Combined Percutaneous Kyphoplasty/Pediculoplasty by Posterolateral Transpedicular Approach for Painful Cervical Spine Metastases: A Single-Center Prospective Study

The role of minimally invasive surgery within a multidisciplinary approach for patients with metastatic spine disease over a decade: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Metastatic spine disease (MSD) occurs commonly in cancer patients causing pain, spinal instability, devastating neurological compromise, and decreased quality of life. Oncological patients are often medically complex and frail, precluding them form invasive procedures. To address this issue, minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) techniques are desirable. The aim of this study is to review published peer-reviewed literature and ongoing clinical trials to provide current state of the art.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, assessing MISS in MSD patients for the period 2013-2023. Innovations under development were assessed by querying and reviewing data from currently enrolling U.S. registered clinical trials.

RESULTS

From 3,696 articles, 50 studies on 3,196 patients focused on spinal oncology MISS. The most commonly reported techniques were vertebral augmentation (VA), percutaneous spinal instrumentation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Surgical instrumentation/stabilization techniques were reported in 10/50 articles for a total of 410 patients. The majority of studies focused on pain as a primary outcome measure, with 28/50 studies reporting a significant improvement in pain following intervention. In the United States, 13 therapeutic trials are currently recruiting MSD patients. Their main focus includes radiosurgery, VA and/or RFA, and laser interstitial thermal therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to their medical complexity and increased fragility, MSD patients may benefit from minimally invasive approaches. These strategies are effective at mitigating pain and preventing neurological deterioration, while providing other advantages including ease to start/resume systemic/radiotherapy treatment(s).

Kyphoplasty of C2 Pathological Fractures Using an Anterior Midline Approach and Steerable Osteotome: Technical Note and Case Series

BACKGROUND

Malignant lesions involving the C2 vertebral body (axis) may be challenging to treat, and not all patients with cancer are good candidates for posterior cervical or occipitocervical instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a modified technique of the direct anterolateral C2 kyphoplasty using a steerable osteotome, commonly used for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal lesions. We also report a case series of 11 patients treated with this technique at our institution.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a C2 kyphoplasty using the anterior midline approach from 2010 to 2020. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, pain severity (visual analog scale), Karnofsky performance status , perioperative complications, and postoperative spinal stability were assessed.

RESULTS

The main indication for a C2 kyphoplasty was refractory neck pain. All patients tolerated the procedure well. There were no intraoperative complications. One patient developed transient dysphagia. Visual analog scale scores were 9.00 ± 1.10 preoperative and 3.73 ± 1.85 at 2 weeks and 1.67 ± 1.66 at 3 months after the procedure and continued to stay low during the remainder of the follow-up (4-60 months). The Karnofsky performance status improved from 72.73 ± 11.04 preoperatively to 82.22 ± 8.33 at 2 weeks and 86.67 ± 5.00 at 3 months after the procedure. There was no evidence of new occurrence or progression of C2 fractures.

CONCLUSION

The anterior kyphoplasty using a steerable osteotome for tumors of the axis can result in lasting pain reduction and improved cervical stability while demonstrating a low complication rate.