Differences in implementation strategies of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2015 in Danish hospitals - a nationwide study

Impact of accredited advanced life support course participation on in-hospital cardiac arrest patient outcomes: A systematic review

Aim

Advanced life support courses have a clear educational impact; however, it is important to determine whether participation of one or more members of the resuscitation team in an accredited advanced life support course improves in-hospital cardiac arrest patient survival outcomes.

Methods

We searched EMBASE.com, Medline, Cochrane and CINAHL from inception to 1 November 2022. Included studies were randomised or non-randomised interventional studies assessing the impact of attendance at accredited life support courses on patient outcomes. Accredited life support courses were classified into 3 contexts: Advanced Life Support (ALS), Neonatal Resuscitation Training (NRT), and Helping Babies Breathe (HBB). Existing systematic reviews were identified for each of the contexts and an adolopment process was pursued. Appropriate risk of bias assessment tools were used across all outcomes. When meta-analysis was appropriate a random-effects model was used to produce a summary of effect sizes for each outcome.

Results

Of 2714 citations screened, 19 studies (1 ALS; 7 NRT; 11 HBB) were eligible for inclusion. Three systematic reviews which satisfied AMSTAR-2 criteria for methodological quality, included 16 of the studies we identified in our search. Among adult patients all outcomes including return of spontaneous circulation, survival to discharge and survival to 30 days were consistently better with accredited ALS training. Among neonatal patients there were reductions in stillbirths and early neonatal mortality.

Conclusion

These results support the recommendation that accredited advanced life support courses, specifically Advanced Life Support, Neonatal Resuscitation Training, and Helping Babies Breathe improve patient outcomes.

Hospital-level variation in outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark

BACKGROUND

We investigated hospital-level variation in outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in Denmark, and assessed whether variation in outcomes could be explained by differences in patient characteristics.

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years old) with IHCA in 2017 and 2018 were included from the Danish IHCA Registry (DANARREST). Data on patient characteristics and outcomes were obtained from population-based registries. Predicted probabilities, likelihood ratio tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and median odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to 30 days, and survival to 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 3340 patients with IHCA from 24 hospitals were included. We found that hospital-level variation in outcomes after IHCA existed across all measures of variation. The unadjusted median OR for ROSC, survival to 30 days, and survival to 1 year were 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24, 1.45), 1.38 (95% CI: 1.33, 1.60), and 1.44 (95% CI: 1.39, 1.70), respectively. The unadjusted ICC suggest that 2.0% (95%: 1.6%, 4.4%), 3.3% (95%: 2.7%, 6.8%), and 4.3% (95%: 3.5%, 8.6%) of the total individual variation in ROSC, survival to 30 days, and survival to 1 year was attributable to hospital-level variation. These results decreased but persisted in the analyses adjusted for select patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that outcomes after IHCA varied across hospitals in Denmark. However, only about 2%-4% of the total individual variation in outcomes after IHCA was attributable to differences between hospitals, suggesting that most of the individual variation in outcomes was attributable to patient-level variation.