Effect of intravitreal ranibizumab on serous retinal detachment in branch retinal vein occlusion

Treatment strategy for BVO-ME based on long-term outcomes correlating retinal structure by OCT image and visual acuity

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a mainstream treatment for reducing ME secondary to BRVO (BVO-ME). Regrettably, most reports of intravitreal anti-VEGF for BVO-ME have disclosed only short-term outcomes. Here, we characterized long-term indicators for the visual prognosis of patients with BVO-ME, including the correlation between retinal structure by OCT and visual acuity.

METHODS

Patients with BVO-ME were retrospectively recruited based on clinical records in Kansai Medical University Hospital from June 2012 to March 2022. This study enrolled patients with vision loss who received intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF for BVO-ME. Inclusion criteria were that patients received intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF as their first treatment and were followed for at least 36 months. Exclusion criteria were those patients with ocular disease other than BRVO or who had been previously treated for BVO-ME. Patients were divided into two groups according to BCVA at the final visit: Group A (≥ 0.7) and Group B (< 0.7).

RESULTS

Forty-seven eyes from 45 patients were assessed. The mean follow-up period from initial to final visit was 64.38 ± 15.07 (range, 38-100) months. BCVA in Group A (n = 32) was significantly greater than in Group B (n = 15) at all timepoints. The ratio that the number of eyes which the EZ band and the foveal bulge were intact in Group A was higher than in Group B (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.0002, respectively). The ratio that the number of eyes which recurrence SRD was observed by the final visit in Group A was lower than in Group B (p = 0.0485).

CONCLUSIONS

The integrity of the EZ band and an intact foveal bulge were significant predictors for visual acuity. In contrast, recurrent SRD led to poor visual acuity in the long term, even if BCVA was good in the short term.

Prevalence and clinical implications of subretinal fluid in retinal diseases: a real-world cohort study

Background/aims

To characterise the baseline prevalence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and its effects on anatomical and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DME) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study of 122 DME and 54 RVO patients who were initiated on anti-VEGF therapy with real-world variable dosing. The DME and RVO cohorts were subclassified based on the presence of SRF at presentation. Snellen VA was measured and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR). Changes in VA and central subfield thickness (CST) were assessed up to 24 months.

Results

SRF was present in 22% and 41% in DME and RVO patients, respectively. In the DME subcohort, eyes with SRF showed an improvement of 0.166 logMAR (1.7 Snellen chart lines) at 12 months and 0.251 logMAR (2.6 Snellen chart lines) at 24 months, which were significantly greater compared with those of the non-SRF group. A significantly greater reduction in CST was noted in the SRF eyes compared with the non-SRF eyes at 3 months and 1 month in the DME and RVO subcohorts, respectively.

Conclusion

Baseline SRF is a good marker for a greater reduction in CST in both DME and RVO, but an improvement in VA associated with SRF may be only noted in DME.

Comparison of the effects of aflibercept and dexamethasone in central retinal vein occlusion with serous retinal detachment

Clinical relevance: Previous studies have shown the efficacy of aflibercept and dexamethasone in central retinal vein occlusion. However, the efficacy of these two drugs in central retinal vein occlusion accompanied by serous macular detachment has not been investigated and compared. This results in a search for more precise data to evaluate the effects of two drugs in real-world studies.Background: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept and dexamethasone implantation injections in central retinal vein occlusion accompanied by serous retinal detachment.Methods: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients with treatment-naive macular oedema post-central retinal vein occlusion were enrolled in the retrospectively designed study. All of the patients had serous retinal detachment at baseline. The patients received three intravitreal aflibercept injections with an interval of four weeks and followed by pro re nata treatment protocol (intravitreal aflibercept group, n = 37) or a single dose dexamethasone implantation injection (dexamethasone implantation group, n = 31). Best-corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness and the height of serous retinal detachment parameters were compared at baseline, and in the first, second, third and sixth months.Results: The groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics (p > 0.05 for all). The visual gain was greater in the intravitreal aflibercept group (p = 0.013). While the intravitreal aflibercept group had a significant central retinal thickness decrease in the first and sixth months (p = 0.011 and p = 0.001, respectively), this superiority was not observed during the entire follow-up period (p = 0.212). There was no difference in serous retinal detachment resolution between the groups (p = 0.403). Two patients in the intravitreal aflibercept group (5.4%) and five patients in the dexamethasone implantation group (16.1%) had serous retinal detachment at the final visit (p = 0.158).Conclusion: Both intravitreal aflibercept and dexamethasone implantation injections seemed to be effective in the treatment of central retinal vein occlusion with serous retinal detachment. Intravitreal aflibercept treatment yielded better results in terms of visual gain and showed a faster anatomical response.

Optical coherence tomographic patterns in patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema treated by ranibizumab: a predictive and personalized approach

Purpose

To establish the morphological and functional parameters to predict the effectiveness of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and to develop a mathematical model for personalized treatment algorithms.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of 98 patients (98 eyes) with macular edema, who received IVI of ranibizumab and were followed up for 12 months. Spectral optical coherence tomography scans and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessments were conducted every 3 months. Treatment outcome predictors were calculated based on logistic regression analysis.

Results

The most significant prognostic factors for the long-term BCVA were baseline BCVA (OR 11.1, p = 0.001), foveal volume (OR 10.8, p = 0.001), destruction of external limiting membrane (OR 15.8, p = 0.001), photoreceptor inner/outer segments (OR 11.1, p = 0.001) and retinal pigment epithelium (OR 9.1, p = 0.001). It has also been discovered that post-treatment BCVA correlated with the height of serous retinal detachment (SRD) (r = -0.4, p = 0.001), ganglion cell complex thickness (r =  + 0.3, p = 0.01) and focal loss of ganglion cells (r =-0.3, p = 0.005). Patients without SRD required fewer ranibizumab injections (3.8 ± 1.1) for macular edema fluid resorption compared to those with SRD (5.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.03). A mathematical model for predicting and personalized approach therapy of ranibizumab has been obtained (accuracy of 89%).

Conclusion

The effectiveness of IVI of ranibizumab depends on baseline morphological and functional changes. The obtained mathematical model allows for predicting the outcomes of therapy, determining individualized algorithms to increase the treatment effectiveness and to prevent low vision that corresponds to the principles of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Choroidal thickening in retinal vein occlusion patients with serous retinal detachment

PURPOSE

To evaluate choroid thickness and macular retinal metrics in treatment naïve retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients with serous retinal detachment (SRD) before and after intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) injection and to elucidate the possible role of choroid in the development of SRD and the potential role of SRD as a prognostic parameter.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study involving 85 RVO patients, 41 central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), and 44 branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), with macular edema: 21 central retinal vein occlusion and 22 branch retinal vein occlusion with SRD and the rest without SRD. Patients were evaluated with ophthalmic examinations and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) both before and 4-6 weeks after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment. Choroid thickness and retinal metrics were measured and compared between SRD and non-SRD groups within each RVO subtype.

RESULTS

In both CRVO and BRVO patients, the mean central subfield foveal thickness (CSFT) and central subfoveal choroid thickness (CSCT) of the SRD groups were thicker than those in the non-SRD groups (p < 0.05) at onset. After one anti-VEGF injection, CSFT and FNRT decreased in all groups (p < 0.05). The CSCTs were thicker in the SRD groups compared with the non-SRD groups (p < 0.05). The mean changes of CSFT were more remarkable in the SRD groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Thicker choroid was a feature of naïve RVO patients with SRD and SRD may be an indicator of better anatomical recovery of retina in RVO patients after a single dose of anti-VEGF treatment.

Comparison of Ranibizumab versus Aflibercept in Treating Macular Edema among Patients with Serous Retinal Detachment Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of ranibizumab and aflibercept in macular edema (ME) with serous retinal detachment (SRD) following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Methods: Once every month for 3 months, 33 patients were treated with ranibizumab (Group 1), whereas 30 others were treated with aflibercept (Group 2). In 9 months after that, patients were evaluated every 4 weeks and received additional injections if they met prespecified criteria for retreatment. Corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and height of SRD was measured.Results: During the first 3 months, the improvement of CFT, BCVA, and height of SRD were greater in Group 2 than Group 1. Those differences disappeared in the subsequent 9 months, and changes in CFT, BCVA, and height of SRD were similar between groups at all other visits.Conclusion: Aflibercept was more effective than ranibizumab from baseline to Month 3 in ME with SRD following BRVO.