An innovative technique for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures - vertebral osteotome with side-opening cannula

Clinical outcomes with second injection after insufficient bone cement distribution in unilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compressive fracture: a cohort retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Bone cement distribution is an important factor affecting pain relief and long-term prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) treated with vertebral augmentation. Unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is the most common procedure, and insufficient bone cement distribution is more common than bilateral PKP. However, effective remedies are remain lack. In this study, sufficient cement distribution was achieved by adjusting the working channel followed by second cement injection as a remedy in cases with insufficient cement distribution, and the purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes by a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

From July 1, 2017 to July 31, 2020, OVCF patients treated with unilateral PKP were included in this retrospective cohort study. According to the bone cement distribution (insufficient cement distribution was confirmed when the cement did not exceed the mid line of the vertebral body in frontal film or/and the cement did not contact the upper/lower vertebral endplates in the lateral film.) and whether second injection was performed during surgery, the patients were divided into three groups. Insufficient group: patients with insufficient cement distribution confirmed by fluoroscopy or postoperative x-ray. Second injection group: patients with insufficient cement distribution was found during the procedure, and second injection was performed to improve the cement distribution.

CONTROL GROUP

patients with sufficient cement distribution in one injection. The Primary outcome was cemented vertebrae re-collapse rate. The secondary outcomes included operative time, radiation exposure, cement leakage rate, VAS, ODI, and adjacent vertebral fracture rate.

RESULTS

There are 34 cases in insufficient group, 45 cases in second injection group, and 241 cases in control group. There was no significant difference in baseline data and follow-up time among the three groups.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

The injured vertebrae re-collapse rate of insufficient group was significantly higher than that of second injection group (42.22% vs 20.59%, P = 0.000) and control group (42.22% vs. 18.26%, P = 0.000). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the survival time between second injection group and control group (P = 0.741, Log-rank test), both of which were significant less than that in insufficient group (P = 0.032 and 0.000, respectively).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

There was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI after operation between second injection group and control group, both of which were superior to those in insufficient group (P = 0.000). At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in VAS and ODI among the three groups (P > 0.05). The operation time of second injection group was significantly higher than that of insufficient group (53.41 ± 8.85 vs 44.18 ± 7.41, P = 0.000) and control group (53.41 ± 8.85 vs 44.28 ± 7.22, P = 0.000). The radiation exposure of the second injection group was significantly higher than that of insufficient group (40.09 ± 8.39 vs 30.38 ± 6.87, P = 0.000) and control group (40.09 ± 8.39 vs 31.31 ± 6.49, P = 0.000). The cement leakage rate of second injection group (20.59%) was comparable with that of insufficient group (24.44%) and control group (21.26%) (P = 0.877). The length of hospital stay of the second injection group (4.38 ± 1.72) was comparable with that of insufficient group (4.18 ± 1.60) and control group (4.52 ± 1.46) (P = 0.431).

CONCLUSIONS

When cement distribution is insufficient during unilateral PKP, second injection may relieve early pain, reduce the incidence of cemented vertebral re-collapse and adjacent vertebral fracture, without increasing the cement leakage rate, although this procedure may increase the operation time and radiation exposure.

Performance of Double-Arm Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA)-Guided and C-Arm-Guided Percutaneous Kyphoplasty (PKP) to Treat Senile Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Background

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common fracture in the elderly. Conservative treatment requires prolonged bedding, which may lead to serious complications. To explore optimized use of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of senile osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures, in this study, we used C-arm-guided and double-arm digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided PKP to treat OVCF in elderly patients and analyzed the effective recovery.

Material/Methods

In all, 60 patients who presented with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures at our hospital between July 2017 and February 2019 were analyzed. They were randomly divided into C-arm-guided group and the double-arm DSA-guided groups. Both groups were treated with percutaneous kyphoplasty.

Results

A pain VAS score analysis revealed that there was no significant difference between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). After surgery, the VAS scores showed a significant difference between the C-arm-guided group and the double-arm DSA-guided PKP treatment group (P<0.01). Moreover, with respect to the bone cement dosage, vertebral correction height, operation time, cumulative radiation dose, percolation rate, and volume of bone cement, the double-arm DSA-guided PKP treatment showed significantly better results than the C-arm-guided PKP treatment (P<0.01).

Conclusions

Our data revealed that double-arm DSA-guided PKP was more accurate in treatment of senile osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures, producing excellent performance with more accurate intraoperative evaluation, shorter operative time, lower incidence of bone cement leakage, less intraoperative radiation dose, and higher safety, and thus, could be extensively applied to clinical surgery.