1
|
Delaforce A, Li J, Grujovski M, Parkinson J, Richards P, Fahy M, Good N, Jayasena R. Creating an Implementation Enhancement Plan for a Digital Patient Fall Prevention Platform Using the CFIR-ERIC Approach: A Qualitative Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3794. [PMID: 36900804 PMCID: PMC10001076 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Inpatient falls are a major cause of hospital-acquired complications (HAC) and inpatient harm. Interventions to prevent falls exist, but it is unclear which are most effective and what implementation strategies best support their use. This study uses existing implementation theory to develop an implementation enhancement plan to improve the uptake of a digital fall prevention workflow. (2) Methods: A qualitative approach using focus groups/interview included 12 participants across four inpatient wards, from a newly built, 300-bed rural referral hospital. Interviews were coded to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and then converted to barrier and enabler statements using consensus agreement. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) tool to develop an implementation enhancement plan. (3) Results: The most prevalent CFIR enablers included: relative advantage (n = 12), access to knowledge and information (n = 11), leadership engagement (n = 9), patient needs and resources (n = 8), cosmopolitanism (n = 5), knowledge and beliefs about the intervention (n = 5), self-efficacy (n = 5) and formally appointed internal implementation leaders (n = 5). Commonly mentioned CFIR barriers included: access to knowledge and information (n = 11), available resources (n = 8), compatibility (n = 8), patient needs and resources (n = 8), design quality and packaging (n = 10), adaptability (n = 7) and executing (n = 7). After mapping the CFIR enablers and barriers to the ERIC tool, six clusters of interventions were revealed: train and educate stakeholders, utilize financial strategies, adapt and tailor to context, engage consumers, use evaluative and iterative strategies and develop stakeholder interrelations. (4) Conclusions: The enablers and barriers identified are similar to those described in the literature. Given there is close agreement between the ERIC consensus framework recommendations and the evidence, this approach will likely assist in enhancing the implementation of Rauland's Concentric Care fall prevention platform and other similar workflow technologies that have the potential to disrupt team and organisational routines. The results of this study will provide a blueprint to enhance implementation that will be tested for effectiveness at a later stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Delaforce
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Jane Li
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - Melisa Grujovski
- Nursing and Midwifery Services, Maitland Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
| | - Joy Parkinson
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Paula Richards
- Nursing and Midwifery Services, Maitland Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
| | - Michael Fahy
- Nursing and Midwifery Services, Maitland Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
| | - Norman Good
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Rajiv Jayasena
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Delaforce A, Farmer S, Duff J, Munday J, Miller K, Glover L, Corney C, Ansell G, Gutta N, Tuffaha H, Hardy J, Hurst C. Results from a type two hybrid-effectiveness study to implement a preoperative anemia and iron deficiency screening, evaluation, and management pathway. Transfusion 2023; 63:724-736. [PMID: 36807584 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation of pathways to screen surgical patients for preoperative anemia and iron deficiency remains limited. This study sought to measure the impact of a theoretically informed, bespoke change package on improving the uptake of a Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation, and Management Pathway. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Pre-post interventional study using a type two hybrid-effectiveness design evaluated implementation. Four hundred (400) patient medical record reviews provided the dataset (200 pre- and 200-post implementation). The primary outcome measure was compliance with the pathway. Secondary outcome measures (clinical outcomes) were anemia on day of surgery, exposure to a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and hospital length of stay. Validated surveys facilitated data collection of implementation measures. Propensity score-adjusted analyses determined the effect of the intervention on clinical outcomes, and a cost analysis determined the economic impact. RESULTS For the primary outcome, compliance improved significantly post-implementation (Odds Ratio 10.6 [95% CI 4.4-25.5] p < .000). In secondary outcomes, adjusted analyses point estimates showed clinical outcomes were slightly improved for anemia on day of surgery (Odds Ratio 0.792 [95% CI 0.5-1.3] p = .32), RBC transfusion (Odds Ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.41-1.78] p = .69) and hospital length of stay (Hazard Ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.77-1.18] p = .67), although these were not statistically significant. Cost savings of $13,340 per patient were realized. Implementation outcomes were favorable for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. CONCLUSION The change package significantly improved compliance. The absence of a statistically significant change in clinical outcomes may be because the study was powered to detect an improvement in compliance only. Further prospective studies with larger samples are needed. Cost savings of $13,340 per patient were achieved and the change package was viewed favorably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Delaforce
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shannon Farmer
- Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jed Duff
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Healthcare Transformation/ School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judy Munday
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation/ School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Nursing Science, The University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Kristin Miller
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lynne Glover
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Chris Corney
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gareth Ansell
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine-Mater Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Naadir Gutta
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine-Mater Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Haitham Tuffaha
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Janet Hardy
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Cameron Hurst
- QIMR Berghoffer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Isbister JP, Pearse BL, Delaforce AS, Farmer SL. Patients' Choice, Consent, and Ethics in Patient Blood Management. Anesth Analg 2022; 135:489-500. [PMID: 35977359 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The goal of patient blood management (PBM) is to optimize clinical outcomes for individual patients by managing their blood as a precious and unique resource to be safeguarded and managed judiciously. A corollary to successful PBM is the minimization or avoidance of blood transfusion and stewardship of donated blood. The first is achieved by a multidisciplinary approach with personalized management plans shared and decided on with the patient or their substitute. It follows that the physician-patient relationship is an integral component of medical practice and the fundamental link between patient and doctor based on trust and honest communication. Central to PBM is accurate and timely diagnosis based on sound physiology and pathophysiology as the bedrock on which scientifically based medicine is founded. PBM in all disease contexts starts with the questions, "What is the status of the patient's blood?" "If there are specific abnormalities in the blood, how should they be managed?" and "If allogeneic blood transfusion is considered, is there no reasonable alternative therapy?" There are compelling scientific reasons to implement a nontransfusion default position when there is clinical uncertainty and questionable evidence of clinical efficacy for allogeneic blood transfusion due to known potential hazards. Patients must be informed of their diagnosis, the nature, severity and prognosis of the disease, and treatment options along with risks and benefits. They should be involved in decision-making regarding their management. However, as part of this process, there are multifaceted medical, legal, ethical, and economic issues, encompassing shared decision-making, patient choice, and informed consent. Furthermore, variability in patient circumstances and preferences, the complexity of medical science, and the workings of health care systems in which consent takes place can be bewildering, not only for the patient but also for clinicians obtaining consent. Adding "patient" to the concept of blood management differentiates it from "donor" blood management to avoid confusion and the perception that PBM is a specific medical intervention. Personalized PBM is tailoring the PBM to the specific characteristics of each patient. With this approach, there should be no difficulty addressing the informed consent and ethical aspects of PBM. Patients can usually be reassured that there is nothing out of order with their blood, in which case the focus of PBM is to keep it that way. In some circumstances, a hematologist may be involved as a patient's blood advocate when abnormalities require expert involvement while the primary disease is being managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Isbister
- From the Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bronwyn L Pearse
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Departments of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Critical Care, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alana S Delaforce
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shannon L Farmer
- Discipline of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia.,Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weng M, Guo M, Li T, Zhou C, Sun C, Yue Y, Liao Q, Cai S, Lu X, Zhou D, Miao C. Anemia tolerance versus blood transfusion on long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective propensity-score-matched analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:940428. [PMID: 36046042 PMCID: PMC9421070 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.940428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Perioperative anemia and transfusion are intertwined with each other, and both have adverse impacts on the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. But the treatment of anemia still relies on transfusion in several countries, which leads us to question the effects of anemia tolerance and transfusion on the long-term outcomes of CRC patients. We investigated the combined effect of preoperative anemia and postoperative anemia and of preoperative anemia and blood transfusion, which imposes a greater risk to survival, to compare the effects of anemia tolerance and transfusion on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing CRC surgery. Methods A retrospective propensity-score-matched analysis included patients with CRC undergoing elective surgery between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. After propensity-score matching, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the prognostic factors for survivals. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, two novel models were built. Results Of the 8,121 patients with CRC, 1,975 (24.3%) and 6,146 (75.7%) patients presented with and without preoperative anemia, respectively. After matching, 1,690 patients remained in each group. In the preoperative anemia and postoperative anemia model, preoperative anemia and postoperative anemia was independent risk factor for OS (HR, 1.202; 95% CI, 1.043–1.385; P=0.011) and DFS (HR, 1.210; 95% CI, 1.050–1.395; P=0.008). In the preoperative anemia and transfusion model, preoperative anemia and transfused was the most dangerous independent prognostic factor for OS (HR, 1.791; 95% CI, 1.339–2.397; P<0.001) and DFS (HR, 1.857; 95% CI, 1.389–2.483; P<0.001). In patients with preoperative anemia, the OS and DFS of patients with transfusion were worse than those of patients without transfusion (P=0.026 in OS; P=0.037 in DFS). Conclusions Preoperative anemia and blood transfusion imposed a greater risk to OS and DFS in patients undergoing CRC surgery, indicating that the harm associated with blood transfusion was greater than that associated with postoperative anemia. These findings should encourage clinicians to be vigilant for the timely prevention and treatment of anemia, by appropriately promoting toleration of anemia and restricting the use of blood transfusion in patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meilin Weng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Miaomiao Guo
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Changming Zhou
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Caihong Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Yue
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingwu Liao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xihua Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China
- *Correspondence: Changhong Miao, ; Di Zhou, ; Xihua Lu,
| | - Di Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Changhong Miao, ; Di Zhou, ; Xihua Lu,
| | - Changhong Miao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Perioperative Stress and Protection, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Changhong Miao, ; Di Zhou, ; Xihua Lu,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scaling up Quality Improvement for Surgical Teams (QIST)—avoiding surgical site infection and anaemia at the time of surgery: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to introduce change in the NHS. Implement Sci 2022; 17:22. [PMID: 35279171 PMCID: PMC8917366 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01193-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to implement large-scale change in the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK, specifically for improving outcomes in patients undergoing primary, elective total hip or knee replacement. Methods We undertook a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the roll-out of two preoperative pathways: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) decolonisation (infection arm) and anaemia screening and treatment (anaemia arm). NHS Trusts are public sector organisations that provide healthcare within a geographical area. NHS Trusts (n = 41) in England providing primary, elective total hip and knee replacements, but that did not have a preoperative anaemia screening or MSSA decolonisation pathway in place, were randomised to one of the two parallel collaboratives. Collaboratives took place from May 2018 to November 2019. Twenty-seven Trusts completed the trial (11 anaemia, 16 infection). Outcome data were collected for procedures performed between November 2018 and November 2019. Co-primary outcomes were perioperative blood transfusion (within 7 days of surgery) and deep surgical site infection (SSI) caused by MSSA (within 90 days post-surgery) for the anaemia and infection trial arms, respectively. Secondary outcomes were deep and superficial SSIs (any organism), length of hospital stay, critical care admissions and unplanned readmissions. Process measures included the proportion of eligible patients receiving each preoperative initiative. Results There were 19,254 procedures from 27 NHS Trusts included in the results (6324 from 11 Trusts in the anaemia arm, 12,930 from 16 Trusts in the infection arm). There were no improvements observed for blood transfusion (anaemia arm 183 (2.9%); infection arm 302 (2.3%) transfusions; adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.52–2.75, p = 0.67) or MSSA deep SSI (anaemia arm 8 (0.13%); infection arm 18 (0.14%); adjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.42–2.46, p = 0.98). There were no significant improvements in any secondary outcome. This is despite process measures showing the preoperative pathways were implemented for 73.7% and 61.1% of eligible procedures in the infection and anaemia arms, respectively. Conclusions Quality improvement collaboratives did not result in improved patient outcomes in this trial; however, there was some evidence they may support successful implementation of new preoperative pathways in the NHS. Trial registration Prospectively registered on 15 February 2018, ISRCTN11085475 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01193-9.
Collapse
|
6
|
Southerland LT, Hunold KM, Van Fossen J, Caterino JM, Gulker P, Stephens JA, Bischof JJ, Farrell E, Carpenter CR, Mion LC. An implementation science approach to geriatric screening in an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:178-187. [PMID: 34580860 PMCID: PMC8742753 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Geriatric Emergency Department (ED) Guidelines recommend screening older adults during their ED visit for delirium, fall risk/safe mobility, and home safety needs. We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC) tool for preimplementation planning. METHODS The cross-sectional survey was conducted among ED nurses at an academic medical center. The survey was adapted from the CFIR Interview Guide Tool and consisted of 21 Likert scale questions based on four CFIR domains. Potential barriers identified by the survey were mapped to identify recommended implementation strategies using ERIC. RESULTS Forty-six of 160 potential participants (29%) responded. Intervention Characteristics: Nurses felt geriatric screening should be standard practice for all EDs (76.1% agreed some/very much) and that there was good evidence (67.4% agreed some/very much). Outer setting: The national and regional practices such as the existence of guidelines or similar practices in other hospitals were unknown to many (20.0%). Nurses did agree some/very much (64.4%) that the intervention was good for the hospital/health system. Inner Setting: 67.4% felt more staff or infrastructure and 63.0% felt more equipment were needed for the intervention. When asked to pick from a list of potential barriers, the most commonly chosen were motivational (I often do not remember (n = 27, 58.7%) and It is not a priority (n = 14, 30.4%)). The identified barriers were mapped using the ERIC tool to rate potential implementation strategies. Strategies to target culture change were identifying champions, improve adaptability, facilitate the nurses performing the intervention, and increase demand for the intervention. CONCLUSION CFIR domains and ERIC tools are applicable to an ED intervention for older adults. This preimplementation process could be replicated in other EDs considering implementing geriatric screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jenifer Van Fossen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH
| | | | - Peg Gulker
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH
| | - Julie A. Stephens
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jason J. Bischof
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH
| | - Erin Farrell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH
| | | | - Lorraine C. Mion
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Delaforce A, Duff J, Munday J, Farmer S, Miller K, Glover L, Corney C, Hurst C, Ansell G, Gutta N, Tuffaha H, Hardy J. A Theoretically Informed Approach to Support the Implementation of Pre-Operative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation, and Management Pathways: Protocol for a Type Two Hybrid-Effectiveness Study. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14:1037-1044. [PMID: 33986598 PMCID: PMC8110260 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s313309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Blood transfusions are a risk factor for increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Patient blood management guidelines provide guidance to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes. They outline steps to help prevent transfusions and considerations for when deciding to transfuse. One recommendation to prevent unnecessary transfusion is to optimize patients using Pre-operative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management Pathways (PAIDSEM-P). The uptake of these recommendations is highly variable, and an effective approach to implementing them in a tailored and context-specific manner remains elusive. Method and Design A mixed-methods, interventional study, using a type two-hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, will evaluate the impact of a change package to improve the uptake of PAIDSEM-P. The change package consists of the intervention (PAIDSEM-P) supported by theoretically informed implementation strategies. Pre- and post-implementation, retrospective health record reviews will determine the effect of the change package on provider outcomes, including compliance with guideline recommendations as measured by the proportion of patients who have the appropriate tests performed, and, if required, appropriate treatment and/or referrals. Patient outcomes will be measured by checking for any difference in the proportion of patients with anemia on the day of surgery and the proportion of patients who receive a blood transfusion during the peri-operative period. An economic evaluation will be conducted to compare health outcomes and costs. The feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of the PAIDSEM-P will be assessed using a quantitative, validated survey to measure implementation outcomes. Discussion Testing of implementation theory is required to advance understanding of what works, in what context, and the impact on implementation success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a theoretically informed change package on improving the uptake of PAIDSEM-P. If successful, it will also provide a framework for health care facilities to follow when addressing other evidence-practice gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alana Delaforce
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jed Duff
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Healthcare Transformation/School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| | - Judy Munday
- Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Centre for Healthcare Transformation/School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Sport Science, The University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Shannon Farmer
- Department of Haematology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School and Division of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Lynne Glover
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Cameron Hurst
- QIMR Berghoffer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Gareth Ansell
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine - Mater Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Naadir Gutta
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine - Mater Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Haitham Tuffaha
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Janet Hardy
- Mater Health Services, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Mater Research Institute-UQ, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|