Contemporary Management of Complex and Non-Complex Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Due to Giant Retinal Tears

Management, risk factors and treatment outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with giant retinal tears: scoping review

BACKGROUND

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is a serious condition that occurs when the retina detaches from its underlying retinal pigment epithelium. RRDs associated with giant retinal tears (GRTs) are caused by retinal tears at least 90° or one-quarter of the circumferential extent. This scoping review systematically identifies and summarizes clinical studies evaluating surgical techniques for the management of GRT-related RRDs, discusses functional and visual outcomes and the risk factors affecting treatment outcomes.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Springer Link databases were searched for relevant papers (from January 2001 to March 2023). Studies that were published in the English language and reported the risk factors, management, and treatment outcomes of GRT-related RRDs were included in the review. The outcome measures included anatomic success rates, changes in BCVA (logMAR) from baseline to the final follow-up, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 11,982 articles were identified. After the title and abstract review, 71 studies were deemed eligible for full-text review. Thirty-six studies that met the eligibility criteria were included in the final review. Four surgical techniques were identified: pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), combined PPV and scleral buckling, scleral buckling alone, and pneumatic retinopexy. Various types of tamponades, including gas, silicone oil, and air, have been used. PPV was the most commonly used surgical technique in 33.1-100% of patients. Among the 20 studies that used PPV alone, 17 were associated with preoperative PVR. In addition, scleral buckling alone or in combination with PPV was reported as a treatment option in 10 studies, with 2-100% of patients experiencing scleral buckling alone and 13.6-100% experiencing combined PPV and complementary scleral buckling. Primary anatomic success (PAS) was achieved with retinal reattachment via a single operation with no residual tamponade, whereas final anatomic success (FAS) was achieved via more than one operation with no residual tamponade. Reported single surgery anatomic success (SSAS) rates range from 65.51 to 100%. The preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 0.067 to 2.47 logMAR, whereas the postoperative BCVA ranged from 0.08 to 2.3 logMAR. An improvement in visual acuity was observed in 29 studies. Cataracts (3.9-28.3%) were the most common postoperative complication, followed by high IOP (0.01-51.2%) and PVR (0.8-31.57%).

CONCLUSION

PPV is the most common surgical technique, and currently microincision vitrectomy surgery (MIVS) systems are commonly employed. Silicone oil is the most frequently used tamponade in RRD repair. Risk factors for GRT-related RRD include age, sex, lens status, high myopia status, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), presenting visual acuity, the extent of the GRT and retinal detachment, and macular involvement. Future research areas include guidelines to reduce variability in the reporting of surgical methodology, choice of tamponades, and reporting of functional and visual outcomes to inform the best therapeutic interventions in GRT-related RRD.

Management of macula-on giant retinal tear detachments- outcome of pars-plana-vitrectomy with silicone oil versus gas tamponade

BACKGROUND

To compare the outcome of eyes with a macula-on giant retinal tear (GRT) detachment treated with pars-plana-vitrectomy (PPV) depending on the used endotamponade.

METHODS

All consecutive cases with a macula-on GRT-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) managed with PPV between 2007 and 2022 were retrospectively assessed depending on the selected endotamponade. By reviewing medical charts and surgical protocols the pre- and intraoperative parameters were analysed in detail. The number of vitreoretinal (VR) procedures needed for reattachment, the redetachment rate and the functional outcome were evaluated. Eyes treated with primary silicone oil (SO) tamponade were compared to eyes with primary gas tamponade. Cases with pre-existing conditions affecting outcome e.g. macula-off situation, history of trauma, status after complicated cataract surgery, former VR surgery or proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade C or higher were excluded.

RESULTS

Overall, 51 eyes of 45 patients with a macula-on GRT detachment were treated with PPV and SO (n = 32; 63%) or gas (n = 19; 37%) endotamponade in the observed period. Eyes with primary SO tamponade underwent on average 2.3 (SD 0.8) VR procedures and had a redetachment rate of 13% (n = 4). Eyes with gas tamponade showed a higher redetachment rate of 32% (n = 6) with a mean number of 1.6 (SD 1.0) PPV procedures. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly better in eyes with primary gas tamponade (mean logMAR BCVA 0.32; SD 0.30) compared to eyes with SO (mean logMAR BCVA 0.60; SD 0.42; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management of GRT-associated RRDs is complex. In clinical routine often SO is used as endotamponade. Because of known disadvantages (second procedure necessary for SO removal, unexplained SO-related visual loss, secondary glaucoma, SO emulsification) some VR surgeons prefer a gas tamponade. In our cohort, eyes with a gas compared to SO tamponade showed higher redetachment rates. However, the final postoperative BCVA was significantly better in eyes with gas compared to SO tamponade.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial protocol was approved by the local ethics committee on 25th of November 2022 (Ethikkommission der Universität Regensburg, Votum 22-3166-104).

GIANT RETINAL TEAR DETACHMENT: Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcomes in 396 Patients

PURPOSE

To study etiology, clinical presentation, anatomical, and functional outcomes of patients with giant retinal tear detachment at a tertiary eye institute.

METHODS

Retrospective, consecutive case series of 396 patients (396 eyes) who underwent surgery were reviewed. Factors affecting the final anatomical and functional success were determined.

RESULTS

Mean age was 37 years (range; 1-79 years), and 86% (n = 339) of the subjects were men. Trauma (21%) and high myopia (11%) were predisposing risk factors. Two hundred and seventy-seven eyes (70%) had giant retinal tear configuration of >180° and <270°, associated with partial retinal detachment in 282 (71%) eyes and macular detachment in 262 (66%) eyes. Primary surgery included pars plana vitrectomy (n = 240, 61%), pars plana vitrectomy with encirclage band (n = 152, 38%), or scleral buckle (n = 4, 1%). The mean follow-up duration was 15 months (median, 8.4 months; range, 3-83 months). Anatomical success after initial surgery was 64% (255 eyes), which improved to 78% (308 eyes) after undergoing a second vitreoretinal procedure for recurrent retinal detachment (53 eyes). Median visual acuity improved from 20/1,500 preoperatively to 20/400 at final follow-up ( P = 0.01), and 15% of eyes achieved postoperative visual acuity of 20/60 or better. Factors associated with poor anatomical success included age <16 years ( P = 0.005) and presenting visual acuity 20/400 or less ( P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Trauma and myopia constituted the major risk factors for giant retinal tear detachment in our series. Surgery for giant retinal tear detachment managed with pars plana vitrectomy with or without encirclage band and silicone oil tamponade had good anatomical and favorable visual outcomes at last follow-up.

A Prediction Nomogram for Recurrent Retinal Detachment

Purpose

Recurrent retinal detachment (re-RD) is one of the complications in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment patients who underwent surgical treatment. We investigated the risk factors for re-RD and developed a nomogram for estimating clinical risk.

Methods

Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to determine the association between variables and re-RD, and a nomogram was then developed for re-RD. The nomogram performance was assessed based on its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

Results

This study analyzed 15 potential variables of re-RD in 403 rhegmatogenous retinal detachment patients who underwent initial surgical treatment. Axial length, inferior breaks, retinal break diameter, and surgical methods were independent risk factors for re-RD. A clinical nomogram incorporating these four independent risk factors was constructed. The diagnostic performance of the nomogram was excellent (area under the curve = 0.892, 95% CI: 0.831-0.953). Our study further validated this nomogram by bootstrapping for 500 repetitions. The area under the curve of the bootstrap model was 0.797 (95% CI: 0.712-0.881). This model showed good calibration curve fitting and a positive net benefit in decision curve analysis.

Conclusion

Axial length, inferior breaks, retinal break diameter, and surgical methods could be risk factors for re-RD. We have developed a prediction nomogram of re-RD for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment following initial surgical treatment.

Vitrectomy versus Vitrectomy with Scleral Buckling in the Treatment of Giant Retinal Tear Related Retinal Detachments: An International Multicenter Study

PURPOSE

To determine the practice pattern for treating giant retinal tear (GRT) related detachments, and their anatomic and visual outcomes with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without scleral buckling (SB).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECTS

Eyes with GRT detachments repaired from 2008-2020 with at least 6 months of follow-up from seven institutions in North and South America, Europe, and Asia.

METHODS

Eyes repaired using PPV versus PPV/SB were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Anatomic and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

A comparable number of eyes underwent PPV (n=101) and PPV/SB (n=99). Except for prior intraocular surgery and lens status, no differences in baseline demographics, ocular characteristics, or intraoperative surgical adjuncts were observed. Overall single surgery anatomic success (SSAS) at 6 months and 1 year was similar between the groups (82.2% and 77.2% of PPV, and 87.9% and 85.7% of PPV/SB). However, when stratified by age, the 1-year SSAS rate was higher for PPV/SB (88.5%) than PPV (56.3%) (p=0.03) for children < 18 years. For both children and adults, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline did not differ between the PPV and PPV/SB groups. However, for children, mean BCVA at 1 year was better in the PPV/SB than PPV groups (p=0.001) while for adults, no difference was found between the two groups. The mean time to first redetachment was 7.9 months in the PPV group and 5.5 months in the PPV/SB group (p=0.8). PVR was the most common cause for redetachment (70.4% of PPV and 93.8% of PPV/SB in redetached eyes; p=0.1). Postoperative complications were also similar between the two groups including ocular hypertension, epiretinal membrane, and cataract.

CONCLUSIONS

PPV and PPV/SB are equally popular among surgeons globally for managing GRT detachments and have comparable anatomic and visual outcomes in adults. In children, PPV/SB is superior to PPV for anatomic and functional success at one year. In adults, the relief of traction by the GRT may reduce peripheral traction and obviate the need for a SB. However, in children, a supplemental SB can be beneficial as complete vitreous shaving and posterior hyaloid detachment, and postoperative positioning are difficult in this group.