Comparative efficacy of alemtuzumab and established treatment in the management of multiple sclerosis

Therapeutic agents for steroid-refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the cornerstones of current oncology treatment, and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis (IRM) is the most fatal of all immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events (irAEs). Methylprednisolone pulse therapy (500-1,000 mg/day) is the initial treatment for IRM recommended by almost all relevant guidelines. However, subsequent treatment regimens remain unclear for patients who do not respond to methylprednisolone pulse therapy (who are defined as steroid-refractory patients). We propose a potential treatment approach for steroid-refractory IRM.

Methods

The PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched using keywords related to IRM. Relevant English-language articles published from January 2000 to February 2024 were included in this narrative review.

Key Content and Findings

Abatacept is the preferred choice for the treatment of isolated steroid-refractory IRM. For rapidly progressive or interleukin-6 abnormally elevated steroid-refractory IRM, alemtuzumab or tocilizumab/tofacitinib are the preferred therapeutic agents, respectively. For steroid-refractory IRM comorbid with myositis or comorbid with myasthenia gravis, abatacept + ruxolitinib/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or MMF + pyridostigmine/IVIG are the preferred therapeutic agents, respectively.

Conclusions

The pathogenesis of steroid-refractory IRM and the treatment regimen remain unclear. A large number of studies need to be conducted to validate or update our proposed treatment approach.

Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis: Are We Ready for Regulatory Approval?

Despite the availability of a lot of effective disease-modifying drugs, multiple sclerosis (MS) (in particular the progressive forms) still represents an important unmet medical need, because of issues in terms of effectiveness, duration of response, safety, and patient compliance. An increasing body of evidence from randomized clinical trials and real-world data suggest that rituximab is a highly effective alternative in both relapsing and progressive MS, with a low discontinuation rate, related to a good benefit/risk profile, and a good compliance. To date, the use of rituximab in patients with multiple sclerosis is not in accordance with the authorized product information (off-label use). However, the use of this medicine is widespread in several countries, and in some cases, it is the most commonly used disease-modifying drug for MS subtypes. This use could be officially recognized by national regulatory authorities, according to specific procedures, to ensure equal access for patients to a safe and effective option.

The sequence of disease-modifying therapies in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety and immunologic considerations

The treatment landscape for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) has expanded considerably over the last 10 years with the approval of multiple new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), and others in late-stage clinical development. All DMTs for RMS are believed to reduce central nervous system immune-mediated inflammatory processes, which translate into demonstrable improvement in clinical and radiologic outcomes. However, some DMTs are associated with long-lasting effects on the immune system and/or serious adverse events, both of which may complicate the use of subsequent therapies. When customizing a treatment program, a benefit–risk assessment must consider multiple factors, including the efficacy of the DMT to reduce disease activity, the short- and long-term safety and immunologic profiles of each DMT, the criteria used to define switching treatment, and the risk tolerance of each patient. A comprehensive benefit–risk assessment can only be achieved by evaluating the immunologic, safety, and efficacy data for DMTs in the controlled clinical trial environment and the postmarketing clinical practice setting. This review is intended to help neurologists make informed decisions when treating RMS by summarizing the known data for each DMT and raising awareness of the multiple considerations involved in treating people with RMS throughout the entire course of their disease.

Immunomodulatory Effects of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 on Dendritic Cells Promote Induction of T Cell Hyporesponsiveness to Myelin-Derived Antigens

While emerging evidence indicates that dendritic cells (DC) play a central role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS), their modulation with immunoregulatory agents provides prospect as disease-modifying therapy. Our observations reveal that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25(OH)₂D₃) treatment of monocyte-derived DC results in a semimature phenotype and anti-inflammatory cytokine profile as compared to conventional DC, in both healthy controls and MS patients. Importantly, 1,25(OH)₂D₃-treated DC induce T cell hyporesponsiveness, as demonstrated in an allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction. Next, following a freeze-thaw cycle, 1,25(OH)₂D₃-treated immature DC could be recovered with a 78% yield and 75% viability. Cryopreservation did not affect the expression of membrane markers by 1,25(OH)₂D₃-treated DC nor their capacity to induce T cell hyporesponsiveness. In addition, the T cell hyporesponsiveness induced by 1,25(OH)₂D₃-treated DC is antigen-specific and robust since T cells retain their capacity to respond to an unrelated antigen and do not reactivate upon rechallenge with fully mature conventional DC, respectively. These observations underline the clinical potential of tolerogenic DC (tolDC) to correct the immunological imbalance in MS. Furthermore, the feasibility to cryopreserve highly potent tolDC will, ultimately, contribute to the large-scale production and the widely applicable use of tolDC.