Factors Affecting Compliance with Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Qualitative Study Comparing English and Spanish Speakers

Comparing Patients' Perceptions of Dry Eye Disease Between Spanish- and English-Speaking Patients in the United States

PURPOSE

It is well-known that patients' perceptions of their disease can impact management strategies and disease outcomes. Limited knowledge exists on such perceptions in dry eye disease (DED) and the role of language in these perceptions. Herein, we compared the perceptions about DED between Spanish- and English-speaking patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 146 patients with DED who underwent ophthalmic evaluation and completed questionnaires assessing their perceptions of DED on a 10-point scale during their routine appointments. Perceptions included opinions on the level of satisfaction with understanding of DED, ease of following doctor's advice, effectiveness of treatment, satisfaction with DED care, and outlook on DED. Perceptions were categorized as low (scores 0-2), moderate (scores 3-7), and high (scores 8-10). The percentage of patients with high perception scores were then compared between Spanish- and English-speaking patients.

RESULTS

There were 48 Spanish speakers and 98 English speakers. Overall, high scores of DED perceptions were identified in 47.9% for satisfaction with the level of understanding of DED, 72.6% for ease of following doctor's advice, 52.1% for helpfulness of DED treatment, 64.4% for satisfaction with DED care, and 52.1% for optimistic outlook on DED. High scores for satisfaction with the level of understanding of DED were significantly lower in Spanish speakers (27.1%) than English speakers (58.2%, p < .001). No significant differences were observed in other perceptions between Spanish- and English-speaking participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Spanish-speaking subjects reported lower satisfaction with their understanding of DED than English speakers. Clinicians should provide health services and educational materials in the patient's preferred language to minimize barriers to understanding their disease.

Improving diabetic retinopathy screening at the point of care: integrating telemedicine to overcome current challenges

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of point of care screening of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the impact of a telemedicine program to overcome current challenges.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were screened for DR using the single-field non-mydriatic fundus photography at the point of care during routine follow-up visits at endocrinology clinic. Retinal images were uploaded and sent to a retina specialist for review. Reports indicating retinopathy status and the need for direct retinal examination were transmitted back to the endocrinology clinic. All patients were informed about DR status and, if needed, referred to the retina specialist for direct retinal examination.

RESULTS

Of the 1159 individuals screened for DR, 417 persons (35.98%) were screen-positive and referred to the retina specialist for direct retinal examination. A total of 121 individuals (29.01%) underwent direct retinal examination by the specialist. Diabetes macular edema (DME) was detected in 12.1%. In addition, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) were detected in 53.4% and 2.6% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Integrating DR screening program at the point of care at the secondary care services improves the rate of DR screening as well as detection of sight threatening retinopathy and provides the opportunity for timely intervention in order to prevent advanced retinopathy in people with T2DM.

Influence of continuous 4C nursing on quality of life and self-care ability of patients with diabetes retinopathy: An observational study

This study aims to investigate the impact of continuous 4C nursing on patients with diabetes retinopathy (DR) and its influence on self-care ability. A total of 100 DR patients admitted to our hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group received routine care, while the observation group received continuous 4C care. The nursing effects of both groups were compared. After nursing, the observation group showed a lower self-rating anxiety scale score and a higher self-care ability scale score compared to the control group (P < .05). The SQQL-VI scores for all social activities were also higher in the observation group (P < .05). Additionally, the observation group had lower levels of fasting blood glucose, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose, and glycated hemoglobin than the control group (P < .05). Moreover, the observation group had higher visual acuity and lower intraocular pressure than the control group (P < .05). The visual impairment rate was lower and the overall compliance rate was higher in the observation group compared to the control group (P < .05). After nursing, both groups showed improvements in symptoms, visual function, physical function, psychological and social activity scores, visual acuity, and patient satisfaction scores. The observation group showed greater improvements compared to the control group (P < .05). The application of continuous 4C nursing in DR patients has shown positive effects, including improved patient compliance and satisfaction, enhanced patient quality of life and visual acuity. These findings suggest that continuous 4C nursing should be widely promoted and applied in clinical practice.

Social Determinants of Health and Perceived Barriers to Care in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

Importance

Regular screening for diabetic retinopathy often is crucial for the health of patients with diabetes. However, many factors may be barriers to regular screening and associated with disparities in screening rates.

Objective

To evaluate the associations between visiting an eye care practitioner for diabetic retinopathy screening and factors related to overall health and social determinants of health, including socioeconomic status and health care access and utilization.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cross-sectional study included adults aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes who answered survey questions in the All of Us Research Program, a national multicenter cohort of patients contributing electronic health records and survey data, who were enrolled from May 1, 2018, to July 1, 2022.

Exposures

The associations between visiting an eye care practitioner and (1) demographic and socioeconomic factors and (2) responses to the Health Care Access and Utilization, Social Determinants of Health, and Overall Health surveys were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was whether patients self-reported visiting an eye care practitioner in the past 12 months. The associations between visiting an eye care practitioner and demographic and socioeconomic factors and responses to the Health Care Access and Utilization, Social Determinants of Health, and Overall Health surveys in All of Us were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of the 11 551 included participants (54.55% cisgender women; mean [SD] age, 64.71 [11.82] years), 7983 (69.11%) self-reported visiting an eye care practitioner in the past year. Individuals who thought practitioner concordance was somewhat or very important were less likely to have seen an eye care practitioner (somewhat important: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.74-0.93]; very important: AOR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.95]). Compared with financially stable participants, individuals with food or housing insecurity were less likely to visit an eye care practitioner (food insecurity: AOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.61-0.91]; housing insecurity: AOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.75-0.98]). Individuals who reported fair mental health were less likely to visit an eye care practitioner than were those who reported good mental health (AOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that food insecurity, housing insecurity, mental health concerns, and the perceived importance of practitioner concordance were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving eye care. Such findings highlight the self-reported barriers to seeking care and the importance of taking steps to promote health equity.

EyeArt artificial intelligence analysis of diabetic retinopathy in retinal screening events

PURPOSE

Early detection and treatment of diabetic retinopathy (DR) are critical for decreasing the risk of vision loss and preventing blindness. Community vision screenings may play an important role, especially in communities at higher risk for diabetes. To address the need for increased DR detection and referrals, we evaluated the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for screening DR.

METHODS

Patient images of 124 eyes were obtained using a 45° Canon Non-Mydriatic CR-2 Plus AF retinal camera in the Department of Endocrinology Clinic (Newark, NJ) and in a community screening event (Newark, NJ). Images were initially classified by an onsite grader and uploaded for analysis by EyeArt, a cloud-based AI software developed by Eyenuk (California, USA). The images were also graded by an off-site retina specialist. Using Fleiss kappa analysis, a correlation was investigated between the three grading systems, the AI, onsite grader, and a US board-certified retina specialist, for a diagnosis of DR and referral pattern.

RESULTS

The EyeArt results, onsite grader, and the retina specialist had a 79% overall agreement on the diagnosis of DR: 86 eyes with full agreement, 37 eyes with agreement between two graders, 1 eye with full disagreement. The kappa value for concordance on a diagnosis was 0.69 (95% CI 0.61-0.77), indicating substantial agreement. Referral patterns by EyeArt, the onsite grader, and the ophthalmologist had an 85% overall agreement: 96 eyes with full agreement, 28 eyes with disagreement. The kappa value for concordance on "whether to refer" was 0.70 (95% CI 0.60-0.80), indicating substantial agreement. Using the board-certified retina specialist as the gold standard, EyeArt had an 81% accuracy (101/124 eyes) for diagnosis and 83% accuracy (103/124 eyes) in referrals. For referrals, the sensitivity of EyeArt was 74%, specificity was 87%, positive predictive value was 72%, and negative predictive value was 88%.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective cross-sectional analysis offers insights into use of AI in diabetic screenings and the significant role it will play in automated detection of DR. The EyeArt readings were beneficial with some limitations in a community screening environment. These limitations included a decreased accuracy in the presence of cataracts and the functional cost of EyeArt uploads in a community setting.

Factors Influencing Eye Screening Adherence Among Latinx Patients With Diabetes: A Qualitative Study

Purpose

Latinx populations have the highest rates of visual impairment and blindness of any ethnic group in the United States, with most cases of diabetic retinopathy remaining undiagnosed. We aimed to identify factors influencing adherence with diabetic eye screening in Latinx communities.

Methods

We conducted semistructured individual interviews with adult Latinx patients in Dane County, WI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated from Spanish to English, and analyzed using QSR NVivo software. We performed both inductive open coding and deductive coding using the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework, as well as the Campbell and Egede Model.

Results

All participants (n = 20) self-identified as Latinx and were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. The mean age was 61.5 years (range 33-79 years). Most participants were uninsured (60%), self-reported low or moderate health literacy (60%), and preferred to speak Spanish during their clinic appointments (75%). Individual-level barriers to diabetic eye screening included limited eye health literacy, lack of insurance coverage, and low self-efficacy with diabetes management. Health system-level facilitators included a recommendation to obtain eye screening from a primary care provider and the use of nonwritten forms of patient education. Community-level barriers included social isolation, concerns about inconveniencing others, machismo, and immigration status.

Conclusions

We identified several health system- and community-level factors, in addition to individual-level factors, influencing adherence with diabetic eye screening in Latinx communities.

Translational Relevance

Strategies addressing these factors may enhance the effectiveness of interventions to prevent blindness from diabetes and contribute to advancing health equity in Latinx communities.

Disparities in Eye Care Access and Utilization: A Narrative Review

This narrative review summarizes the literature on factors related to eye care access and utilization in the United States. Using the Healthy People 2030 framework, this review investigates social determinants of health associated with general and follow-up engagement, screenings, diagnostic visits, treatment, technology, and teleophthalmology. We provide hypotheses for these documented eye care disparities, featuring qualitative, patient-centered research. Lastly, we provide recommendations in the hopes of appropriately eliminating these disparities and reimagining eye care.

Factors Associated with Annual Vision Screening in Diabetic Adults: Analysis of the 2019 National Health Interview Survey

Purpose

To determine the association(s) between receiving an annual eye exam and various economic, social, and geographic factors assessed in the 2019 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) among adults with diabetes.

Patients and Methods

Data from adults 18 years of age and older relevant to self-reported non-gestational diabetes diagnosis and eye exam within the last 12 months were extracted from the 2019 NHIS dataset. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine associations between receiving an eye exam in the preceding 12 months and various economic, insurance-related, geographic, and social factors. Outcomes were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Among diabetic adults in the US, receiving an eye exam within the last 12 months was significantly associated with female sex (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.05-1.58), residence in the Midwestern United States (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.01-1.92), use of Veteran's Health Administration healthcare (OR 2.15; 95% CI 1.34-3.44), having a usual place to go for healthcare (OR 3.89; 95% CI 2.16-7.01), and the use of Private, Medicare Advantage, or other insurance (OR 3.66; 95% CI 2.42-5.53), use of Medicare only excluding Medicare Advantage (OR 3.18; 95% CI 1.95-5.30), dual eligibility for Medicare and Medicaid (OR 3.88; 95% CI 2.21-6.79), and use of Medicaid and other public health insurance (OR 3.04; 95% CI 1.89-4.88) compared to those without insurance. An educational attainment of less than high school (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.92), and an educational attainment of high school or GED without any college (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.47-0.81) reduced the odds of having an annual eye exam.

Conclusion

Economic, social, and geographic factors are associated with diabetic adults receiving an annual eye exam.