/injection achieved a median peak FIX of 103.3 IU/dL. Across postoperative Days 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 14, the median predose levels were 75.1 IU/dL with 1 injection/d, 71.6 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, and 43.2 IU/dL with 0 to 1 injection/d, respectively. Hemostasis was rated excellent (14 of 16) or good (2 of 16) across surgeries. Both case studies (knee arthroscopy and ankle fusion) illustrate measured FIX levels with rFIXFc.

Conclusion

The aggregate analysis and representative cases of major surgeries demonstrate that rFIXFc can achieve FIX levels for effective hemostasis during invasive high-risk procedures.

Efficacy of rFIXFc versus N9-GP Prophylaxis in Patients with Hemophilia B: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of B-LONG and PARADIGM 2 Trials

Purpose

For patients with hemophilia B, extended half-life factor IX (FIX) products are available for prophylaxis and for treating bleeds. Different methods are used to extend the half-lives of recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) and nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP). This affects their biodistribution and plasma FIX levels, although differences do not always correlate with clinical outcomes. A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP was performed, based on licensed dosing in the European Union.

Patients and Methods

Combined rFIXFc data from the weekly and individualized interval prophylaxis arms of the B-LONG clinical trial, and N9-GP data from the 40 IU/kg once-weekly prophylaxis arm of PARADIGM 2 were used in a MAIC. Individual patient data for rFIXFc (n=87) were matched to aggregated data for N9-GP (n=29). Estimated annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for rFIXFc were recalculated using a Poisson regression model with adjustment for over-dispersion, and compared with ABRs reported for N9-GP, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

There was no evidence of significant differences in estimated ABRs between prophylaxis with rFIXFc and N9-GP. Analysis of pooled rFIXFc weekly and interval-adjusted dosing compared with N9-GP 40 IU/kg once weekly produced estimated ABRs of 2.59 versus 2.51 (IRR 1.03; 95% CI 0.56-1.89), as well as 1.34 versus 1.22 (IRR 1.10; 95% CI 0.42-2.91) and 1.13 versus 1.29 (IRR 0.88; 95% CI 0.47-1.63) for overall, spontaneous, and traumatic bleeding events, respectively.

Conclusion

The study did not reveal any significant differences in the efficacy of rFIXFc and N9-GP prophylaxis. Given differences in trough levels (rFIXFc dosing was targeted to achieve a trough 1-3 IU/dL above baseline versus a reported estimated N9-GP mean trough of 27.3 IU/dL), interpreting plasma FIX levels as potential surrogate efficacy markers requires consideration of compound-specific pharmacokinetic profiles.

Eftrenonacog Alfa: A Review in Haemophilia B

Eftrenonacog alfa (Alprolix^®) is an extended half-life recombinant factor IX (rFIX)-Fc fusion protein (hereafter referred to as rFIXFc). Administered as an intravenous bolus, it is approved for prophylactic use and the treatment of bleeding in patients with haemophilia B in various countries worldwide, including those of the EU, as well as the USA. In multinational, phase III trials, rFIXFc was effective for the prophylaxis, perioperative management or on-demand treatment of bleeding in male patients with severe haemophilia B regardless of age and irrespective of whether or not they had been previously treated with FIX replacement products. Prophylactic efficacy was maintained over the longer term (up to 5 years) in previously treated patients. rFIXFc effectiveness in the real-world setting is supported by results of prospective studies, as well as the outcomes of several retrospective trials. rFIXFc was well tolerated in clinical trials in previously treated and untreated children, adolescents and/or adults with severe haemophilia B. Thus, rFIXFc continues to represent a useful treatment option among the haemophilia B patient population.