Profile of Solriamfetol in the Management of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Narcolepsy or Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Focus on Patient Selection and Perspectives

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) affects 13-33% of males and 6-9% of females globally and poses significant treatment challenges, including poor adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and residual excessive sleepiness (RES). This review aims to elucidate the emerging interest in pharmacological treatments for OSAS, focusing on recent advancements in this area. A thorough analysis of extensive clinical trials involving various drugs, including selective dopamine reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine inhibitors, combined antimuscarinic agents, and orexin agonists, was conducted. These trials focused on ameliorating respiratory metrics and enhancing sleep quality in individuals affected by OSAS. The studied pharmacological agents showed potential in improving primary outcomes, notably the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). These improvements suggest enhanced sleep quality and symptom management in OSAS patients. With a deeper understanding of OSAS, pharmacological interventions are emerging as a promising direction for its effective management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of drug research in OSAS, highlighting the potential of these treatments in addressing the disorder's complex challenges.

Recovery Mimicking "Ideal" CPAP Adherence Does Not Improve Wakefulness or Cognition in Chronic Murine Models of OSA: Effect of Wake-Promoting Agents

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic condition characterized by intermittent hypoxia (IH) and sleep fragmentation (SF). OSA can induce excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and is associated with impaired cognition and anxiety. Solriamfetol (SOL) and modafinil (MOD) are widely used wake-promoting agents in OSA patients with EDS.

METHODS

Male C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to SF along with sleep controls (SC) or to IH and room air (RA) controls during the light (inactive) phase for 4 and 16 weeks, respectively. Both IH and SF exposures were then discontinued to mimic "ideal" continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence. All groups were then randomly assigned to receive once daily intraperitoneal injections of SOL, MOD, or vehicle (VEH) for 6 days. Sleep/wake activity was assessed along with tests of explicit memory, anxiety and depression were performed before and after treatments.

RESULTS

IH and SF exposures increased sleep percentage in the dark phase and reduced wake bouts lengths (i.e., EDS), and induced cognitive deficits and impulsivity in mice. Both SOL and MOD treatments effectively mitigated EDS when combined with recovery, while recovery alone did not improve EDS over the 6-day period. Furthermore, improvements explicit memory emerged only after SOL.

CONCLUSION

Chronic IH and SF induce EDS in young adult mice that is not ameliorated by recovery except when combined with either SOL or MOD. SOL, but not MOD, significantly improves IH-induced cognitive deficits. Thus, SOL emerges as a viable adjuvant medication for residual EDS in OSA along with its positive impact on cognition.

False positive urine amphetamine immunoassay due to solriamfetol

Solriamfetol is a schedule IV-controlled substance used to treat excessive daytime sleepiness resulting from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. We present a patient prescribed solriamfetol who tested positive for amphetamines on a routine urinary toxicology screen despite patient denial of illicit drug use, raising the possibility of a false positive amphetamine screen. Spiking studies were performed on negative urine, and different concentrations of solriamfetol drug on 2 different amphetamine assays: the commonly used Beckman Emit® II Plus Amphetamines Assay, and the Citrine™ Triple Quad™ MS/MS Systems. The Beckman yielded positive results for amphetamines at solriamfetol concentrations of 200 μg/mL and 2000 μg/mL and negative results at 0.2 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL. However, the Citrine™ Triple Quad™ MS/MS Systems was negative at all concentrations. The Beckman Emit® II Plus Amphetamine Assay gave false positive results for amphetamines due to solriamfetol drug usage, a finding of relevance to prescribers of solriamfetol.

Solriamfetol enhances wakefulness and improves cognition and anxiety in a murine model of OSA

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic condition characterized by intermittent hypoxia (IH). Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a common consequence of OSA and is associated with cognitive deficits and anxiety. Modafinil (MOD) and Solriamfetol (SOL) are potent wake-promoting agents clinically used to improve wakefulness in OSA patients with EDS.

METHODS

Male C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to either IH or room air (RA) controls during the light phase for 16 weeks. Both groups were then randomly assigned to receive once-daily intraperitoneal injections of SOL (200 mg/kg), MOD (200 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH) for 9 days while continuing IH exposures. Sleep/wake activity was assessed during the dark (active) phase. Novel object recognition (NOR), elevated-plus maze test (EPMT), and forced swim test (FST) were performed before and after drug treatment.

RESULTS

IH exposure increased dark phase sleep percentage and reduced wake bouts lengths and induced cognitive deficits and anxiogenic effects. Both SOL and MOD treatments decreased sleep propensity under IH conditions, but only SOL promoted improvements in NOR performance (explicit memory) and reduced anxiety-like behaviors.

CONCLUSION

Chronic IH, a hallmark feature of OSA, induces EDS in young adult mice that is ameliorated by both SOL and MOD. SOL, but not MOD, significantly improves IH-induced cognitive deficits and promotes anxiolytic effects. Thus, SOL could potentially benefit OSA patients beyond EDS management.

Pharmacological options for narcolepsy: are they the way forward?

INTRODUCTION

Narcolepsy is an under-recognized, rare neurologic disorder of hypersomnolence that is associated with increased mortality and medical and psychiatric co-morbidities. Narcolepsy exerts a substantial economic burden on patients and society. There is currently no cure, and life-long symptomatic therapy is needed. Available drugs do not modify the disease course.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript provides an overview of narcolepsy symptoms, diagnosis, pathophysiology, current pharmacotherapies, and emerging treatments. Gaps and unresolved issues in diagnosis and management of narcolepsy are discussed to answer whether pharmacological options are the way forward.

EXPERT OPINION

Diagnostic criteria for narcolepsy (ICSD-3) need revision and greater clarity. Improved recognition of cataplexy and other symptoms through educational outreach, new biomarkers, improved test scoring through artificial intelligence algorithms, and use of machine learning may facilitate earlier diagnosis and treatment. Pharmacological options need improved symptomatic therapy in addition to targeted therapies that address the loss of hypocretin signaling. Optimal narcolepsy care also needs a better understanding of the pathophysiology, recognition of the different phenotypes in narcolepsy, identification of at-risk individuals and early recognition of symptoms, better diagnostic tools, and a database for research and disease monitoring of treatment, side-effects, and comorbidities.

Cognitive Impairments, Neuroinflammation and Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability in Mice Exposed to Chronic Sleep Fragmentation during the Daylight Period

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic condition characterized by intermittent hypoxia (IH) and sleep fragmentation (SF). In murine models, chronic SF can impair endothelial function and induce cognitive declines. These deficits are likely mediated, at least in part, by alterations in Blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Male C57Bl/6J mice were randomly assigned to SF or sleep control (SC) conditions for 4 or 9 weeks and in a subset 2 or 6 weeks of normal sleep recovery. The presence of inflammation and microglia activation were evaluated. Explicit memory function was assessed with the novel object recognition (NOR) test, while BBB permeability was determined by systemic dextran-4kDA-FITC injection and Claudin 5 expression. SF exposures resulted in decreased NOR performance and in increased inflammatory markers and microglial activation, as well as enhanced BBB permeability. Explicit memory and BBB permeability were significantly associated. BBB permeability remained elevated after 2 weeks of sleep recovery (p < 0.01) and returned to baseline values only after 6 weeks. Chronic SF exposures mimicking the fragmentation of sleep that characterizes patients with OSA elicits evidence of inflammation in brain regions and explicit memory impairments in mice. Similarly, SF is also associated with increased BBB permeability, the magnitude of which is closely associated with cognitive functional losses. Despite the normalization of sleep patterns, BBB functional recovery is a protracted process that merits further investigation.

Solriamfetol improves chronic sleep fragmentation-induced increases in sleep propensity and ameliorates explicit memory in male mice

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent condition characterized by episodes of partial or complete breath cessation during sleep that induces sleep fragmentation (SF). One of the frequent manifestations of OSA is the presence of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with cognitive deficits. Solriamfetol (SOL) and modafinil (MOD) are wake-promoting agents commonly prescribed to improve wakefulness in OSA patients with EDS. This study aimed to assess the effects of SOL and MOD in a murine model of OSA characterized by periodic SF. Male C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to either control sleep (SC) or SF (mimicking OSA) during the light period (06:00 h to 18:00 h) for 4 weeks, which consistently induces sustained excessive sleepiness during the dark phase. Both groups were then randomly assigned to receive once-daily intraperitoneal injections of SOL (200 mg/kg), MOD (200 mg/kg), or vehicle for 1 week while continuing exposures to SF or SC. Sleep/wake activity and sleep propensity were assessed during the dark phase. Novel Object Recognition test, Elevated-Plus Maze Test, and Forced Swim Test were performed before and after treatment. SOL or MOD decreased sleep propensity in SF, but only SOL induced improvements in explicit memory, while MOD exhibited increased anxiety behaviors. Chronic SF, a major hallmark of OSA, induces EDS in young adult mice that is mitigated by both SOL and MOD. SOL, but not MOD, significantly improves SF-induced cognitive deficits. Increased anxiety behaviors are apparent in MOD-treated mice. Further studies aiming to elucidate the beneficial cognitive effects of SOL are warranted.

Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome: state of the art

Obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) is an extremely common sleep-related breathing disorder (SRBD) characterised by complete or partial collapse of the upper airways. These nocturnal phenomena cause high-frequency hypoxemic desaturations (or intermittent hypoxia, IH) during sleep and alterations in gas exchange. The result of IH is the development or worsening of cerebro-cardio-vascular, metabolic and other diseases, which cause a high risk of death. Hence, OSAHS is a multifactorial disease affecting several organs and systems and presenting with various clinical manifestations involving different medical branches. Although it has been estimated that about one billion individuals worldwide are affected by OSAHS, this SRBD remains underestimated also due to misinformation regarding both patients and physicians. Therefore, this review aims to provide information on the main symptoms and risk factors for the detection of individuals at risk of OSAHS, as well as to present the diagnostic investigations to be performed and the different therapeutic approaches. The scientific evidence reported suggest that OSAHS is an extremely common and complex disorder that has a large impact on the health and quality of life of individuals, as well as on healthcare expenditure. Moreover, given its multifactorial nature, the design and implementation of diagnostic and therapeutic programmes through a multidisciplinary approach are necessary for a tailor-made therapy for each patient.

Effects of solriamfetol on on-the-road driving in participants with narcolepsy: A randomised crossover trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of solriamfetol, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, on on-the-road driving performance in participants with narcolepsy.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, driving performance during a 1 h on-road driving test was assessed at 2 and 6 h post-dose following 7 days of treatment with solriamfetol (150 mg/day for 3 days, followed by 300 mg/day for 4 days) or placebo. The primary endpoint was standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) at 2 h post-dose.

RESULTS

The study included 24 participants (54% male; mean age, 40 years); 22 had evaluable SDLP data. At 2 h post-dose, median SDLP was significantly lower (improved) with solriamfetol compared with placebo (19.08 vs. 20.46 cm [median difference, -1.9 cm], p = 0.002). Four participants on solriamfetol and 7 on placebo had incomplete driving tests. At 6 h post-dose, median SDLP was not statistically significantly different with solriamfetol compared with placebo (19.59 vs. 19.78 cm [median difference, -1.1 cm], p = 0.125). Three participants on solriamfetol and 10 on placebo had incomplete driving tests. Common adverse events (≥5%) included headache, decreased appetite, and somnolence.

CONCLUSIONS

Solriamfetol 300 mg/day improved on-the-road driving performance, at 2 h post-administration in participants with narcolepsy.

Sleep Disorders in Patients With Craniopharyngioma: A Physiopathological and Practical Update

Sleep disorders (SDs) represent an important issue in patients with craniopharyngioma (CP). Nearly 70% of these patients complain of sleep-wake cycle alterations and/or excessive diurnal somnolence due to sleep-related breathing disorders, such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and/or central hypersomnia, including secondary narcolepsy. SDs may severely reduce quality of life, increase disease-related cardiorespiratory and cardiovascular morbidity, and finally play a major role in increased long-term mortality reported on patients with CP. A major risk factor for SDs is represented by the hypothalamic syndrome, which may develop because of direct hypothalamic damage by the tumor itself and/or complications of the treatments, neurosurgery and/or radiotherapy, and typically includes permanent neuroendocrine dysfunctions, morbid obesity, and secondary metabolic disorders. Despite increasing attention to SDs in the general population, and in particular to OSA as a risk factor for cardio-metabolic diseases and excessive daytime somnolence, sleep evaluation is still not routinely proposed to patients with CP. Hence, SDs are often underdiagnosed and undertreated. The aim of this paper is to update current knowledge of the pathogenesis and prevalence of SDs in patients with CP and propose practical algorithms for their evaluation and management in clinical practice. Particular attention is paid to screening and diagnostic tools for appropriate characterization of SDs, identification of risk factors, and potential role of hypothalamic sparing surgery in the prevention of morbid obesity and SDs. Available tools in sleep medicine, including lifestyle interventions, drugs, and respiratory devices, are discussed, as well as the importance of optimal hormone replacement and metabolic interventions. Current limits in the diagnosis and treatment of SDs in patients with CP and possible future avenues for research agenda are also considered.

Pharmacotherapy of residual excessive sleepiness among continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treated patients with sleep apnea

INTRODUCTION

Patients with persistent sleepiness after adequate treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) experience impaired cognition, reduced productivity, and worse quality of life. Although the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon are not completely understood, neuroimaging studies have identified reduced gray matter in the frontal cortex and alterations in white matter integrity suggestive of axonal and myelin damage. The intermittent hypoxia with resulting oxidative injury is considered a prime culprit behind the loss of wake-promoting catecholaminergic neurons.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review gives an overview of the pathophysiology and approaches to managing patients with residual sleepiness. The authors explore different targeted strategies aimed at improving selection of appropriate pharmacotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Wake-stimulant medications (modafinil and armodafinil) have demonstrated efficacy in reducing sleepiness in adequately treated OSA. The recent FDA approval of pitolisant and solriamfetol complements the use of modafinil by substituting for direct sympathomimetic agents. The distinctive pharmacologic profile and mode of action of each of these agents offer the opportunity of a personalized approach to the management of this disorder. Further studies should be conducted on the long-term effect of these agents alone or in combination on brain structural and functional changes.

Pharmacologic Therapy for Narcolepsy

Narcolepsy is a lifelong disorder that adversely affects daytime function and quality of life. Major symptoms include excessive daytime sleepiness with irrepressible sleep attacks and cataplexy. Recent developments in the understanding of the pathobiology of narcolepsy, as well as the neuronal systems involved in the regulation of wakefulness have led to development of new pharmacologic approaches to therapy. In this paper, we review available pharmacologic treatments for narcolepsy as well as agents currently under investigation.

Current Understanding of Narcolepsy 1 and its Comorbidities: What Clinicians Need to Know

Narcolepsy is a chronic neurologic disorder associated with the dysregulation of the sleep–wake cycle that often leads to a decreased quality of life and results in a considerable health burden. There is often a delay to diagnosis of narcolepsy, mainly due to the lack of recognition of this disorder. One of the main factors hindering the diagnosis of narcolepsy is the association of comorbidities, which include other sleep disorders, psychiatric disorders, cardiovascular disorders, and metabolic disorders. The signs and symptoms of these comorbidities often overlap with those of narcolepsy, and some of the medications used for their treatment may obscure the symptoms of narcolepsy, leading to a delay in diagnosis. This review is targeted to clinicians unaccustomed to working with sleep disorders and aims to increase recognition and improve the management of narcolepsy.

Current Management of Residual Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Due to Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Insights for Optimizing Patient Outcomes

Although excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) attributable to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can be resolved by consistent usage of and effective treatment (often with the use of continuous positive airway pressure therapy), 12–58% of patients report residual EDS (REDS). While REDS is difficult to treat, a proportion of cases are possibly due to reversible issues, and wake-promoting medications can prove useful for the remaining cases. Given the challenges associated with effective management of REDS and its relationship to multiple comorbidities, multidisciplinary management of patients with REDS is often recommended. Here we aim to bridge the knowledge gap on the burden, risk factors, prevalence, and potential pathophysiologic mechanisms of REDS in patients with OSA after first-line treatment. The roles of primary care physicians and sleep specialists, as well as the importance of the use of objective assessment tools for the evaluation of REDS and the effective management of comorbidities, are discussed. An update of approved treatments and emerging candidate treatments is also presented.

Expert Opinion: Managing sleep disturbances in people with epilepsy

Poor sleep and daytime sleepiness are common in people with epilepsy. Sleep disorders can disrupt seizure control and in turn sleep and vigilance problems can be exacerbated by seizures and by antiepileptic treatments. Nevertheless, these aspects are frequently overlooked in clinical practice and a clear agreement on the evidence-based guidelines for managing common sleep disorders in people with epilepsy is lacking. Recently, recommendations to standardize the diagnostic pathway for evaluating patients with sleep-related epilepsies and comorbid sleep disorders have been presented. To build on these, we adopted the Delphi method to establish a consensus within a group of experts and we provide practical recommendations for identifying and managing poor night-time sleep and daytime sleepiness in people with epilepsy. We recommend that a comprehensive clinical history of sleep habits and sleep hygiene should be always obtained from all people with epilepsy and their bed partners. A psychoeducational approach to inform patients about habits or practices that may negatively influence their sleep or their vigilance levels should be used, and strategies for avoiding these should be applied. In case of a suspected comorbid sleep disorder an appropriate diagnostic investigation should be performed. Moreover, the possible presence of sleep fragmentation induced by sleep-related seizures should be ruled out. Finally, the dose and timing of antiepileptic medications and other co-medications should be optimized to improve nocturnal sleep and avoid daytime sedation.

Pitolisant, a wake-promoting agent devoid of psychostimulant properties: Preclinical comparison with amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol

Several therapeutic options are currently available to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients suffering from narcolepsy or obstructive sleep apnea. However, there are no comparisons between the various wake-promoting agents in terms of mechanism of action, efficacy, or safety. The goal of this study was to compare amphetamine, modafinil, solriamfetol, and pitolisant at their known primary pharmacological targets, histamine H3 receptors (H3R), dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin transporters, and in various in vivo preclinical models in relation to neurochemistry, locomotion, behavioral sensitization, and food intake. Results confirmed that the primary pharmacological effect of amphetamine, modafinil, and solriamfetol was to increase central dopamine neurotransmission, in part by inhibiting its transporter. Furthermore, solriamfetol increased levels of extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, and decreased the 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl acetic acid (DOPAC)/DA ratio in the striatum, as reported for modafinil and amphetamine. All these compounds produced hyperlocomotion, behavioral sensitization, and hypophagia, which are common features of psychostimulants and of compounds with abuse potential. In contrast, pitolisant, a selective and potent H3R antagonist/inverse agonist that promotes wakefulness, had no effect on striatal dopamine, locomotion, or food intake. In addition, pitolisant, devoid of behavioral sensitization by itself, attenuated the hyperlocomotion induced by either modafinil or solriamfetol. Therefore, pitolisant presents biochemical, neurochemical, and behavioral profiles different from those of amphetamine and other psychostimulants such as modafinil or solriamfetol. In conclusion, pitolisant is a differentiated therapeutic option, when compared with psychostimulants, for the treatment of EDS, as this agent does not show any amphetamine-like properties within in vivo preclinical models.