Oral pressure therapy for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: clinical feasibility

How might non nutritional sucking protect from sudden infant death syndrome

Epidemiology has identified an association between the use of pacifiers and protection from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The use of pacifiers for SIDS prevention fails to gain adoption partly because there is no widely accepted physiologic mechanism to explain the epidemiologic association. Additionally, the scientific literature available on pacifier use focuses largely on the probable adverse effects. We hypothesize that pacifier use and all other forms of non-nutritional sucking (specifically digit sucking, also known as thumb sucking) is a life saving defense mechanism meant to splint open and stabilize the collapsible portion of the upper airway in infants.The main objective of this review article is to propose a mechanism to explain how pacifiers might help prevent SIDS. If the medical community accepts this mechanism, it can help promote pacifier use by the public and potentially reduce the incidence of SIDS.

Short-term efficacy of minimally invasive treatments for adult obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Many treatments have been proposed for adult obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but no comprehensive comparison of all interventions has been performed. We aimed to compare and rank the effectiveness of all minimally invasive treatments for adult OSA in a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Literature was searched within Ovid MedLine, EMBASE Classic+Embase, Cochrane library, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to Aug 9th, 2016 for randomized controlled trials comparing minimally invasive treatments for adult OSA. The outcomes were the changes in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Frequentist approach to network meta-analysis was used and treatment hierarchy was summarized according to the surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves. Eighty-nine randomized controlled trials comprising 6346 adult OSA participants and comparing 18 different interventions were included. In comparison with no treatment, positive airway pressure (PAP) was most effective in reducing AHI (23.28 [weighted mean difference]; 95% confidence interval: 19.20-27.35). PAP was ranked first followed by mandibular advancement device (MAD) in reducing AHI. Exercise was ranked first followed by cervico-mandibular support collar in reducing ESS. Considering the effectiveness in reducing both AHI and ESS, PAP was ranked the best, followed by MAD and positional therapy, while lifestyle modification alone was the least effective intervention. Interventions that are highly effective in reducing objective laboratory-derived AHI do not demonstrate equivalent effectiveness in improving patients' subjective sleepiness. Future improvement of the interventions is necessary to simultaneously improve both objective and subjective outcomes.

Examining the mechanism of action of a new device using oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to explore the mechanism of action of the oral pressure therapy (OPT) device, a new treatment for sleep apnea.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Fifteen subjects with sleep apnea who had been successfully treated (responders) with the OPT device and 4 subjects who were not successfully treated (non-responders) with the OPT device.

INTERVENTIONS

All subjects underwent a MRI (without the device, with the device in place without vacuum and with the device in place with vacuum) to examine the biomechanical changes associated with the OPT device.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Oral pressure therapy significantly (P = 0.002) increased the size of the retropalatal airway in both the lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions by moving the soft palate anteriorly and superiorly and the anterior-superior segment of the tongue forward, toward the teeth. The percentage and absolute increase in the cross-sectional area of the retropalatal region, the superior movement of the soft palate, and the anterior displacement of the tongue were significantly greater in the responders than in the non-responders. In responders, there were significant increases in the mean (P = 0.002), maximum (P = 0.0002), and minimum (P = 0.04) cross-sectional areas of the retropalatal region with the OPT device. However, in the retroglossal region, airway caliber decreased with the OPT device.

CONCLUSIONS

In those who responded to oral pressure therapy, it increased airway caliber in the retropalatal region by moving the soft palate anteriorly and superiorly and the anterior-superior segment of the tongue forward.

CITATION

Schwab RJ, Kim C, Siegel L, Keenan BT, Black J, Farid-Moayer M, Podmore J, Vaska M. Examining the mechanism of action of a new device using oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

Improvements in current treatments and emerging therapies for adult obstructive sleep apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common and is associated with a number of adverse outcomes, including an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Typical treatment approaches, including positive airway pressure, oral appliances, various upper airway surgeries, and/or weight loss, can improve symptoms and reduce the severity of disease in select patient groups. However, these approaches have several potential limitations, including suboptimal adherence, lack of suitability for all patient groups, and/or absence of adequate outcomes data. Emerging potential therapeutic options, including nasal expiratory positive airway pressure (PAP), oral negative pressure, upper airway muscle stimulation, and bariatric surgery, as well as improvements in existing treatments and the utilization of improving technologies are moving the field forward and should offer effective therapies to a wider group of patients with OSA.