Post-Thrombolytic D-Dimer Elevation Predicts Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage and Poor Functional Outcome After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

Development and validation of outcome prediction model for reperfusion therapy in acute ischemic stroke using nomogram and machine learning

OBJECTIVE

To develop logistic regression nomogram and machine learning (ML)-based models to predict 3-month unfavorable functional outcome for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing reperfusion therapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular treatment) were prospectively recruited. Unfavorable outcome was defined as 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 3-6. The independent risk factors associated with unfavorable outcome were obtained by regression analysis and included in the prediction model. The performance of nomogram was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). ML models were compared with nomogram using AUC; the generalizability of all models was ascertained in an external cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 505 patients were enrolled, with 256 in the model construction, and 249 in the external validation. Five variables were identified as prognostic factors: baseline NIHSS, D-dimer level, random blood glucose (RBG), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) before reperfusion. The AUC values of nomogram were 0.865, 0.818, and 0.779 in the training set, test set, and external validation, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA indicated appreciable reliability and good net benefits. The best three ML models were extra trees (ET), CatBoost, and random forest (RF) models; all of them showed favorable discrimination in the training cohort, and confirmed in the test and external sets.

CONCLUSION

Baseline NIHSS, D-dimer, RBG, BUN, and SBP before reperfusion were independent predictors for 3-month unfavorable outcome after reperfusion therapy in AIS patients. Both nomogram and ML models showed good discrimination and generalizability.