Electrophysiological findings of Turkish patients with restless legs syndrome

Electrophysiological findings in patients with restless legs syndrome

BACKGROUND

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) manifests as an urge to move the body to relieve the discomfortable sensations, primarily when resting, sitting, laying down, or sleeping. Diagnosis of RLS relies on clinical criteria, and the immobilization test was the only instrumental tool with equivocal results.

OBJECTIVES

To assess different electrophysiological findings in patients with RLS, and compare the diagnostic values of these parameters in the diagnosis of RLS.

METHODS

30 patients with primary RLS and 30 controls who were matched for age and gender were studied. Participant's demographics, laboratory findings, and electrophysiological test, namely nerve conduction studies (NCS), cutaneous silent period (CSP), H reflex and sympathetic skin response (SSR), F-wave latency, amplitude, F-wave duration (FWD), and the ratio between FWD and duration of the corresponding compound muscle action potential (FWD/CMAPD) were analyzed.

RESULTS

None of the patients showed altered NCS data. FWD of upper (12.37 ± 2.77 ms) and lower limb (21.71 ± 5.24 ms) were significantly longer in patients. Also, FWD/CMAP duration of the upper (1.03 ± 0.2) and lower limb (2.02 ± 0.55) was longer in patients. Likewise, they exhibited delayed CSP latency from TA (110.62 ± 13.73 ms) and APB (77.35 ± 12.16 ms) whereas the CSP duration from TA and APB was decreased (37.36 ± 11.59 ms; 42.55 ± 7.97 ms, respectively). The SSR latency was not different, and right-sided H reflex amplitude (5.07 ± 3.98 mV) and H/M ratio (0.65 ± 1.81) were significantly increased in the patient group.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that there may be a dysfunction of the inhibitory/excitatory circuits at a spinal level; and no pathology in the peripheral nerves. The unilateral difference of H reflex amplitude and H/M ratio may suggest asymmetrical central inhibitory dysfunction. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are now needed to evaluate the pathophysiology of RLS with different neurophysiological assessment tools.

Presynaptic inhibition in restless legs syndrome

Introduction: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a condition that particularly urges at night in resting and causes the need to move the legs. Although the pathophysiology has not yet been clarified, dopamine and iron metabolism and spinal cord pathologies are blamed for causing the condition. There are few studies on spinal reflex mechanisms on RLS. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of presynaptic inhibition (PreI) in the spinal cord in RLS.Methods: Fourteen patients with RLS and 14 controls with similar demographic characteristics were included in the study. Soleus muscle H-reflex (Ht) investigation was performed for subjects whose electrophysiologic investigation was normal. The Ht response was conditioned to the stimulation of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) (Hc). The test and conditioned stimulation intervals were kept between 10 ms, 20 ms, 30 ms, 40 ms, 50 ms, 75 ms, 100 ms, 150 ms and 200 ms. In each inter-stimulus interval, nonparametric repeat measurement evaluations were conducted with the percentage value of Hc/Ht. The Hc/Ht values of the study and control groups in the same intervals were compared separately.Results: A significant decrease was detected in Hc values in the control group in the repeat measurement values at 20 ms and 100 ms inter-stimulus intervals; however, there was not decrease in any intervals in the patient's group.Conclusion: The absence of any decrease in Hc reflexes for 20-100 ms intervals revealed that discernible PreI was vanished in RLS patients.

Restless legs syndrome: Clinical changes in nervous system excitability at the spinal cord level

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a complex multifactorial disorder whose aetiology has yet to be fully elucidated. Some of the features of RLS, such as processing of sensations and activation of movement, may result from a dysfunction in spinal processing giving rise to a state of spinal hyperexcitability. In the current article we review studies investigating spinal excitability in RLS patients looking specifically at electrophysiological studies of spinal activity, sensory evaluations, and spinal reflex studies. Increased spinal excitability has been shown in RLS patients based on the combined data from electrophysiological studies. Results from studies assessing sensory evaluations in RLS patients show enhanced spinal processing of nociceptive inputs possibly due to central sensitisation. However, not all sensory modalities demonstrate an increase in sensitivity. An increase in nervous system excitability would result in an increase in reflex responses in RLS patients however the data from reflex analyses in RLS patients has failed to consistently show this expected result. Overall changes to RLS spinal excitability have been demonstrated though these changes might be heterogeneous as not all afferent input appears to be affected in the same manner. There may be phase-dependent and modality-dependent alterations in spinal excitability suggesting that the theory of absolute spinal hyperexcitability in RLS patients' needs to be reconsidered.