Single-arm open-label study of Durolane (NASHA nonanimal hyaluronic acid) for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the thumb

Comparison of intra-articular injection of ArtiAid®-Mini with Ostenil®-Mini for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: A double-blind, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections of ArtiAid®-Mini (AAM) and Ostenil®-Mini (OM) for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2018 and April 2020, this 24-week, double-blind, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial included a total of 17 patients (8 males, 9 females; mean age: 60.3±9.5 years; range, 42 to 76 years) who were treated with either intra-articular AAM (n=8) or OM (n=9). The primary outcome was pain according to a change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 12 weeks after the last injection. The secondary outcomes included the change of VAS at Weeks 2, 4, and 24 after the injection, satisfaction, range of motion (ROM) of trapeziometacarpal joint, pinch strength, grip strength, and adverse events at Weeks 2, 4, 12, and 24 after the injection.

RESULTS

Eight patients with AAM and eight patients with OM completed the follow-up. No significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes were observed between the two groups at baseline and each time point (p>0.05). The intra-group differences were significant in each time point.

CONCLUSION

The intra-articular injection of either AAM or OM is effective and safe for patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis up to 24 weeks.

Efficacy, Safety, and Accuracy of Intra-articular Therapies for Hand Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence

The lifetime risk of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (OA) is 39.8%, with one in two women and one in four men developing the disease by age 85 years and no disease-modifying drug (DMOAD) available so far. Intra-articular (IA) therapy is one of the options commonly used for symptomatic alleviation of OA disease as it can circumvent systemic exposure and potential side effects of oral medications. The current narrative review focuses on the efficacy and safety profiles of the currently available IA agents in hand OA (thumb-base OA or interphalangeal OA) such as corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid (HA), as well as the efficacy and safety of IA investigational injectates in phase 2/3 clinical trials such as prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma, stem cells, infliximab, interferon-? and botulinum toxin, based on the published randomized controlled trials on PubMed database. The limited published literature revealed the short-term symptomatic benefits of corticosteroids in interphalangeal OA while long-term data are lacking. Most of the short-term studies showed no significant difference between corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid in thumb-base OA, usually with a faster onset of pain relief in the corticosteroid group and a slower but greater (statistically insignificant) pain improvement in the HA group. The majority of studies in investigational agents were limited by small sample size, short-term follow-up, and presence of serious side effects. In addition, we reported higher accuracy rates of drug administrations under imaging guidance than landmark guidance (blind method), and then briefly describe challenges for the long-term efficacy and prospects of IA therapeutics.

New Trends in Injection-Based Therapy for Thumb-Base Osteoarthritis: Where Are We and where Are We Going?

Thumb-base osteoarthritis (TBOA) is a common condition, mostly affecting post-menopausal women, often inducing a significant impact on quality of life and hand functionality. Despite its high prevalence and disability, the therapeutic options in TBOA are still limited and few have been investigated. Among the pharmacological strategies for TBOA management, it would be worthwhile to mention the injection-based therapy. Unfortunately, its efficacy is still the subject of debate. Indeed, the 2018 update of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis (OA) stated that intra-articular (IA) injections of glucocorticoids should not generally be used, but may be considered in patients with painful interphalangeal joints, without any specific mention to the TBOA localization and to other widely used injections agents, such as hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Even American College of Rheumatology (ACR) experts conditionally recommended against IA HA injections in patients with TBOA, while they conditionally encouraged IA glucocorticoids. However, the recommendations from international scientific societies don’t often reflect the clinical practice of physicians who routinely take care of TBOA patients; indeed, corticosteroid injections are a mainstay of therapy in OA, especially for patients with pain refractory to oral treatments and HA is considered as a safe and effective treatment. The discrepancy with the literature data is due to the great heterogeneity of the clinical trials published in this field: indeed, the studies differ for methodology and protocol design, outcome measures, treatment (different formulations of HA, steroids, PRP, and schedules) and times of follow-up. For these reasons, the current review will provide deep insight into the injection-based therapy for TBOA, with particular attention to the different employed agents, the variety of the schedule treatments, the most common injection techniques, and the obtained results in terms of efficacy and safety. In depth, we will discuss the available literature on corticosteroids and HA injections for TBOA and the emerging role of PRP and other injection agents for this condition. We will consider in our analysis not only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but also recent pilot or retrospective studies trying to step forward to identify satisfactory management strategies for TBOA.

Nonanimal Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis: AProspective, Single-Arm Cohort Study

Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) can cause disabling symptoms, and some patients prefer to be treated with minimally invasive procedures. Nonanimal hyaluronic acid (NASHA) is a cross-linked hyaluronic acid product that has a prolonged intra-articular residence time. The authors report the first study of NASHA for the treatment of ankle OA. Thirty-seven patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III ankle OA received an intra-articular injection of NASHA (1 mL). Outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain and disability. At baseline, the mean VAS pain score was 50.1 ± 14.5mm. During the 26-week follow-up period, the least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in the ankle OA VAS pain score was -20.5mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -25.5 to -15.6 mm), an LS mean percentage reduction of 40.0% (95% CI 30.2% to 49.9%). The LS mean change from baseline in the VAS disability score during 26 weeks was -19.2mm (95% CI -24.8 to -13.6 mm), a percentage reduction of 34% (95% CI 22.3% to 45.7%). Five participants experienced a total of 7 adverse events considered to be related to study treatment (injection site pain, n = 3; injection site joint pain, n = 3; plantar fasciitis, n = 1). This study shows promise for viscosupplementation with NASHA in the treatment of ankle OA. A single injection was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in pain and disability during a 26-week period and, in general, was well tolerated.

Safety and Predictive Factors of Short-Term Efficacy of a Single Injection of Mannitol-Modified Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid in Patients with Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis. Results of a Multicentre Prospective Open-Label Pilot Study (INSTINCT Trial)

Purpose:

To assess safety and search predictive factors of efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of a mannitol-modified hyaluronic acid (HA) viscosupplement, in patients having trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods:

Patients with symptomatic TMC OA, not adequately relieved by analgesic therapy and/or by the use of a thumb splint, were included in a 3-month prospective multicentre open-label trial. All underwent plain radiographs with the Kapandji incidences allowing the Dell radiological grade assessment (1-4). Primary end point was the variation between injection (D0) and day 90 (D90) of the thumb pain (11-point Likert scale). Treatment consisted in a single injection of 0.6 to 1 mL of a viscosupplement made of a cross-linked HA combined with mannitol. All injections were performed under imaging guidance. Predictive factors of pain decrease were studied in univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results:

A total of 122 patients (76% women, mean age 60, mean disease duration 36 months) were included and 120 (98%) were assessed at 3 months. The TMC OA was of Dell’s grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 in 23%, 36.8%, 36.8%, and 3.5% of cases, respectively. At D0, the average (SD) pain level was 6.5 ± 1.6 without significant difference between Dell groups (P = .21). At day 90, pain decreased from 6.5 ± 1.6 to 3.9 ± 2.5 (difference −2.7 ± 2.5; −42%; P < .0001) without significant difference between Dell grade (P = .055), despite a seemingly smaller number of responders in stage 2 patients. The average analgesic consumption decreased in more than 1 out of 2 patients. In multivariate analysis, no predictor of response was identified. There was no safety issue. All adverse events (11%) were transient increase in pain during or following HA administration and resolved without sequel within 1 to 7 days.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that a single course of HANOX-M-XL injection is effective in relieving pain in patients with TMC OA, without safety concern. Patients with advanced stage of OA benefit the treatment as much as those with mild or moderate OA.