Advancements in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Research and the Path to Precision

Exploring the relationship between hallucination proneness and brain morphology

BACKGROUND

Hallucinations, including both auditory and visual forms, are often associated with alterations in brain structure, particularly in specific language-related cortical areas. Existing models propose different frameworks for understanding the relationship between brain volume and hallucination proneness, but practical evidence supporting these models is limited.

METHODS

This study investigated the relationship between hallucination proneness and brain volume in language-related cortical regions, specifically the superior temporal gyrus and Broca's area. A total of 68 participants, primarily university students, completed the Launay-Slade Hallucination Scale (LSHS) to assess hallucination proneness for both auditory and visual experiences. Structural MRI scans were used to measure brain volume in the targeted regions.

RESULTS

The results indicated significant positive correlations between LSHS scores and brain volume in the superior temporal gyrus and Broca's area regions previously linked to volume reductions in patients with clinically diagnosed hallucinations. Participants reporting high hallucination proneness for both auditory and visual hallucinations exhibited higher brain volumes in these language areas compared to those experiencing hallucinations rarely or never.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings challenge existing models by suggesting that higher brain volumes in language-related cortical areas may be associated with increased proneness to both auditory and visual hallucinations in non-clinical populations. This contrasts with the volume reductions seen in patients with clinical hallucinations and highlights the need for further research into the complex interplay between brain structure and hallucinatory experiences.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applications in the Study of Executive Functions: A Review

PURPOSE

Executive functions (EFs) are a set of advanced cognitive functions essential for human survival and behavioral regulation. Understanding neurophysiological mechanisms of EFs as well as exploring methods to enhance them are still challenging problems in cognitive neuroscience. In recent years, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been widely used in the field of EF research and has made notable progress. This article aimed to discuss the impact of TMS technology on EF research from both basic and applied research perspectives.

METHODS

We searched for literature on TMS and EFs published in the last decade (2013-2023) and reviewed how TMS has been applied in the field of EF.

FINDINGS

We found that the combination of TMS with neuroimaging techniques was helpful in exploring the brain mechanisms of EFs and investigating the executive dysfunctions caused by other neuropsychiatric disorders. Moreover, TMS could be considered as one of the most important techniques to enhance EFs among patient populations, even healthy people, with high safety and credibility. Meanwhile, we discussed the application of TMS in the research of EFs and made suggestions for future research directions. We suggested that a multidisciplinary structure of methods such as epigenetics and endocrinology could be integrated with TMS for investigating deeper in EF domains, and a substantial number of high-quality clinical studies are required to further elucidate the effects of TMS on EFs.

CONCLUSIONS

TMS holds great promise for gaining insight into investigating the neural mechanisms of EFs and improving executive functions among different populations.

Engineering and Technological Advancements in Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS): A Five-Year Review

In the past five years, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has evolved significantly, driven by advancements in device design, treatment protocols, software integration, and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). This review evaluates how these innovations enhance the safety, efficacy, and accessibility of rTMS while identifying key challenges such as protocol standardization and ethical considerations. A structured review of peer-reviewed studies from 2019 to 2024 focused on technological and clinical advancements in rTMS, including AI-driven personalized treatments, portable devices, and integrated BCIs. AI algorithms have optimized patient-specific protocols, while portable devices have expanded access. Enhanced coil designs and BCI integration offer more precise and adaptive neuromodulation. However, challenges remain in standardizing protocols, addressing device complexity, and ensuring equitable access. While recent innovations improve rTMS's clinical utility, gaps in long-term efficacy and ethical concerns persist. Future research must prioritize standardization, accessibility, and robust ethical frameworks to ensure rTMS's sustainable impact.

A semi-automated pipeline for finite element modeling of electric field induced in nonhuman primates by transcranial magnetic stimulation

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used to treat a range of brain disorders by inducing an electric field (E-field) in the brain. However, the precise neural effects of TMS are not well understood. Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are used to model the impact of TMS on neural activity, but a systematic method of quantifying the induced E-field in the cortex of NHPs has not been developed.

NEW METHOD

The pipeline uses statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to automatically segment a structural MRI image of a rhesus macaque into five tissue compartments. Manual corrections are necessary around implants. The segmented tissues are tessellated into 3D meshes used in finite element method (FEM) software to compute the TMS induced E-field in the brain. The gray matter can be further segmented into cortical laminae using a volume preserving method for defining layers.

RESULTS

Models of three NHPs were generated with TMS coils placed over the precentral gyrus. Two coil configurations, active and sham, were simulated and compared. The results demonstrated a large difference in E-fields at the target. Additionally, the simulations were calculated using two different E-field solvers and were found to not significantly differ.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Current methods segment NHP tissues manually or use automated methods for only the brain tissue. Existing methods also do not stratify the gray matter into layers.

CONCLUSION

The pipeline calculates the induced E-field in NHP models by TMS and can be used to plan implant surgeries and determine approximate E-field values around neuron recording sites.

A comparative transcranial magnetic stimulation study: Assessing cortical excitability and plasticity in Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and Frontotemporal dementia

BACKGROUND

Here, we aimed to investigate the roles of long-term potentiation-like (LTP-like) plasticity using intermittent theta burst (iTBS) protocol and resting motor threshold (rMT) in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), diffuse dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD).

METHOD

We enrolled 21 subjects with AD, 28 subjects with DLB, 14 subjects with FTD, and 33 elderly subjects with normal cognitive functions into the study. We recorded rMT and percentage amplitude change of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) after the iTBS protocol in each group.

RESULTS

In patients with AD and DLB, the percentage amplitude change of MEPs, and rMTs were significantly lower than in healthy subjects. However, no significant difference was observed in individuals with FTD.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that transcranial magnetic stimulation measures, particularly rMTs and LTP-like plasticity, may be potential biomarkers to distinguish between different dementia subtypes. Impaired motor cortical excitability and synaptic plasticity were more prominent in AD and DLB than in FTD. This aligns with the evidence that cortical motor networks are usually spared in FTDs in early-to-middle stages.

Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Approach for Brain Modulation and Repair: Underlying Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms

Neurological and psychiatric diseases generally have no cure, so innovative non-pharmacological treatments, including non-invasive brain stimulation, are interesting therapeutic tools as they aim to trigger intrinsic neural repair mechanisms. A common brain stimulation technique involves the application of pulsed magnetic fields to affected brain regions. However, investigations of magnetic brain stimulation are complicated by the use of many different stimulation parameters. Magnetic brain stimulation is usually divided into two poorly connected approaches: (1) clinically used high-intensity stimulation (0.5-2 Tesla, T) and (2) experimental or epidemiologically studied low-intensity stimulation (μT-mT). Human tests of both approaches are reported to have beneficial outcomes, but the underlying biology is unclear, and thus optimal stimulation parameters remain ill defined. Here, we aim to bring together what is known about the biology of magnetic brain stimulation from human, animal, and in vitro studies. We identify the common effects of different stimulation protocols; show how different types of pulsed magnetic fields interact with nervous tissue; and describe cellular mechanisms underlying their effects-from intracellular signalling cascades, through synaptic plasticity and the modulation of network activity, to long-term structural changes in neural circuits. Recent advances in magneto-biology show clear mechanisms that may explain low-intensity stimulation effects in the brain. With its large breadth of stimulation parameters, not available to high-intensity stimulation, low-intensity focal magnetic stimulation becomes a potentially powerful treatment tool for human application.