Critical analysis of the use of onabotulinumtoxinA (botulinum toxin type A) in migraine

Evaluation of Regio Temporalis in 3 Steps in Terms of Interventional Procedures

Regio temporalis is a site where botulinum neurotoxin is applied for various medical reasons, such as migraine, bruxism, and myofascial pain syndrome. The region is also one of the target regions in flap surgery. This study aimed to define the region topographically. In addition, it was aimed to reveal the intramuscular nerve distribution of the temporalis.11 fixed cephalus (cadaver head) and 2 fresh cephalus were used. The lateral canthus of the eye was marked as point A, and the middle of the ear tragus as point B. The transverse and vertical distances of the branching point of the superficial temporal artery to the A and B points were measured. Transverse distances of the superficial temporal artery and superficial temporal vein to A and B points were measured. The muscle was examined in 5 equal parts (L0-L1-L2-L3-L4), and each part's vertical muscle and tendon lengths were examined. Intramuscular nerve density was demonstrated by applying the modified Sihler staining to fresh temporalis'. Superficial temporal artery had an average transverse distance of 8.56±1.9 mm in women and 12.56±1.94 mm in men from the middle of the ear tragus. The artery was 64.21±5.59 mm posterior in females and 63.48±6.53 mm in males from the lateral canthus of the eye. Our study determined that the branching point of the superficial temporal artery was below the upper level of the arcus zygomaticus in 10% of cases and above it in 90% of cases. In our study, the L2 point had the highest vertical muscle length at 45.67 mm, while the L3 point had the highest vertical tendon length at 41.25 mm. The point where the muscle length had the highest ratio with 1.49 compared to the tendon length, was the L2 point. The temporalis' for which the modified Sihler staining was applied was examined in 5 quadrants. It was determined that the nerve densities were in the second and third quadrants from anterior to posterior. The distance of superficial landmarks to neurovascular structures is extremely important in interventions to the regio temporalis. Considering the average distances given in our study is important in avoiding damage in surgical procedures and not injecting into vascular structures. The point where the muscle length had the highest ratio of 1.49 compared to the tendon length was the L2 point. The area in line with this point is the most suitable area for injection. The L2 point is also the most suitable area for injection as it has the highest muscle length. Since the nerve densities were observed in the modified Sihler staining applied temporalis' 2 and 3 quadrants from anterior to posterior, botulinum neurotoxin injections to these areas will give more effective results.

New anatomical insights of the superficial branch of the zygomaticotemporal nerve for treating temporal migraines: An anatomical study

The zygomaticotemporal nerve is known to contribute to temporal migraines; however, its precise anatomy remains unknown. The potential accessory branches of the zygomaticotemporal nerve may be considered a cause of continued temporal migraines after surgical procedures. In this study, we defined the novel superficial branch of the zygomaticotemporal nerve (sZTN) and investigated its anatomical course, distribution, and clinical implications. Twenty-two hemifaces from 11 fixed Korean cadavers (six males, five females; mean age, 78.3 years) were used in this study. The piercing points of the sZTN through the deep and superficial layers of the deep temporal fascia, and the superficial temporal fascia were defined as P1, P2, and P3, respectively. The distance of each point from the zygomatic tubercle was measured using an image analysis software. The sZTN ascended between the bone and the temporalis after emerging from the zygomaticotemporal foramen. It then pierced the deep temporal fascia without penetrating the temporalis. After then, it pierced the superficial layer of the deep temporal fascia and turned superiorly toward the upper posterior temple. When the sZTN passed through the superficial temporal fascia, it intersected with the superficial temporal artery in every case. The novel findings of the sZTN may help in the treatment of intractable temporal migraines refractory to injection or surgical procedure. Based on our findings, targeting the sZTN may be applied as an alternative treatment strategy for patients who do not show significant improvement with treatment targeted to trigger sites.

Botulinum Toxin—A Current Place in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine and Other Primary Headaches

Headaches are a very common condition that most people will experience many times during their lives. This article presents the primary headaches, which are a large group of diseases where the headache is not a symptom of another known disease. Tension-type headache affects approximately 80% of the general population, and the prevalence of migraine is estimated at 10–12%. Clinical data and experience to date have demonstrated that botulinum toxin may be an effective prophylactic treatment for chronic headache types. It has been used in neurology for the treatment of dystonia and blepharospasm. Now it has been approved to treat chronic migraine and has been shown to confer significant benefit in refractory cases. Based on clinical experience botulinum toxin has also been tried in other headache disorders. While it is intuitively attractive to think that due to its effect on pain by sensory modulation, there may also be efficacy in its use in chronic tension-type headache and cluster headache, so far, there is little evidence to support this. Botulinum toxin is effective in pain control through its interaction with the SNARE complex, which inhibits the release of neurotransmitters, such as glutamate, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide. OnabotulinumtoxinA is effective not only in headache frequency and pain intensity but in other parameters, including quality of life.

Guidance to trigger point injection for treating myofascial pain syndrome: Intramuscular neural distribution of the quadratus lumborum

Postural habits and repetitive motion contribute toward the progress of myofascial pain by affecting overload on specific muscles, the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle being the most frequently involved. The therapy of myofascial pain syndrome includes the release of myofascial pain syndrome using injective agents such as botulinum neurotoxin, lidocaine, steroids, and normal saline. However, an optimal injection point has not been established for the QL muscle. This study aimed to propose an optimal injection point for this muscle by studying its intramuscular neural distribution using the whole mount staining method. A modified Sihler's procedure was completed on 15 QL muscles to visualize the intramuscular arborization areas in terms of the inferior border of the 12th rib, the transverse processes of L1-L4, and the iliac crest. The intramuscular neural distribution of the QL had the densely arborized areas in the three lateral portions of L3-L4 and L4-L5 and the medial portion between L4 and L5.

Intramuscular Neural Distribution of the Serratus Anterior Muscle: Regarding Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection for Treating Myofascial Pain Syndrome

The serratus anterior muscle is commonly involved in myofascial pain syndrome and is treated with many different injective methods. Currently, there is no definite injection point for the muscle. This study provides a suggestion for injection points for the serratus anterior muscle considering the intramuscular neural distribution using the whole-mount staining method. A modified Sihler method was applied to the serratus anterior muscles (15 specimens). The intramuscular arborization areas were identified in terms of the anterior (100%), middle (50%), and posterior axillary line (0%), and from the first to the ninth ribs. The intramuscular neural distribution for the serratus anterior muscle had the largest arborization patterns in the fifth to the ninth rib portion of between 50% and 70%, and the first to the fourth rib portion had between 20% and 40%. These intramuscular neural distribution-based injection sites are in relation to the external anatomical line for the frequently injected muscles to facilitate the efficiency of botulinum neurotoxin injections. Lastly, the intramuscular neural distribution of serratus anterior muscle should be considered in order to practice more accurately without the harmful side effects of trigger-point injections and botulinum neurotoxin injections.

Guidelines for botulinum neurotoxin injections in piriformis syndrome

BACKGROUND

The piriformis muscle is normally involved in piriformis syndrome and can be treated with botulinum neurotoxin using several different injection methods. However, definitive injection guidelines for the muscle have not been reported previously.

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the ideal area for injections based on the intramuscular nerve distribution as obtained using a modified Sihler's staining technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modified Sihler's method was applied to the piriformis muscle in 15 specimens. The intramuscular arborization areas were identified based on two anatomical landmarks: (a) the lateral border of the sacrum bone and (b) the greater trochanter.

RESULTS

The nerve entry point for both piriformis muscles was found in the area between the lateral border of the sacrum and one-fifth of the distance toward the greater trochanter. The intramuscular nerve distribution for the piriformis muscle had the largest arborization patterns between one-fifth and two-fifths of the distance from the sacrum to the greater trochanter. The piriformis muscle was tendinous from two-fifths of the distance to the greater trochanter.

DISCUSSION

This study has yielded suggested optimal injection locations for the piriformis muscle relative to external anatomical landmarks.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians can use these guidelines to ensure the effectiveness of not only botulinum neurotoxin injections but also other agents such as steroids, anesthetics, and normal saline. These guidelines will also help to avoid adverse outcomes of injection treatments.

Effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) in pediatric patients experiencing migraines: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study in the pediatric pain population

INTRODUCTION

OnabotulinumtoxinA (OBTA) is approved for treating chronic headaches and migraines in adults, but there is limited scientific literature on the outcomes in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to determine if subjects treated with OBTA reported a statistically significant improvement in the primary features (frequency, intensity, duration and disability scoring) associated with migraines compared with placebo at follow-up visits.

METHODS

After obtaining approval by the appropriate local (HS# 2016-3108) and federal institutions, the principal investigator enrolled candidates aged 8 to 17 years old diagnosed with chronic migraines (at least 6 months), and 15 or more headache days in a 4-week baseline period. This randomized control trial consisted of two phases: double-blind and open-label for the first two and last two sets of treatments, respectively. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive a treatment protocol-155 units at 31 injection sites-in 3-month intervals and follow-up visits every 6 weeks. Non-parametric testing (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) was performed using widely available open-source statistical software ('R').

RESULTS

From February 2017 to November 2018, 17 subjects presented for a screening visit; 15 met eligibility criteria. Subjects that received OBTA reported a statistically significant decrease from the following baseline values compared with placebo 6-week post-treatment compared with placebo: frequency (20 (7 to 17) vs 28 (23 to 28); p=0.038), intensity (5 (3 to 7) vs 7 (5 to 9); p=0.047), and PedMIDAS (Pediatric Migraine Disability Score) (3 (2 to 4) vs 4 (4 to 4); p=0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in the duration (10 (2 to 24) vs 24 (4 to 24); p=0.148) of migraines between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

OnabotulinumtoxinA showed a statistically significant decrease in frequency and intensity of migraines compared with placebo. No adverse effects or serious adverse events related to the use of OBTA were reported. In the future, we aim to evaluate the specific nature of migraines, for example, quality/location of pain presented during an initial consult to predict the likelihood of OBTA being a truly effective modality of pain management for pediatric migraineurs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03055767.

Migraine patients' journey until a tertiary headache center: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Migraine diagnosis is based on clinical aspects and is dependent on the experience of the attending physician. This study aimed to describe the patients journey profile until they start their experience in a tertiary headache center.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, medical charts from migraine patients were reviewed to describe which treatments, procedures and follow-up strategies are performed until the first appointment with a headache specialist. Patients from both sexes, ≥18 years old, which came to their first visit from March to July 2017 were included. Sociodemographic information, headache characteristics, diagnostic methods previously used, clinical history, family history and the treatments previously used were assessed in the first appointment with a specialist. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and General Anxiety Disorder-7 were also applied. Descriptive analyses were performed to describe the sample profile and statistical tests were used to evaluate factors associated with the type of migraine (chronic or episodic).

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 465 patients. On average, the pain started 17.1 (SD = 11.4) years before the first appointment with a headache specialist. Most of patients were classified as having chronic migraine (51.7%), with an average frequency of 15.5 (SD = 9.9) days per month. Regarding patients' journey until a specialist, most patients were submitted to laboratory tests (74.0%), cranial tomography (66.8%) and magnetic resonance imaging (66.8%) as diagnostic methods, and preventive drugs (70.2%) and acupuncture (61.0%) as treatments. After stratification by migraine type as episodic or chronic, patients with chronic migraine were submitted to more magnetic resonance imaging test, acupuncture, psychotherapy, used preventive drugs, and reported to have used topiramate without beneficial effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazilian patients with migraine experiment a long journey until getting to a headache specialist and are submitted to a great number of unnecessary exams, especially those with chronic migraine.

A Critical Review of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Prophylactic Treatment of Chronic Migraine in Adults

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a severe, disabling condition, ranked by World Health Organization as the sixth highest cause of disability worldwide. It greatly affects patients' quality of life, functionality, and physical and mental health. The financial burden of migraine on the UK economy is conservatively estimated at £3.42 billion per year.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to perform an evidence-based literature review of the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (onaBoNTA) in the prophylactic treatment of adult patients suffering with chronic migraine (CM) compared to placebo. After the best evidence is identified, it will be utilized to formulate a protocol for doctors managing CM in their aesthetic clinic.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the current literature on the topic was performed by H.M. using Pubmed MEDLINE electronic database on March 1, 2018. All articles up to and inclusive of this date were included. Articles were limited to human studies and those in the English language. In vitro and animal studies were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 260 articles were identified. Of these, the excellent-quality, high-strength (level 1A) trials were short-listed to answer the research question.

CONCLUSIONS

There is high-quality, level 1A evidence to support onaBoNTA treatment in adults with CM is well tolerated and considered safe. However, it is associated with increased risk of adverse events and still some uncertainty exists associated with the degree onaBoNTA improves outcome measures compared to placebo. These data have been used to formulate The London Aesthetic Migraine Protocol (LAMP) to provide safe, evidence-based guidance for appropriately trained and experienced aesthetic practitioners to manage CM in their aesthetic clinics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

The Effect of OnabotulinumtoxinA on Aura Frequency and Severity in Patients With Hemiplegic Migraine: Case Series of 11 Patients

BACKGROUND

OnabotulinumtoxinA has been demonstrated to be effective for the preventive treatment of headache in individuals with chronic migraine and has been approved and recommended for this patient population. While the therapeutic effect of onabotulinumtoxinA on migraine headache is well documented, there is limited information on the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA on migraine aura.

OBJECTIVE

Given the prolonged and often debilitating nature of aura in patients with hemiplegic migraine, our group sought to examine the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA on aura frequency and severity in this specific subset of migraine patients.

METHODS

All clinical notes from July 1, 1994 to December 1, 2017 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with hemiplegic migraine who received at least one set of onabotulinumtoxinA injections. Thirty-four patients were identified; and of those, 23 were excluded due to incomplete documentation regarding aura symptoms at follow-up visits. The clinical notes of the remaining 11 patients (4 with familial hemiplegic migraine [FHM] and 7 with sporadic hemiplegic migraine [SHM]) were reviewed, and the frequency and description of their headaches and aura before and after receiving onabotulinumtoxinA were recorded.

RESULTS

Nine of the 11 patients in our series noted a decrease in the frequency, severity, and/or duration of their aura after receiving onabotulinumtoxinA. Of the 2 non-responders, one was FHM and one was SHM. Of the 9 that noticed improved aura symptoms, 6 described a "wearing off" effect of onabotulinumtoxinA around week 9 or 10 of the 12-week cycle, with subsequent improvement after the next round.

CONCLUSION

For 9 of 11 patients with hemiplegic migraine, onabotulinumtoxinA was helpful not only in reducing the frequency and severity of headaches but also in reducing the frequency and severity of the aura. In this manuscript, we speculate on potential pathophysiologic mechanisms that could have contributed to this effect.

Inhibitory effect of high-frequency greater occipital nerve electrical stimulation on trigeminovascular nociceptive processing in rats

Electrical stimulation of the greater occipital nerve (GON) has recently shown promise as an effective non-pharmacological prophylactic therapy for drug-resistant chronic primary headaches, but the neurobiological mechanisms underlying its anticephalgic action are not elucidated. Considering that the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) is a key segmental structure playing a prominent role in pathophysiology of headaches, in the present study we evaluated the effects of GON electrical stimulation on ongoing and evoked firing of the dura-sensitive STN neurons. The experiments were carried out on urethane/chloralose-anesthetized, paralyzed and artificially ventilated male Wistar rats. Extracellular recordings were made from 11 neurons within the caudal part of the STN that received convergent input from the ipsilateral facial cutaneous receptive fields, dura mater and GON. In each experiment, five various combinations of the GON stimulation frequency (50, 75, 100 Hz) and intensity (1, 3, 6 V) were tested successively in 10 min interval. At all parameter sets, preconditioning GON stimulation (250 ms train of pulses applied before each recording) produced suppression of both the ongoing activity of the STN neurons and their responses to electrical stimulation of the dura mater. The inhibitory effect depended mostly on the GON stimulation intensity, being maximally pronounced when a stimulus of 6 V was applied. Thus, the GON stimulation-induced inhibition of trigeminovascular nociceptive processing at the level of STN has been demonstrated for the first time. The data obtained can contribute to a deeper understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of GON stimulation in primary headaches.

Effective Botulinum Toxin Injection Guide for Treatment of Temporal Headache

This study involved an extensive analysis of published research on the morphology of the temporalis muscle in order to provide an anatomical guideline on how to distinguish the temporalis muscle and temporalis tendon by observing the surface of the patient’s face. Twenty-one hemifaces of cadavers were used in this study. The temporalis muscles were dissected clearly for morphological analysis between the temporalis muscle and tendon. The posterior border of the temporalis tendon was classified into three types: in Type I the posterior border of the temporalis tendon is located in front of reference line L2 (4.8%, 1/21), in Type II it is located between reference lines L2 and L3 (85.7%, 18/21), and in Type III it is located between reference lines L3 and L4 (9.5%, 2/21). The vertical distances between the horizontal line passing through the jugale (LH) and the temporalis tendon along each of reference lines L0, L1, L2, L3, and L4 were 29.7 ± 6.8 mm, 45.0 ± 8.8 mm, 37.7 ± 11.1 mm, 42.5 ± 7.5 mm, and 32.1 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. BoNT-A should be injected into the temporalis muscle at least 45 mm vertically above the zygomatic arch. This will ensure that the muscle region is targeted and so produce the greatest clinical effect with the minimum concentration of BoNT-A.

Current status and future directions of botulinum neurotoxins for targeting pain processing

Current evidence suggests that botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) A1 and B1, given locally into peripheral tissues such as skin, muscles, and joints, alter nociceptive processing otherwise initiated by inflammation or nerve injury in animal models and humans. Recent data indicate that such locally delivered BoNTs exert not only local action on sensory afferent terminals but undergo transport to central afferent cell bodies (dorsal root ganglia) and spinal dorsal horn terminals, where they cleave SNAREs and block transmitter release. Increasing evidence supports the possibility of a trans-synaptic movement to alter postsynaptic function in neuronal and possibly non-neuronal (glial) cells. The vast majority of these studies have been conducted on BoNT/A1 and BoNT/B1, the only two pharmaceutically developed variants. However, now over 40 different subtypes of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) have been identified. By combining our existing and rapidly growing understanding of BoNT/A1 and /B1 in altering nociceptive processing with explorations of the specific characteristics of the various toxins from this family, we may be able to discover or design novel, effective, and long-lasting pain therapeutics. This review will focus on our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms whereby BoNTs alter pain processing, and future directions in the development of these agents as pain therapeutics.

Pediatric migraine prescription patterns at a large academic hospital

BACKGROUND

Here we report the prescription patterns by drug type, age, and sex of patients at a large academic pediatric hospital. Because there are few guidelines based on outcome studies in pediatric migraine, physician treatment approaches in children vary.

METHODS

Using the i2b2 query tool, we determined that over an approximately 4 year period, 4839 patients between the ages of 2 and 17 years were observed at Boston Children's Hospital for migraine with or without aura, 59% women and 41% men.

RESULTS

The most common medications prescribed to this population were sumatriptan, amitriptyline, topiramate, ondansetron, and cyproheptadine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support recent data regarding choices of medication in the pediatric population and additionally support current studies and future investigation into controlled trials in the pediatric population.

The pathophysiological and pharmacological basis of current drug treatment of migraine headache

Migraine is a common neurological syndrome that affects approximately 10-20% of the population. The pathophysiology of migraine is unclear. 5-hydroxytriptamine is a key mediator in the pathogenesis of migraine and thus 5-HT1-receptor agonists are the principal drugs for acute migraine therapy. There are three classes of drugs for migraine: over-the-counter analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute mild migraine, specific prescription drugs (triptans and ergot alkaloids) for acute severe migraine and pharmacological agents for prophylaxis of migraine. Sumatriptan, naratriptan and others, referred to as 'triptans', are the mainstay for acute treatment of migraine. Ergot alkaloids (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine) are used in patients with frequent, moderate migraine, but are less effective than triptans. There are several agents for prevention of migraine occurrence in patients with frequent or severe disabling migraine attacks. New drugs with improved efficacy and reduced side effects are needed for effective treatment and prevention of migraine.

A critical evaluation of migraine trigger site deactivation surgery

Migraine headache trigger site deactivation surgery is a term that encompasses 4 different surgical procedures that are performed based on headache onset location for the preventative treatment of migraine headaches. Multiple studies have demonstrated some efficacy of these procedures, but closer evaluation of the methodology of these studies reveals major flaws in study design. In this article, the author provides an overview of the procedures and presurgical screening tools, as well as a critical evaluation of 2 of the major studies that have been published. In addition, the author provides his opinion on future study designs that may help to better determine the potential efficacy of these experimental procedures and potential headache subtypes (contact point headache, supraorbital neuralgia, and occipital neuralgia) that may respond to peripheral decompression surgery.

Patients profiling for Botox® (onabotulinum toxin A) treatment for migraine: a look at white matter lesions in the MRI as a potential marker

Background

To evaluate if white matter lesions (WML) on MRI can be a potential marker for onabotulinum toxin A (Botox®) treatment success in migraine, given the limited response rate and high costs per treatment.

Methods

Retrospective data base and MRI analysis of 529 migraineurs who received Botox® between 2002 and 2009. Responders were defined as patients who underwent three or more treatments, whereas non-responders had only one or two treatments. MRIs were analysed on axial T2 and coronar FLAIR (fluid attenuated inversion recovery) sequences for the presence of WML. Statistical analysis was done with the Chi-Square-Test and the Mann–Whitney-U-Test.

Results

Of 529 Botox® treated migraineurs, 111 patients had a MRI. Of these 111 patients, 47 were responders, 64 non-responders to Botox®. Response rate to Botox® in migraineurs with WML was 55.3%, in migraineurs without WML 44.7%. In the investigated items “age”, “age at onset”, “gender”, “attack duration”, “frequency”, “aura”, “WML”, “size of WML”, we found no statistical significant difference between the two groups. 55% of the responders and 50% of the non-responders showed WML. All WML were located supratentorially, anteriorly, mostly of small size (3–5 mm).

Conclusion

WML on MRIs cannot serve as a marker to predict a positive response to Botox®.

The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Patients with Migraine

Although many patients with migraine get positive benefits from conventional pharmacological treatments, many others do not benefit sufficiently or experience adverse effects from these treatments. For that reason, these patients usually seek complementary and/or alternative medical (CAM) treatments all over the world. In general, although CAM therapies are not recommended by neurologist in Turkey, most of migraine patients, who do not respond conventional medicine treatments, seek alternative therapy. Acupuncture, botulinum toxin, mind-body interventions, and nutraceutical options are the most popular treatments. In this review, the available evidence for all these treatments will be discussed.

The role of chemosensitive afferent nerves and TRP ion channels in the pathomechanism of headaches

The involvement of trigeminovascular afferent nerves in the pathomechanism of primary headaches is well established, but a pivotal role of a particular class of primary sensory neurons has not been advocated. This review focuses on the evidence that supports the critical involvement of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in the pathophysiology of primary headaches, in particular, migraine. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 and transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 receptors sensitive to vanilloids and other irritants are localized on chemosensitive afferent nerves, and they are involved in meningeal nociceptive and vascular responses involving neurogenic dural vasodilatation and plasma extravasation. The concept of the trigeminal nocisensor complex is put forward which involves the trigeminal chemosensitive afferent fibers/neurons equipped with specific nocisensor molecules, the elements of the meningeal microcirculatory system, and the dural mast cells. It is suggested that the activation level of this complex may explain some of the specific features of migraine headache. Pharmacological modulation of TRP channel function may offer a novel approach to the management of head pain, in particular, migraine.

OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®): a review of its use in the prophylaxis of headaches in adults with chronic migraine

This article reviews the pharmacology, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability profile of intramuscularly injected onabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNTA; BOTOX®) for headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine, with a focus on UK labelling for the drug. The pharmacological actions of onaBoNTA include a direct antinociceptive (analgesic) effect; while not fully understood, the mechanism of action underlying its headache prophylaxis effect in chronic migraine is presumed to involve inhibition of peripheral and central sensitization in trigeminovascular neurones. Pooled findings from two large phase III studies of virtually identical design (PREEMPT [Phase III REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy] 1 and 2) showed that treatment with up to five cycles of onaBoNTA (155-195 units/cycle) at 12-week intervals was effective in reducing headache symptoms, decreasing headache-related disability, and improving health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in patients with chronic migraine, approximately two-thirds of whom were overusing acute headache medications at baseline. During the double-blind phase of both trials, significantly more patients treated with onaBoNTA (two cycles) than placebo experienced clinically meaningful improvements in the monthly frequencies of headache days, moderate to severe headache days and migraine days, and in the cumulative hours of headache on headache days/month. OnaBoNTA therapy also resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in functioning and HR-QOL compared with placebo. Notably, improvements in headache symptoms, functioning and HR-QOL favouring onaBoNTA over placebo were seen regardless of whether or not patients were medication overusers and irrespective of whether or not they were naive to (oral) prophylactic therapy. Further improvements relative to baseline in headache symptoms, functioning and HR-QOL were observed during the open-label extension phase of both trials (all patients received three cycles of onaBoNTA). Treatment with up to five cycles of onaBoNTA was generally well tolerated in the PREEMPT trials. Treatment-related adverse events reported by onaBoNTA recipients (e.g. neck pain, facial paresis and eyelid ptosis) were consistent with the well established tolerability profile of the neurotoxin when injected into head and neck muscles; no new safety events were observed. Debate surrounding the PREEMPT studies has centred on the small treatment effect of onaBoNTA relative to placebo, the possibility that blinding was inadequate and the relevance of the evaluated population. Nonetheless, the totality of the data showed that onaBoNTA therapy produced clinically meaningful improvements in headache symptoms, functioning and HR-QOL; on the basis of these trials, it has become the first (and so far only) headache prophylactic therapy to be specifically approved for chronic migraine in the UK and US. Overall, onaBoNTA offers a beneficial, acceptably tolerated and potentially convenient option for the management of this highly disabling condition, for example in patients who are refractory to oral medications used for prophylaxis.

Learning from the past: historical aspects of bacterial toxins as pharmaceuticals

Botulinum neurotoxins are the most poisonous substances known to humankind, but also are the bacterial toxins most frequently used as pharmaceuticals to benefit humans. The discovery of botulinum toxins and development into a useful drug is unique and fascinating, dating back to the early 19th century, when Justinus Kerner first recognized that botulism was caused by a biological toxin and suggested its use for medicinal purposes. This was translated into reality in 1980, when Alan Scott for the first time used the toxins to successfully treat strabismus. Now a subset of botulinum toxins are widely used for cosmetic applications, treatment of various movement disorders, pain and many other syndromes, and further developments using other botulinum toxins or recombinant molecules engineered from subdomains are promising.