Measurement of treatment adherence with antipsychotic agents in patients with schizophrenia

Patient Factors Influencing Outpatient Retention in Patients with Affective and Anxiety Disorders: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to identify the factors that affect retention in outpatients with psychiatric disorders as indicators of treatment adherence, including Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) scores.

METHODS

The medical records of 146 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, or anxiety disorder for at least 10 years and discharged were retrospectively reviewed in the present study. The subjects were categorized based on the duration of outpatient treatment as < 6 months (L6) or ≥ 6 months (M6) groups and reclassified as < 36 months (L36) and ≥ 36 months (M36) groups. The demographic, clinical, and personality characteristics of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

Patients in M6 and M36 groups were more likely to have a higher educational level compared with those in the L6 and L36 groups, respectively. Patients in the M6 group showed significantly lower hypomania (Ma) scores on the MMPI test than did patients in the L6 group.

CONCLUSION

The association between high Ma score on the MMPI test and early discontinuation of treatment suggests that impulsivity, hostility, and disinhibition confer higher risk of nonadherence.

Real-world adherence assessment of lurasidone and other oral atypical antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia: an administrative claims analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare adherence with lurasidone to other oral atypical antipsychotics among Medicaid and commercially insured patients with schizophrenia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Administrative claims of patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical antipsychotics (lurasidone, aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone) from October 2010 to September 2011 were identified from MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Databases, and were classified by the first (index) antipsychotic. Patients were 18-64 years, had insurance coverage 12 months pre- and 6 months post-index, and no pre-index use of the index drug.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Medication possession ratio (MPR), discontinuation rate, and mean time to discontinuation were assessed post-index. Pairwise comparisons (lurasidone versus each drug) were conducted using chi-square tests and Student's t-tests.

RESULTS

There were 146 Medicaid (mean age 43.5 years, 47.9% female) and 63 commercial (mean age 40.0 years, 42.9% female) patients treated with lurasidone. In the Medicaid population, the MPR for patients treated with lurasidone was 0.60, versus 0.41-0.48 for patients treated with other antipsychotics (all p < .05). Patients treated with lurasidone exhibited a lower discontinuation rate compared to patients treated with all other antipsychotics (49.3% versus 62.3%-68.3%, all p < .05). The mean time to discontinuation with lurasidone was significantly longer than with ziprasidone (p < .05). In the commercial population, the MPR for patients treated with lurasidone (0.61) was higher compared to patients treated with quetiapine (0.44) and ziprasidone (0.43) (both p < .05). The discontinuation rate (44.4%) was lower for patients treated with lurasidone compared to patients treated with all other antipsychotics except risperidone (p < .05). The mean time to discontinuation was longer for lurasidone than with other antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

In Medicaid and commercial populations, patients treated with lurasidone demonstrated greater adherence compared to patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics. Limitations of using administrative claims data include potential errors or inconsistencies in coding, and lack of complete clinical information.

Measuring Medication Adherence in Patients With Schizophrenia: An Integrative Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to assess the validity, reliability and levels of evidence of existing instruments for measuring medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is estimated to affect approximately 7 individuals out of 1000 in their lifetimes, with fifty percent of patients attempting suicide. However studies have shown that measuring medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia is difficult and no gold standard currently exists. Without reliable and valid instruments to evaluate non-adherence in this population, research into strategies to improve adherence cannot move forward.

DATA SOURCES

This integrative review used the following search terms: assessing, measuring, medication adherence, schizophrenia, medication non-adherence, validity, reliability and measures. Databases searched included CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO and Scopus). Studies were included if they were published from 2000 to 2016. Fourteen instruments were identified from six studies and were included in this review.

RESULTS

All the instruments assessed were weak in both validity and reliability coupled with having low levels of evidence. Three instruments (two are fairly new) yielded better validity, reliability and sensitivity; however they have not been assessed in broad, diverse samples, so their generalizability remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests the need to develop an instrument with adequate validity, reliability, and sensitivity to various patients' characteristics.

Comparison of pharmacy-based measures of medication adherence

Background

Pharmacy databases are commonly used to assess medication usage, and a number of measures have been developed to measure patients’ adherence to medication. An extensive literature now supports these measures, although few studies have systematically compared the properties of different adherence measures.

Methods

As part of an 18-month randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of automated telephone reminders on adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) among 6903 adult members of a managed care organization, we computed eight pharmacy-based measures of ICS adherence using outpatient pharmacy dispensing records obtained from the health plan’s electronic medical record. We used simple descriptive statistics to compare the relative performance characteristics of these measures.

Results

Comparative analysis found a relative upward bias in adherence estimates for those measures that require at least one dispensing event to be calculated. Measurement strategies that require a second dispensing event evidence even greater upward bias. These biases are greatest with shorter observation times. Furthermore, requiring a dispensing to be calculated meant that these measures could not be defined for large numbers of individuals (17-32 % of participants in this study). Measurement strategies that do not require a dispensing event to be calculated appear least vulnerable to these biases and can be calculated for everyone. However they do require additional assumptions and data (e.g., pre-intervention dispensing data) to support their validity.

Conclusions

Many adherence measures require one, or sometimes two, dispensings in order to be defined. Since such measures assume all dispensed medication is used as directed, they have a built in upward bias that is especially pronounced when they are calculated over relatively short timeframes (< 9 months). Less biased measurement strategies that do not require a dispensing event are available, but require additional data to support their validity.

Trial registration

The study was funded by grant R01HL83433 from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and is filed as study NCT00414817 in the clinicaltrials.gov database.

Adesão ao tratamento medicamentoso em pacientes do espectro esquizofrênico: uma revisão sistemática da literatura

OBJETIVO: Realizar revisão sistemática para avaliar a adesão medicamentosa ao tratamento em pacientes do espectro esquizofrênico. MÉTODO: As buscas dos artigos foram conduzidas nas seguintes bases de dados: PubMed/Medline, Lilacs, SciELO e PePSIC, considerando artigos publicados entre 2001 e 2010. Na estratégia de busca, foram utilizados descritores de acordo com sua definição no DeCS e no MeSH: "schizophrenia" and "patient adherence" or "patient compliance" or "medication adherence". As correspondências em português e espanhol foram respectivamente "esquizofrenia/esquizofrenia" e "cooperação do paciente/cooperácion del paciente" ou "adesão à medicação/cumplimiento de lá medicación". Também foram realizadas buscas manuais nas referências dos artigos selecionados. RESULTADOS: A busca bibliográfica resultou em 1.692 artigos. Contudo, apenas 54 preencheram os critérios para compor esta revisão. CONCLUSÕES: A maioria dos estudos sobre o tema foi realizada em países desenvolvidos, prejudicando a aplicação dos achados à nossa realidade. As taxas da adesão e os métodos utilizados para avaliação variaram bastante, porém os fatores associados à não adesão se repetiram, como falta de insight, comorbidade com uso de substâncias psicoativas, falta de apoio social, efeitos colaterais da medicação, comportamento violento, situação de rua, tentativa de suicídio, entre outros. Assim sendo, há necessidade da realização de mais estudos nacionais para investigar potenciais variáveis associadas a não adesão e suas consequências para a população estudada.

Use of antipsychotic and antidepressant within the Psychiatric Disease Centre, Regional Health Service of Ferrara

Background

This study aimed at describing the type and dosage of psychopharmaceuticals dispensed to patients with psychiatric disorders and to assess the percentage of patients treated with antipsychotics and antidepressants, the associated therapies, treatment adherence, and dosages used in individuals registered at the Psychiatric Disease Center (PDC), Regional Health Service of Ferrara.

Methods

The analysis focused on therapeutic programmes presented to the Department of Pharmacy of the University Hospital of Ferrara of 892 patients treated by the PDC (catchment area of 134605 inhabitants). All diagnoses were made according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9). The analysis focused on prescriptions from September 2007 to June 2009. Data on adherence to prescribed therapy have were processed by analysis of variance.

Results

Among the patients 63% were treated with antipsychotics and 40% with antidepressants. Among patients receiving antipsychotics 92% used second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) whereas the remaining 8% used first generation antipsychotics (FGAs). Antipsychotic doses were lower than Daily Defined Dose (DDDs), and SGAs were often given with anticholinergics to decrease side effects. Mean adherence to antipsychotic therapy was 64%. Among antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most often prescribed, 55%. Dosages of these were within the limits indicated by the technical datasheet but higher than DDDs. Only 26% of patients underwent monotherapy. In antidepressants polytherapy, medication was associated with another antidepressant, 6% or with an antipsychotic, 51%. Mean adherence to the antidepressant therapy was 64%.

Conclusions

Patients treated with antipsychotics tend to use doses lower than DDDs. The opposite tendency was noted in patients treated with antidepressants. Only a small percentage of patients (14%) modified their neuroleptic therapy by increasing the dosage. On the contrary, patients treated with antidepressants mainly tended to reduce the doses of their drugs. This study highlights the tendency to follow combination therapies, prescribing SGAs together with anticholinergics in order to minimize extrapyramidal side effects or by combining two antidepressants. The study showed low adherence for both pharmaceutical therapies, which is typical in the setting of the analyzed diseases.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment, reviewed key areas and considered the strength of evidence and clinical implications. The guidelines were drawn up after extensive feedback from the participants and interested parties, and cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. The practice recommendations presented are based on the available evidence to date, and seek to clarify which interventions are of proven benefit. It is hoped that the recommendations will help to inform clinical decision making for practitioners, and perhaps also serve as a source of information for patients and carers. They are accompanied by a more detailed qualitative review of the available evidence. The strength of supporting evidence for each recommendation is rated.

Evaluation of health services use following the initiation of risperidone long-acting therapy among schizophrenia patients in the veterans health administration

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The introduction of long-acting injection antipsychotic agents has been associated with better treatment persistence and better subsequent patient outcomes. However, limited empirical data are available on patient outcomes resulting from the initiation of long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents. In this study, we assessed patterns of health-care utilization following the initiation of risperidone long-acting therapy (RLAT), the first and only second generation long-acting injectable antipsychotic agent, in schizophrenia patients within the Veterans Health Administration.

METHODS

Patients were identified if they initiated RLAT between 1 October 2005 and 30 September 2006, were ≥ 18 years of age at the time of initiation, and had at least four injections following the initiation. Paired t-tests and McNemar tests were used to compare patterns of health services use during 12 months pre- and post-initiation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Among 924 eligible study subjects, about 94% were male with mean age of 51·1 years and as high as 60% had >3 and 29% had >5 comorbid conditions. The initiators of RLAT had an average of 17·3 (SD ± 9·7) injections within the 12 months following the initiation, with an average of 14 days between injections. Between the pre- and post-initiation periods, although the number of psychiatric-related outpatient visits increased from 24·6 to 39·1 (P < 0·001), the number of psychiatric hospitalizations decreased from 1·4 to 1·0 (P < 0·001) with an average length of stay reducing from 20 to 14 days (P < 0·001). The percentage of patients who experienced at least one or two psychiatric-related hospitalizations decreased from 68·9% to 45·7% (P < 0·001) and from 34·9% to 24·4% (P < 0·001), respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Despite the values of RLAT in treating patients with schizophrenia, RLAT is largely underutilized in routine clinical practice. This observation highlights the importance for future research to ascertain the cost-effectiveness of initiating RLAT, especially the extent to which medication adherence influences the prescription pattern of RLAT and subsequent costs of initiating RLAT.