1
|
Jorgensen MP, Safai P, Mainwaring L. An examination of social relations and concussion management via the blue card. Front Sports Act Living 2024; 6:1392809. [PMID: 38887686 PMCID: PMC11180777 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1392809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Initially developed by New Zealand Rugby in 2014, the Blue Card initiative in rugby enables match officials to remove athletes from play if they are suspected to have sustained a concussion. Considerable attention has been paid by sport and health advocates to the possibilities and limitations of this initiative in safeguarding athlete health. However, little if any attention has been paid to the well-being of those responsible for administering the Blue Card (i.e., match officials). The aim of this paper was to examine match officials' experiences with and perspectives on implementing the Blue Card initiative in Ontario, Canada, with focused attention on the tensions around their ability to manage games and participants (e.g., athletes, coaches) while attempting to safeguard athlete well-being. Methods Using Relational Coordination Theory (RCT) as a guiding framework and qualitative research method, we highlight the rich accounts of 19 match officials' perspectives and experiences regarding sport-related concussion (SRC) management and the Blue Card protocol. Results Four themes were derived from the data, reflecting latent assumptions embedded within the concussion management process, which include: assumptions of trust, respect, and cooperation; assumptions of shared responsibility; assumptions of shared understanding; and assumptions of harassment-free sport. Discussion Our findings emphasize the need to attend to social relations in concussion management and provide insight into match officials' fraught experiences on the frontlines of concussion management. We identify factors affecting match official well-being and provide considerations for concussion management initiatives designed to improve athlete safety, such as the Blue Card.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. Jorgensen
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Parissa Safai
- Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lynda Mainwaring
- Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kroshus E, Steiner MK, Lowry SJ, Lion KC, Klein EJ, Strelitz B, Chrisman SP, Rivara FP. Development of a Measure of Parent Concussion Management Knowledge and Self-Efficacy. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:2353-2361. [PMID: 37058357 PMCID: PMC10649183 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract Assessing parent readiness to support their child's post-concussion management requires valid and reliable measures. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and conduct preliminary tests of reliability and validity of survey measures of parent concussion management knowledge and self-efficacy. Additionally, we tested the hypothesis that among parents of youth who had sustained a concussion, higher scores on measures of knowledge and self-efficacy would predict greater likelihood of engaging in recommended concussion management behaviors during their child's recovery. Measure development occurred with reference to parenting behaviors included in the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) Management Guidelines. A multi-stage mixed- methods approach was employed, including expert review, cognitive interviews with parents, quantitative item reduction, and tests of reliability and validity. All participants were English-speaking parents of school-aged children in the United States. A stepwise measure development process was followed, with different participant groups across steps (including opt-in web-based survey panels and in-person recruitment from the population of parents of pediatric patients seen in a large pediatric emergency department). In total, 774 parents participated in study activities. The final knowledge index had 10 items, and the final self-efficacy scale had 13 items across four subscales (emotional support, rehabilitation support, monitoring, and external engagement). Internal consistency reliability was 0.63 for the knowledge index and 0.79-0.91 for self-efficacy sub-scales, and validation tests were in the hypothesized directions. In a test of predictive validity, we observed that among parents of youth patients with recent concussion, higher self-efficacy scores at the time of discharge from the pediatric emergency department were positively correlated (r = 0.12) with greater likelihood of engaging in recommended support behaviors at 2-week follow-up. There was no association between concussion management knowledge at discharge and parenting behaviors at follow-up. Parents have the potential to play an important role in concussion management. The measures of knowledge and self-efficacy developed in this study can help identify parent needs and evaluate interventions aiming to support parenting post-concussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kroshus
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mary Kathleen Steiner
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sarah J. Lowry
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - K. Casey Lion
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Eileen J. Klein
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Bonnie Strelitz
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sara P.D. Chrisman
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Frederick P. Rivara
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|