Influence of the sample anticoagulant on the measurements of impedance aggregometry in cardiac surgery

Assessment of Multiplate platelet aggregometry using citrate, heparin or hirudin in Rhesus macaques

Electrical impedance aggregometry (EIA) has gained popularity in clinical and research applications. Nonhuman primates are used to study disease and drug-related mechanisms that affect hemostasis, therefore establishing normal EIA parameters are necessary. The anticoagulants sodium heparin, hirudin and sodium citrate and three agonists, ADP, ASPI, and collagen were evaluated. Whole blood from 12 adult male rhesus macaques was collected to evaluate anticoagulants, sodium heparin, hirudin and sodium citrate using three agonists (ADP, ASPI and collagen), on the Multiplate® 5.0 Analyzer. Platelet function was reported for three parameters: Area under the curve (AUC), aggregation, and aggregation velocity. There was a significant difference in mean AUC between citrate and heparin samples, and citrate and hirudin samples regardless of the agonist used. There was no difference in AUC between heparin and hirudin. ADP-activated samples showed an increase in impedance with hirudin samples compared to citrate. Furthermore, heparin and hirudin out-perform citrate as the anticoagulant for EIA in the macaque. Finally, this study demonstrates the utility of the Multiplate® system in this model and provides important insight into anticoagulant choice when using EIA.

Optimization of Multiplate(®) whole blood platelet aggregometry in the Beagle dog and Wistar rat for ex vivo drug toxicity testing

This study was performed to optimize and standardize the use of the Multiplate(®) whole blood impedance aggregometer in the Beagle dog and Wistar rat for use in a research laboratory environment. The anticoagulants citrate, heparin and hirudin were compared and platelet aggregation responses to ADP, collagen, arachidonic acid and Par-4 agonist were evaluated to determine their half maximal effective concentrations (EC(50)) in blood containing low concentrations of a drug solvent (0.1% DMSO). The results indicate that citrate anticoagulation is not suitable for Multiplate(®) whole blood aggregometry because of the presence of spontaneous aggregation. ADP and collagen were found to be appropriate agonists for both species, whereas in the Beagle dog Par-4 agonist failed to induce aggregation and arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregation showed a high interindividual variability. The agonists EC(50) calculated in hirudin blood were 2.70 μM ADP, 0.85 μg/ml collagen, 0.03 mM arachidonic acid and 165.7 μM Par-4 agonist in the Wistar rat, and 0.95 μM ADP and 0.23 μg/ml collagen in the Beagle dog.

Haemostatic therapy in coronary artery bypass graft patients with decreased platelet function: comparison of fibrinogen concentrate with allogeneic blood products

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at risk of postoperative bleeding because of decreased platelet function and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-induced haemostatic impairment. Fibrinogen concentration decreases by 34-42% of the preoperative level by the end of CPB. An inverse relationship between perioperative plasma fibrinogen levels and postoperative bleeding has been reported in CABG patients. Administration of fibrinogen concentrate after weaning from CPB in patients with diffuse microvascular bleeding may help promote haemostasis. We compared patient outcomes following fibrinogen concentrate administration or transfusion of allogeneics in CABG patients with decreased platelet function.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with decreased preoperative platelet function in Multiplate aggregometry were included. Patients with bleeding after CPB received either fibrinogen concentrate (guided by the measurement of fibrin clot quality using the FIBTEM thromboelastometric test) or allogeneics.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine of 38 patients received haemostatic therapy (bleeding + fibrinogen group, n = 10; bleeding + allogeneics group, n = 19). Total transfusion (median (interquartile range)) was significantly lower in the bleeding + fibrinogen group (0 (0, 3.8) units), compared with the bleeding + allogeneics group (6 (5, 8) units, p = 0.0073). Bolus administration of fibrinogen concentrate increased FIBTEM maximum clot firmness from 10.5 (9.3, 11) mm after CPB to 20.5 (20, 21.8) mm at the end of surgery. Postoperative outcomes were similar in both groups. No treatment-related complications were observed after fibrinogen concentrate.

CONCLUSIONS

In CABG patients with bleeding after CPB, FIBTEM-guided administration of fibrinogen concentrate resulted in overall decreased transfusion, compared with haemostatic therapy with allogeneics. Fibrinogen concentrate administration increased the fibrin clot quality and helped achieve haemostasis.