Keratoprosthesis prophylaxis: is it time for a paradigm shift?

Infectious Keratitis After Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Implantation

PURPOSE

To identify the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of infectious keratitis after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (kpro) implantation.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of kpro procedures at the Stein Eye Institute and the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal between May 1, 2004, and December 31, 2018. Data were collected regarding ocular history, operative details, postoperative management, microbiologic profile, treatment, and outcomes. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) were used to evaluate for an association between risk factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 349 kpro procedures were performed in 295 eyes of 268 patients. Fifty-seven cases of presumed infectious keratitis were identified after 53 procedures (15.2%) in 50 eyes (16.9%) of 49 patients (18.3%). The incidences of culture-positive bacterial and fungal keratitis were 0.014 and 0.004 per eye-year, respectively. Persistent corneal epithelial defect formation (P < 0.001) and cicatricial disease (HR: 1.98, 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.83) were associated with a significantly higher incidence of infectious keratitis. For the 53 cases with a known outcome, medical therapy achieved resolution of infection in 34 cases (64.2%), whereas kpro explantation was required in 19 cases (35.8%). Infectious keratitis was associated with an increased risk for kpro explantation (HR: 3.09, 95% confidence interval, 1.92-4.79).

CONCLUSIONS

Infectious keratitis develops in approximately 17% of eyes after kpro implantation, with a higher rate of culture-positive bacterial than fungal keratitis. The observed rate of microbial keratitis suggests the need for additional topical antimicrobial prophylaxis in eyes at higher risk, such as those with preexisting cicatricial disease or postoperative persistent corneal epithelial defect formation.

The Search for Antifungal Prophylaxis After Artificial Corneal Surgery-An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the antifungal properties of topical antibiotics (already being used successfully to prevent bacterial endophthalmitis) and some promising antiseptics for antifungal prophylaxis in the setting of artificial corneal implantation.

METHODS

Several commonly used antibiotics for antimicrobial prophylaxis after artificial corneal implantation, in addition to antiseptics [benzalkonium chloride (BAK), povidone-iodine (PI), and some ionic liquids (ILs)], were tested in vitro against Candida albicans, Fusarium solani, and Aspergillus fumigatus. The time-kill activity was determined. Toxicity was assayed in vitro on human corneal epithelial cultures using trypan blue. Adhesion and tissue invasion experiments were also carried out on porcine corneas and commonly used contact lenses, with or without gamma irradiation, and by analysis with fluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

Polymyxin B (PMB)/trimethoprim/BAK (Polytrim), PMB alone, gatifloxacin with BAK (Zymaxid), and same-concentration BAK alone exhibited antifungal activity in vitro. Moxifloxacin (MOX) or gatifloxacin without BAK-as well as trimethoprim, vancomycin, and chloramphenicol-had no effect. 1% PI and ILs had the highest efficacy/toxicity ratios (>1), and Polytrim was species dependent. Subfungicidal concentrations of Polytrim reduced adhesion of C. albicans to Kontur contact lenses. Gamma-irradiated corneas showed enhanced resistance to fungal invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Of antibiotic preparations already in use for bacterial prophylaxis after KPro surgery, Polytrim is a commonly used antibiotic with antifungal effects mediated by both PMB and BAK and may be sufficient for prophylaxis. PI as a 1% solution seems to be promising as a long-term antifungal agent. Choline-undecanoate IL is effective and virtually nontoxic and warrants further development.