Treatment persistence of subcutaneous TNF inhibitors among Australian patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD)

Effectiveness and Persistence of Anti-TNFα Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis - A 7 Years Real-World Cohort Study

Purpose

To describe the effectiveness and persistence of treatment with three anti-TNFα drugs, Infliximab, Etanercept, and Adalimumab, in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in a rheumatology center.

Patients and Methods

A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Data were obtained from the health records of patients with RA who were followed up in a rheumatology center between 2011 and 2019 under a multidisciplinary healthcare model (MCM). The drugs used in this study were indicated according to the treatment guidelines for prescription. In order to follow-up of disease activity, at least three DAS28 reports for every analyzed year were used. The chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analyses of categorical variables. For the analysis of treatment persistence, the Kaplan-Meier method was used based on the recorded follow-up time of disease activity.

Results

One hundred and eighty-three RA patients included (80% women, median age 60 years), who received adalimumab (n = 56) (30.6%), etanercept (n = 64) (34.9%), or infliximab (n = 63) (34.4%) during the 7-year study period. A higher proportion of patients had moderate or high disease activity for all three anti-TNFα. In first-year treatment, 67% to 87% of the cohort achieved disease activity control and disease response to treatment. For the first three years, 95% to 98% of patients continued with the medications. In years 5th and 7th, the proportion of patients on medication was 80% to 90% and 42% to 54%, respectively.

Conclusion

The efficacy and persistence of anti-TNF-α were similar among the three molecules. These findings regarding long-term persistence in treatment may be useful for therapeutic decision-making based on real-life cohort results.

Impact of a Patient Support Program on time to discontinuation of adalimumab in Australian adult patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-an observational study

This observational study evaluated the impact of a sponsor company-provided Patient Support Program (PSP) on discontinuation of adalimumab in adult Australian patients eligible for Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS)-reimbursed adalimumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), Crohn's Disease (CD), Ulcerative Colitis (UC), or Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS). Patients initiating adalimumab between May 2018 and September 2019 were enrolled into two prospective cohorts based on their decision to opt for or decline the PSP (PSP or non-PSP cohorts). In addition, a historical, retrospective Non-PSP cohort was established from the Services Australia 10% PBS dataset by extracting data of patients initiating adalimumab prior to the introduction of adalimumab PSPs and based on adalimumab PBS listing dates (AS: April 2007 to March 2009; PsA/RA: January 2007 to December 2008; CD: January 2009 to December 2010; HS and UC indications not included). Follow-up for all cohorts was 12 months. The primary endpoint was the time to discontinuation, compared between the prospective PSP cohort and the prospective or retrospective Non-PSP cohort. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the cohorts. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated no difference in time to discontinuation between the prospective PSP (n = 162) and non-PSP (n = 65) cohorts (HR [95% CI] = 1.256 [0.616-2.563], p = 0.5304). The 12-month adalimumab persistence rates (95% CI) were 78% (69%, 84%) and 82% (67%, 90%), respectively. In contrast, discontinuation was less likely in the prospective PSP (n = 151) compared with the retrospective non-PSP (n = 297) cohort (HR [95% CI] = 0.44 [0.28-0.68], p<0.001). The 12-month persistence rates (95% CI) were 81% (76%, 90%) and 61% (56%, 67%), respectively. Overall, this study suggests that optimal adalimumab persistence can be achieved with either a structured PSP or healthcare support from other sources, but this was not the case more than a decade ago.

Reasons and Predictors of Treatment Change in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Biological and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) often experience treatment changes due to inefficacy or adverse events. The purpose of this study was to clarify the incidence and reasons for change of b/tsDMARDs in a cohort of Japanese patients with RA and to identify the predictors of treatment change. This was a retrospective observational study of RA patients prescribed b/tsDMARD between April 2011 and December 2020 at the Kindai University Nara Hospital. We focused on the change of first-line b/tsDMARDs and identified the reasons for change using the electronic medical records. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of treatment change as the objective variable and baseline characteristics as the explanatory variable. The reasons for treatment change were inefficacy in 69.6% of cases and adverse events in 29.7% of cases. Concomitant administration of higher dose prednisolone at baseline (adjusted odds ratio: [95% confidence interval]: 2.52 [1.19-5.33]) and old age (2.00 [1.03-3.87]) were associated with change in b/tsDMARD treatment due to inefficacy within 2 years of initiation. A better understanding of b/tsDMARDs persistence and elucidating the predictors of treatment change can help improve treatment outcomes for RA.

The long-term persistence of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with moderate to severe immune-mediated rheumatic diseases: A nation-wide, population-based real-world study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the long-term persistence between different tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis) with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD). This study can potentially provide insights into the real-world evidence regarding safety and effectiveness of TNFi treatment in a Chinese population.

METHODS

We enrolled newly diagnosed IMRD patients in this active comparator, retrospective cohort study by using National Taiwan insurance claim datasets. The drug survivals of first-line TNFi agents, including etanercept, golimumab, and adalimumab were compared. Propensity score matching was conducted to control the confounding effect from the observed covariates. The cumulative proportion of discontinuation was calculated over 5 years. The multiple-variable regression and propensity score analysis was used for confounding adjustment.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were 2267 patients identified in each etanercept, golimumab, and adalimumab group. We observed the 5-year cumulative proportion of discontinuation was 52.80%, 45.85%, and 56.86% in etanercept, golimumab, and adalimumab, respectively. Compared with golimumab, increase of 31% (95% CI: 20-43) and 38% (95% CI: 26-50) risk of discontinuation were observed in etanercept and adalimumab. The factors including female gender, increasing age, long hospital stays, without co-medication with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or methotrexate were associated were discontinuation of first-line TNFi treatment.

CONCLUSION

Golimumab had better drug survival than etanercept or adalimumab over 5 years of observation in Asian IMRD patients. Gender, age, longer hospital stays, concomitant use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were associated with survival with TNFis.

Treatment Persistence in Patients Cycling on Subcutaneous Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitors in Inflammatory Arthritis: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Biologic treatments including subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (SC-TNFis) have greatly improved disease management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (collectively inflammatory arthritis, IA). Nevertheless, some patients discontinue their first-line treatment; for them, one option may be a subsequent line of the same treatment class (i.e., cycling). The aim of this study was to assess treatment persistence between first- and second-line therapy in Swedish IA patients cycling on SC-TNFis.

METHODS

Using data from the Swedish Health Data Registers, adult IA patients filling prescriptions between May 1, 2010, and October 31, 2016, for a SC-TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab and golimumab) were included. Treatment persistence was derived based on information from filled prescriptions and a 60-day grace period. Unadjusted and adjusted marginal Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the relative risk of discontinuation across treatment lines, using robust sandwich covariance matrix estimates to account for intrapatient dependence (i.e., multiple treatment lines per patient). The analysis was restricted to the first two lines of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the eligible patients, 3181 were identified as cyclers. Among these, most were female (68%), and 46%, 28% and 26% were diagnosed with RA, AS and PsA, respectively. Both the unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed that the relative risk of discontinuing SC-TNFi treatment was significantly lower in second compared to first line (hazard ratio; 0.60 [0.57, 0.63] and HR; 0.59 [0.56, 0.62]). This finding was also consistent across IA indications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients cycling on SC-TNFis in IA, persistence was greater in second- compared to first-line treatment. The finding was consistent across all IA indications. Hence, patients who discontinue their first-line treatment may still benefit from treatment with an alternative SC-TNFi as a second-line therapy in IA.

Is Real-world Evidence Really Real?

Many important questions in medical research are investigated based on observational data, including "real-world evidence" studies.¹ In fact, the vast majority of published medical research relies on data obtained from observational studies.².

Drug Survival of Biologics in Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-World Evidence

BACKGROUND

The last decade has witnessed the increasing use of biologics for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Drug survival is an outcome incorporating real-world effectiveness and safety. However, the drug survival of biologics in treating AS is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to assess the drug survival of biologics (tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and anti-interleukin-17 monoclonal antibodies) in treating AS.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and searched the PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase databases up to 13th May 2020. Studies that analyzed the drug survival of biologics for AS and reported the respective annual data for each biologic for at least 1 year were included. Two authors independently screened and selected studies and assessed their risk of bias. A third author was available for arbitrating discrepancies. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed to evaluate the risk of bias of included studies. We conducted a random-effects model meta-analysis to obtain pooled drug survival from year 1 to 5. We performed subgroup analyses for biologic-naïve patients, first-line versus second- and third-line biologics, discontinuation due to loss of effectiveness and adverse effects, and high-quality studies.

RESULTS

We included 39 studies with 32,493 patients. The drug survival decreased from 76% at year 1 to 51% at year 5 for etanercept, from 75 to 51% for adalimumab, from 76 to 53% for infliximab, from 72 to 49% for golimumab, and from 63 to 57% for certolizumab pegol. The drug survival rate for secukinumab was 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.64‒0.90) at year 1. Subgroup analyses on biologic-naïve patients and discontinuation due to adverse effects found no differences in the drug survival of various biologics except for a lower drug survival of infliximab in biologic-naïve patients. The drug survival for first-line biologics was higher than for second- and third-line biologics.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on the drug survival of biological therapies for AS patients. The drug survival of all biologics in treating AS appeared comparable, but is higher in first-line biologics than second- and third-line biologics. To date there are scarce data on the drug survival of newly available biologics, for example, anti-interleukin-17 biologics.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NO

CRD42018114204.

Clinical Utility and Cost Savings in Predicting Inadequate Response to Anti-TNF Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

The PrismRA® test identifies rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies. This study evaluated the clinical and financial outcomes of incorporating PrismRA into routine clinical care of RA patients.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was created to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes in the 12-month period following first biologic treatment. Two treatment strategies were compared: (1) observed clinical decision-making based on a 175-patient cohort receiving an anti-TNF therapy as their first biologic after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and (2) modeled clinical decision-making of the same population using PrismRA results to inform first-line biologic treatment choice. Modeled costs include biologic drug pharmacy, non-biologic pharmacy, and total medical costs. The odds of inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies and various components of patient care were calculated based on PrismRA results.

RESULTS

Identifying predicted inadequate responders to anti-TNF therapies resulted in a modeled 38% increase in ACR50 response to first-line biologic therapies. The fraction of patients who achieved an ACR50 response to any therapy (TNFi and others) within the 12-month period was 33% higher in the PrismRA-stratified population than in the unstratified population (59 vs. 44%, respectively). When therapy prescriptions were modeled according to PrismRA results, cost savings were modeled for all financial variables: overall costs (4% decreased total, 19% decreased on ineffective treatments), total biologic drug pharmacy (4% total, 23% ineffective), non-biologic pharmacy (2% total, 19% ineffective), and medical costs (6% total, 19% ineffective). Female sex was the clinical metric that showed the greatest association with inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies (odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval 1.20, 4.88).

CONCLUSIONS

If PrismRA is implemented into routine clinical care as modeled, predicting which RA patients will have an inadequate response to anti-TNF therapies could save > $7 million in overall ineffective healthcare costs per 1000 patients tested and increase targeted DMARD response rates in RA.

Comparative persistence of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in ankylosing spondylitis patients: a multicenter international study

Objective: To evaluate persistence on conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) and anti-TNF therapies, and to identify potential determinants of discontinuation among individuals with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) living in Brazil and Quebec, Canada.Methods: We conducted a cohort study of AS patients using health administrative data (2010-2015). One-year and 2-year persistence rates were assessed. Cox regression was used to identify potential determinants of therapy discontinuation.Results: One-year persistence was less likely in Brazil for both anti-TNF and cDMARDs (Brazil: 62.1 and 30.7%, Quebec: 66.9 and 67.0%). The 2-year persistence rates were lower for both anti-TNF and cDMARD, but remained higher in Quebec (Brazil: 47.9 and 18.1%, Quebec: 51.5 and 53.5%). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, sex and comorbidities were associated with persistence in both countries. In Quebec, persistence did not differ between rural and urban regions or with socioeconomic status. While in Brazil, patients in regions with higher Human Development Index and those in cities with lower Gini index were less likely to discontinue therapy.Conclusions: Canadian AS patients were more likely to persist on therapy compared to Brazilian patients, although rates were lower at 2 years in both countries. Socioeconomic disparity in persistence was found in Brazil, but not in Quebec.