Evaluation of intralesional propranolol for periocular capillary hemangioma

β-Adrenoreceptors as Therapeutic Targets for Ocular Tumors and Other Eye Diseases-Historical Aspects and Nowadays Understanding

β-adrenoreceptors (ARs) are members of the superfamily of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and are activated by catecholamines, such as epinephrine and norepinephrine. Three subtypes of β-ARs (β₁, β₂, and β₃) have been identified with different distributions among ocular tissues. Importantly, β-ARs are an established target in the treatment of glaucoma. Moreover, β-adrenergic signaling has been associated with the development and progression of various tumor types. Hence, β-ARs are a potential therapeutic target for ocular neoplasms, such as ocular hemangioma and uveal melanoma. This review aims to discuss the expression and function of individual β-AR subtypes in ocular structures, as well as their role in the treatment of ocular diseases, including ocular tumors.

[Treatment and management of orbital tumors]

BACKGROUND

There are various options for the conservative treatment of the most frequent orbital tumors. These can delay, complement or be superior to the surgical approach, which is often prone to complications.

OBJECTIVE

This article gives a summary of the possible treatment options for the most common orbital tumors in childhood and adulthood.

METHODS

A literature search was carried out and the possible treatment pathways are presented.

RESULTS

1. Frequent orbital tumors in childhood: a systemic treatment with noncardioselective beta blockers is the primary treatment for capillary orbital hemangiomas. In cases of no response, steroids, interferon alpha or cyclophosphamide are treatment options. Observation is a possible option for smaller dermoid cysts, in cases of progression excision can become necessary. Symptomatic optic nerve gliomas can also be observed and in cases of progression treated with chemotherapy, mTOR/MEK inhibitors or radiotherapy (children > 5 years). Rhabdomyosarcomas are biopsied and subsequently treated by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. 2. Frequent orbital tumors in adulthood: asymptomatic cases of cavernous hemangiomas of the orbit can just be observed. Symptomatic hemangiomas can be surgically excised or treated with radiotherapy. For meningiomas of the optic nerve sheath radiotherapy is a very effective treatment. Surgical excision should be reserved for cases with no prognosis of visual acuity. There is also the option to treat with antiprogesterone. Orbital lymphomas with purely orbital involvement can be treated with radiotherapy, chemotherapy or the application of rituximab.

CONCLUSION

There are now very effective conservative treatment options for many orbital tumors. In some cases a surgical procedure can be avoided and a good visual function can be retained.

Morphological, genetic and clinical correlations in infantile hemangiomas and their mimics

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most frequent pediatric benign vascular tumors, with a reported incidence of 5% to 10%. They have self-limiting evolution pattern divided into a growth phase in the first 12 months and a regression one, that may take up to 10 years. Occasionally, hemangiomas might lead to local or systemic complications, depending on their morphological characteristics. The first line of treatment is β-blockers, such as Propranolol, Timolol, Nadolol, administered either locally or systemically. Newer therapeutic strategies involving laser therapy and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are being studied, while older treatment modalities like corticosteroids, Imiquimod, Vincristine, Bleomycin and Interferon-α have become second line therapy options. Before establishing the appropriate treatment, clinical, histological, and imaging investigations are required.

To compare intralesional and oral propranolol for treating periorbital and eyelid capillary hemangiomas

Purpose:

A pilot randomized control trial to compare the efficacy and side effects of intralesional and oral propranolol in periorbital and eyelid capillary hemangiomas.

Methods:

Twenty patients were prospectively randomized to two groups of ten each. Group 1 was initiated on oral propranolol 1 mg/kg/day titrated to final dose of 3 mg/kg/day over 1 week which was continued for 6 months and then tapered over 1 week; Group 2 received 3 doses of direct intralesional propranolol hydrochloride 1 mg/ml; 0.2 ml/cm 4–6 weeks apart. Hemangioma area and corneal astigmatism were measured.

Results:

Within each group at 6 months there was a significant reduction in area (group 1: 83.48 ± 11.67%, P = 0.0019; group 2: 67.78 ± 21.71%, P = 0.0019) and improvement in astigmatism (pre, post: group 1: 2.98D @ 179.8°, 1.13D @ 179.8°, P = 0.0045; group 2: 1.62D @ 90.16°, 0.75D @ 179.9°, P = 0.0001). There was no difference in area reduction (P = 0.056), change in appearance (P = 0.085), ptosis (P = 0.23) and side effects (lethargy, poor feeding; P = 0.171) between the two groups.

Conclusion:

Efficacy and side effects with intralesional propranolol are comparable to oral propranolol for periorbital and eyelid lesions.

The Use of β-Blockers for the Treatment of Periocular Hemangiomas in Infants: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the published literature assessing the efficacy of β-blockers for the treatment of periocular hemangioma in infants.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in May 2018 in PubMed with no date restrictions and limited to studies published in English and in the Cochrane Library database without any restrictions. The combined searches yielded 437 citations. Of these,16 articles were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this assessment and assigned a level of evidence rating by the panel methodologist.

RESULTS

None of the 16 studies included in this assessment were rated level I, 3 were rated level II, and 13 were rated level III. The most common treatment regimen was 2 mg/kg daily oral propranolol, but intralesional and topical β-blockers were also used. Treatment effect was most often measured in terms of reduction in the size of the lesions, which occurred in the majority of patients. β-Blockers were consistently shown to reduce astigmatism, but this reduction was shown to be statistically significant in only 2 series. The effect of β-blockers on amblyopia was not adequately documented. β-Blockers were generally well tolerated and had mild side effects (fatigue, gastrointestinal upset/diarrhea, restlessness/sleep disturbances, minor wheezing, and cold extremities). Complications severe enough to require cessation of treatment occurred in only 2 patients out of a total of 229 who received β-blockers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence to support the safety and efficacy of both topical and systemic β-blockers to promote regression of periocular hemangiomas. Additional research may confirm the best dosage and route of administration to maximize efficacy in reducing induced astigmatism and amblyopia associated with periocular hemangiomas while minimizing side effects.

Propranolol therapy in a case of capillary hemangioma

Capillary hemangioma is one the most common tumors of eyelid and orbit reported in pediatric age group. Oral propranolol therapy is latest addition to the armamentarium of treatment options available to ophthalmologists in treating capillary hemangiomas. We report the successful response to propranolol therapy to a 5-year-old child with capillary hemangioma involving lids, orbit, and the paranasal sinuses. A long-term follow-up is necessary for the prognostic efficacy of the therapy.

Efficacious Healing of Ulcerated Infantile Hemangiomas Using Topical Timolol

Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common benign pediatric soft-tissue tumors. Ulceration—the most frequent complication of IH—tends to heal poorly and is associated with pain, bleeding, infection, and scarring. Mainstay treatment modalities include propranolol (β-blocker) and corticosteroids, whose effectiveness is countered by a need for long-term medication and risk of systemic adverse effects and ulcer recurrence. A 3-month-old infant presented to us with a large, medial thigh-ulcerated IH that progressed despite 2 prior months of dressings and topical antimicrobials. Topical timolol 0.5% thrice daily was initiated, and significant healing was evident at 1 week, with complete healing at 1 month. Timolol was stopped after 3 months, and at 18 months after cessation of timolol, there was no ulcer recurrence. This novel therapy for ulcerated IH seems to have many advantages such as rapid efficacy with easy application, no systemic adverse effects and no long-term recurrence, and current literature describing similar advantages justifies the use of this treatment modality in infants.

Pulsed dye laser and topical timolol gel versus pulse dye laser in treatment of infantile hemangioma: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background:

Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common tumor during infancy that usually appears as macular and gradually becomes a plaque or tumor. Approximately, 20% of all IH cases results in adverse effects and the Pulsed dye laser (PDL) 585 nm is a vascular laser leading to selective the micro vascular damage. Results of studies on non-selective B-blockers (e.g., timolol) indicate their effectiveness in preventing hemangioma growth. The aim of this study is a comparison of PDL plus timolol and PDL in the treatment of IH.

Materials and Methods:

This double-blind study was carried out on 30 infants (1-12 months old) and the patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated with the four sessions PDL and the timolol gel 0.05% and Group B with PDL.

Results:

There were no differences in the mean age of patients for the diagnosis of hemangioma (Group A: 32.69 ± 24.64 days, Group B: 25.69 ± 21.16 days, P = 0.39) and the mean age at the start of the treatment (Group A: 148.125 ± 85.88 days, Group B: 146.25 ± 60.87 days, P = 0.94). There were a statistical difference in the mean of lesion size reduction (Group A: 17.62 ± 6.97 cm and Group B: 12 ± 5.71 cm, P = 0.018), mean percentage change in size mean (Group A: 71079 ± 23.41% and Group B: 54.59 ± 25.46%, P = 0.050) visual analog scale (Group A: 7.19 ± 1.51, Group B: 5.62 ± 1.78, P = 0.012) after treatment. There was no correlation between the time of beginning the treatment and the results (P = 0.857).

Conclusions:

Application of timolol with PDL is accompanied by the highest efficacy, cost benefits and the short time of treatment.

Treatment of periorbital infantile haemangiomas: a systematic literature review on propranolol or steroids

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of propranolol versus corticosteroids for the treatment of periorbital infantile haemangiomas (IHs).

METHODS

A literature review using PubMed, Ovid Medline, EBSCO, Springer, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, CNKI and associated references before 2 March 2013 was conducted. The main outcomes were distribution of locations, response rate, rebound growth rate, spherical and cylinder power before and after treatment, amblyopia rate and adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies including 425 patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 70.6% of patients were female, 89.6% of the periorbital IHs were located in the upper or lower eyelid area. The most common administration routes involved oral propranolol and intralesional injection of corticosteroids. The mean response rate was 94.0% for propranolol and 82.3% for corticosteroid (P = 0.001). The rebound growth rate was 13.9% for propranolol and 12.0% for steroids (P = 0.71). Astigmatism was reduced in both propranolol and steroid studies (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001), but a significant reduction in spherical power was only demonstrated in propranolol studies (P = 0.005). A total of 31.1% of patients treated with corticosteroids developed post-operative amblyopia compared with 16.7% of patients treated with propranolol (P = 0.04). Oral propranolol seemed to induce more temporary adverse events than intralesional corticosteroids administration (24.0% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Propranolol may represent an effective therapy for periorbital IHs compared with the use of corticosteroids; however, further randomised control studies are needed to compare adverse events.

Failure of intralesional propranolol in infantile hemangiomas

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of intralesional propranolol injection in the management of small, noncomplicated infantile hemangiomas (IHs) located in areas of cosmetic concern. A prospective study was performed in six female infants with small, non-complicated IHs in areas of cosmetic concern. The parents had refused oral propranolol or the patients had no response to topical timolol or had relapsed after oral propranolol and the parents refused further systemic treatment. All six patients were treated with 1 mg/mL propranolol solution at a dose of 0.2 mL/cm(2). The size, color, and growth of the hemangiomas were monitored and recorded every 4 weeks. Treatment response was evaluated using a 5-point scale: much better (+2), better (+1), same (0), worse (-1), and much worse (-2). Heart rate and blood pressure were measured before and 1 hour after each injection. Adverse effects after medication were evaluated and managed accordingly. All hemangiomas stopped growing during therapy, but no significant changes in size or color were observed, even after repeated injections, and all patients were evaluated as 0 (same). One patient whose hemangioma stopped growing during treatment presented rebound growth after therapy cessation. No changes in heart rate or blood pressure were observed after intralesional propranolol injection. Adverse effects observed were pain and redness after injection. Intralesional propranolol seems safe but is not effective for the treatment of IH.

Propranolol therapy for infantile hemangioma

CONTEXT

There has been widespread interest surrounding the use of beta-blockers (i.e. propranolol, timolol, nadolol, acebutolol) in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IH).

OBJECTIVE

To review literature evaluating treatment of IH with propranolol.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a literature search on PubMed and investigated for case reports, case series, and controlled trials by using search terms including hemangioma and propranolol.

RESULTS

Data suggest that beta-blockers are efficacious in cutaneous, orbital, subglottic, and hepatic hemangiomas and assist in the resolution of ulcerated hemangiomas. Improvement has also been documented in children with PHACE syndrome. Propranolol produces favorable results in children who do not respond to steroids and with no long-term adverse effects. Propranolol should be administered with caution due to rare but serious side effects including hypoglycemia, wheezing, hypotension, and bradycardia. Additionally, recurrence of lesions following the cessation of treatment has been documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Although large-scale randomized controlled trials must be conducted in order to further evaluate the safety and the possible role of propranolol in the treatment of IH, the reviewed literature suggests that propranolol carries promise as a potential replacement for corticosteroids as first-line therapy or as a part of a multimodal approach.

Beta-blockers versus corticosteroids in the treatment of infantile hemangioma: an evidence-based systematic review

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of beta-blockers versus corticosteroids in the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IHs) is controversial. This study aimed to summarize evidence described in the literature and to assess the quality of studies involving beta-blockers and corticosteroids for the treatment of cutaneous IHs.

METHODS

Comparative studies were collected from 15 online electronic databases, including OVID Medline, PubMed, ISI Web of Science, CENTRAL, CNKI, ChiCTR, JPCTR, CTRIndia, IranCTR, SLCTR, ISRCTRN, NLCTR, GCTR, ANCTR, ClinicalTrial. gov, and associated references. Studies without a control group were excluded, and the remaining studies were assessed by two reviewers independently using the Downs & Black scale for reported quality. The main areas assessed in the included studies were volume changes, overall improvement in appearance, eye function, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Ten comparative studies were included with a total of 419 children. A meta-analysis was not performed due to the considerable heterogeneity across studies. Some evidence showed that beta-blockers are superior to steroids in reducing volume and improving the overall appearance of IHs, such as lightening of the color and flattening of the surface. Conclusions regarding improved eye function and adverse events were divided, and no consensus has been reached on the superiority of one treatment over another. No episodes of severe-onset asthma, hypotension, or bradycardia occurred in the beta-blocker treatment due to the rigorous exclusion of patients with contraindications.

CONCLUSIONS

Available studies indicate that beta-blockers are an alternative option to corticosteroids for IH treatment with respect to volume shrinkage and improvement in appearance. No evidence has shown a significant difference in improved eye function and adverse events between beta-blockers and corticosteroids in the treatment of IH; indeed, there is a lack of well-designed, high-quality randomized control trials.

[News on infantile hemangioma therapy by beta-blocker]

Hemangiomas are benign tumors most commonly encountered in infancy and early childhood. While most of them regress spontaneously, some require treatment due to a significant proliferation, which may be complicated by ulceration, deformation aesthetic deformation or worse impairment vital. Among the treatments used corticosteroids is the standard treatment but its use in high doses expose to potential risks. In 2008, the discovery by "chance" of the effectiveness of propranolol in the management of hemangioma revolutionizes the first line treatment. Its mechanism of action is not yet well understood and establishment of such treatment should be done by a hospital paediatrician in the absence of any contraindications. This article proposes focus on effectiveness and tolerance of β-blockers used as treatment of infantile hemangiomas.

Infantile hemangiomas: A review

Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most common eyelid and orbital tumors of childhood. Although they are considered benign lesions that have a generally self-limited course, in the periocular region, they have the potential to cause amblyopia, strabismus, and severe disfigurement. The decision for treatment can be a source of anxiety for patients, parents, and physicians alike. There are numerous treatment modalities, including emerging therapies that may make treatment safer and more effective than ever before. This review discusses our current understanding of this disease, its management, and future therapies.