Effectively managing intractable central hyperthermia in a stroke patient by bromocriptine: a case report

Clinical experience with bromocriptine for central hyperthermia after brain insult

INTRODUCTION

Bromocriptine is a dopamine receptor agonist used for central hyperthermia with limited data. We describe our single-center experience utilizing bromocriptine for central hyperthermia, including the population treated, most common dosing regimens, adverse events, and discontinuation reasons.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted screening patients who were admitted to intensive care units for acute neurological insults and administered bromocriptine for central hyperthermia between April 2016 and September 2022. Baseline characteristics, disease severity markers, and bromocriptine doses were collected. Body temperatures prior to the first dose of bromocriptine, at the time of dose, and after each dose were recorded. Co-administration of additional hyperthermia management therapies was noted.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. The most common diagnosis was traumatic brain injury (TBI) (N = 14). The most common reason for discontinuation was resolution of indication (N = 14). Discontinuation due to mild adverse effects occurred in four patients; hepatotoxicity was the most common. There was a paired mean difference of -0.37°C (p = 0.005) between temperatures before and after bromocriptine initiation.

CONCLUSION

Bromocriptine is a potential therapy for the management of central hyperthermia in patients with severe acute neurologic insults who have failed other therapies. Bromocriptine was well tolerated and associated with a low incidence of adverse events.

A comparative study on the use of procalcitonin to distinguish between central fever and infectious causes of fever

Introduction

central fever is defined as elevated body temperature without any evidence of infection or drug reaction fever, and currently it has no definitive diagnostic criteria. The current study aims to assess the role of procalcitonin (PCT) in differentiating central fever from fever secondary to infections in patients with neurological insults.

Methods

we conducted a retrospective study of patients admitted with a neurological insult (brain trauma, brain tumors and cerebrovascular accidents) in a tertiary care hospital. All patients who developed fever 48 hours after admission and had procalcitonin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) done as part of fever evaluation were assessed to include in the study.

Results

out of 70 patients who met inclusion criteria, 37 had infections identified and 33 had no source of infection. The mean age was 42.9 years (± 18) in the infectious group while 40.3 years (± 18.2) in the central fever group and there was male predominance in both groups. In the infectious group there were 25(67.6%) males vs. 12(32.4%) females while in non -infectious group, males vs. females were 18(54.5%) vs. 15(45.5%) and there was no difference in both group (p-value 0.26) Median procalcitonin (PCT) value was 0.09 ng/dl (IQR 0.05- 0.19) in patients with no identified cause of infection and 1.4 ng/dl (IQR 0.5-5.1) in patients with infections with a p-value of <0.001. Although CRP and ESR were low in patients with central fever as compared to those with infections, these differences did not reach statistical significance with p-value of CRP 0.18 and p-value of ESR 0.31 between two groups.

Conclusion

PCT levels were low in patients with central fever and may be considered as a useful biomarker to differentiate between infectious fever from non-infectious fever in patients with brain injury. This can prevent unnecessary antibiotic use in patients without infection.

Antipyretic Efficacy of Bromocriptine in Central Fever: an Exploratory Analysis

BACKGROUND

'Central' fevers are thought to result from disruption of hypothalamic thermoregulatory pathways following severe brain injuries. Bromocriptine, due to its central dopamine receptor agonism, has been hypothesized to have antipyretic effect in this setting. However, clinical evidence for this off-label use is limited to a few case reports. In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the effect of bromocriptine administration on body temperature in acute brain injury patients with suspected central fever.

METHODS

We screened a cohort of adult patients that received bromocriptine in the neurologic-intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. Indication of central fever was ascertained by review of clinical documentation. A generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was used to model temperature as a function of time relative to bromocriptine initiation. We adjusted for potential confounding due to the following covariates: temperature recording method (invasive vs surface), concurrent antipyretic administration within 8 h, and surface cooling device use within 4 h of temperature measurement. Temperature-time function was modeled using a cubic spline with k = 10 knots.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were included in the analysis (14 women; mean age: 50 y, standard deviation 14 y). Median dose of bromocriptine was 7.5 mg (range 2.5-40) for a median of 13 d (range 5-160). Age and sex did not impact the function of temperature over time. Predicted temperatures were significantly (p < 0.05) higher by 0.4 °C with invasive compared to surface recording methods, lower by 0.2 °C in the presence of cooling device use and lower by 0.1 °C with concurrent antipyretic use. On adjusted analysis with the GAMM, there was decline (p < 0.05) in temperature following bromocriptine initiation by - 0.3 °C at 24 h, - 0.5 °C at 48 h, and - 0.7 °C at 72 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Bromocriptine use was associated with modest but statistically significant decline in temperature, with nadir at 72 h post initiation. The findings provide a data driven basis for prospective evaluation.

Uncontrolled central hyperthermia by standard dose of bromocriptine: A case report

BACKGROUND

Some patients present to the intensive care unit due to noninfectious pathologies resulting in fever, especially acute neurological injuries, including brain trauma and intracranial haemorrhage. The cause has been identified to be central hyperthermia characterized by a high core temperature and a poor response to antipyretics and antibiotics. However, no proper guidelines on how to treat central hyperthermia have been developed for clinical practice.

CASE SUMMARY

A 63-year-old woman was transferred to our hospital due to injury after a traffic accident. Eight hours after admission, her pupils enlarged bilaterally from 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm. She developed severe coma and underwent decompressive craniectomy. She was diagnosed with central hyperthermia after surgery and was prescribed bromocriptine. The standard dose of bromocriptine could not control her hyperpyrexia, and we prescribed 30 mg a day to control her temperature.

CONCLUSION

Bromocriptine may be effective in controlling central hyperthermia and have a dosage effect.

Central Hyperthermia Treated with Bromocriptine

Introduction. Central hyperthermia is common in patients with brain injury. It typically has a rapid onset with high temperatures and marked fluctuations and responds poorly to antibiotics and antipyretics. It is also associated with worse outcomes in the brain injured patient. Recognizing this, it is important to aggressively manage it. Case Report. We report a 34-year-old male with a right thalamic hemorrhage extending to the midbrain and into the ventricles. During his admission, he developed intractable fevers with core temperatures as high as 39.3°C. Infectious workup was unremarkable. The fever persisted despite empiric antibiotics, antipyretics, and cooling wraps. Bromocriptine was started resulting in control of the central hyperthermia. The fever spikes were reduced to minor fluctuations that significantly worsened with any attempt to wean off the bromocriptine. Conclusion. Diagnosing and managing central hyperthermia can be challenging. The use of bromocriptine can be beneficial as we have reported.

Intractable Central Hyperthermia in the Setting of Brainstem Hemorrhage

Hyperthermia from a central cause is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Dysfunction of brainstem thermoregulatory pathways may explain the intractable rise in temperature. Antipyretics, dantrolene, bromocriptine, and surface and intravascular cooling devices have been attempted for temperature control. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman with history of hypertension who presented with pontine hemorrhage with extension into the midbrain and medulla. On days 8-9 of her hospital admission, she developed intractable fever and expired the same day despite aggressive treatment of hypothermia, including antipyretics, ice lavage, cold fluid boluses, surface cooling, dantrolene, and bromocriptine. Hyperthermia from brainstem hemorrhage can be difficult to manage with current treatment options. Early recognition of those patients who may develop hyperthermia could lead to early intervention and possibly better outcomes. More evidence from prospective randomized controlled trials will elucidate the risk-benefit profile of achieving normothermia with aggressive fever control in these patients.