Acanthamoeba Keratitis in Egypt: Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes

Perspectives on the Incidence of Acanthamoeba Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TOPIC

To provide an overview on the incidence of Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although being a sight-threatening cause of infectious keratitis, a comprehensive assessment of the incidence of AK is lacking.

METHODS

Incidence of AK was computed as the number of eyes with AK per health care center, per year (annualized center incidence [ACI]). Two meta-analytical ratios also were calculated: (1) the ratio of eyes with AK to the count of eyes with nonviral microbial keratitis (MK) and (2) the ratio of eyes with AK to the overall population (i.e., the total number of people in a nation or region, as indicated by the authors in each study). Center was defined as the health care facility where the study took place. Actual and projected estimates of the number of eyes with AK in years were calculated multiplying the ratio of eyes with AK to the total population and the corresponding population estimates, sourced from the United Nations Population Prospects.

RESULTS

Overall, 105 articles were included, published between 1987 and 2022. The total number of eyes identified was 91 951, with 5660 eyes affected by AK and 86 291 eyes affected by nonviral MK. The median ACI was 1.9 eyes with AK per health care center per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.6 eyes), with no statistically significant differences among continents. The ratio of eyes with AK to the total number of eyes with MK was 1.52% (95% CI, 1.03%-2.22%), whereas the ratio of eyes with AK in relationship to the entire population was estimated at 2.34 eyes per 1 000 000 people (95% CI, 0.98-5.55 per 1 000 000 people). The projected increase in the numbers of eyes with AK indicated an increase of 18.5% (n = 15 355 eyes with AK) in 2053 and 25.5% (n = 16 253 eyes with AK) in 2073, compared with the baseline of 2023 (n = 12 953 eyes with AK).

DISCUSSION

Acanthamoeba keratitis emerged as a relatively low-incident disorder, and no significant differences in terms of its incidence were found among different continents.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Differentiation of acanthamoeba keratitis from other non-acanthamoeba keratitis: Risk factors and clinical features

INTRODUCTION

Infectious Keratitis is one of the most common ocular emergencies seen by ophthalmologists. Our aim is to identify the risk factors and clinical features of Acanthamoeba Keratitis (AK).

METHODS

This retrospective chart review study was conducted at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and included all the microbial keratitis cases, male and female patients of all ages. The main outcome is the differentiation between various microbial keratitis types.

RESULTS

We included 134 consecutive eyes of 126 persons. We had 24 cases of acanthamoeba keratitis, 22 bacterial keratitis, 24 fungal keratitis, 32 herpetic keratitis, and 32 bacterial co-infection. Contact lens wear was found in 33 eyes (24.6%). Among acanthamoeba keratitis patients, 73% were ≤ 39 years of age, and 73% were females (P <0.001). Also, in AK cases, epithelial defect was found in all cases (100%), endothelial plaques were found in 18 eyes (69.2%), 12 cases had radial keratoneuritis (46.2%), and ring infiltrate was found in 53.8% of AK cases.

CONCLUSIONS

We determined the factors that increase the risk of acanthamoeba infection and the clinical characteristics that help distinguish it from other types of microbial keratitis. Our findings suggest that younger females and patients who wear contact lenses are more likely to develop acanthamoeba keratitis. The occurrence of epitheliopathy, ring infiltrate, radial keratoneuritis, and endothelial plaques indicate the possibility of acanthamoeba infection. Promoting education on wearing contact lenses is essential to reduce the risk of acanthamoeba infection, as it is the most significant risk factor for this infection.

Diagnosing and monitoring the characteristics of Acanthamoeba keratitis using slit scanning and laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy

INTRODUCTION

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is a serious and potentially blinding ocular infection caused by the free-living amoeba, Acanthamoeba. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) is a non-invasive device which has been proven of great use to diagnose Acanthamoeba infections immediately. The aim of this review was to establish different patterns and signs of AK that appear on the IVCM both before and after treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 1974 until September 2021 was performed using Embase and PubMed, following The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty different signs of AK were observed using IVCM. The included studies used vastly different criteria to diagnose infections, ranging from just 1 to 13 of the signs, demonstrating the current lack of a standardised diagnosis of this infection using the IVCM. The appearance of double wall cysts, trophozoites, signet rings, target signs and clusters were shown to be pathognomonic to AK infections. Bright spots located in the corneal epithelium were demonstrated as non-reliable predictors of AK. The presence of cysts in clusters and single file can predict the need for corneal transplantation. The morphological changes in cysts using the IVCM following treatment were described as breaking down to hollow forms and occasionally surrounded by black cavities. Using this information, a visual guideline for identifying AK signs in diagnosis and follow-up using IVCM was created.

CONCLUSION

Increased awareness of the different signs and patterns of AK that appear on the IVCM is crucial in order to correctly identify an infection and increase the potential of this device. Our guidelines presented here can be used, but further studies are needed in order to determine the relationship and aetiology of these signs and cellular changes on the IVCM both before and after anti-amoeba treatment.

New Frontiers in Acanthamoeba Keratitis Diagnosis and Management

Acanthamoeba Keratitis (AK) is a severe corneal infection caused by the Acanthamoeba species of protozoa, potentially leading to permanent vision loss. AK requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to mitigate vision impairment. Diagnosing AK is challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other corneal infections, and treatment is made complicated by the organism's dual forms and increasing virulence, and delayed diagnosis. In this review, new approaches in AK diagnostics and treatment within the last 5 years are discussed. The English-language literature on PubMed was reviewed using the search terms "Acanthamoeba keratitis" and "diagnosis" or "treatment" and focused on studies published between 2018 and 2023. Two hundred sixty-five publications were initially identified, of which eighty-seven met inclusion and exclusion criteria. This review highlights the findings of these studies. Notably, advances in PCR-based diagnostics may be clinically implemented in the near future, while antibody-based and machine-learning approaches hold promise for the future. Single-drug topical therapy (0.08% PHMB) may improve drug access and efficacy, while oral medication (i.e., miltefosine) may offer a treatment option for patients with recalcitrant disease.

Diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan in detecting acanthamoeba keratitis and fungal keratitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) and fungal keratitis (FK) are two microbial keratitis that cause serious damage and, without early accurate diagnosis and treatment, may lead to blindness. In vivo corneal confocal scan, as an emerging ocular diagnostic method in comparison with microbiological smears and cultures as the gold standard, may assist in accelerating appropriate diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan for the diagnosis of AK and FK.

METHODS

Data were collected via a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Scopus using keywords related to diagnostic accuracy of confocal scan in AK and FK up to October 2022. Pooled data underwent meta-analysis in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of confocal scan for the diagnosis of AK and FK.

RESULTS

The final 14 relevant studies were identified, including 1950 eyes. Meta-analysis in AK group revealed 94% sensitivity, 87% specificity, 89% PPV, 92% NPV, and DOR of 143.32, and in FK group disclosed 88% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 85% PPV, 88% NPV, and DOR of 75.98.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of confocal scan for the diagnosis of AK was significantly more than that for detecting FK; despite the limitations such as limited numbers of available retrospective studies for the detection of FK, confocal scan had an acceptable performance in detecting FK eyes. The overall performance of NCS was similar with that of HRT-RCM for the detection of both types of keratitis.