Non-Medical Radiography Staff Experiences in Inter-Professional Communication: A Swedish Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study

Attitudes and barriers to interprofessional collaboration among radiographers: A multi-country perspective

INTRODUCTION

To promote effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC), it is crucial to understand the attitudes of healthcare workers towards IPC and identify any barriers they may face. This is particularly important in the radiography profession where IPC is vital for providing holistic care and ensuring radiation protection and safety. However, there is limited research available on the attitudes and barriers to IPC specifically among radiographers. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the attitudes and barriers to IPC among radiographers from multiple countries.

METHODS

A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional online survey was conducted using the adapted attitudes toward healthcare teams scale (ATHCT) and barriers scale towards IPC. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and exploratory factor analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 233 radiographers across the globe participated in this survey. The study found that the overall mean score on the ATHCT scale was 54.68 (SD = 5.75). Although not statistically significant, radiographers with over 15 years of experience tended to strongly agree with all the statements, indicating a more positive attitude towards IPC. The study also identified three subscales related to IPC: quality of care, team efficiency, and time constraint. The top three barriers to IPC reported by radiographers include i. a lack of clearly defined, shared, and measurable purpose, ii. poor communication, and iii. a lack of commitment from team members.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the need for interventions and programs that promote effective communication and establish a shared vision among healthcare team members.

Roles and Responsibilities in the Transition to Working Independently: A Qualitative Study of Recently Graduated Radiographers' Perspectives in Australia

Background

Medical imaging features along the entire healthcare continuum and is known for its fast-paced technological evolution which enables it to keep up with the demands of the healthcare system to provide safe, quality services. The overall efficacy and efficiency of the system depends on practitioners' clinical competence, achieved through professional education and continuous professional development. Recent studies have revealed concerns regarding newly graduated healthcare professionals' preparedness and readiness to handle actual practice.

Methods

We conducted qualitative face-to-face and telephonic interviews with a convenient and purposive sample of 23 participants consisting of recently graduated radiographers (n=14), radiography students (n=5) and supervising radiographers (n=4) in Australia. Verbatim transcriptions were analyzed inductively to identify themes pertaining to perspectives and experiences of the work readiness of novice radiographers.

Results

The findings of our study suggest that the workplace immersion and transitioning of recently graduated radiographers into their professional roles requires a process of experiential learning and honing of knowledge and skills if they are to function efficiently and independently in a team-oriented workplace. Radiographic services are spread across various levels of care and are an integral part of the organizational structure of a healthcare system. Maladaptive transitions to the workplace may be the result of low self-confidence, a lack of support, uncertainty in inter-collegial interactions, or unrealistic performance expectations. The overarching themes of communication and interaction emerged clearly as recently graduated radiographers navigated the four roles of coordinator, collaborator, mediator, and advocate.

Conclusion

The application of radiographic skills is embedded in a workplace culture of communication and safety. Transitioning to independent practice takes place in a complex, multifaceted environment and is accompanied by internal and external expectations. Because each workplace has a unique context, system and culture, no novice radiographic professional can ever be fully prepared through pre-service training and workplace induction.

Radiographers' actions and challenges when confronted with inappropriate radiology referrals

OBJECTIVES

To explore radiographers' actions toward inappropriate referrals and hindrances to assessing referrals.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to radiographers via the International Society of Radiographers and Radiological Technologists (ISRRT) networks. The questionnaire consisted of 5-point Likert scale questions on radiographers' actions to supplement referral information, actions for unjustified referrals and hindrances to referral assessment. The questionnaire was validated using a test-retest reliability analysis. Kappa values ≥ 0.6 were accepted. SPSS software was used for data analysis and chi-square tests to compare subgroups.

RESULTS

Total responses received were 279. The most reported actions to supplement missing referral information were to ask the patient or relative, examine the body region of concern and check medical records (73%, 70%, 67%, responded often/always, respectively). The actions when confronted with unjustified referrals were reported equally to consult the radiologist, referring clinician and radiographer (69-68% often/always responses). The hindering factors ranked high (agreed/strongly agreed responses) pertained to inadequate information in referral forms (83%), ineffective communication among healthcare professionals (79%), lack of training (70%) and allocated time (61%). Statistically significant associations were observed for a few actions and hindrances with education level, modality of practice and responsibility to screen imaging referrals.

CONCLUSION

Radiographers consult colleagues about suspected unjustified referrals. Effective communication pathways, training and time allocation to improve radiographers' skills to assess referrals may enhance appropriate imaging and delivery of quality patient care.

KEY POINTS

• Radiographers' actions of supplementing missing information in radiology referrals facilitate provision of high-quality health services. • Radiographers' strategy when confronted with inappropriate referrals is to consult radiologists and referring clinicians. • Better inter-professional communication and organisation of tasks can facilitate radiographers' participation in referral assessment to ensure appropriate imaging.

Verification of a Sense of Community Scale for Hospitals in Japan

Introduction/Objectives:

We aimed to verify whether a sense of community scale developed for hospital wards can be applied to hospitals.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire between July and October 2018 in 3 hospitals in Japan. The subjects were staff members working in these hospitals who provide direct medical or administrative services to patients and their families. The questionnaire inquired about the participants’ basic attributes and workplace satisfaction, and included the sense of community scale and the Japanese version of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale-II. We evaluated the scale’s structural validity, internal consistency, and hypothesis testing for construct validity.

Results:

Of 826 eligible staff members, 539 were included in the analysis. Mean age was 40.4 years and 77.4% were female. Exploratory factor analysis showed that 24 of the 28 items in the sense of community scale could be categorized under 3 factors. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a goodness of fit index of 0.794, adjusted goodness of fit index of 0.752, comparative fit index of 0.885 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.092. Cronbach’s α for score in the sense of community scale was high (.96). Participants who reported high workplace satisfaction had significantly higher scores in the sense of community scale than those who indicated low workplace satisfaction (P < .001).

Conclusions:

We verified the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the sense of community scale, which was originally developed for hospital wards, for the community in hospitals. With further verification, we hope the scale will be useful for evaluating the sense of community in hospitals.