1
|
Sultan A, Harris DL, Lam P, Whitcomb J, Hamrah P. The Optejet Technology Minimizes Preservative-Mediated Cytotoxicity of Conjunctival Epithelial Cells Treated with Latanoprost In Vitro. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2024. [PMID: 39358871 DOI: 10.1089/jop.2024.0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) is a commonly used preservative to maintain sterility for multiuse eye drops such as latanoprost. One option to minimize the deleterious effects of BAK in eye drops may be to reduce the volume administered. The aim of this study was to assess the response of cells from the ocular surface to latanoprost+BAK administered by the Optejet technology, which dispenses a microdose (∼8 µL) ophthalmical spray. Methods: Cultured human conjunctival epithelial cells were exposed to the following treatments: (1) no treatment, (2) drop form of latanoprost without BAK (∼35 µL), (3) drop form of latanoprost with 0.01% BAK (∼35 µL), (4) ophthalmical spray form of latanoprost with 0.01% BAK delivered by the Optejet technology (∼8 µL). After 5 h, cells were assessed for changes in cytotoxicity, morphology, and inflammatory marker expression. Results: Latanoprost+BAK delivered by a drop induced cytotoxicity, cytoplasmic shrinkage, and loss of cell-cell contact, and expression of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 and interleukin-6. In contrast, latanoprost+BAK delivered by the Optejet technology was both well tolerated and similar to no treatment controls and BAK-free latanoprost treatment. Conclusions: A microdose of latanoprost+BAK ophthalmical spray administered with the Optejet technology prevented the cytotoxicity associated with larger volumes found in eye drops. Precision dosing by the Optejet technology has the potential to decrease ocular surface disorder typically associated with eye drops containing preservatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayesha Sultan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deshea L Harris
- Department of Ophthalmology, Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter Lam
- Eyenovia, Inc., New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Pedram Hamrah
- Department of Ophthalmology, Center for Translational Ocular Immunology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Steger JS, Durai I, Odayappan A, Raman R, Sruthi T, Song AJ, Puthuran G, Venkatesh R, Colantuoni E, Robin AL. An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Maleate 0.5% Microdrops Administered with the Nanodropper. Ophthalmology 2024; 131:1045-1055. [PMID: 38492865 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine if 12.5 μl timolol maleate 0.5% microdrops dispensed with the Nanodropper Adaptor provide noninferior intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction compared with conventional 28 μl drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN Prospective, noninferiority, parallel, multicenter, single-masked, active-controlled, randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS Treatment-naïve subjects who were recently diagnosed with OAG and OHT at the Aravind Eye Care System. METHODS Both eyes of subjects received 1 commercially available drop or both eyes of subjects received 1 microdrop of timolol maleate 0.5%. We measured IOP, resting heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 8 hours after timolol administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The IOP was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were resting HR, systolic BP (sBP), and diastolic BP (dBP). RESULTS Adaptor-mediated microdrops and conventional drops of timolol significantly decreased IOP compared with baseline at all timepoints. Noninferiority was established at 3 of 4 timepoints. Heart rate decreases with Nanodropper were approximately 3 beats per minute (bpm) less than with conventional drops. CONCLUSIONS Timolol microdrops appear to be as effective in ocular hypotensive action as conventional drops with a slightly attenuated effect on resting HR and BP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Allisa J Song
- Nanodropper, Inc., Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Alan L Robin
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoppe CB, Yonamine S, Kao BW, Turner ML, Ou Y, Han Y, Keenan JD, Oatts JT. Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Nanodropper Device for Pupillary Dilation and Cycloplegia in Children. Ophthalmology 2023; 130:324-330. [PMID: 36280185 PMCID: PMC10108985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the noninferiority of 10.4 μl of eye drops eluted with a commercially available eye drop adapter, the Nanodropper (Nanodropper, Inc), on pupillary dilation and cycloplegia in children compared with the standard of care (SOC), 50 μl of eye drops. DESIGN Prospective randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS Pediatric patients scheduled for routine pupillary dilation at the University of California, San Francisco, at the Pediatric Ophthalmology Clinic were enrolled. Each participant provided 1 eye for the intervention group (Nanodropper) and 1 eye for the control group (SOC). METHODS Participants were randomized to receive small-volume dilating drops in 1 eye (Nanodropper) and SOC dilating drops in the other eye. Dilation was performed using 1 drop each of 1% cyclopentolate, 1% tropicamide, and 2.5% phenylephrine. Refraction and pupillometry were obtained before and 30 minutes after dilation. A noninferiority analysis was performed to assess change from before to after dilation in spherical equivalent and in pupil constriction percentage and maximum pupil diameter after dilation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Spherical equivalent, maximum pupil diameter, and pupil constriction percentage. RESULTS One hundred eyes of 50 patients were included, with a mean ± standard deviation age of 9 ± 3 years. After controlling for baseline measurements, the spherical equivalent after dilation was 0.05 diopter (D) more (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.28 to 0.37 D) in the Nanodropper arm, which did not achieve noninferiority. Maximum pupil diameter after dilation was lower in the Nanodropper group (mean, -0.01 mm; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.03), which did achieve noninferiority. Constriction percentage after dilation was 0.57 percentage points more (95% CI, -1.38 to 2.51 percentage points) in the Nanodropper group, which did not achieve noninferiority. CONCLUSIONS Administration of eye drops using a small-volume adapter demonstrated similar efficacy to SOC in a pediatric population. Strict noninferiority was met only for pupillary dilation and not for cycloplegia or constriction percentage; however, the small differences in the effect of the Nanodropper versus SOC on all primary outcomes were not clinically significant. We conclude that small-volume eye drops have the potential to decrease unnecessary medical waste and medication toxicity while maintaining therapeutic effect. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis B Hoppe
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sean Yonamine
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Brandon W Kao
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Marcus L Turner
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Yvonne Ou
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ying Han
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeremy D Keenan
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Julius T Oatts
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li G, Akpek EK, Ahmad S. Glaucoma and Ocular Surface Disease: More than Meets the Eye. Clin Ophthalmol 2022; 16:3641-3649. [PMID: 36389640 PMCID: PMC9642795 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s388886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the association between ocular surface disease and glaucoma is important for improving adherence to treatment and introducing practical solutions. While topical antihypertensive medications for glaucoma are well tolerated according to short-term studies, there is little evidence on their long-term effects. Since they are often required for many years, the effects of these drops on the ocular surface become important in regard to quality of life and adherence. In this nonsystematic review performed in April 2022, we summarize what is known about the relationship between glaucoma and ocular surface disease. Specifically, we examine how each class of topical glaucoma drops affects the ocular surface. We then review the treatment of ocular surface disease for patients on topical glaucoma therapy. Finally, we discuss treatments that may reduce or eliminate the burden of topical medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Li
- Department of Ophthalmology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Esen Karamursel Akpek
- Ocular Surface Disease Clinic, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sumayya Ahmad
- Department of Ophthalmology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wilson CG, Aarons L, Augustijns P, Brouwers J, Darwich AS, De Waal T, Garbacz G, Hansmann S, Hoc D, Ivanova A, Koziolek M, Reppas C, Schick P, Vertzoni M, García-Horsman JA. Integration of advanced methods and models to study drug absorption and related processes: An UNGAP perspective. Eur J Pharm Sci 2021; 172:106100. [PMID: 34936937 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
This collection of contributions from the European Network on Understanding Gastrointestinal Absorption-related Processes (UNGAP) community assembly aims to provide information on some of the current and newer methods employed to study the behaviour of medicines. It is the product of interactions in the immediate pre-Covid period when UNGAP members were able to meet and set up workshops and to discuss progress across the disciplines. UNGAP activities are divided into work packages that cover special treatment populations, absorption processes in different regions of the gut, the development of advanced formulations and the integration of food and pharmaceutical scientists in the food-drug interface. This involves both new and established technical approaches in which we have attempted to define best practice and highlight areas where further research is needed. Over the last months we have been able to reflect on some of the key innovative approaches which we were tasked with mapping, including theoretical, in silico, in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo, preclinical and clinical approaches. This is the product of some of us in a snapshot of where UNGAP has travelled and what aspects of innovative technologies are important. It is not a comprehensive review of all methods used in research to study drug dissolution and absorption, but provides an ample panorama of current and advanced methods generally and potentially useful in this area. This collection starts from a consideration of advances in a priori approaches: an understanding of the molecular properties of the compound to predict biological characteristics relevant to absorption. The next four sections discuss a major activity in the UNGAP initiative, the pursuit of more representative conditions to study lumenal dissolution of drug formulations developed independently by academic teams. They are important because they illustrate examples of in vitro simulation systems that have begun to provide a useful understanding of formulation behaviour in the upper GI tract for industry. The Leuven team highlights the importance of the physiology of the digestive tract, as they describe the relevance of gastric and intestinal fluids on the behaviour of drugs along the tract. This provides the introduction to microdosing as an early tool to study drug disposition. Microdosing in oncology is starting to use gamma-emitting tracers, which provides a link through SPECT to the next section on nuclear medicine. The last two papers link the modelling approaches used by the pharmaceutical industry, in silico to Pop-PK linking to Darwich and Aarons, who provide discussion on pharmacometric modelling, completing the loop of molecule to man.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clive G Wilson
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow, U.K.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mirko Koziolek
- NCE Formulation Sciences, Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Schick
- Department of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Center of Drug Absorption and Transport, University of Greifswald, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhu CQ, Sadlak N, Fiorello MG, Lee D, Desai M. A Comparison of Patient Acceptance of 3 Eye Drop Instillation Aids. J Glaucoma 2021; 30:725-731. [PMID: 34049349 PMCID: PMC8366596 DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PRECIS Patients can be quite amenable to using eye drop instillation aids. We should consider recommending these devices to patients who otherwise struggle with drop instillation and medication adherence. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of 3 commercially available eye drop instillation aids in a diverse tertiary care population. METHODS In this prospective, randomized controlled study, 39 patients being treated with topical antihypertensives were assigned to Arm A (no intervention) or Arm B (AutoDrop, AutoSqueeze, or SimplyTouch). Subjects in Arm B were instructed to administer their eye drop with the assigned drop aid at every use for ~6 weeks. Satisfaction surveys were administered at 3 and 6 weeks, where patients also reported the number of drops missed. RESULTS Thirty-two of 39 subjects completed study participation and full data analysis. Within this total group, 24 subjects were randomized to drop aids (AutoDrop N=10, AutoSqueeze N=8, SimplyTouch N=6), and 8 were randomized to no drop aid. At the 3 and 6-week timepoints, patients found instillation easier with AutoDrop (70.0%, 60.0%) followed by the AutoSqueeze (62.5%, 75.0%), and lastly SimplyTouch (33.3%, 33.3%). For the AutoSqueeze, the mean number of drops missed with and without the drop aid were significantly different (P=0.015 at 3 wk, P=0.008 at 6 wk). There was no difference in the mean number of drops missed with the AutoDrop and SimplyTouch at either timepoint. CONCLUSIONS For the AutoDrop and AutoSqueeze groups, over 60% of the patients found the devices helpful and would consider using them long-term. Our results suggest that patients would be amenable to using eye drop instillation aids, although more objective data is needed to determine whether these devices would improve medication compliance and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Deborah Lee
- Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine
| | - Manishi Desai
- Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Quiroz-Mercado H, Ivri E, Gonzalez-Salinas R, Kourtis IC, Gilbert J, Pérez-Vázquez JF, Blumenkranz M, Jiménez-Román J, Marcellino G. Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:139-147. [PMID: 32021079 PMCID: PMC6980856 DOI: 10.2147/opth.s221749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and accurate delivery with substantially lower drug exposure than conventional eye drops. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two randomized Phase 1 studies were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of a topical ophthalmic solution administered as a ~9 μL microfluid stream via the test device compared with a ~30-40 μL drop delivered via conventional dropper in healthy subjects (Trial 1) and glaucoma patients (Trial 2). In Trial 1, a 1% tropicamide/2.5% phenylephrine solution was administered via the test device in one eye and by conventional dropper in the contralateral eye. Pupil dilation was measured at 30 min intervals post-instillation and subject comfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale (range, 0-100). In Trial 2, patients were randomized to receive latanoprost 0.005% via the test device or conventional dropper. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline and 4-8 hrs post-instillation. RESULTS In Trial 1 (N=20), mean (SD) pupil diameter 30 mins post-instillation increased by 3.4 (0.9) and 3.5 (1.0) mm in the test and control eyes, respectively. The mean comfort score was 81.7 for the test device versus 57.3 for conventional dropper delivery. In Trial 2 (N=18), the mean change in intraocular pressure following administration of latanoprost was -5.0 (1.8) and -4.3 (3.3) mm Hg in the test and control groups, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed in either study. CONCLUSION Administration of a single dose of topical ophthalmic therapy via an electromechanical drug delivery device resulted in comparable effects on pupil dilation and intraocular pressure with lower drug exposure and increased patient comfort compared with conventional dropper delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Quiroz-Mercado
- Association to Prevent Blindness, Hospital Sanchez-Bulnes, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ehud Ivri
- Kedalion Therapeutics Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jesús Jiménez-Román
- Association to Prevent Blindness, Hospital Sanchez-Bulnes, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Summary November 2018, the period covered by this article, showed strong activity in mergers/acquisitions and collaborations, including the announcement of a deal for the global manufacture of a micellar nanoparticulate formulation of paclitaxel. The month also brought positive clinical trial news in therapeutic areas such as pancreatic cancer using CAR-T therapies and asthma. In regulatory news, the US FDA issued a warning highlighting concerns about the serious complications that can occur when using unapproved painkillers with implantable drug pumps and approval was announced for an oral film formulation to treat Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. November also saw patents being issued on novel therapeutic delivery methods for ocular delivery and the use of proprietary vitamin A-micellar delivery vehicle. Information sources used in compiling this update included company press releases and other news websites.
Collapse
|