Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Gas Tamponade For Full-Thickness Macular Holes of Different Etiology - Is It Still Relevant?

Comparison of conventional internal limiting membrane versus pars plana vitrectomy without peeling for small idiopathic macular hole

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare functional and anatomical changes in patients with small full thickness macular holes (FTMHs) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.

METHODS

42 eyes of 42 patients diagnosed for FTMHs (< 250 micron) were included in our prospective interventional study. Main outcome measures were: Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), Macular hole closure rate, Ellipsoid Zone (EZ) and External Limiting Membrane (ELM) recover, Vessel Density in both Superficial (VDSCP) and deep (VDDCP) capillary plexus, Macular pigment Optical density (MPOD) and mean Central Macular Sensitivity (CMS).Patients were randomly divided into "peeling group" (21 patients), in which the ILM peeling maneuver was performed and "no-peeling group" (21 patients) in which the ILM was not peeled off. Examinations were repeated one month (T1), three months (T2) and six months (T3) after surgery.

RESULTS

Although significant improvements in terms of MPOD, CMS, VDSCP and VDDCP over time (p < 0.001) no significant differences were found between the peeling and no peeling group. Conversely, FTMHs closure was achieved in all cases (100%) in the peeling group, whereas 10% of cases in the no peeling group experienced the hole re-opening at T3, with reported different rates of ELM/EZ recover between the two groups. Nevertheless, BCVA improved significantly (p < 0.001) but without significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were found in terms of anatomical and functional outcomes between the peeling or not the ILM in small FTMHs at 6 months follow-up.