Intraarticular STP Radiofrequency for Painful Osteoarthritis in the Knee: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

Minimally invasive interventional procedures for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

to summarize the evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive interventional procedures such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in patients with osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.

METHODS

a literature search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science databases. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI) were included. The results were organized according to the treated anatomical site: knee, hip, foot and ankle, shoulder, hand and wrist, sacroiliac joints. Data about treatment efficacy were extracted. The main outcome was change in pain intensity using the 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 1 month. Additional timepoints at 3, 6 and 12 months were assessed. Change in functional status was evaluated. Pooled estimates were calculated as the mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval relative to baseline. The meta-analyses of RCTs and NRSI were conducted separately.

RESULTS

of the 4599 retrieved articles, 164 were included in the review and, considering all the established timepoints, 111 (38 RCTs and 73 NRSI) were selected for the meta-analysis. Only one article described patients with inflammatory arthritis. In the meta-analysis of RCTs, one month after the procedure, MD in VAS was -3.98 (-4.41 to -3.55; k = 21) for knee RFA, and -3.18 (-3.96 to -2.39; k = 8) for sacroiliac joints RFA. In the meta-analysis of NRSI, MD in VAS was -4.12 (-4.63 to -3.61; k = 23) for knee RFA, -3.84 (-4.77 to -2.92; k = 7) for knee TAE, -4.34 (-4.96 to -3.71; k = 2) for hip RFA, -3.83 (-4.52 to -3.15; k = 3) for shoulder RFA and -4.93 (-5.58 to -4.28; k = 14) for sacroiliac joints RFA. Significant decrease in pain intensity was found also at 3, 6 and 12 months. Additionally, functional status improved at all the assessed timepoints.

CONCLUSION

minimally invasive interventional procedures can improve pain and functional status of patients affected by OA or chronic sacroiliac pain of degenerative origin. Further research is warranted in the field of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Pain sensitivity genes as therapeutic targets in knee osteoarthritis: A comprehensive analysis

Pain sensitivity is a significant factor in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), influencing patient outcomes and complicating treatment. Genetic differences, particularly in pain-sensing genes (PSRGs), are known to contribute to the variability in pain experiences among KOA patients. This study aims to systematically analyze PSRGs in KOA to better understand their role and potential as therapeutic targets. We utilized bulk RNA-seq data from the GSE114007 and GSE169077 datasets to identify differentially expressed genes, with 20 genes found to be significantly altered. Key PSRGs, including PENK, NGF, HOXD1, and TRPA1, were identified using LASSO, SVM, and random forest algorithms. Further, KEGG and GO enrichment analyses revealed pathways such as "Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction" and "ECM-receptor interaction," which were validated through external datasets. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis from GSE152805, GSE133449, and GSE104782 datasets demonstrated the heterogeneity and dynamic expression of PSRGs across different cell subpopulations in synovium, meniscus, and cartilage samples. UMAP and pseudotime analyses were used to visualize spatial distribution and developmental trajectories of these genes. The findings emphasize the critical roles of PSRGs in KOA, highlighting their potential as therapeutic targets and suggesting that integrating genetic information into clinical practice could significantly improve pain management and treatment strategies for KOA.

Interventional Pain Procedures: A Narrative Review Focusing on Safety and Complications. Part 1 Injections for Spinal Pain

In recent years, there has been a considerable increase in the number of image-guided interventional procedures performed for the management of acute and chronic pain. Concomitantly, there has also been an increase in the complication rate related to these procedures. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the primary complications associated with commonly performed image-guided (fluoroscopic- or ultrasound-guided) interventional procedures. We conclude that although complications from interventional pain procedures can be mitigated to a certain degree, they cannot be eliminated altogether. In order to avoid adverse events, patient safety should be given considerable attention and physicians should be constantly aware of the possibility of developing complications.

Critical Appraisal of Current Acute LBP Management and the Role of a Multimodal Analgesia: A Narrative Review

Acute low back pain (LBP) stands as a leading cause of activity limitation and work absenteeism, and its associated healthcare expenditures are expected to become substantial when acute LBP develops into a chronic and even refractory condition. Therefore, early intervention is crucial to prevent progression to chronic pain, for which the management is particularly challenging and the most effective pharmacological therapy is still controversial. Current guideline treatment recommendations vary and are mostly driven by expertise with opinion differing across different interventions. Thus, it is difficult to formulate evidence-based guidance when the relatively few randomized clinical trials have explored the diagnosis and management of LBP while employing different selection criteria, statistical analyses, and outcome measurements. This narrative review aims to provide a critical appraisal of current acute LBP management by discussing the unmet needs and areas of improvement from bench-to-bedside, and proposes multimodal analgesia as the way forward to attain an effective and prolonged pain relief and functional recovery in patients with acute LBP.

Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joint Pain Using a V-Shaped Active Tip Needle: An Observational Retrospective Study

Background

Lumbar zygapophyseal joint dysfunction represents one of the major sources of chronic low back pain. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a V-shaped active tip needle may offer a larger lesion of the medial branch nerves, improving clinical outcome. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of RFA using V-shaped active tip needles.

Methods

This is a single-center observational retrospective study. Clinical records were screened and analyzed if they met the following inclusion criteria: adult patients (>18 years), diagnosis of chronic lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain, failure of conservative treatments, ability to provide informed consent for data analysis and publication. Exclusion criteria: lumbar pain not related to zygapophyseal joints, previous spinal/lumbar surgery, incomplete data, absence or withdrawal of informed consent. The primary outcome of the study was a change in pain intensity at follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the evaluation of quality-of-life improvement, the occurrence of adverse events and the impact on post-procedural analgesic consumption. For these purposes, pre- and post-treatment numeric rating scale (NRS), neuropathic pain 4 questions (DN4), EuroQoL - EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, EQ-index and North American Spine Society (NASS) index were retrieved and analysed.

Results

Sixty-four patients were included. 7.8% of patients at 1-month (CI95% 0.026, 0.173), 37.5% at 3-month (CI95% 0.257, 0.505), 40.6% at 6-month (CI95% 0.285, 0.536) and 35.9% at 9-month (CI95% 0.243, 0.489) follow-up reported a reduction of more than 80% in NRS Statistical analysis indicated a significant change in NRS, DN4, EQ-index and EQ-5D-VAS (p-value <0.001) at the different time-points.

Conclusion

RFA using a V-shaped active tip needle might be a feasible and effective treatment for chronic lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain.

Interventional Therapies for Osteoarthritis: An Update

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common diseases worldwide and is expected to increase in incidence as the age of the general population rises. Both oral medications, such as NSAIDs, and surgical treatments used for OA management have limitations. Demand is rising for minimally invasive techniques such as intraarticular injections and percutaneous interventions for use in place of or in conjunction with oral medications and surgical therapies, and the past 2 decades have seen a rapid expanse in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic minimally invasive OA treatments. Image guidance with fluoroscopy, CT, or ultrasound is often used in conjunction with these procedures to achieve precise treatment localization to achieve maximal therapeutic effect. The choice of modality used for image guidance is often influenced by clinician experience, patient characteristics, and equipment availability. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, contraindications, complications, and efficacy of conventional and developing minimally invasive OA treatments. The minimally invasive treatment options described in this Review include therapeutic injections such as antiinflammatory agents, viscosupplements, and biologics, as well as nonpharmacologic treatments of subchondroplasty, nerve ablation, genicular artery embolization, intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency therapy, and MRI-guided focused ultrasound therapy.