Antinociceptive tolerance to NSAIDs in the agranular insular cortex is mediated by opioid mechanism

Predicting the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in migraine using deep learning and three-dimensional T1-weighted images

Deep learning (DL) models based on individual images could contribute to tailored therapies and personalized treatment strategies. We aimed to construct a DL model using individual 3D structural images for predicting the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in migraine. A 3D convolutional neural network model was constructed, with ResNet18 as the classification backbone, to link structural images to predict the efficacy of NSAIDs. In total, 111 patients were included and allocated to the training and testing sets in a 4:1 ratio. The prediction accuracies of the ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNeXt50, DenseNet121, and 3D ResNet18 models were 0.65, 0.74, 0.65, 0.70, and 0.78, respectively. This model, based on individual 3D structural images, demonstrated better predictive performance in comparison to conventional models. Our study highlights the feasibility of the DL algorithm based on brain structural images and suggests that it can be applied to predict the efficacy of NSAIDs in migraine treatment.

Agmatine Administration Effects on Equine Gastric Ulceration and Lameness

Osteoarthritis (OA) accounts for up to 60% of equine lameness. Agmatine, a decarboxylated arginine, may be a viable option for OA management, based on reports of its analgesic properties. Six adult thoroughbred horses, with lameness attributable to thoracic limb OA, received either daily oral phenylbutazone (6.6 mg/kg), agmatine sulfate (25 mg/kg) or a control for 30 days, with 21-day washout periods between treatments. Subjective lameness, thoracic limb ground reaction forces (GRF), plasma agmatine and agmatine metabolite levels were evaluated using an established rubric, a force platform, and mass spectrometry, respectively, before, during and after each treatment period. Gastric ulceration and plasma chemistries were evaluated before and after treatments. Braking GRFs were greater after 14 and 29 days of agmatine compared to phenylbutazone administration. After 14 days of phenylbutazone administration, vertical GRFs were greater than for agmatine or the control. Glandular mucosal ulcer scores were lower after agmatine than phenylbutazone administration. Agmatine plasma levels peaked between 30 and 60 min and were largely undetectable by 24 h after oral administration. In contrast, plasma citric acid levels increased throughout agmatine administration, representing a shift in the metabolomic profile. Agmatine may be a viable option to improve thoracic limb GRFs while reducing the risk of glandular gastric ulceration in horses with OA.

Cortical Modulation of Nociception

Nociception is the neuronal process of encoding noxious stimuli and could be modulated at peripheral, spinal, brainstem, and cortical levels. At cortical levels, several areas including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), prefrontal cortex (PFC), ventrolateral orbital cortex (VLO), insular cortex (IC), motor cortex (MC), and somatosensory cortices are involved in nociception modulation through two main mechanisms: (i) a descending modulatory effect at spinal level by direct corticospinal projections or mostly by activation of brainstem structures (i.e. periaqueductal grey matter (PAG), locus coeruleus (LC), the nucleus of raphe (RM) and rostroventral medulla (RVM)); and by (ii) cortico-cortical or cortico-subcortical interactions. This review summarizes evidence related to the participation of the aforementioned cortical areas in nociception modulation and different neurotransmitters or neuromodulators that have been studied in each area. Besides, we point out the importance of considering intracortical neuronal populations and receptors expression, as well as, nociception-induced cortical changes, both functional and connectional, to better understand this modulatory effect. Finally, we discuss the possible mechanisms that could potentiate the use of cortical stimulation as a promising procedure in pain alleviation.

Endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems contribute to antinociception produced by administration of NSAIDs into the insular cortex of rats

Pain sensation is characterized as a complex experience, dependent on sensory processes as well as the activation of limbic brain areas involved in emotion, among them anterior insula. This cortical area is involved in the perception and response to painful stimuli. We investigated if this area contributes to antinociception produced by NSAIDs, and underlying mechanisms. We found that administration of NSAIDs into the anterior insular cortex in rats reduced mechanical and heat hyperalgesia produced by intraplantar injection of formalin, and this was attenuated by pre- or post-treatment with the opioid receptor antagonists, naloxone and CTOP, and the cannabinoid receptor (CB1) antagonist AM-251. These data support the concept that NSAID-evoked antinociception is mediated via descending endogenous opioid and cannabinoid systems inhibiting spinal paw withdrawal reflexes in rodents.

Brain-Wide Mapping of Afferent Inputs to Accumbens Nucleus Core Subdomains and Accumbens Nucleus Subnuclei

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is the ventral part of the striatum and the interface between cognition, emotion, and action. It is composed of three major subnuclei: i.e., NAc core (NAcC), lateral shell (NAcLS), and medial shell (NAcMS), which exhibit functional heterogeneity. Thus, determining the synaptic inputs of the subregions of the NAc is important for understanding the circuit mechanisms involved in regulating different functions. Here, we simultaneously labeled subregions of the NAc with cholera toxin subunit B conjugated with multicolor Alexa Fluor, then imaged serial sections of the whole brain with a fully automated slide scanning system. Using the interactive WholeBrain framework, we characterized brain-wide inputs to the NAcC subdomains, including the rostral, caudal, dorsal, and ventral subdomains (i.e., rNAcC, cNAcC, dNAcC, and vNAcC, respectively) and the NAc subnuclei. We found diverse brain regions, distributed from the cerebrum to brain stem, projecting to the NAc. Of the 57 brain regions projecting to the NAcC, the anterior olfactory nucleus (AON) exhibited the greatest inputs. The input neurons of rNAcC and cNAcC are two distinct populations but share similar distribution over the same upstream brain regions, whereas the input neurons of dNAcC and vNAcC exhibit slightly different distributions over the same upstream regions. Of the 55 brain regions projecting to the NAcLS, the piriform area contributed most of the inputs. Of the 72 brain regions projecting to the NAcMS, the lateral septal nucleus contributed most of the inputs. The input neurons of NAcC and NAcLS share similar distributions, whereas the NAcMS exhibited brain-wide distinct distribution. Thus, the NAcC subdomains appeared to share the same upstream brain regions, although with distinct input neuron populations and slight differences in the input proportions, whereas the NAcMS subnuclei received distinct inputs from multiple upstream brain regions. These results lay an anatomical foundation for understanding the different functions of NAcC subdomains and NAc subnuclei.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Medial prefrontal cortex diclofenac-induced antinociception is mediated through GPR55, cannabinoid CB1, and mu-opioid receptors of this area and periaqueductal gray

Supraspinal mechanisms of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced antinociception are not well understood. In the present study, the possible antinociceptive mechanisms induced by intra-medial prefrontal cortex (intra-mPFC) microinjection of diclofenac were investigated after blockade of GPR55, cannabinoid CB1, and mu-opioid receptors in this area and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG). For drug delivery, unilateral (left side) of mPFC and bilateral (right and left sides) of vlPAG were surgically cannulated. Formalin test was induced by subcutaneous injection of a diluted formalin solution into the right vibrissa pad. A typical biphasic (neurogenic and inflammatory phases) pain behavior was produced following formalin injection. Microinjection of diclofenac (2.5, 5, and 10 μg/0.25 μL) into the mPFC suppressed both phases of pain. Intra-mPFC microinjection of naloxonazine (a mu-opioid receptor antagonist, 1 μg/0.25 μL) and AM251 (a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, 1 μg/0.25 μL) increased both phases of pain intensity. In addition, intra-mPFC-microinjected diclofenac-induced antinociception was inhibited by prior intra-mPFC and intra-vlPAG administration of naloxonazine and AM251. On the other hand, intra-mPFC and intra-vlPAG microinjection of AM251 (0.25 μg/0.25 μL) decreased pain severity which was inhibited by prior administration of ML193. The above-mentioned drugs did not alter locomotor activity. In conclusion, diclofenac suppressed both the neurogenic and inflammatory phases of formalin-induced orofacial pain at the level of mPFC. GPR55, cannabinoid CB1, and mu-opioid receptors of the mPFC and vlPAG might be involved in the mPFC analgesic effects of diclofenac.