1
|
Skalicky A, Bennett B, Raimbourg J, Lonardi S, Correll J, Lugowska I, Dixon M, Sargalo N, Martin ML. Patient experience of medication administration and development of a Patient Experience and Preference Questionnaire (PEPQ) for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1310546. [PMID: 38601466 PMCID: PMC11004258 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1310546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A better understanding of patient experience of intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) routes of administration is fundamental to providing optimal administration of medical therapies to oncology patients. The objective of this study was to examine patient experiences of IV and SC treatment with nivolumab and confirm the relevance of item concepts in the Patient Experience and Preference Questionnaire (PEPQ). The PEPQ is a clinical outcomes' assessment instrument developed to obtain patient-centric data and understand the experience with IV and SC treatment administration. Methods: Embedded qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants from three treatment cohorts with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), unresectable or advanced metastatic melanoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or colorectal cancer (CRC) from the CA209-8KX clinical trial. Concept elicitation interviews were conducted within 14 days of the initial treatment cycle and patient experiences with IV and SC treatment administration were assessed. Concepts from interviews were mapped to the PEPQ version 1.0 questions to assess relevance and convergence of concepts. Results: Interviews were conducted with 43 trial participants from clinical sites opting to participate from six countries (Argentina, France, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and New Zealand). The mean age of sub-study participants was 66 ± 11.3 years (range 24-80 years), and 67.4% (N = 29) were male. Sub-study participants with experience of SC most frequently reported symptoms or signs of injection-related redness (27.9%), itching (14.0%), and pain (of needle), and described the pain as pricking, stinging, or tingling (11.0% each). The amount of pain and time burden were widely endorsed as important factors for satisfaction and related to the route of medication administration. For 11 sub-study participants with experience with both IV and SC treatments, 10 (90.9%) preferred SC over IV treatment administration. Conclusion: This study summarizes the experience and satisfaction of receiving IV or SC treatment and confirms the relevance of the PEPQ in a subgroup of CA209-8KX clinical trial participants with metastatic NSCLC, RCC, melanoma, HCC, and CRC. Participant treatment experience and satisfaction with the route of medication mapped to the PEPQ question content support the relevance of PEPQ v2.0 in clinical trials as a self-report measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Judith Raimbourg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, St Herblain, France
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Iwona Lugowska
- Maria Sklodowska Curie National Cancer Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Matthew Dixon
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergqvist V, Holmgren J, Klintman D, Marsal J. Real-world data on switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:1389-1401. [PMID: 35470449 PMCID: PMC9322578 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Vedolizumab is a gut-selective treatment approved for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Recently, a subcutaneous formulation of vedolizumab was approved. The aims of this study were to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, patient experience and costs following a switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment. METHODS Patients were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance treatment and followed prospectively for 6 months and a subgroup for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change in faecal calprotectin levels. Furthermore, we evaluated clinical disease activity, remission rates, plasma CRP, drug persistence, adverse events, local injection reactions, serum drug concentrations, patient satisfaction, quality-of-life and treatment costs. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients were included (48 CD; 41 UC). Faecal calprotectin decreased significantly in CD but not in UC. Clinical indices, remission rates, plasma CRP levels and quality-of-life scores remained unchanged. Patients that had been on standard compared to optimised IV vedolizumab dosing displayed similar outcomes on standard SC dosing. Drug persistence at 6 and 12 months was 95.5% and 88.5%, respectively. Frequencies of adverse events were similar before and after the switch. No serious adverse events occurred. Transient severe local injection reactions were experienced by 1.2% of patients. Median vedolizumab trough levels were 2.3 times higher on subcutaneous compared to intravenous treatment. Patient satisfaction was generally high. Annualised treatment costs were reduced by 15% following the switch. CONCLUSIONS The switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab could be done with preserved therapeutic effectiveness, safety, high patient satisfaction and low discontinuation rate, at a reduced cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Bergqvist
- Department of GastroenterologySkane University HospitalLund/MalmöSweden,Section of MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Johanna Holmgren
- Department of GastroenterologySkane University HospitalLund/MalmöSweden,Section of MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Daniel Klintman
- Department of GastroenterologySkane University HospitalLund/MalmöSweden,Section of MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Jan Marsal
- Department of GastroenterologySkane University HospitalLund/MalmöSweden,Section of MedicineDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund UniversityLundSweden,Section of ImmunologyDepartment of Experimental Medical Science, Lund UniversityLundSweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
García-Moguel I, Rosado A, Gómez-Cardeñosa A, Gandolfo-Cano M, Robledo Echarren T, Moro Moro MDM, Reaño Martos MDM, Pineda-Pineda R, Valverde-Monge M, Martin-Arriscado Arroba C, Domínguez-Ortega J. Reliability, Satisfaction and Effectiveness of Benralizumab Home Self-Administration in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma in Real-World Practice: The Auto-Benra Study. J Asthma Allergy 2022; 15:623-632. [PMID: 35592384 PMCID: PMC9113658 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s358738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The increase in drugs available for severe uncontrolled asthma and the lifestyle of these patients make it necessary to implement self-administration programs of these therapies at home. Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL5R, was authorized in Spain for poorly controlled severe eosinophilic asthma. The possibility of administration at home was approved in March 2020 in Spain. The aim of the Auto-Benra study was to evaluate the usability and satisfaction of the benralizumab prefilled syringe and autoinjector and assessing the effectivity of these devices in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) in home-self administration. Methods This is a retrospective, observational multicenter study uncontrolled SEA patients treated with benralizumab at least with 3 doses self-administered at home before April 30, 2021. Reliability and satisfaction with benralizumab at home were evaluated with subcutaneous administration assessment questionnaire (SQAAQ) and visual analogic scales (VAS). Effectiveness was evaluated in all patients with asthma control test (ACT), Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), annual exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid treatment (OCS) and asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency visits. Results Fifty-four patients across 9 hospitals in Spain were included. The mean SQAAQ score was 6.89 (±0.16) points. Patients and their caregivers and doctors report excellent satisfaction by VAS, with no differences between benralizumab devices used (prefilled syringe and autoinjector). Severe exacerbation rate decreased by 65% (p = 0.0007) after benralizumab treatment. ACT score improved on average 6.27 ± 5.35 points (p < 0.0001) and the mean MiniAQLQ increased up to 1.58 ± 1.47 points (p < 0.0001). Twenty-four patients were OCS-dependent and at the end of study 14 patients get complete OCS withdrawal. Conclusion AUTO-BENRA study supports the use of benralizumab at home given the excellent results of satisfaction and usability by patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismael García-Moguel
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain
- Correspondence: Ismael García-Moguel, Tel +34 645852229, Email
| | - Ana Rosado
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aída Gómez-Cardeñosa
- Department of Allergy, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de investigación biomédica en enfermedades respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mar Gandolfo-Cano
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
- RETIC ARADyAL, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Teresa Robledo Echarren
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Clinico San Carlos (HCSC), Instituto de investigación sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdSSC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Marcela Valverde-Monge
- Department of Allergy, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
- Centro de investigación biomédica en enfermedades respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martin-Arriscado Arroba
- Research and Science Support Unit, Instituto de investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre I+12, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Domínguez-Ortega
- Department of Allergy, La Paz University Hospital, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lange J, Schneider A, Jordi C, Lau M, Disher T. Formative Study on the Wearability and Usability of a Large-Volume Patch Injector. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2021; 14:363-377. [PMID: 34815721 PMCID: PMC8605886 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s337670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The subcutaneous self-administration of biologics using a single large-volume bolus dose requires novel large-volume patch injectors. However, the usability and wearability of such on-body devices has rarely been investigated thus far. Therefore, this formative simulated use experiment studies the overall handling and acceptability in terms of the size and weight of a novel 10 mL large-volume patch injector device platform. Methods Twenty-three participants, including patients and healthcare professionals, simulated two injections with the large-volume patch injector, each lasting 17 min. During the injections, the patient participants performed predefined movements and activities with the on-body devices. Perceived usability and wearability were assessed through observation by the moderator and participant-reported feedback using five-point Likert scales and open-ended interviews. Results All participants successfully completed the simulated injections. Only non-serious usability issues were identified. Users rated the device acceptability in terms of wearability and usability with high ratings. Conclusion The results suggest the safe and effective usage of a novel prefilled large-volume patch injector that enables the subcutaneous delivery of a single bolus dose of up to 10 mL with an injection duration of 15 min. The participants of the simulated use study successfully used the device regardless of the disease state, age, or body size and habitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Lange
- Ypsomed Delivery Systems, Ypsomed AG, Burgdorf, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Michael Lau
- Insight Product Development, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patient Perspectives and Experiences of Preventive Treatments and Self-Injectable Devices for Migraine: A Focus Group Study. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 15:93-108. [PMID: 34131880 PMCID: PMC8739468 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00525-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several self-injectable preventive treatments for migraine have become available, they are not yet widely used. Thus, understanding patients' perceptions towards them is limited. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to inform the design of a preference-elicitation instrument, which is being developed to quantify preventive treatment preferences of people with migraine. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study involving nine in-person focus groups (three per country) in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. Participants were adults (n = 47) with episodic or chronic migraine who were currently using or had used a prescription preventive treatment for migraine within the previous 5 years. During the focus groups, participants described their experiences of migraine and preventive treatments; handled and simulated self-injection using five different unbranded, fired demonstration auto-injectors and prefilled syringes; and ranked different aspects of preventive treatments by importance. Focus groups were analyzed with a focus on themes that would be feasible or meaningful to include in a subsequent preference-elicitation instrument. RESULTS Reducing the frequency and severity of migraine attacks was consistently ranked as the most important aspect of preventive treatment. Participants expressed dissatisfaction with available daily oral preventive treatments for migraine they had previously used because they were ineffective or caused intolerable adverse events. Many participants were willing to self-inject a treatment that was effective and tolerable. When presented with devices for self-injecting a preventive treatment for migraine, participants generally preferred autoinjectors over prefilled syringes. Participants especially valued safety features such as the unlocking step and automated needle insertion, and audible and visual dose confirmation increased confidence in autoinjector use. Autoinjector needle protection mechanisms were also appreciated, especially by participants averse to needles, as the needles are not visible. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the fact that many people with migraine still lack access to a preventive treatment that is effective and tolerable. In addition to efficacy and safety considerations, treatment decisions may be guided by the mode of administration. In the case of self-injectable preventive treatments, key device characteristics affecting these decisions may be ease of use, comfort, and confidence in self-injection. Insights gained from this study were used to help develop a preliminary set of attributes and levels for a preference-elicitation instrument.
Collapse
|
6
|
Schneider A, Richard P, Mueller P, Jordi C, Yovanoff M, Lange J. User-Centric Approach to Specifying Technical Attributes of Drug Delivery Devices: Empirical Study of Autoinjector-Cap Removal Forces. Patient Prefer Adherence 2021; 15:159-168. [PMID: 33564226 PMCID: PMC7866940 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s298725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The subcutaneous delivery of biologics using pre-filled autoinjector devices continues to attract broad scholarly interests. However, research still lacks a detailed understanding of user perceptions as the basis for specifying the clinically relevant technical attributes of a device, such as the cap-removal force. Therefore, this article studies the ability of users to remove the autoinjector cap, as well as the effects of the cap-removal force and user characteristics on the perceived ease of decapping. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-two participants among patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals removed the protective cap using non-functional devices with different target cap-removal forces between 25 N and 55 N. Data were collected on the ability of the users to effectively decap the device and their perceived ease of decapping. Linear regression was then applied to quantify the impact of the decapping force and patient characteristics on the perceived ease of decapping. RESULTS The participants of the study effectively decapped all autoinjector devices irrespective of age, sex, and dexterity impairments. Moreover, the study reveals that the perceived ease of decapping decreases significantly with increasing decapping force and participants' dexterity impairments. CONCLUSION The study provides initial empirical evidence on the ability of users to decap autoinjector devices and shows how increasing the cap-removal force and dexterity impairments reduce the perceived ease of decapping.
Collapse
|
7
|
Stenger F, König A, Ochsendorf F, Kaufmann R, Pinter A. Correct performance of subcutaneous injections in plaque psoriasis: comparison of trained and untrained patients with different application systems in routine clinical care. J DERMATOL TREAT 2020; 32:898-906. [PMID: 32009495 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1720580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis can be treated very successfully with systemic therapies. Often the therapeutics must be injected subcutaneously. This prospective observational study aimed to compare the correct preparation and performance of subcutaneous injections in trained and untrained patients with plaque psoriasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS We asked 110 patients (29.1% women, 70.9% men, injection system: 75.5% prefilled syringe, 24.5% autoinjector) to what extent they were trained for self-injection. While participants injected a sham injection with their current system, we evaluated the preparation, execution, and follow-up using a newly developed scoring system. RESULTS 87.3% (n = 96) of the participants declared that they had been trained for self-injection. No statistically significant difference was observed between the trained and untrained participants in performing the injection correctly (p = .458). The most common mistakes were the wrong preparation and follow-up of the injection. A bifactorial rank-variance analysis showed a negative influence of the factor injection system (prefilled syringe) on the total score (p = .005). CONCLUSION We can indicate that patients with plaque psoriasis are well prepared for subcutaneous self-injection. Self-injection of systemic therapies is easy to perform, especially with patient-friendly systems, and does not require specialized training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Stenger
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Anke König
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Falk Ochsendorf
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Pinter
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fettner S, Mela C, Wildenhahn F, Tavanti M, Wells C, Douglass W, Mallalieu NL. Evidence of bioequivalence and positive patient user handling of a tocilizumab autoinjector. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2019; 16:551-561. [PMID: 31043095 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2019.1604678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab is approved for subcutaneous injection using a prefilled syringe (PFS). We report results from a bioequivalence study in healthy subjects and a user-handling study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using an autoinjector (AI) for tocilizumab. METHODS A randomized crossover study in healthy subjects (N = 161) examined the bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of tocilizumab after a single subcutaneous injection by AI versus PFS. A nonrandomized observational, real-life human factors study in RA patients (N = 54) assessed user (RA patients, caregivers, health care providers) ability to administer tocilizumab effectively by AI. RESULTS Bioequivalence criteria for tocilizumab AI versus PFS were met for key pharmacokinetic parameters. Safety was comparable between devices and consistent with the established tocilizumab profile. In the real-life human factors study, the proportion of users who successfully performed all essential tasks required to operate the AI to deliver the full dose was 92.3% at first assessment and 98.1% at second assessment, with no safety concerns. CONCLUSIONS Tocilizumab administration by AI was bioequivalent to administration by PFS. Intended users were successful in performing the tasks required to administer tocilizumab by AI. No new safety signals were observed in either study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02678988, NCT02682823.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stauffer VL, Sides R, Lanteri-Minet M, Kielbasa W, Jin Y, Selzler KJ, Tepper SJ. Comparison between prefilled syringe and autoinjector devices on patient-reported experiences and pharmacokinetics in galcanezumab studies. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:1785-1795. [PMID: 30271122 PMCID: PMC6147689 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s170636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to compare the usability and patient-rated experiences of an autoinjector with a prefilled syringe in patients with migraine, who self-administered galcanezumab, and to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between these devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patient-rated experiences with an investigational autoinjector and a prefilled syringe were compared in an open-label, 12-month study of once-monthly injections of galcanezumab 120 or 240 mg (NCT02614287). Patient-rated ease of usability was assessed with the Subcutaneous Administration Assessment Questionnaire (SQAAQ) and compared between devices. Positive responses on the SQAAQ were rated as "agree or strongly agree" to 12 statements. Tolerability was assessed by the frequency of injection-site-related adverse events (AEs) by device and injection location. In a separate study, galcanezumab pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects was compared between the devices (NCT02836613). RESULTS In the open-label clinical trial, 179 patients used both the prefilled syringe and autoinjector at least once. The majority of patients (91%-97%) had positive responses on the SQAAQ to the use of autoinjector across the items assessed. There were 23 injection-site-related AEs with the first self-administered injection with the prefilled syringe (N=7) or autoinjector (N=16; P=0.061), with the most common AE for either device being injection-site pain. There were no significant between-device differences in injection-site-related AEs. For pharmacokinetics, the 90% CI for the ratio (autoinjector/prefilled syringe) of geometric least-square means for the galcanezumab area under the curve (AUC) concentration and maximum concentration (Cmax) was between 0.8 and 1.25, indicating no statistically significant difference in the galcanezumab concentrations regardless of the device used. CONCLUSION The ease of usability with either device was comparable, and there were no significant differences in tolerability between the prefilled syringe and autoinjector with the first self-administration; however, the analysis was not powered to detect a clinically significant difference. Galcanezumab pharmacokinetics were comparable between devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan Sides
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA,
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- Pain Department, CHU Nice, Nice, France
- Université Cote d'Azur, FHU InovPain, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - William Kielbasa
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA,
| | - Yan Jin
- Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Travanty MN, Calawa B, Shalaby WS, Jozwiakowski MJ, Haraldsen KB. Development and usability of a new subcutaneous auto-injector device to administer hydroxyprogesterone caproate to reduce the risk of recurrent preterm birth. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2018; 11:241-252. [PMID: 30100767 PMCID: PMC6064158 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s157114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current administration of hydroxyprogesterone caproate (HPC) by intramuscular injection is associated with limitations, including the potential for human error and contamination, patient anxiety, and increased risk of needlestick injury. Objective To describe the design of an auto-injector for subcutaneous (SC) administration of HPC and the results of studies that evaluated the target user's understanding of the proper use of this device. Materials and methods A single-use, prefilled, fixed-dose, disposable auto-injector intended for the SC administration of HPC was developed, and its usability by health care providers was evaluated in 3 formative (N=32, 64 injections) and 3 validation studies (N=45, 90 injections). These studies consisted of one-on-one testing sessions performed in a simulated home environment. Analyses were based on observed use error or use difficulty during the performance of specific tasks, including those considered critical (associated with high severity harms). Results In the formative studies, the majority of participants correctly administered an injection with the auto-injector, but prior training improved performance. Specific errors were noted, including holding the device at the injection site for a period inconsistent with its instructions for use (IFU). The IFU was modified to reduce potential occurrence of these errors. Use errors were subsequently observed on critical tasks in the first and second validation studies, including hold-time errors that were attributed to using visual cues rather than counting seconds. For the third validation study, the IFU was modified to focus on visual cues and all users were able to successfully perform the injection per the IFU. Conclusion An auto-injector device for SC administration of HPC for reduction in risk of recurrent preterm birth was successfully developed through iterative design and validation testing. The device design provides high usability and acceptance of this device by health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bryon Calawa
- Research Department, Design Science, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Kyle B Haraldsen
- Technical Operations & Project Management, AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schneider AE, Lange J. Pen devices for self-injection: contrasting measured injection force with users' perceived ease of injection. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2017; 15:115-125. [PMID: 29226723 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2018.1415884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Past research has emphasized injection force as a clinically highly relevant technical attribute of pen devices. However, little work has been conducted to relate these results to in-use studies. This article explores whether and how differences in pen injection force profiles influence users' self-reported perceived ease of injection and preferences. METHODS Three different pen systems were subjected to measurements of injection force using an automated mechanical set-up followed by a simulated use study where users assessed perceived ease of injection. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE Outcomes were measured by fitting data of measured injection force and perceived ease of injection using a linear model. RESULTS Although mechanical testing revealed significant differences between the three pen's measured injection forces these differences were not directly perceived by users in simulated injection studies. CONCLUSION The article bridges literature on injection force measurement and simulated use. It reveals how users' perceived ease of injection is less sensitive to measured injection forces than prior research has assumed. Thus, future research should holistically integrate patient feedback in new device development. Key limitations of this work are the low number of participants in the simulated use study and the fact that the ease of injection was assessed indirectly.
Collapse
|
12
|
Update on IL-17 Inhibitors for Psoriasis. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s13671-017-0181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
13
|
Abstract
Ixekizumab (Taltz®) is a subcutaneously administered, humanized anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy (USA and EU) or phototherapy (USA). In the phase 3 UNCOVER trials in this patient population, ixekizumab was superior to placebo or etanercept in terms of the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and in those achieving a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1, after 12 weeks of induction treatment. Clinical responses to ixekizumab were seen as early as week 1. Patients receiving ixekizumab also reported improvements in health-related quality of life, itching, and work productivity. Clinical responses to ixekizumab were sustained during additional 48 weeks of maintenance treatment. Ixekizumab was generally well tolerated and exhibited low immunogenicity in the UNCOVER trials during up to 60 weeks of therapy. Currently available data indicate that ixekizumab is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. It has the potential advantage of one maintenance dose for every 4 weeks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahiya Y Syed
- Springer, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|