Clinicodemographic Profiles of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients from a Single Center in Saudi Arabia

Prevalence of Hypertension and Its Associated Risk Factors Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Purpose

Data regarding hypertension prevalence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Saudi Arabia are scarce. This study was aimed at estimating the prevalence of hypertension and its associated risk factors among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Saudi Arabia.

Patients and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis who presented at the OPD of two major hospitals in Riyadh city. Patient information such as demographic characteristics, comorbidities, drug use, and other clinical data were captured through medical record review and supplemented by patient interviews. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the significant factors for hypertension.

Results

The prevalence of hypertension was found in 32.35% of the 1490 rheumatoid arthritis patients who participated in our study. Logistic regression analyses revealed that advanced age, female sex, low education level, unemployment, smoking, and consulting with physicians less than two times within the past 12 months were risk factors for increased hypertension prevalence among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A significantly higher risk of hypertension was observed among RA patients with obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cancer, kidney disease, osteoporosis, and Parkinson’s disease than among patients without these comorbidities.

Conclusion

Hypertension is highly prevalent among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and advanced age, sex, low educational level, unemployment, smoking, and comorbidities are risk factors for increased hypertension prevalence.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Sustained and Switching Treatments Using Biological and Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: A Multicenter, Observational Cross-Sectional Study for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease with different disease activity grades. Several registries have been designed to determine the appropriate regimens of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to obtain sustained clinical remission. We examined epidemiological and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis patients using a clinical registry database (BioSTaR) and analyzed the differences in patients with sustained and switched therapies.

Methods

A multicenter, observational cross-sectional study for rheumatoid arthritis was performed between February 2019 and September 2020 using the BioStaR-RA registry.

Demographic and clinical characteristics were prospectively recorded into a specifically designed electronic database. The patients were divided into three groups due to the heterogeneity of the study cohort. Patients were grouped as Group I (Initial; within the first 6 months of treatment with biological/targeted synthetic drugs), Group ST (Sustained Treatment; any first drug lasting for at least 6 months without any change), and Group S (Switch; any switching to another drug). Comparative analysis was performed between sustained treatment (Group ST) and drug switching (Group S) groups.

Results

The study included a total of 565 patients. The mean age was 53.7 ± 12.8 years, and the majority were female (80.4%). There were 104, 267, and 194 patients in Groups I, ST, and S, respectively. Erosive arthritis and hematological extra-articular involvement were more frequently detected in Group S than Group ST (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001). The patients in Group S had significantly higher disease activity scores (DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI) (p = 0.025, p = 0.010, and p = 0.003). There were significantly more patients with moderate disease activity in Group S (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The groups with sustained treatment and switching included patients with different disease activity status, although higher disease activity was determined in switchers. Overall, moderate disease activity and remission were the most common disease activity levels. Lower disease activity scores, lower hematologic manifestations, better functional status, and lesser radiographic damage are associated with sustained treatment.

Patterns of Response to Different Treatment Strategies in Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in South-Western Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To study the pattern of response to different treatment strategies in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to describe our clinical practice in RA management.

Patients and Methods

Over a period of two years from April 2018 to April 2020, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 288 consecutive seropositive RA patients attending rheumatology clinics and the daycare unit at Aseer Central Hospital. Data were collected on patient demographics, disease duration, extraarticular manifestations, comorbidities and treatment. Disease activity was assessed using the clinical disease activity index (CDAI).

Results

Out of the total 288 patients, 42% (120) are on csDMRADs, while 54% (162) are on bDMRADs and 4% (6) are on tsDMARDs. Of the patients on csDMARDS, 51%, 43% and 7% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. However, of the patients on non-csDMARDS, 36.3%, 49.4% and 14.3% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. Failure of csDMARDs was affected by the presence of high disease activity at baseline, extraarticular lung manifestations and coexistent fibromyalgia, with a significant effect of the latter on remission rate. Among patients on non-csDMARDs, 42 (25%) showed one or more therapy changes. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the predominant first-line agents in biologically naive patients (65%) followed by abatacept (18%). Abatacept was the most frequently prescribed second biologic in 52% of cases followed by tocilizumab in 19%.

Conclusion

The current clinical practice in our hospital is consistent with the latest American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines. Treat-to-target strategy was achieved in the vast majority of our patients, while remission was observed in almost half of the patients.