1
|
Ricardi F, Gelormini F, Parisi G, Vallino V, Borrelli E, Marolo P, D'Antico S, Salafia M, Reibaldi M. The no-retina-touch technique: vitrectomy and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of lamellar macular hole. New insights into pathogenesis. Eye (Lond) 2024:10.1038/s41433-024-03414-5. [PMID: 39448851 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03414-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a potential therapeutic adjuvant strategy for treating degenerative lamellar macular holes (LMHs). DESIGN A prospective interventional case series. METHODS Seven consecutive patients (8 eyes) with a diagnosis of LMH underwent a pars-plana vitrectomy with PRP injection under air tamponade. Anatomical results based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and functional results, in terms of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reading performance, were analyzed. RESULTS At 12 months postoperatively, 7 out of 8 eyes (88%) presented a complete closure of the LMH. The ellipsoid zone (EZ) was restored in 3 eyes (37.5%). The mean (±SD) postoperative BCVA was 0.39 (±0.56) LogMAR, resulting in a statistically significant visual acuity improvement (p = 0.007). The mean (±SD) maximum reading speed (MaxRS) improved to 133.48 (±41.47) wpm, with a significant increase compared to the baseline (p = 0.029). The mean (±SD) reading acuity score (RA score) resulted in 0.44 (±0.04) LogRAD, with an improvement in reading acuity that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.129). CONCLUSIONS The utilization of the PRP technique with a no-retina-touch approach safeguards the delicate retinal tissues, minimizing the possibility of iatrogenic trauma or post-operative complications, while maintaining a high rate of efficacy in enabling the improvement of the foveal defect in lamellar macular holes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Enrico Borrelli
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Marolo
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sergio D'Antico
- Blood Bank, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Marika Salafia
- Blood Bank, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lippera M, Moussa G, Ivanova T, Ferrara M, Spiess K, Ally N, Jasani K, Dhawahir-Scala F, Patton N, Jalil A. Volumetric Biomarkers of Visual Outcome after Surgical Repair in Lamellar Macular Holes. J Pers Med 2024; 14:755. [PMID: 39064009 PMCID: PMC11278409 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigate novel OCT parameters, based on the volumetric analysis of lamellar macular holes (LMHs), as prognostic indicators for visual outcomes after surgery. METHODS LMHs were divided into degenerative LMHs (D-LMHs) and ERM-foveoschisis (ERM-FS). Pre-operative clinical, OCT linear and volumetric parameters were collected. Volumes were obtained using the OCT automatic segmentation, such as central retinal volume (CRV) and outer nuclear layer (ONL) volume, or using a novel method to calculate volumes of specific LMH entities like epiretinal proliferation (ERP), foveal cavity (FC) in D-LMH and schitic volume (SV) in ERM-FS. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis evaluated the factors predictive for post-operative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS We included 31 eyes of 31 patients (14 D-LMH,17 ERM-FS). A pre-operative BCVA ≤ 0.48 logMAR was a predictor for achieving ≤0.30 logMAR at final follow-up. A lower pre-operative BCVA (p = 0.008) and the presence of ERP (p = 0.002) were associated with worse visual outcomes post-surgery. Moreover, novel pre-operative OCT parameters significantly associated with worse post-operative BCVA, such as increased FC volume (p = 0.032) and lower CRV (p = 0.034) in the D-LMH subtype and lower CRV (p < 0.001) and ERP volume (p < 0.001), higher SV (p < 0.001) and foveal ONL volume (p < 0.001) in the ERM-FS subtype. CONCLUSIONS Novel volumetric OCT parameters can be prognostic indicators of visual outcome following surgery in LMHs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myrta Lippera
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - George Moussa
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - Tsveta Ivanova
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - Mariantonia Ferrara
- School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Eye Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Karina Spiess
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - Naseer Ally
- Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Neurosciences, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Road, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
| | - Kirti Jasani
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - Felipe Dhawahir-Scala
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - Niall Patton
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| | - Assad Jalil
- Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK (K.S.); (K.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Confalonieri F, Haave H, Binder S, Bober AM, Bragadottir R, Baerland T, Faber R, Forsaa V, Gonzalez-Lopez JJ, Govetto A, Haugstad M, Ivastinovic D, Jenko NČ, Nicoară SD, Kaljurand K, Kozak I, Kvanta A, Lytvynchuk L, Nawrocka ZA, Pajic SP, Petrovič MG, Radecka L, Rehak M, Romano MR, Ruban A, Speckauskas M, Stene-Johansen I, Stranak Z, Thaler A, Thein ASA, Theocharis I, Tomic Z, Yan X, Zekolli M, Zhuri B, Znaor L, Petrovski BE, Kolko M, Lumi X, Petrovski G. Macular hole Delphi consensus statement (MHOST). Acta Ophthalmol 2023; 101:815-825. [PMID: 37493073 DOI: 10.1111/aos.15682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To derive a Delphi method-based consensus for the surgical management of Full Thickness Macular Hole (FTMH) and Lamellar Macular Hole (LMH). METHODS 37 expert VR surgeons from 21 mainly European countries participated in Delphi method-based questionnaire for diagnosis and treatment of FTMHs and LMHs. RESULTS A total of 36 items were rated in round 1 by 37 participants, of which 10 items achieved consensus: intraoperative verification of PVD; clinical superiority of OCT-based FTMH classification; practical ineffectiveness of ocriplasmin; circular 360° ILM peeling for small macular holes; use of regular surgical technique for the size of the hole in concomitant retinal detachment; performing complete vitrectomy; SF6 gas as preferred tamponade; cataract surgery if crystalline lens is mildly/moderately opaque; removal of both ILM and LHEP in LMH surgery. In round 2, 18 items with moderate consensus (45-70% agreement) in round 1 were rated by 35 participants. Final consensus was reached in 35% of questions related to both diagnosis and surgical procedures. CONCLUSIONS This Delphi study provides valuable information about the consensus/disagreement on different scenarios encountered during FTMH and LMH management as a guide tosurgical decision-making. High rate of disagreement and/or variable approaches still exist for treating such relatively common conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Confalonieri
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Hanna Haave
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Susanne Binder
- Department of Ophthalmology, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Ragnheidur Bragadottir
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Baerland
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rowan Faber
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vegard Forsaa
- Department of Ophthalmology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Julio J Gonzalez-Lopez
- Surgery Department, Universidad de Alcalá School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain
- Ophthalmology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Govetto
- Ophthalmology Department, Fatebenefratelli and Ophthalmic Hospital, ASSt-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Haugstad
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Neža Čokl Jenko
- Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Simona Delia Nicoară
- Department of Ophthalmology, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Department of Ophthalmology, Emergency County Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Igor Kozak
- Moorfields Eye Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Anders Kvanta
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Eye and Vision, St. Erik Eye Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lyubomyr Lytvynchuk
- Department of Ophthalmology, Justus Liebig University, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany
- Karl Landsteiner Institute for Retinal Research and Imaging, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Mojca Globočnik Petrovič
- Eye Hospital University Medical Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Matus Rehak
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Mario R Romano
- Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Martynas Speckauskas
- Department of Ophthalmology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | - Zbynek Stranak
- Department of Ophthalmology for Children and Adults, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Ophthalmology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Angela Thaler
- Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Zoran Tomic
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Xiaohe Yan
- Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen Eye Institute, Jinan University, Shenzhen, China
| | | | | | - Ljubo Znaor
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia
| | | | - Miriam Kolko
- Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Xhevat Lumi
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Ophthalmology, "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Goran Petrovski
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hagenau F, Osterode EV, Klaas JE, Vogt D, Keidel LF, Schworm B, Siedlecki J, Mayer WJ, Kreutzer TC, Priglinger SG. Long-Term Results of Adjunct Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma in Lamellar Macular Hole Surgery Showing Lasting Restoration of Foveal Anatomy. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24054589. [PMID: 36902019 PMCID: PMC10002568 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-time results of highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) used as an adjunct in lamellar macular hole (LMH) surgery. Nineteen eyes of nineteen patients with progressive LMH were enrolled in this interventional case series, on which 23/25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy was performed and 0.1 mL of highly concentrated autologous platelet-rich plasma was applied under air tamponade. Posterior vitreous detachment was induced, and the peeling of tractive epiretinal membranes, whenever present, was performed. In cases of phakic lens status, combined surgery was carried out. Postoperatively, all patients were instructed to remain in a supine position for the first two postoperative hours. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, microperimetry, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were carried out preoperatively and at minimum 6 months (in median 12 months) postoperatively. Foveal configuration was postoperatively restored in 19 of 19 patients. Two patients who had not undergone ILM peeling showed a recurring defect at 6-month follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.29 ± 0.08 to 0.14 ± 0.13 logMAR (p = 0.028, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Microperimetry remained unchanged (23.38 ± 2.53 preoperatively; 23.0 ± 2.49 dB postoperatively; p = 0.67). No patients experienced vision loss after surgery, and no significant intra- or postoperative complications were observed. Using PRP as an adjunct in macular hole surgery significantly improves morphological and functional outcomes. Additionally, it might be an effective prophylaxis to further progression and also the formation of a secondary full-thickness macular hole. The results of this study might contribute to a paradigm shift in macular hole surgery towards early intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Hagenau
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Elisa V. Osterode
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Julian E. Klaas
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Denise Vogt
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie F. Keidel
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schworm
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Jakob Siedlecki
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang J. Mayer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas C. Kreutzer
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Confalonieri F, Josifovska N, Boix-Lemonche G, Stene-Johansen I, Bragadottir R, Lumi X, Petrovski G. Vitreous Substitutes from Bench to the Operating Room in a Translational Approach: Review and Future Endeavors in Vitreoretinal Surgery. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:3342. [PMID: 36834754 PMCID: PMC9961686 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Vitreous substitutes are indispensable tools in vitreoretinal surgery. The two crucial functions of these substitutes are their ability to displace intravitreal fluid from the retinal surface and to allow the retina to adhere to the retinal pigment epithelium. Today, vitreoretinal surgeons can choose among a plethora of vitreous tamponades, and the tamponade of choice might be difficult to determine in the ever-expanding range of possibilities for a favorable outcome. The currently available vitreous substitutes have disadvantages that need to be addressed to improve the surgical outcome achievable today. Herein, the fundamental physical and chemical proprieties of all vitreous substitutes are reported, and their use and clinical applications are described alongside some surgical techniques of intra-operative manipulation. The major upcoming developments in vitreous substitutes are extensively discussed, keeping a translational perspective throughout. Conclusions on future perspectives are derived through an in-depth analysis of what is lacking today in terms of desired outcomes and biomaterials technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Confalonieri
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Natasha Josifovska
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Gerard Boix-Lemonche
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingar Stene-Johansen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnheidur Bragadottir
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
| | - Xhevat Lumi
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Goran Petrovski
- Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Center for Eye Research and Innovative Diagnostics, Department of Ophthalmology, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Split School of Medicine and University Hospital Centre, 21000 Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu L, Bradshaw R. Primary Lamellar Macular Holes: To Vit or Not to Vit. J Clin Med 2022; 11:5046. [PMID: 36078977 PMCID: PMC9457236 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a wide spectrum of macular conditions that are characterized by an irregular foveal contour caused by a break in the inner fovea. These include full-thickness macular hole (FTMH), foveal pseudocyst, lamellar macular hole (LMH) and macular pseudohole (MPH). Clinical examination of vitreomacular interface disorders is notoriously poor in differentiating these conditions. These conditions were initially described with slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and the main goal was to distinguish an FTMH from the others. The introduction of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has revolutionized our understanding of the foveal microstructural anatomy and has facilitated differentiating these conditions from an FTMH. However, the definitions of the other conditions, particularly LMH, has evolved over the past two decades. Initially the term LMH encompassed a wide spectrum of clinical conditions. As OCT became more widely used and observations became more refined, two different phenotypes of LMH became apparent, raising the question of different pathogenic mechanisms for each phenotype. Tractional and degenerative pathological mechanisms were proposed. Epiretinal membranes (ERMs) associated with each phenotype were identified. Typical ERMs were associated with a tractional mechanism, whereas an epiretinal proliferation was associated with a degenerative mechanism. Epiretinal proliferation represents Müller cell proliferation as a reactive process to retinal injury. These two types of ERM were differentiated by their characteristics on SD-OCT. The latest consensus definitions take into account this phenotypic differentiation and classifies these entities into LMH, MPH and ERM foveoschisis. The initial event in both ERM foveoschisis and LMH is a tractional event that disrupts the Müller cell cone in the foveola or the foveal walls. Depending on the extent of Müller cell disruption, either a LMH or an ERM foveoschisis may develop. Although surgical intervention for LMH remains controversial and no clear guidelines exist for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), eyes with symptomatic, progressive ERM foveoschisis and LMH may benefit from surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihteh Wu
- Asociados de Macula, Vitreo y Retina de Costa Rica, Primer Piso Torre Mercedes, Paseo Colón, San José 10102, Costa Rica
- Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
| | - Ryan Bradshaw
- Centro de Oftalmologia y Microcirugia Boyd, Departamento de Retina, Panama City 0816-02593, Panama
| |
Collapse
|