A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Rehabilitation Using Digital Healthcare on Musculoskeletal Pain and Quality of Life

[Tele-rehabilitation in musculoskeletal pathology of the upper and lower limb]

Chronic musculoskeletal conditions cause pain and disability and have significant impact on morbidity worldwide. Tele-rehabilitation is proposed as an alternative or complement to improve patient's muscle function, pain, and quality of life. However, the satisfaction of both patients and professionals must be assessed, together with the patient's daily life activity independence. A search of the literature was made to locate assessment reports, systematic reviews and reports from regulatory bodies with support from a documentarian from the Andalusian Health Technologies Assessment Area (AETSA). For this purpose, the following sources were used: Medline, EMBASE, INAHTA (international network of health technologies assessment) and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) from 2014 onwards. Subsequently a secondary search was carried out on the articles selected in the initial search. A search of open clinical trials was also carried out in the database: www.ClinicalTrials.gov Initially 345 articles were identified. Duplicated articles (57) were excluded. By first analysing the title and abstract 238 articles were excluded. The full texts of the remaining 30 articles were analysed. Finally 18 articles were included.

Physiotherapists' experiences of implementation of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a focus group interview study

INTRODUCTION

The BetterBack model of care (MoC), a best practice physiotherapy MoC for low back pain (LBP), was implemented in Swedish primary care to improve management of patients with LBP and provide patients with support tools to better self-manage episodes of LBP.

PURPOSE

The objective was to describe how physiotherapists in primary care experienced the implementation of the BetterBack MoC for LBP.

METHODS

Focus group interviews were conducted with physiotherapists in 2018-2019, 14-18 months after the introduction of the BetterBack MoC. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

Five focus group interviews with 23 (15 female and 8 male) physiotherapists, age range 24-61 years were analyzed. A supportive organization and adaptation to the local culture, combined with health care professionals' attitudes and collaboration between physiotherapists emerged as important factors for a successful implementation and for long-term sustainability of the MoC. Physiotherapists had differing opinions if the implementation led to change in clinical practice. Improved confidence in how to manage patients with LBP was expressed by physiotherapists.

CONCLUSIONS

Several barriers and facilitators influence the implementation of a best practice physiotherapy MoC for LBP in primary care, which need to be considered in future implementation and sustainability processes.