Evaluation of postoperative analgesia in pediatric patients after hip surgery: lumbar plexus versus caudal epidural analgesia

Analgesic Effect of Caudal and Abdominal Nerve Blocks among Children Undergoing Inguinal Surgeries: An Original Research

Context

Pediatric inguinal surgeries sometimes cause considerable post-operative pain that requires effective analgesics. Caudal and abdominal nerve blocks may help this population with pain. It is uncertain how successful they are compared.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial included 70 pediatric inguinal surgery patients. An abdominal (ANB) or caudal nerve block (CNB) was randomly assigned to participants in addition to usual analgesic treatment. Post-operative pain was measured at various times using a standardized scale. The initial rescue analgesia time and dose were recorded. Statistics were used to compare CNB and ANB results.

Results

The CNB and ANB groups were demographically similar. At every time point, the two groups' analgesic usage and post-operative pain were similar. No serious adverse events occurred in either group.

Conclusion

CNB and ANB provide equivalent analgesia for pediatric inguinal surgeries. Both approaches alleviate pain well and have similar post-operative effects. Individual nerve block approaches must be chosen based on patient features and clinical considerations. More research is needed to determine each procedure's long-term safety and results.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block for paediatric hip surgery: A randomised, double-blinded study

Background and Aims

Postoperative pain after hip surgeries in children could be classified as severe, requiring combined intra- and postoperative opioid analgesia with regional blocks. This study was carried out to investigate ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block for pain management after paediatric hip surgery. The primary objective was to assess the time of the first request for morphine rescue analgesia.

Methods

In this randomised study, 56 children scheduled for elective unilateral hip surgery were distributed randomly to ESP and PENG groups. Intraoperative haemodynamics, fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain measurement, morphine consumption, time of first rescue analgesia, adverse effects and parents' satisfaction score were studied. The primary outcome was the time of the first request for morphine rescue analgesia. The Chi-square test, Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used, where applicable, to compare the groups.

Results

The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in Group ESP than in Group PENG (P < 0.001), with significantly higher postoperative morphine consumption in Group PENG than in Group ESP (P = 0.04). The pain scores of Group ESP were lower than those of Group PENG at 2 and 4 h postoperatively (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively). At 8 h postoperatively, the score was significantly higher in Group ESP than in Group PENG (P = 0.005). Other outcomes were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

ESP and PENG could be both effective for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in paediatric hip surgeries, but the ESP block prolonged the time of first rescue analgesia more than the PENG block.

Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative pain in pediatric orthopedic surgery with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) in postoperative analgesia following pediatric orthopedic surgery with the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible participants were children aged 3-15 years who were scheduled to undergo orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities under general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 58 children were randomly allocated into two groups: TEAS (n = 29) and sham-TEAS (n = 29). The ERAS protocol was used in both groups. In the TEAS group, the bilateral Hegu (LI4) and Neiguan (PC6) acupoints were stimulated starting from 10 min before anesthetic induction until the completion of surgery. In the sham-TEAS group, the electric stimulator was also connected to the participants; however, electrical stimulation was not applied.

MEASURES

The primary outcome was the severity of pain before leaving the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at postoperative 2 h, 24 h, and 48 h. Pain intensity was measured with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).

RESULTS

None of the participants had any TEAS-related adverse reactions. In comparison with the sham-TEAS group, FPS-R scores in the TEAS group were significantly decreased before leaving the PACU and at postoperative 2 h and 24 h (p < 0.05). The incidence of emergence agitation, intraoperative consumption of remifentanil, and time to extubation were significantly reduced in the TEAS group. Furthermore, the time to first press of the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) pump was significantly longer, the pressing times of the PCIA pump in 48 h after surgery was significantly decreased, and parental satisfaction was significantly improved (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TEAS may safely and effectively relieve postoperative pain and reduce the consumption of perioperative analgesia in children following orthopedic surgery with the ERAS protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200059577), registered on May 4, 2022.

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block versus caudal block for postoperative analgesia in pediatric hip and proximal femur surgery: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

According to previous research, 20% of infants experience prolonged postsurgical pain 6-12 months after major surgery, which is linked to functional impairment and a lower quality of life. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether the analgesic effect of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is superior to that of caudal epidural anesthesia (CEA) in pediatric patients undergoing hip or proximal femoral surgeries.

METHODS

Seventy-six children ranging in age from 1 to 7 years scheduled for hip or proximal femur surgery were randomly assigned to receive either a unilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB or CEA with bupivacaine 0.25% at a dose of 0.5 ml/kg. The primary outcome was the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale 2 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were pain scores every 15 min for the first hour and then at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; the block failure rate; time to perform a successful block; and time to first rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

The FLACC score 2 h post¬operatively was not superior in the ESPB group compared to the CEA group; indeed, it was significantly higher in the ESPB group at 15 and 30 min post-operation (P = 0.005, 0.004, respectively). Additionally, the time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged in the CEA group (P < 0.001). The time to perform a successful block was comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The analgesic effect of the ESPB was not superior to that of CEA in pediatric patients undergoing hip and proximal femur surgery.

Improved Pain and Perioperative Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy With the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block

PURPOSE

To compare early postoperative pain in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with versus without the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data was performed to identify patients who underwent hip arthroscopy at a single institution between May 2019 and October 2021. Patients were included if they received general anesthesia and were opioid naive. Patients who received the PENG block were compared with patients who did not. Opioid, benzodiazepine, and antiemetic medication administration was recorded both intraoperatively and for the duration of the patient's stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Opioids administered were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale. Time to discharge (in minutes) and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were identified for inclusion, of whom 28 received the PENG block and 25 did not. Opioid consumption was significantly lower in the PENG block group both intraoperatively (16.9 ± 14.1 MMEs vs 40.6 ± 18.3 MMEs, P < .001) and in the PACU (14.4 ± 11.4 MMEs vs 31.2 ± 20.1 MMEs, P < .001). The highest recorded PACU pain score was significantly greater in the no-PENG block group (7.0 ± 1.9 vs 5.3 ± 2.1, P = .004). Within the PENG block group, fewer patients required antiemetics (0 vs 4, P = .043). There was a greater time to discharge in the no-PENG block group (161 ± 50 minutes vs 129 ± 34 minutes, P = .008). No complications, including postoperative falls, were noted in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The PENG block improves perioperative outcomes by decreasing pain, opioid consumption, time to discharge, antiemetic requirements, and benzodiazepine requirements after hip arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Lumbar Plexus Nerve Blocks for Perioperative Pain Management in Cerebral Palsy Patients Undergoing Hip Reconstruction: More Effective Than General Anesthesia and Epidurals

BACKGROUND

Hip reconstruction in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) is associated with. significant postoperative pain. However, adequate analgesia can be difficult to achieve. in this population due to spasticity, communication barriers, and postoperative. spasticity. Recently, multimodal pain management techniques such as epidurals and. regional nerve blocks have been described for postoperative pain control, but it is unclear if 1 technique is more beneficial. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of different perioperative pain management techniques.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of children with CP over a 5-year period at a single pediatric tertiary-care hospital who underwent hip reconstruction (proximal femoral osteotomy with or without a pelvic osteotomy). Patients were subdivided based on their anesthetic protocol into the following groups: general anesthesia alone (G), general anesthesia with an epidural (E), and general anesthesia with lumbar plexus block (LPB). Our primary outcome was cumulative postoperative narcotic consumption (converted to morphine equivalents). Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), average postoperative heart rate, and pain scores. analysis of variance testing was utilized to compare differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients who underwent hip reconstruction were included: 19 in the G group, 18 in the E group, and 17 in the LPB group. LOS was significantly higher in the E group compared with the G and LPB groups: F(2,51)=3.58, P=0.04. The average pain score was significantly lower in the LPB group compared with the others: F(2,51)=4.26, P=0.02. The average postoperative heart rate was significantly lower in the LPB group: F(2,51)=7.08, P<0.01. Postoperative narcotic consumption was significantly lower in the LPB group: F(2,51)=11.57, P<0.01.

CONCLUSION

The LPB patients required the least amount of narcotics compared with the other groups. This, combined with a lower perioperative heart rate and shorter LOS would suggest these patients experienced less pain over the time of their in-patient stay. In comparison to general anesthesia alone and epidural anesthesia, lumbar plexus nerve blocks are an effective pathway for postoperative pain control after hip reconstruction in a CP population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-Case control or retrospective comparative study.

Erector spinae plane block in children: a narrative review

The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel technique used in both adult and pediatric patients. Its use in children has mostly been described in terms of perioperative pain management for various types of surgery. After its introduction, anesthesiologists began using ESPBs in various surgical settings. As adequate analgesia along with a low complication rate were reported, interest in this technique dramatically increased. Many studies in adults and children, including randomized controlled trials, have been published, resulting in the emergence of different clinical indications, with various technical and pharmacological approaches currently evident in the literature. This narrative review aims to analyze the current evidence in order to guide practitioners towards a more homogeneous approach to ESPBs in children, with a major focus on clinical applications. The ESPB is an efficient, safe, and relatively easy technique to administer. It can be applied in a wide range of surgeries, includes thoracic, abdominal, hip, and femur surgery. Its usefulness is evident in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and multimodal analgesia. Single-shot, intermittent bolus, and continuous infusion techniques have been described, and non-inferiority has been observed when compared with other locoregional techniques. Even though both the efficacy and safety of the procedure are widely accepted, current evidence is predominantly based on case reports, with very few well-designed observational studies. Consequently, the level of evidence is still poor, and more well-designed double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are needed to refine the procedure for different clinical applications in the pediatric population.

Comparison Between Ultrasound-guided Caudal Analgesia versus Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Lower Limb Surgeries in Pediatrics: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study

Background and Aim

Ultrasound (US) guided regional analgesia is a safe and effective method in providing perioperative analgesia in pediatrics with a high success rate rapid onset and fewer side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of US-guided caudal block versus US-guided peripheral nerve blocks (femoral and sciatic nerve blocks) in providing perioperative analgesia in pediatrics undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery.

Methods

Children aged 1–12 years scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgery during the period from January 2020 to December 2021 were randomly allocated into two groups. Group C where pediatrics received US-guided caudal block, while in group P, pediatrics received US-guided femoral and sciatic nerve blocks after the induction of general anesthesia (GA). The primary aim was to compare the postoperative pain (evaluated by the COMFORT pain score) between the two groups. Secondary aims were to compare perioperative opioids used parents’ satisfaction and occurrence of side effects.

Results

Pediatrics who underwent unilateral lower limb surgeries were allocated into two groups (group C and group P). There was no significant difference between patients’ baseline characteristics and the postoperative pain score at 2, 4, 16, and 20 h.’ However there was a statistical significance at 6, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively, frequency of analgesia as well as the total postoperative dose of opiates (nalbuphine). Time to first analgesic (nalbuphine) requirement was significantly less in group C with a mean of (9.6±2.9 h) than in group P with a mean of (15.1±3.5 h). Parents of children in group P were more satisfied than those in group C with no recorded complications for both techniques.

Conclusion

US-guided lower limb peripheral nerve block is a simple and safe method to provide adequate and more prolonged analgesia compared to US-guided caudal block for lower limb surgeries in pediatrics.

Analgesic efficacy of posterior and anterior psoas compartment block: Lumbar plexus versus three -in-one nerve block after lower limb orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia: A prospective cohort study

Introduction

Postoperative pain is the most common complaint in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery. Regarding with the severity of pain, orthopedic patients suffered more than non-orthopedic patients in the immediate post-operative period. Therefore, pain management is crucial for better patient outcome. Lumbar plexus (LB) and three -in-one (3IN1) nerve blocks have been routinely practiced as pain management techniques in the study area but the analgesic efficacy was not studied yet. Thus, this study was aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of the LBP versus 3IN1B as postoperative pain management after thigh orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia.

Method

An institutional-based prospective cohort study was conducted from October 10, 2020 to March 30, 2021 at the University comprehensive specialized hospital. Non-probability convenient sampling was used to select participants in both groups. The time to first analgesic request, severity of pain and total analgesia consumption within the first postoperative 24 h were measured.

Result

The mean and standard deviation to seek the first analgesia request time was 11. 55 ± 2. 82hr and 13. 35 ± 2. 58hr (p- 0.07) in patients who received LPB and 3IN1B respectively. Pain severity at rest and on movement was also comparable. The total tramadol consumption was 67. 65 ± 27. 20 mg and 70. 59 ± 37. 19 mg (p- 0.71), while total Diclofenac consumption was 63. 23 ± 45. 74 mg and 44. 88 ± 34. 72 mg (p-0.07) in LPB and 3IN1B groups respectively.

Conclusion

The study showed that there was no significant difference in the time to first analgesia request, postoperative pain, both at rest and movement and total analgesic consumption, between the LPB and 3IN1B.

•

Orthopedic patients suffered more than non-orthopedic patients in the immediate post-operative period.

•

Nerve blocks provide effective analgesic options.

•

There are controversies comparing the efficacy of lumbar plexus and three in one femoral nerve block.

•

Lumbar plexus and three in one nerve blocks have comparable time to seek 1st analgesia.

•

Lumbar plexus and three in one nerve blocks have comparable pain severity and comparable analgesic consumption.

Short Communication: Lumbar Plexus Block versus Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block to Provide Analgesia Following Hip and Femur Surgery in Pediatric-Aged Patients - An Analysis of a Case Series

Introduction

For surgical procedures involving the hip and femur, various regional anesthetic techniques may be used to provide analgesia. Although there has been an increase in the use of lumbar plexus block (LPB), the technique may be time consuming and associated with complications. Suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is a potentially easier and safer alternative. The current study prospectively compares LPB with suprainguinal FICB.

Methods

This prospective, double-blinded, randomized, study included patients undergoing elective orthopedic procedures of the hip and/or femur. All study patients received general anesthesia with randomization to either an LPB or suprainguinal FICB using 0.5% ropivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone. Postoperative pain control was achieved with intravenous hydromorphone delivered by patient-controlled analgesia with scheduled acetaminophen and ketorolac. Outcome data included time to perform the block, perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores (VAS) and hospital length of stay.

Results

The study cohort included 15 patients between the ages of 7 and 16 years (LPB N = 7, FICB N = 8). The median block time was 6 minutes (IQR: 4.11) for the LPB group and 3 minutes (IQR: 3.6) for the FICB group (p = 0.107). Median postoperative pain scores were 4 (IQR: 0.6) for the LPB group and 2 (IQR: 0.5) for the FICB group (p = 0.032). There were no differences in the intraoperative or postoperative opioid and NSAID use between the two groups.

Discussion

The suprainguinal FICB provides analgesia that is at least as effective as a LPB following hip and femur surgery. Time to perform the block was shorter with the FICB due to the supine patient position and limited needle trajectory. Although we noted no adverse effects, the superficial needle trajectory of the FICB offers a less invasive approach and the potential for decreased risks of adverse effects.

Postoperative analgesic effects of the quadratus lumborum block III and transversalis fascia plane block in paediatric patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip undergoing open reduction surgeries: a double-blinded randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of two novel regional nerve blocks in paediatric patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after open reduction surgeries.

DESIGN

Prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

2 tertiary teaching hospitals in China between August 2017 and July 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

110 paediatric patients aged 2-10 years with DDH undergoing open reduction surgeries were recruited, 95 were randomised and 90 were included in the final analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Random assignment to quadratus lumborum block III (QLB III) group, transversalis fascia plane block (TFPB) group and the control (no region nerve block) group.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) Scale Scores. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid consumption, the time until first press of nurse-controlled analgesia/patient-controlled analgesia (NCA/PCA) pump and the total counts number of pressing, length of postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, length of hospital stay, parental satisfaction with pain management and adverse events.

RESULTS

Mean FLACC Scores were significantly lower in QLB III group and TFPB group while in the PACU and for 48 hours postoperatively, compared with control group (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, respectively). No differences were found for FLACC Scores between QLB III group and TFPB group, neither at rest (p=0.0402) nor while posture changing (p=0.0306). TFPB prolonged the first-time request for NCA/PCA analgesia, and decreased the total number of pressing counts, compared with QLB III (22.5 (16.2 to 28.7) vs 11.7 (6.6 to 16.8), p<0.0001; 2.4 (1.3 to 3.6) vs 3.8 (2.8 to 4.8), p=0.0111, respectively). No patient experienced any adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggested that both ultrasound-guided QLB III and TFPB should be considered as an option for perioperative analgesia in children with DDH undergoing open reduction surgeries. TFPB was superior to the QLB III because it prolonged the first-time request for NCA/PCA analgesia and decreased the total counts number of pressing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03189966/2017.

Postoperative analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in congenital hip dislocation surgery : A randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Congenital hip dysplasia (CHD) defines a spectrum of pathologies in which the acetabulum and proximal femur of babies and children abnormally develop. Open surgery in congenital hip dysplasia leads to severe postoperative pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for congenital hip dysplasia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Following ethical board approval, 40 children aged between 1-5 years undergoing surgery for congenital hip dysplasia were randomized into two groups. Patients (n = 20) received ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block (group QLB) using 0.5 mL/kg body weight 0.25% bupivacaine preoperatively. The same standard postoperative analgesia protocol was used in both groups. Pain scores, parental satisfaction, requirement for ibuprofen and opioids were recorded. Pain was measured using the face, legs, activity, crying, consolability (FLACC) scale.

RESULTS

The FLACC scores were lower at 30min and 1h, 2h, 4h, 6h, 12h and 24h in the QLB group when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The requirement for rescue opioid analgesia was statistically significantly higher in the control group when compared to the QLB group (15/20 vs. 3/20, p < 0.001). Rate of ibuprofen usage in the ward was higher in the control group when compared to the QLB group (14/20 vs. 4/20, p = 0.004). Parental satisfaction was higher in the QLB group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block reduces pain scores and analgesic requirements following congenital hip dysplasia surgery.

Utilization of a Continuous Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block with an Opioid-Sparing Repair of a Femoral Neck Fracture in a Pediatric Patient

In the pediatric population, femoral neck fractures are usually associated with high-impact trauma and often present with pain in the groin area. Regional anesthesia can offer adjunctive therapy for acute pain management. Various techniques have been employed to circumvent pain related to hip fractures and resultant hip surgery. Neuraxial, lumbar plexus, caudal, epidural, fascia iliaca, and femoral continuous nerve block techniques are advantageous in mitigating hip pain. However, these approaches require patient repositioning during placement and carry the potential for motor blockade with resultant weakness. A newly described method, the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, allows for analgesia of the anterior hip capsule via the obturator, accessory obturator, and femoral nerves while sparing motor blockade. PENG blockade has demonstrated efficacy in both adult and pediatric patients. Herein, we describe the perioperative course of a 9-year-old girl with a transcervical femoral neck fracture who underwent an opioid-sparing open repair with the utilization of a continuous PENG block. PENG blockade via a continuous nerve block resulted in optimal analgesia and markedly reduced perioperative opioid consumption with preserved motor function. Our experience facilitated early discharge and rehabilitation mobility while reducing potential rebound hyperalgesia and enabling parental/patient satisfaction.