Transdermal Buprenorphine for Acute Pain in the Clinical Setting: A Narrative Review

Optimizing Safe Opioid Prescribing: A Paradigm Shift in Buprenorphine Management for Orthopaedic Surgery

The worsening opioid epidemic in the United States, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitates innovative approaches to pain management. Buprenorphine, a long-acting opioid, has gained popularity due to its safety profile and accessibility. Orthopaedic surgeons, encountering an increasing number of patients on buprenorphine, face challenges in perioperative management. This article will update orthopaedic surgeons on new developments in the understanding of buprenorphine as a pain reliever and share evidence-based practice guidelines for buprenorphine management. For patients on buprenorphine for opioid use disorder or chronic pain, the updated recommendation is to continue their home dose of buprenorphine through the perioperative period. The patient's buprenorphine prescriber should be contacted and notified of any impending surgery. The continuation of buprenorphine should be accompanied by a multimodal approach to analgesia, including a preoperative discussion about expectations of pain and pain control, regional anesthesia, standing acetaminophen, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when possible, gabapentinoids at night for patients under 65 years, cryotherapy, elevation, and early mobilization. Patients can also be prescribed short-acting, immediate-release opioids for breakthrough pain. Transdermal buprenorphine is emerging as an excellent option for the management of acute perioperative pain in both elective and nonelective orthopaedic patients. A single patch can provide a steady dose of pain medication for up to 1 week during the postoperative period. A patch delivery method can help combat patient nonadherence and ultimately provide better overall pain control. In the future, transdermal buprenorphine patches could be applied in virtually all fracture surgery, spinal surgery, total joint arthroplasty, ligament reconstructions with bony drilling, etc. As the stigma surrounding buprenorphine decreases, further opportunities for perioperative use may develop.

Multimodal postoperative analgesia with transdermal buprenorphine is a safe option in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs are associated with moderate-to-severe pain. Opioids are not the first line for postsurgical pain control due to their potential misuse and side effects. Transdermal buprenorphine represents an alternative for multimodal postoperative pain control.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective longitudinal exploratory study of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs managed with multimodal analgesia with transdermal buprenorphine. Patients were followed-up by telephone at eight time points, assessing pain levels, rescue analgesics requirement and side effects.

FINDINGS

Twenty-five patients with an average age of 63.4 ± 8.2 were included. Fourteen patients were ⩾65 years. Pain levels were similar among age groups at all time points, with no pain or mild pain (visual analogue scale 1-4) in most patients. The most frequent side effects were dizziness and somnolence.

CONCLUSION

Transdermal buprenorphine provided a sustained analgesic effect after an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair during the acute postsurgical period. It showed a similar safety profile among younger and older patients.

In-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of sustained-release buprenorphine using in-situ forming lipid-liquid crystal gels

AIMS

Sustained-release systems reduce the incidence of drug side effects and the need for frequent drug consumption, thus increasing patient compliance with treatment. In this study, we aimed to produce sustained-release buprenorphine (BP) using lipid-liquid crystal gels.

MAIN METHODS

The three experimental groups in this study included: group I: lipid-liquid crystal formulation 5 (F5) containing BP, group II: BP-free F5, group III: BP solution in NMP, and group IV: control (no treatment). The formulations were injected subcutaneously into the rabbits' back neck.

KEY FINDINGS

The results showed that the time required to reach the drug's maximum concentration (T_max) was longer in group I than in group III. The maximum BP concentration (C_max) and the constants of the drug removal rate and drug absorption rate (K_a) were significantly higher in group III compared to group I. The half-life (t_1/2) of the drug in blood circulation was significantly longer in group I than in group III. Histopathological analysis revealed no histological abnormalities in the skin and heart in group I (BP-containing F5); however, mild hyperemia was observed in interstitial vessels in group III (BP-containing NMP). The kidney and liver tissues showed normal structure in the control group, as well as groups I and II. However, in the group receiving BP-containing NMP, significant congestion, tissue damage, necrosis, and fibrosis were observed in the kidney and liver.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results showed that the lipid-liquid crystal system can be used to design slow-release platforms for BP, minimizing the side effects associated with the use of its conventional forms.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Buprenorphine

Pain management in palliative care (PC) is becoming more complex as patients survive longer with life-limiting illnesses and population-wide trends involving opioid misuse become more common in serious illness. Buprenorphine, a generally safe partial mu-opioid receptor agonist, has been shown to be effective for both pain management and opioid use disorder. It is critical that PC clinicians become comfortable with indications for its use, strategies for initiation while understanding risks and benefits. This article, written by a team of PC and addiction-trained specialists, including physicians, nurse practitioners, social workers, and a pharmacist, offers 10 tips to demystify buprenorphine use in serious illness.

Buprenorphine and its formulations: a comprehensive review

Buprenorphine, a novel long-acting analgesic, was developed with the intention of two purposes: analgesia and opioid use disorder. Regarding its pharmacodynamics, it is a partial agonist at mu receptors, an inverse agonist at kappa receptors, and an antagonist at delta receptors. For the purpose of analgesia, three formulations of buprenorphine were developed: IV/IM injectable formulation (Buprenex®), transdermal patch formulation (Butrans®), and buccal film formulation (Belbuca®). Related to opioid dependence, the formulations developed were subcutaneous extended release (Sublocade®), subdermal implant (Probuphine®), and sublingual tablets (Subutex®). Lastly, in order to avoid misuse of buprenorphine for opioid dependence, two combination formulations paired with naloxone were developed: film formulation (Suboxone®) and tablet formulation (Zubsolv®). In this review, we present details of each formulation along with their similarities and differences between each other and clinical considerations.

Effectiveness of Transdermal Buprenorphine for Pain Control in the ICU After Major Surgical Procedures

Transdermal buprenorphine (TBUP) may be useful for postoperative pain after major surgery, when pain is expected to be severe and sustained. The objective of this study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption in critically ill postoperative patients who were treated with TBUP or not during ICU admission.

Influences of Gender on Intravenous Nalbuphine Actions After Major Abdominal Surgery: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Nalbuphine, a synthetic kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist and a partial µ-opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist, has been used for years as an effective analgesic. It has been shown to have a better safety profile than morphine. Considering the long history of use of this drug, it is interesting that only a limited amount of information exists on how gender differences influence nalbuphine responses. In this randomized double-blind comparative trial after major abdominal surgery, the analgesic effects of two doses of continuous intravenous infusion of nalbuphine were evaluated based on gender.

METHODS

Enrolled patients were divided into four groups (two females and two males with 32 patients in each group). Two of them (groups A1 and A2), one male and one female, received postoperative continuous intravenous infusions of nalbuphine at 2 mg/h via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Each patient had the potential of receiving a rescue bolus of 1 mg of nalbuphine with a lock out time of 15 min. The other two groups (groups B1 and B2) received half the infusion dose, 1 mg/h, and half the nalbuphine rescue dose with the PCA pump, 0.5 mg maximum every 15 min as needed. Patients' vital signs, numerical pain rating scores, rescue nalbuphine, and incidence of side effects were assessed immediately after the operation, and every 3 h during the first 12 h.

RESULTS

Nalbuphine 2 mg/h dosing led to significantly lower pain scores amongst females compared to males at 6, 9, and 12 h; while the 1 mg/h infusion pain scores were only lower at the 9-h time period. Females receiving the nalbuphine 2 mg dose at 6 h, and the 1 mg dose at 6, 9, and 12-h measurements needed significantly lower doses of rescue nalbuphine. Females on the 1 mg dose experienced significantly more nausea, vomiting, and sedation at the 6-, 9-, and 12-h measurement times. In the multivariate analysis, female gender was a negative predictor at all measurement times.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports the hypothesis that although nalbuphine was found to be an effective and well-tolerated analgesic after major abdominal surgery, females were statistically more responsive than males.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the Pan African Clinical trials Registry PACTR201304000486309, and approved for the Ethical aspects.