Longstanding refractory pseudophakic cystoid macular edema resolved using intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone implants

Current management options for the treatment of refractory postoperative cystoid macular edema: A systematic review

Post-operative cystoid macular edema (PCME) is an important complication following intraocular surgery that often resolves spontaneously without treatment. In some cases, PCME may persist despite initial medical therapy, which can adversely impact visual outcomes. Various topical, intraocular and systemic treatments exist for the prevention and management of cystoid macular edema; however, there is no consensus on treatment of refractory cases in the postoperative setting. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed 68 articles describing management options and their outcomes for treatment-resistant cases of PCME. The most commonly reported treatments included steroid (39 studies) and biological-based (17 studies) therapies. We provide an overview of the treatment options for refractory PCME.

The efficacy of different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, and dexamethasone implant therapy in patients with serous retinal detachment caused by Irvine-Gass syndrome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA), bevacizumab (IVB), ranibizumab (IVR), and dexamethasone implant (IVDI) in the treatment of serous retinal detachment (SRD) caused by Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort, comparative study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical records of 128 eyes with no previous history of intravitreal agents in 128 IGS patients with SRD that received IVA, IVB, IVR, and IVDI monotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 4 groups, according to treatment. Patients with recurrence and/or were unresponsive following a course of topical steroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and SRD were compared between the 4 treatment groups at baseline, at follow-up months 1, 3, 6, and 12, and at the final follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Serous retinal detachment completely resolved in 74%, 45.7%, 66.4%, and 40.8% of the eyes at month 1 (P = 0.042), 87%, 50.9%, 75.8%, and 80.9% at month 3 (p = 0.031), 88.9%, 50.4%, 75.7%, 80.2% at month 6 (p = 0.028), 81.7%, 72.8%, 68.7%, 80.1% at month 12 (p = 0.580), and 100%, 66.4%, 87.9%, 93.2% (p = 0.478) at final follow-up visit in the IVA, IVB, IVR, and IVDI groups, respectively. BCVA was significantly better in the IVA group at all follow-up time points (month 1: p < 0.001; month 3: p < 0.001; month 6: p = 0.002; month 12: p = 0.009, final follow-up visit: p < 0.001). CMT was significantly lower in the IVA group at months 3 (p = 0.008), 6 (p = 0.011), and 12 (p = 0.010), and at the final follow-up visit (p < 0.001). Recurrence was observed after a longer period of time and fewer injections were needed in the IVDI and IVA groups (p < 0.05). Resolution of CME was most rapid in the IVA group (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

All intravitreal agents were effective in terms of visual results in the SRD patients; however, eyes treated with IVA and IVDI required fewer injections, as compared to the eyes treated with IVB and IVR. Furthermore, SRD entirely resolved in all eyes in the IVA group at the final follow-up visit.

Pseudophakic macular edema in nondiabetic and diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant during a 12-month period in nondiabetic and diabetic patients without diabetic retinopathy (DR) as a treatment for refractory pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) following prior treatment with topical nepafenac 0.1% and prednisolone 1%.

METHODS

Forty-two consecutive medical records of patients diagnosed with PCME after uneventful cataract surgery were included. The outcomes measured included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT). Linear regression analysis was statistically applied.

RESULTS

Following topical treatment, nondiabetic and diabetic subjects presented a mean ± SD gain of - 0.11 ± 0.11 and - 0.18 ± 0.11 BCVA logMAR and a CFT reduction of - 43.42 ± 53.66 µm and - 58.76 ± 36.28 µm, respectively. The mean BCVA gain at month 12 subsequent to DEX implantation was - 0.35 ± 0.17 in nondiabetic (p < 0.001) and - 0.55 ± 0.26 in diabetic patients (p < 0.001), with CFT reductions of - 195.71 ± 93.23 µm (p < 0.001) and - 260.81 ± 198.69 µm (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients who responded with better VA after topical treatment presented better visual outcomes at month 12 following DEX implantation (r2 = 0.46; rho = - 0.71, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Nondiabetic and diabetic patients without DR demonstrated similar results after DEX implant after combined topical therapy, suggesting that selected diabetic patients may have a response comparable to that of nondiabetic patients with PCME.

Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (FAc, 0.19 mg, ILUVIEN®) in the Treatment of Patients with Recurrent Cystoid Macular Edema After Pars Plana Vitrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a complication of several ocular procedures, including pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), due to the activation of the inflammatory cascade. The purpose of this case series is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (FAc, 0.2 μg/day; ILUVIEN®) in the treatment of refractory PCME after successful PPV.

METHODS

This retrospective observational case series includes consecutive eyes of patients with recurrent PCME after PPV and treated with a single FAc implant at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal. Previous treatments, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters), central macular thickness (CMT, μm), intraocular pressure (IOP, mmHg), and IOP-lowering medication needed were recorded at baseline and during follow-up. Total macular edema resolution was defined as CMT less than 300 μm or a reduction of greater than 20%, and partial macular edema resolution was defined as a reduction of greater than 10%.

RESULTS

Nine eyes from nine patients were included. Before FAc implant, all eyes received intravitreal short-action corticosteroids (triamcinolone and dexamethasone implant), with a good response but relapse 1-5 months later. At baseline, BCVA was 55.0 ± 10.6 letters, CMT was 514.9 ± 165.6 μm, and IOP was 15.4 ± 2.4 mmHg with four eyes under IOP-lowering medication. After FAc implant, all eyes achieved edema resolution (eight total and one partial) with a peak gain of 17.2 letters and a maximum decrease of 208.2 μm in CMT. During follow-up (44.0 ± 14.8 months), 66.7% of the eyes kept their macula dry and three showed recurrence after 11, 14, and 28 months, respectively. The maximum IOP registered was 17.0 ± 6.0 mmHg. IOP-lowering regimen was increased in one eye and two additional eyes started hypotensive drops.

CONCLUSION

FAc implant can be considered a therapeutic alternative in PCME refractory to other therapies in vitrectomized eyes, reducing the need for repeated treatments.

Efficacy of Intravitreal Injection of Filtered Modified Low-Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide and Ranibizumab on Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema

Purpose

To compare the visual and morphological effects between intravitreal injection of filtered modified 2 mg triamcinolone acetonide (TA) and 0. 5 mg ranibizumab in patients with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME).

Methods

A retrospective, interventional study was conducted from January 2015 to February 2020 involving patients with PCME after uneventful cataract surgery. A total of 25 patients (25 eyes) with PCME received an intravitreal injection of 0.22 μm filtered modified 2 mg TA, while 15 patients (15 eyes) received 0.5 mg ranibizumab injection. Central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), times of repeated injections, and other side effects were observed at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after injection; then, the data were compared with preinjection information in each group and between the two groups.

Results

Both the TA and ranibizumab intravitreal injection can achieve improved BCVA and reduced CMT in patients with PCME (P < 0.05), with a trend toward greater improvement in the TA group, but the difference was only significant at 3 months (P < 0.05). IOP was in the normal range without any significant difference (P > 0.05). Thirty-three percent of patients in the ranibizumab group required repeated intravitreal injection compared to 4% in the TA group. Further stratified analysis showed that the better therapeutic effect of the TA group at 3 months after injection only existed in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), while not in patients without DM. There was no repeat injection in the TA group and 12.5% in the ranibizumab group for patients without DM, while 16.7% in the TA group and 57.1% in the ranibizumab group required repeated injection for patients with DM, which had a significant difference (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Intravitreal injection of filtered modified 2 mg TA is safe, effective, and an inexpensive alternative to antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for patients with PCME, especially for patients concurrently with DM. A large number of clinical randomized controlled studies along with long-term follow-up observations are needed.

Evaluation of Functional Outcomes and OCT-Biomarkers after Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema in Vitrectomized Eyes

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone implant (DEX) for the treatment of postoperative cystoid macular edema (PCME) in vitrectomized eyes and to investigate visual and morphological OCT predictive factors.

Methods

In this retrospective study, eyes with PCME after vitrectomy were treated with at least one DEX injection and were observed over 12 months. Indications for surgery were epiretinal membrane (ERM) or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) without macular involvement. Prior treatments, if any, were noted. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and OCT morphology including the presence of intraretinal cysts/fluid or subretinal fluid (IRF/SRF) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) continuity were evaluated. Correlations between OCT measures and visual outcomes were analyzed by the generalized estimating equations procedure.

Results

Forty-six eyes with ERM and 15 eyes with RRD were enrolled. The ERM group was more likely to gain BCVA than RRD (odds ratio (OR), 1.168; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.003–1.360; p=0.046). The absence of SRF (OR, 0.860; 95% CI, 0.743–0.995; p=0.043) was predictive of worse BCVA, whereas the integrity of EZ (OR, 1.094; 95% CI, 0.951–1.257; p=0.209) or naïve status (OR, 0.946; 95% CI, 0.871–1.137, p=0.853) was not. Eyes with a worse baseline BCVA were more likely to gain >1 line after 12 months (OR, 1.485; 95% CI, 1.171–1.884; p=0.001).

Conclusion

The efficacy of the treatment of PCME in vitrectomized eyes seems to be affected by baseline BCVA, the absence of SRF, and the indication for surgery. Naïve status appears not to play any significant role in the prediction of BCVA. This trial is registered with DRKS00018955.

Novel Triamcinolone Acetonide-Loaded Liposomal Topical Formulation Improves Contrast Sensitivity Outcome After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery

Purpose: To assess visual results, macular modifications, and the incidence of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in patients using a topical triamcinolone acetonide-loaded liposomal formulation (TA-LF) after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). Methods: Fifty-six eyes after FLACS were selected. Twenty-eight eyes in the combined therapy group (P + N) were treated with prednisolone 1% and nepafenac 0.1% for 21 days postoperatively, whereas 28 eyes in the TA-LF group received a liposomal formulation containing 2 mg/mL of TA (0.2%) for the same period of time. Follow-up visits at 1 day, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks after surgery consisted of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity (CS), central foveal thickness (CFT), total macular volume (TMV) measurements, and the detection of CSME. Results: CS improved in the TA-LF group (basal value: 1.087 ± 0.339 vs. 1.276 ± 0.147 at week 12, P = 0.0346), whereas in the P + N group, CS was not different from the baseline (basal value: 1.130 ± 0.331 vs. 1.274 ± 0.133 at week 12, P = 0.1276). There were similar increases in postoperative CFT and TMV in both groups. CFT and TMV significantly correlate with CS only in the TA-LF group. The r² for CFT and CS was 0.1963 (P = 0.0206), whereas the r² for TMV and CS was 0.3615 (P = 0.0007) at 12 weeks. No difference was observed in the incidence of CSME between the groups. Conclusion: TA-LF is associated with better CS outcomes compared to combined therapy after FLACS.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implantation in Intravitreal Bevacizumab Treatment-resistant Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in visual acuity (VA) and central macular thickness (CMT) after intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implantation in intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) treatment-resistant cases with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME).

Methods

This study included 10 PCME cases who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation with similar methods and six PCME cases referred to our hospital for treatment of low VA after cataract surgery. Due to the persistence of PCME, both topical steroid and anti-inflammatory medication were administered first, followed by IVB injection. IVD implantation was performed for all IVB treatment-resistant cases. VA and CMT values were compared before and at three months after the first IVD implantation.

Results

The mean VA values before and at 3 months after the first IVD implantation were 0.69 ± 0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (1.50 to 0.10 logMAR) and 0.26 ± 0.07 logMAR (1.00 to 0.00 logMAR), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean CMT was 476.13 ± 135.13 mm (314 to 750 mm) and 294.06 ± 15.26 mm (222 to 480 mm), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean number of implanted IVD was 1.44 ± 0.89 (1 to 4) and the mean follow-up time was 7.4 ± 4.6 months (6 to 24 months). After IVD implantation therapy, the mean VA and CMT values were 0.19 ± 0.05 logMAR (0.70 to 0.00 logMAR) and 268.38 ± 31.35 mm (217 to 351 mm), respectively.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to show the efficacy of IVD implantation even after repeated IVB injections in treatment-resistant PCME. IVD implantation is both a safe and effective method for decreasing PCME after both uneventful and complicated cataract surgery.

Novel Triamcinolone Acetonide-Loaded Liposomes Topical Formulation for the Treatment of Cystoid Macular Edema After Cataract Surgery: A Pilot Study

Purpose: To report tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a topical triamcinolone acetonide-loaded liposomes formulation (TA-LF) in targeting the macular area in patients with refractory pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME).

Methods: For tolerability, safety and efficacy evaluation, 12 eyes of 12 patients with refractory PCME were exposed to one drop of TA-LF (TA at 0.2%) every 2 h for 90 days or until best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was achieved. Intraocular pressure (IOP), slit lamp examination, and central foveal thickness (CFT) were analyzed at every visit.

Results: Patients with refractory PCME under TA-LF therapy showed a significant improvement in BVCA and CFT without significant IOP modification (P = 0.94). On average CFT decreased to 206.75 ± 135.72 μm and BCVA improved to 20.08 ± 10.35 letters (P < 0.0005). BCVA was achieved at 10.58 ± 6.70 weeks (range 2–18). TA-LF was well tolerated in all cases. Neither ocular surface abnormalities nor adverse events were recorded.

Conclusion: TA-LF was well tolerated and improved BCVA and CFT on patients with refractory PCME.

[Treatment of postoperative macular edema (a clinical case study)]

Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CMO) known to appear in 0.1-2.35% of patients after phacoemulsification is one of the common causes of vision decrease during the postoperative period. The authors analyze a case of CMO development in a pseudophakic patient diagnosed 7 months after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was suggested for patients with low vision and a sensation of shroud before the eye for early diagnosis of pathological process. Intravitreal injection of the 0.7 mg dexamethasone micro-implant performed soon after establishing diagnosis was proved to be viable for postoperative CMO arrest in patients without previous treatment. One month after intravitreal implant injection the visual acuity in the patient's eye improved from 0.4 to 0.7, and retinal thickness in the macular area decreased from 705 to 255 μm. The result remained stable for 10 months. Intravitreal micro-implant appeared to have higher efficiency in contrast with traditional treatment methods (according to literature data), which was attributed to direct drug delivery to the area of pathological process. The use of 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant did not increase the intraocular pressure indicating its potential viability for patients with compensated glaucoma.

[Treatment of postoperative macular edema (a clinical case study)]

Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CMO) known to appear in 0.1-2.35% of patients after phacoemulsification is one of the common causes of vision decrease during postoperative period. The authors analyzed a case of CMO development in a pseudophakic patient diagnosed 7 months after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was suggested for patients with low vision and a sensation of shroud before the eye for early diagnosis of pathological process. Intravitreal injection of the 0.7 mg dexamethasone micro-implant performed soon after establishing the diagnosis was proved to be viable for postoperative CMO arrest in patients without previous treatment. One month after intravitreal implant injection, the visual acuity in the patient's eye improved from 0.4 to 0.7, and retinal thickness in the macular area decreased from 705 to 255 μm. The result remained stable for 10 months. Intravitreal micro-implant appeared to have higher efficiency in contrast with traditional treatment methods (according to literature data), which was attributed to direct drug delivery to the area of pathological process. The use of 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant did not increase the intraocular pressure indicating its potential viability for patients with compensated glaucoma.

Evaluation of Predictive Factors for Successful Intravitreal Dexamethasone in Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema

Purpose

To determine the efficacy, safety, and predictive outcome factors for intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) in pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME).

Methods

Retrospective, interventional, controlled study. Patients included had to have clinically significant PCME and have been treated with the DEX between 2012 and 2015. Charts and one-year data were selected consecutively, and efficacy and safety were abstracted. Visual acuity (VA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were analysed.

Results

Nineteen patient data sets were analysed. After treatment with DEX, mean VA increased significantly by 0.2 logMAR (p = 0.034), while the mean CFT was reduced significantly by 162.79 μm (p < 0.001). Five patients receiving a combination of DEX/bevacizumab have not experienced a higher mean VA gain or CFT reduction compared to fourteen patients receiving DEX alone. Decision rules, when to combine DEX with bevacizumab, have not been defined before the study. Only posttreatment VA gains in the nonhypertensive subgroup (n = 11) were significantly better (p = 0.026). Analysis of data from diabetes patients (n = 4) versus nondiabetics yielded no significant differences in efficacy. There have been no adverse events within follow-up time.

Conclusion

The use of DEX in PCME showed significant improvements in VA and CFT. The VA seems to show greater improvements in patients without hypertension.

Widening use of dexamethasone implant for the treatment of macular edema

Sustained-release intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (DEX) implant is approved in Europe for the treatment of macular edema related to diabetic retinopathy, branch retinal vein occlusion, central retinal vein occlusion, and non-infectious uveitis. The implant is formulated in a biodegradable copolymer to release the active ingredient within the vitreous chamber for up to 6 months after an intravitreal injection, allowing a prolonged interval of efficacy between injections with a good safety profile. Various other ocular pathologies with inflammatory etiopathogeneses associated with macular edema have been treated by DEX implant, including neovascular age-related macular degeneration, Irvine-Gass syndrome, vasoproliferative retinal tumors, retinal telangiectasia, Coats' disease, radiation maculopathy, retinitis pigmentosa, and macular edema secondary to scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy. We undertook a review to provide a comprehensive collection of all of the diseases that benefit from the use of the sustained-release DEX implant, alone or in combination with concomitant therapies. A MEDLINE search revealed lack of randomized controlled trials related to these indications. Therefore we included and analyzed all available studies (retrospective and prospective, comparative and non-comparative, randomized and nonrandomized, single center and multicenter, and case report). There are reports in the literature of the use of DEX implant across a range of macular edema-related pathologies, with their clinical experience supporting the use of DEX implant on a case-by-case basis with the aim of improving patient outcomes in many macular pathologies. As many of the reported macular pathologies are difficult to treat, a new treatment option that has a beneficial influence on the clinical course of the disease may be useful in clinical practice.

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant for recurrent cystoid macular edema due to Irvine-Gass syndrome: a prospective case series

PurposeTo determine the preliminary efficacy and safety of off-label dexamethasone implant for treatment of recurrent cystoid macular edema (CME) secondary to Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS).Patients and methodsThis study was set in Raghudeep Eye Clinic, Ahmedabad and LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad (India). It is a Prospective Case Series. Prospective case series comprising of patients with uncomplicated pseudophakia and CME due to IGS who recurred after one course of topical steroids with NSAIDS and a sub-Tenon corticosteroid injection. A complete ocular and systemic exam, fluorescein angiography, and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography scans were performed. Follow-up visits were on days 1, 15, and 30 and then monthly for a year. Appropriate statistical analysis was done. The primary outcome measure was the change in CDVA at months 1, 6, and 12. Secondary outcome measures were recurrence of CME and complications if any as noted at months 1, 2, 6, and 12.ResultsAbout 27 patients (27 eyes) with 16 males were included. Median age: 63.24±5.62 years. At 1 month, the CDVA improved to 0.04±0.02 (20/25) logMAR from 0.52±0.12 logMAR (20/70) (P=0.001) with a reduction in CST from 454.2±45.3 to 218.32±38.15 microns(P=0.013). The CDVA was 0.04±0.03 logMAR(P<0.001) at month 6 and 0.05±0.02 logMAR(P<0.001) at month 12. The CST was 221±35.2 microns (P=0.013) at month 6 and 214±43.34 microns (P=0.0124) at month 12. All improvements were maintained for a year. Only one patient required a second injection. No complications were noted.ConclusionThe implant is safe and effective for the treatment of recurrent CME due to IGS.

Sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant for persistent macular edema after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Persistent macular edema (ME) after surgical removal of epiretinal membrane (ERM) may impair postoperative visual recovery. Sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) was used to treat recalcitrant ME after vitrectomy for ERM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of eyes treated with DEX for ME after ERM removal. Visual and anatomic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five eyes with refractory ME on optical coherence tomography (OCT) after ERM surgery were treated with DEX. Four of five eyes demonstrated reduction in macular thickness on OCT (mean: 106 μm), with mean percentage reduction in central foveal thickness of 25%. Visual acuity improved by one or more Snellen lines in four of five eyes. DEX effect duration was 3 to 9 months. Two eyes with OCT and visual improvement after initial DEX received multiple DEX implants for maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSION

Inflammatory factors may contribute to persistent ME after vitrectomy for ERM. DEX may be a treatment option in such cases.

[Study of the effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in pseudophakic macular edema. Preliminary]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant on the treatment of pseudophakic macular edema (PME).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted on 4 patients who received an intravitreal injection of dexamethasone implant due to PME in the period from 1st January 2013 to 31st December 2013 in the Hospital Universitario de La Ribera (Alzira, Valencia, Spain). A complete ophthalmic examination was performed on these patients. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), macular thickness), and duration of the effect of the treatment were studied.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean MT was 414μm. After dexamethasone implant, mean values of MT decreased to 330.25μm at month one. The mean change from baseline MT was 83.75μm. The baseline mean BCVA was 0.3 and improved to 0.575 at month one and 3. The mean duration of the effect of the treatment was 3.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant is a possible treatment for Irvine-Gass syndrome as it improved visual acuity and reduced the macular thickness of these patients.

Efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for prostaglandin-induced refractory pseudophakic cystoid macular edema: case report and review of the literature

Background

Macular edema is a known complication even after uneventful cataract surgery. The chronic use of prostaglandin analogs is a risk factor for the development of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered first-line therapy but refractory postsurgical CME represents a therapeutic challenge, as there is not an evidence-based treatment.

Objective

To report the use of a single implant of intravitreal dexamethasone for tafluprost-associated pseudophakic CME refractory to NSAIDs and to sub-Tenon’s corticosteroid injections.

Case report

A 64-year-old female with ocular hypertension treated with tafluprost experienced decreased vision (visual acuity 20/60) and metamorphopsia 2 months after uneventful cataract extraction. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) revealed CME. After 1 month of topical and oral NSAIDs, CME was still evident on SD-OCT (visual acuity 20/50). Two sub-Tenon’s betamethasone injections were performed at a 2-week interval. As CME was still present, 2 months after the diagnosis of CME (visual acuity 20/40), the patient underwent a single dexamethasone intravitreal implant. One month later, macular appearance was normal, and visual acuity increased to 20/30. This result was maintained throughout the 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

In this report, a single implant of intravitreal dexamethasone successfully treated pseudophakic CME associated with the use of prostaglandin analogs unresponsive to NSAIDs and sub-Tenon’s betamethasone. The results of this report need to be corroborated by powered, prospective, randomized trials. The need for repeated treatments as well as the retreatment interval in patients requiring more than a single injection are issues still needing further investigations.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Irvine-Gass Syndrome

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the potential efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab in patients with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 7 eyes with CME treated with intravitreal ranibizumab. Patients were examined at 1 week and 1 month after injection and monthly thereafter. Main outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Safety was assessed by ophthalmic examination and report of systemic adverse effects.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference on BCVA (p < 0.001) and CRT (p < 0.001) before and after the ranibizumab injection. One injection appeared to be sufficient for the resolution of CME, while recurrence was observed in 1 patient, in a long-term follow-up. No observable ocular or systemic side effects were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal ranibizumab seems to be effective and safe for the treatment of pseudophakic CME, demonstrating a statistically significant difference in BCVA as well as CRT.