Acetaminophen for analgesia following pyloromyotomy: does the route of administration make a difference?

National Intravenous Acetaminophen Use in Pediatric Inpatients From 2011–2016

OBJECTIVE

To 1) determine current intravenous (IV) acetaminophen use in pediatric inpatients; and 2) determine the association between opioid medication duration when used with or without IV acetaminophen.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of pediatric inpatients exposed to IV acetaminophen from January 2011 to June 2016, using the national database Health Facts.

RESULTS

Eighteen thousand one hundred ninety-seven (2.0%) of 893,293 pediatric inpatients received IV acetaminophen for a median of 14 doses per patient (IQR, 8–56). A greater proportion of IV acetaminophen patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (14.8% vs 5.1%, p < 0.0001), received positive pressure ventilation (2.0% vs 1.5%, p < 0.0001), had a higher hospital mortality rate (0.9% vs 0.3%, p < 0.0001), and were operative (35.5% vs 12.8%, p < 0.001) than those not receiving IV acetaminophen. The most common operations associated with IV acetaminophen use were musculoskeletal and digestive system operations. Prescription of IV acetaminophen increased over time, both in prescription rates and number of per patient doses. Of the 18,197 patients prescribed IV acetaminophen, 16,241 (89.2%) also were prescribed opioids during their hospitalization. A multivariate analysis revealed patients prescribed both IV acetaminophen and opioids had a 54.8% increase in opioid duration as compared with patients who received opioids alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to assess IV acetaminophen prescription practices for pediatric inpatients. Intravenous acetaminophen prescription was greater in the non-operative pediatric inpatient population than operative patients. Intravenous acetaminophen prescription was associated with an increase in opioid duration as compared with patients who received opioids alone, suggesting that it is commonly used to supplement opioids for pain relief.

Enhanced Recovery After Cleft Lip Repair: Protocol Development and Implementation in Outreach Settings

Introduction

Clefts of the lip are of the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies. The development and implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol among patients undergoing cleft lip repair may decrease postoperative complications, accelerate recovery, and result in earlier postoperative discharge.

Methods

A modified ERAS program was developed and applied through Global Smile Foundation outreach craniofacial programs. The main components of this protocol include: (1) preoperative patient education, (2) nutrition screening, (3) smoking cessation when applicable, (4) use of topical anesthetic adjuncts, (5) facial nerve blocks, (6) postoperative analgesia, (7) preferential use of short-acting narcotics, (8) antibiotic administration, (9) use of elbow restraints, (10) early postoperative oral feeding and hydration, and (11) discharge planning.

Results

Between April 2019 and March 2020, GSF operated on 126 patients with cleft lip from different age groups and 58.8% of them were less than 1 year of age. Three patients (2.4%) had delayed wound healing and one (0.8%) had postoperative bleeding. There were no cases of mortality, length of hospital stay did not exceed 1 postoperative day, and patients were able to tolerate fluids intake at discharge.

Conclusion

The implementation of an ERAS protocol among patients undergoing cleft lip repair has shown to be highly effective in minimizing postoperative discomfort while reducing opioids use, decreasing the length of stay in hospital, and leading to early oral feeding resumption. The ERAS principles described carry increased relevance in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and opioid crisis and can be safely applied in resource-constrained settings.

Association of Intravenous Acetaminophen Administration With the Duration of Intravenous Opioid Use Among Hospitalized Pediatric Patients

Importance

Adoption of multimodal pain regimens that incorporate nonopioid analgesic medications to reduce inpatient opioid administration can prevent serious opioid-related adverse effects in children, including tolerance, withdrawal, delirium, and respiratory depression. Intravenous (IV) acetaminophen is in widespread pediatric use; however, its effectiveness as an opioid-sparing agent has not been evaluated in general pediatric inpatients.

Objective

To determine if IV acetaminophen administered prior to IV opioids is associated with a reduction in the total duration of IV opioids administered compared with IV opioids administered without IV acetaminophen in general pediatric inpatients.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness research study included data on pediatric inpatients from 274 US hospitals between January 2011 and June 2016 collected from a national database. Outcomes were compared with a propensity score-matched analysis of pediatric inpatients administered IV opioids without IV acetaminophen (control) and those administered IV acetaminophen prior to IV opioids (intervention). Data were analyzed from January 2020 through October 2021.

Exposures

Patients in the intervention group received IV acetaminophen prior to IV opioids. Patients in the control group received IV opioids without IV acetaminophen.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Total duration of all IV opioids administered during a patient's hospitalization.

Results

Of 893 293 pediatric inpatients, a total of 104 579 were included in analysis (median [IQR] age, 1.3 [0-14.7] years; 59 806 [57.2%] female; 21 485 [21.5%] African American, 56 309 [53.8%] White), of whom 18 197 (2.0%) received IV acetaminophen, and 287 504 (34.0%) received IV opioids. After applying exclusion criteria, among patients who received IV acetaminophen, 1739 (10.8%) received IV acetaminophen prior to IV opioids within a median (IQR) treatment time of 1.5 (0.02-7.3) hours. After propensity score matching produced comparable groups in the control and intervention groups (with 839 patients in each group), the multivariable model estimated a 15.5% shorter duration of IV opioid use in the intervention group, with an absolute IV opioid reduction of 7.5 hours (95% CI, 0.7-15.8 hours).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this comparative effectiveness study, IV acetaminophen administered prior to IV opioids was associated with a reduction in IV opioid duration by 15.5%. Multimodal pain regimens that use IV acetaminophen prior to IV opioids could reduce IV opioid duration.

Variation in Intravenous Acetaminophen Use in Pediatric Hospitals: Priorities for Standardization

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to evaluate hospital variation in intravenous (IV) acetaminophen use across pediatric patient populations. The secondary objective was to identify populations with high use of IV acetaminophen and wide variation in practice to identify priority areas for cost reduction and practice standardization.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of children ≤18 years old hospitalized in 2019 in 48 US pediatric hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. Primary measures included IV acetaminophen use (percentage of encounters) and total days of therapy (DOT). A multivariable analysis identified clinical and demographic factors associated with IV acetaminophen use. High-priority groups for practice standardization were the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups in the top quartile of DOT, with wide variation of use across hospitals (interquartile range >50%).

RESULTS

Among 866 346 encounters, 14.4% received 1 dose of IV acetaminophen with 287 935 DOT, costing $29.8 million. In multivariable analysis age, payer, surgical procedure, ICU admission, total parenteral nutrition, and case mix index remained significantly associated with IV acetaminophen use. After multivariable adjustment, variation in hospital use ranged from <0.1% to 31% of all encounters. Twenty diagnosis groups accounted for 47% of total DOT (135 910 days) and 48% of cost ($14.2 million). Appendectomy, tonsil and adenoidectomy, and craniotomy were identified as top candidates for standardization efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed large variation in IV acetaminophen use across pediatric hospitals and within diagnosis groups. These diagnoses represent candidates for practice standardization.

Impact of a multimodal analgesic protocol modification on opioid consumption after cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Adequate pain control is a mainstay in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. ERAS protocols are widely accepted in colorectal and gynecologic surgeries and are increasingly implemented in the obstetric setting. Multimodal analgesia incorporating non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen is a mainstay of ERAS protocols for cesarean delivery, but little research has focused on the choice of NSAIDs or timing of initiation in women undergoing cesarean delivery. At our institution, patients undergoing cesarean delivery receive a standardized multimodal analgesic regimen consisting of neuraxial morphine with NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Our initial protocol involved starting the oral analgesics in the recovery room. There was variability in whether these medications were given in a timely manner or withheld in the setting of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We modified this protocol and performed a retrospective analysis to assess the impact of this change on postoperative opioid rescue requirements in women undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients who underwent cesarean deliveries from 1 July 2014 to 22 August 2017. With the initial analgesic protocol, patients received neuraxial morphine, followed by naproxen 500 mg PO Q12 hours and acetaminophen 650-975 mg PO Q6 hours initiated in the recovery room. After protocol revision in January 2016, the same neuraxial morphine dose was used in addition to acetaminophen 975 mg PR at the start of the case and ketorolac 15-30 mg IV at the end of the case. Postoperatively, patients received acetaminophen PO 975 mg Q6 hours, ketorolac IV 15 mg Q6 hours for 3 doses, transitioning to ibuprofen 600 mg Q6 hours. Fentanyl, oxycodone, and intravenous hydromorphone were given for breakthrough pain with both protocols. The primary outcome of the study is the need for rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes are total opioid usage, time to first rescue opioid, maximum reported pain scores, and need for rescue antiemetics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed controlling for variables significantly different between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

3250 patients were included in our analysis (1574 in the old protocol and 1676 in the new protocol). There was no significant difference in patient demographics or intraoperative characteristics between the two cohorts except for more primiparous women (25% vs. 17%), more Pfannenstiel incision (98% vs. 96%), and less repeat cesarean deliveries (40% vs. 44%) in the new protocol cohort. Need for rescue opioids was reduced with the new protocol at 2, 24, and 48 h [(36.46% vs. 75.73%, p < .0001), (74.28% vs 91.99%, p < .0001), (87.53% vs 95.49% p < .0001), respectively]. Among those who received opioids, opioid consumption over 48 h was reduced (median [IQR]: 55 [30, 95] vs. 40 [20, 70] mg oxycodone equivalents) after protocol revision (GMR 0.75, 95% CI 0.7, 0.80, p < .0001). The time to first rescue opioid medication was significantly longer in the new protocol compared to the old protocol (175 [79, 1057] min vs 51 [28, 104] min, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

There was a significant decrease in the need for and the dose of rescue opioid medications with the new protocol. This highlights the importance of optimizing the choice of agents, as well as route and timing of administration of the components of the postoperative multimodal analgesic regimen.

Guidelines for Opioid Prescribing in Children and Adolescents After Surgery: An Expert Panel Opinion

IMPORTANCE

Opioids are frequently prescribed to children and adolescents after surgery. Prescription opioid misuse is associated with high-risk behavior in youth. Evidence-based guidelines for opioid prescribing practices in children are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To assemble a multidisciplinary team of health care experts and leaders in opioid stewardship, review current literature regarding opioid use and risks unique to pediatric populations, and develop a broad framework for evidence-based opioid prescribing guidelines for children who require surgery.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Reviews of relevant literature were performed including all English-language articles published from January 1, 1988, to February 28, 2019, found via searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pediatric was defined as children younger than 18 years. Animal and experimental studies, case reports, review articles, and editorials were excluded. Selected articles were graded using tools from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011 levels of evidence. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was applied throughout guideline creation. Consensus was determined using a modified Delphi technique.

FINDINGS

Overall, 14 574 articles were screened for inclusion, with 217 unique articles included for qualitative synthesis. Twenty guideline statements were generated from a 2-day in-person meeting and subsequently reviewed, edited, and endorsed externally by pediatric surgical specialists, the American Pediatric Surgery Association Board of Governors, the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Surgery Executive Committee, and the American College of Surgeons Board of Regents. Review of the literature and guideline statements underscored 3 primary themes: (1) health care professionals caring for children who require surgery must recognize the risks of opioid misuse associated with prescription opioids, (2) nonopioid analgesic use should be optimized in the perioperative period, and (3) patient and family education regarding perioperative pain management and safe opioid use practices must occur both before and after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These are the first opioid-prescribing guidelines to address the unique needs of children who require surgery. Health care professionals caring for children and adolescents in the perioperative period should optimize pain management and minimize risks associated with opioid use by engaging patients and families in opioid stewardship efforts.

Using Quality Improvement to Reduce IV Acetaminophen Use in a PICU

OBJECTIVES

Improve medication-related variable ICU costs by increasing value related to a locally identified high-frequency/high-cost medication, IV acetaminophen.

DESIGN

Structured quality improvement initiative using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement.

SETTING

Twenty-three-bed tertiary PICU.

PATIENTS

All patients admitted to the PICU receiving IV acetaminophen during the study period of 2015-2018.

INTERVENTIONS

PICU staff survey, education to close nurse/provider knowledge gap, optimization of order sets and electronic health record order entry, improving oral/enteral medication transition, and optimization of pharmacy dispensing.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary outcome of interest was IV acetaminophen doses per patient day reported as a 12-month rolling average. Baseline IV acetaminophen prescribing prior to the study period was initially 0.55 doses per patient day, and in 2014, there were 3,042 doses administered. IV acetaminophen is $43 per dose. The rolling 12-month average post intervention was 0.33 doses per patient day. Enteral and rectal doses increased from 0.42 to 0.58 doses per patient day. Opioid utilization varied throughout the study. A 40% reduction in IV acetaminophen equated to a $35,507 cost savings in a single year.

CONCLUSIONS

IV acetaminophen is prescribed with high frequency and impacts variable PICU costs. Value can be improved by optimizing IV acetaminophen prescribing.

The Association Between Opioid Use and Outcomes in Infants Undergoing Pyloromyotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency and variation of opioid use across hospitals in infants undergoing pyloromyotomy and to determine the impact of opioid use on postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study (2005-2015) was conducted by using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database, including infants (aged <6 months) with pyloric stenosis who underwent pyloromyotomy. Infants with significant comorbidities were excluded. Opioid use was classified as a patient receiving at least 1 opioid medication during his or her hospital stay and categorized as preoperative, day of surgery, or postoperative (≥1 day after surgery). Outcomes included prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS; ≥3 days) and readmission within 30 days.

FINDINGS

Overall, 25,724 infants who underwent pyloromyotomy were analyzed. Opioids were administered to 6865 (26.7%) infants, with 1385 (5.4%) receiving opioids postoperatively. In 2015, there was significant variation in frequency of opioid use by hospital, with 0%-81% of infants within an individual hospital receiving opioids (P < 0.001). Infants only receiving opioids on the day of surgery exhibited decreased odds of prolonged hospital LOS (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92). Infants who received an opioid on both the day of surgery and postoperatively exhibited increased odds of a prolonged hospital LOS (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.33-2.20). Thirty-day readmission was not associated with opioid use (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.14).

IMPLICATIONS

There is national variability in opioid use for infants undergoing pyloromyotomy, and postoperative opioid use is associated with prolonged hospital stay. Nonopioid analgesic protocols may warrant future investigation.

A Preliminary Examination of the Comparative Efficacy of Intravenous vs Oral Acetaminophen in the Treatment of Perioperative Pain

Objective

The management of postoperative pain is a major health care issue. While the cost of intravenous acetaminophen (IVA) is significantly greater than its oral acetaminophen (OA) counterpart, less is known regarding comparative effectiveness of these routes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether perioperative IVA is equivalent in reducing postoperative pain compared with perioperative OA for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LapChole).

Design

Double-blinded, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Setting

Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

Subjects

Adults (age > 18 years) active duty military, veterans, and beneficiaries receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

This study was conducted at Womack Army Medical Center (WAMC), Fort Bragg, North Carolina, between January 2013 and June 2015. Sixty-seven subjects with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomly assigned to receive two doses (1,000 mg each) of either IVA or OA. A numerical rating scale (NRS) score of pain was obtained preoperatively and every six hours for 24 hours postoperation. The primary objective was to assess whether treatment groups had significantly different 24-hour postoperative sum of pain intensity differences (SPID24) using an analysis of covariance test.

Results

Sixty subjects completed the study and were included in the analysis. Treatment groups did not differ in SPID24, even when controlling for age, gender, and preoperative pain levels (F(1,55) = 0.39, P = 0.54, partial η2 = 0.007), nor did 24-hour opioid consumption when controlling for age, gender, and operation time (F(1, 46) = 0.47, P = 0.50, partial η2 = 0.01). Furthermore, treatment groups were equally as likely to report average postoperative NRS scores of 4 or higher (β = 0.24, Exp(B) = 1.28, P = 0.68).

Conclusions

The results show no evidence of differences between IVA or OA in pain or opioid consumption among a sample of patients undergoing LapChole. Due to low sample size, these descriptive findings warrant larger studies, which may have a significant economic impact.

Postoperative pain management in children: Guidance from the pain committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative)

The main remit of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA) Pain Committee is to improve the quality of pain management in children. The ESPA Pain Management Ladder is a clinical practice advisory based upon expert consensus to help to ensure a basic standard of perioperative pain management for all children. Further steps are suggested to improve pain management once a basic standard has been achieved. The guidance is grouped by the type of surgical procedure and layered to suggest basic, intermediate, and advanced pain management methods. The committee members are aware that there are marked differences in financial and personal resources in different institutions and countries and also considerable variations in the availability of analgesic drugs across Europe. We recommend that the guidance should be used as a framework to guide best practice.

Perioperative Intravenous Acetaminophen in Pediatric Tonsillectomies

Purpose: This study investigated the effect of perioperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen on opioid requirements in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy at a single center. Methods: This retrospective chart review included patients who were less than 18 years old and underwent an outpatient tonsillectomy procedure. Patients who received non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dosing of IV acetaminophen, without documented weights, and on chronic pain medications at the time of the procedure were excluded. The primary outcome was opioid requirements postoperatively prior to discharge measured as morphine equivalents per kilogram. Descriptive statistics were used to compare differences between groups. A multivariate analysis was performed, accounting for differences between groups in baseline and procedural characteristics. Results: In total, 157 patients were included in this study, of whom 55 had received IV acetaminophen and 102 had not. The average IV acetaminophen dose for was 14.5 mg/kg for patients weighing less than 50 kg (n = 22); the remaining patients received the maximum 1 g dose. Patients who received IV acetaminophen were less likely to be administered postoperative opiates as compared with those did not (45.5% vs 63.7%, odds ratio = 0.48, P = .036). There was a trend toward a decrease in total amount of opiates administered with IV acetaminophen (0 vs 0.033 µg/kg, P = .61). After adjusting for age and documented pain assessment, IV acetaminophen administration remained a significant factor for postoperative opiate administration. Conclusions: Perioperative administration of IV acetaminophen was associated with less frequent administration of symptom-directed opiates in pediatric tonsillectomies. This finding indicates that the agent may have an opioid-sparing effect in this patient population.

An update on pain management for elderly patients undergoing ambulatory surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the drugs and techniques used for multimodal postoperative pain management in the older population undergoing surgery in the ambulatory setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Interest has grown in the possibility of adding adjuncts to a single shot nerve block in order to prolong the local anesthetic effect. The rapid and short-acting local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia are potentially beneficial for day-case surgery in the older population because of shorter duration of the motor block, faster recovery, and less transient neurologic symptoms. Another recent advance is the introduction of intravenous acetaminophen, which can rapidly achieve rapid peak plasma concentration (<15 min) following infusion and analgesic effect in ∼5 min with a duration of action up to 4 h.

SUMMARY

The nonopioid analgesic therapies will likely assume an increasingly important role in facilitating the recovery process and improving the satisfaction for elderly ambulatory surgery patients. Strategies to avoid the use of opioids and minimize opioid-related side-effects is an important advance as we expand on the use of ambulatory surgery for the aging population.