Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx) through a small incision (SMILE) for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: current perspectives

Flexural and Cell Adhesion Characteristic of Phakic Implantable Lenses

Background and Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the physical properties of hole-implantable collamer lenses (H-ICLs) and implantable phakic contact lenses (IPCLs) and investigate their flexural and cell adhesion characteristics. Materials and Methods: Transverse compression load to achieve lens flexion and static Young's modulus were measured in H-ICLs and IPCLs using designated equipment. Load was measured both with and without restraining the optic section of the lenses. Adhesion of iHLEC-NY2 cells to the lens surfaces was examined using phase-contrast microscopy, and cell proliferation activity was evaluated using WST-8 assay. Results: The H-ICL showed a greater tendency for transverse compression load compared to IPCL, while the IPCL showed a higher Young's modulus with respect to the force exerted on the center of the anterior surface of the optic section. The joint between the optic section and haptic support in the IPCL was found to mitigate the effects of transverse compression load. Both lens types showed minimal cell adhesion. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that H-ICLs and IPCLs exhibit distinct physical properties and adhesive characteristics. The IPCL demonstrated higher Young's modulus and unique structural features, while the H-ICL required greater transverse compression load to achieve the flexion required to tuck the haptic supports into place behind the iris to fix the lens. The observed cell non-adhesive properties for both lens types are promising in terms of reducing complications related to cell adhesion. However, further investigation and long-term observation of IPCL are warranted to assess its stability and potential impact on the iris. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the performance and potential applications of H-ICLs and IPCLs in ophthalmology.

Comparative study of small incision refractive lenticule extraction with 5 mm versus 6.5 mm optic zone for myopia

Purpose

To compare residual stromal thickness (RST) in eyes undergoing small incision refractive lenticule extraction (SMILE) using a lenticular diameter of 6.5 mm versus those with a diameter of 5 mm.

Methods: In this retrospective

comparative case series.

, consecutive

patients who underwent SMILE between 2016 and 2021 with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Preoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), refractive error, contrast sensitivity, central corneal thickness, keratometry, higher order aberrations, and scotopic pupil size were recorded using a Placido disk topography with Sheimpflug tomography-based system. Patients underwent SMILE with a lenticular diameter of 6.5 mm until 2018 (n = 372 eyes). Thereafter, the lenticular diameter was reduced to 5 mm (n = 318). The RST, postoperative refraction, aberrations, subjective glare, and halos were compared across groups at 1 and 6 months.

Results

The mean age of participants was 26.8 ± 5.8 years with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent of -4.48 D ± 2.16 D (range: -0.75 to -12.25 D) and mean scotopic pupil of 3.7 ± 0.75 mm. Eyes in the 5 mm group had 30.6 m (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28 to 33 m, P < 0.001) greater RST compared to the 6.5 mm group after adjusting for spherical equivalent and preoperative pachymetry. There were no differences in vision, contrast sensitivity, aberrations (wavefront error of 0.19 ± 0.2 vs. 0.25 ± 0.2, P = 0.19) or glare between the two groups.

Conclusion

SMILE performed with a lenticular diameter of 5 mm leads to greater RST across the myopic range, but without inducing significant higher-order aberrations.

Changes in accommodation and convergence function after refractive surgery in myopic patients

In recent years, with the gradual maturation of myopia correction surgery, the changes in binocular visual function after surgery have attracted widespread attention. The accommodation of facility, the amplitude of accommodation, relative accommodation, and accommodation convergence/accommodation assembly are essential parameters for assessing binocular visual function. The changes in these parameters are significant for guiding patients in the design of the preoperative surgical approach and alleviating postoperative visual fatigue. This paper aims to guide the preoperative assessment, design, and postoperative visual training of refractive surgery in myopic patients from the perspective of changes in binocular visual function before and after myopia and surgery, which can improve accommodation and convergence function in patients after refractive surgery.

Visual Acuity Improvement in Low, Moderate and High Myopia After Posterior-Chamber Phakic Implantable Collamer Lens Surgery in a Large Patient Cohort

Purpose

To compare best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before and after implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery in patients with low, moderate and high myopia.

Methods

A single-centre, prospective, registry-based study involving patients with myopia who received ICLs between October 2018 and August 2020. The study population was divided into three groups of subjects with low (from 0 to -6 D), moderate (-6 to -10 D) and high myopia (more than -10 D). We analysed uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), differences between BCVA pre- and 1-month postoperative, and line gain in BCVA 1 month after surgery.

Results

A total of 770 eyes belonging to 473 patients were surgically intervened during the study period, of which 692 eyes completed 1 month of postoperative follow-up and were included in the study population. At 1-month follow-up, 478 eyes (69%) achieved a BCVA of 20/20, 599 (87%) obtained 20/25 or better, and 663 (96%) had a BCVA of 20/40 or better. We identified a significant improvement in BCVA (baseline 0.15±0.2 logMAR vs follow-up 0.07±0.2 logMAR, p<0.0001) and a significant reduction in SE (baseline -9.23±4.1 D, vs follow-up -0.21±0.8 D, p<0.0001), with a significant relationship between preoperative SE and line gain (r = -0.46, p<0.0001). We identified a significantly higher line gain among eyes with higher degrees of myopia (low myopia 0.22±0.69 lines compared to moderate myopia 0.56±1.1 lines and high myopia 1.51±1.9 lines, p<0.0001). Notably, 99.6% of eyes with a high grade of myopia achieved improvement to a low degree (less than -6 D) at follow-up. The safety and efficacy indexes were 0.083±0.1 and -0.001±0.1, respectively.

Conclusion

In this large patient cohort, ICL surgery was related to a significant line gain in BCVA, particularly among eyes with higher degrees of myopia.

Possible use of corneal lenticule in surgery of corneal diseases (literature review)

In this review, we analyzed the domestic and foreign literature on the use of corneal lenticula obtained by keratorefractive surgery using the SMILE technology (SMall Incision Lenticula Extraction). Research is being actively carried out on the use of a lenticular tissue for refractive purposes: for the correction of hyperopia (LIKE – Lenticular Intrastromal Keratoplasty), for the correction of presbyopia (PEARL – PrEsbyopic Allogenic Refractive Lenticule). A significant amount of works are devoted to the use of lenticular tissue for the treatment of keratectasias of various origins. For example, a number of authors for the treatment of keratoconus suggest implantation of a lenticule into the recipient’s corneal pocket formed by a femtolaser (SLAK – Stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty). Clinical cases of combined treatment are described: implantation of a lenticule and corneal intrastromal segments for the treatment of corneal pellucid degeneration. A large number of works are devoted to the use of lenticules for tectonic coverage of ulcerative defects, marginal thinning in Mooren’s ulcer. Several clinical cases of the use of a corneal lenticule to cover a deep corneal defect in recurrent pterygium are described. This review also included articles on the storage and decellularization of corneal lenticules. The analyzed articles show a wide area of application of the corneal lenticule; however, more research is required in each of the areas of application, and it is also necessary to solve the problem of procurement and storage of lenticular tissue.

Long-Term Refractive Outcome of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Very High Myopia

PURPOSE

To assess the stability, safety, predictability, and efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia.

METHODS

The study was conducted as a retrospective noncomparative analysis of the records of 495 eyes of 270 patients treated by the ReLEx SMILE technique for a mean spherical myopic error of -12.84 ± 2.47 D (range: -10.0 to -14.0 D) combined with a mean astigmatism of -1.17 ± 1.34 D (up to -4.0 D). The mean LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.2 ± 0.6. In this study, 225 patients had the bilateral SMILE procedure, whereas 45 patients had a single eye treated with SMILE.

RESULTS

One month after surgery, the mean refractive error was 20.72 ± 0.88 D (range: +1 to 21.5 D), and the mean postoperative astigmatism was -0.83 ± 1.04 D. The mean LogMAR UDVA was 0.2 ± 0.34. In the last follow-up visit, 3 years after surgery, all the before mentioned parameters were the same or within minimal changes with no statistically significant difference from the earlier results. However, the spherical error demonstrated a significant change from -0.72 ± 0.88 D at 1 month to -1.17 ± 1.01 D at the end of the follow-up. However, this change had an insignificant visual impact. At the end of the follow-up period, approximately 94% of patients had unchanged CDVA or gained one or more lines, 6% lost one line of CDVA, and 1% lost 2 lines.

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE may be effective and safe, with a stable and predictable outcome for correction of very high myopia.

Early visual quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism

Background

To evaluate early optical quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 55 eyes from 37 patients who had preoperative myopic astigmatism of ≥2.00 diopters (D) who had been treated with SMILE surgery. Preoperatively, the mean cylinder was − 2.41 ± 0.54 D (range, − 2.00 D to − 4.50 D). The preoperative and postoperative visual outcomes, refraction, and higher-order aberration (HOA) at 1 and 3 months were compared. Refractive astigmatism changes were analyzed by the Alpins vector method.

Results

Three months after SMILE surgery, the average cylinder was − 0.14 ± 0.31 D, and the average astigmatism vector was − 0.09 D × 6.34°. The angle of error (AofE) was limited to within ±10°, and the magnitude of error was limited to within ±1.0 D in all patients. The correction index (CI) was 0.98 ± 0.07, the index of success (IOS) was 0.08 ± 0.13, and the flattening index (FI) was 0.97 ± 0.07. Significant positive correlations were found between IOS and |AofE| (P = 0.000); negative correlations were found between FI and |AofE| (P = 0.000). The postoperative total HOA, spherical aberration, vertical coma aberration, and trefoil 30° were increased significantly compared with preoperative measurements, and the increase in HOA was closely related to preoperative astigmatism (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

SMILE has preferable outcomes for correcting high myopic astigmatism. Axis rotation during the surgery might influence the undercorrection of astigmatism. The increase of HOA after surgery is related to preoperative astigmatism.

Preliminary results of a new intrastromal corneal ring segment as a tissue saving procedure in photorefractive keratectomy to correct moderate to high myopia

AIM

To evaluate the clinical results after implantation of a new intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) associated with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct high myopia (HM) patients with thin corneas.

METHODS

We evaluated 42 eyes of 23 HM patients that had ICRS implantation followed by PRK. The mean age of patients was 29.1±7.12y (range 18 to 40 years old). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), keratometry, spherical equivalent, pachymetry, and aberrometry were compared using ANOVA with repeated measurements evaluated preoperatively and at last follow-up visit after the procedures. The refractive predictability and simulated/real corneal ablation were also assessed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time after PRK was 6.8±1.6mo. The mean preoperative UCVA improved from 20/800 preoperative to 20/100 after ICRS and 20/35 after PRK. The mean preoperative BCVA was 20/25 (range from 20/30 to 20/20) and remained unchanged after ICRS implantation. Following the PRK the mean BCVA was 20/25 (range from 20/30 to 20/20). The mean spherical equivalent decreased from -7.25±1.12 (range -5.00 to -9.00) preoperatively to -3.32±1.0 (range -2.00 to -5.00) postoperatively (P<0.001) after ICRS implantation and decreased from -2.44±1.51 preoperatively to 0.32±0.45 (range -0.625 to 0.875) postoperatively (P<0.001) after PRK. The change in BCVA and topographic astigmatism was statistically significant (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ICRS in HM associated with PRK can be a tissue saving procedure and an alternative surgical option for correction of moderate to high myopia.

Myopia

Myopia, also known as short-sightedness or near-sightedness, is a very common condition that typically starts in childhood. Severe forms of myopia (pathologic myopia) are associated with a risk of other associated ophthalmic problems. This disorder affects all populations and is reaching epidemic proportions in East Asia, although there are differences in prevalence between countries. Myopia is caused by both environmental and genetic risk factors. A range of myopia management and control strategies are available that can treat this condition, but it is clear that understanding the factors involved in delaying myopia onset and slowing its progression will be key to reducing the rapid rise in its global prevalence. To achieve this goal, improved data collection using wearable technology, in combination with collection and assessment of data on demographic, genetic and environmental risk factors and with artificial intelligence are needed. Improved public health strategies focusing on early detection or prevention combined with additional effective therapeutic interventions to limit myopia progression are also needed.

Epithelial ingrowth following small incision lenticule extraction

A 27-year-old female patient came for a routine postoperative check-up, with a history of bilateral ReLEx small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery done 1.5 years back. On examination, epithelial ingrowth was noticed in the left eye at 8-9'o'clock position. Topography showed excess flattening in the area of ingrowth. Anterior Segment OCT showed hyper-reflectivity and was measured to be at a depth of 120 microns from the corneal surface. As the ingrowth appeared non-progressive, with no involvement of the pupillary axis and no visual complaints, no active intervention was done. Nonetheless, treatment options available include mechanical scraping and Nd:YAG laser procedure.

Comparison of refractive outcomes and high-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To compare the results of using small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and wavefront-guided femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG FS-LASIK) to correct high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 94 eyes of 47 patients with high myopia or myopic astigmatism, if not both, who had undergone SMILE were compared with the 94 eyes of 47 patients with high myopia or myopic astigmatism, also if not both, who had undergone WFG FS-LASIK. Only eyes with high myopic or myopic astigmatism errors greater than - 6.0 diopter (D) spherical refraction and 0-3 D cylindrical refraction were included. Values of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, efficacy index, safety index, predictability, and high-order aberration between the patient groups were compared.

RESULTS

The SMILE and WFG FS-LASIK groups did not significantly differ according to sex or age. Values of preoperative and postoperative spherical refraction, cylindrical refraction, spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity, and corrected distance visual acuity between the groups also did not significantly differ nor did values of predictability, the efficacy index, or the safety index. SMILE induced more coma and trefoil (p < 0.001), whereas WFG FS-LASIK induced more spherical aberration (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both SMILE and WFG FS-LASIK are efficient, safe, predictable procedures for correcting high myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE may induce more coma and trefoil, whereas WFG FS-LASIK may induce more spherical aberration.

Comparison of Visual, Refractive and Ocular Surface Outcomes Between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is the most commonly performed laser refractive surgical technique worldwide for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. In recent years, small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) has emerged as a promising alternative to LASIK, requiring only a single femtosecond laser to create an intrastromal lenticule, which is then removed via a small incision. The technique obviates the need for a corneal flap. A number of published studies have compared the two techniques in terms of visual, refractive and ocular surface outcomes. This review compares the clinical outcomes between LASIK and SMILE in treating myopia and myopic astigmatism based on studies published in the last 5 years. Twenty-two studies were included, all of which were observational in nature. Results suggest that the two techniques have comparable visual outcomes in terms of safety, efficacy and predictability, although recovery in visual acuity may be slower in SMILE-treated than LASIK-treated eyes. SMILE is found to result in less severe postoperative dry eye symptoms and faster recovery of corneal sensitivity than LASIK. It is important to note, however, that the SMILE technique is limited by the lack of a cyclotorsion-compensation system and option for customized treatment profile. The heterogeneity of results in this review may be attributable to the use of different LASIK platforms in different studies. Few studies compared the outcomes regarding severity of myopia. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up period will be highly beneficial for progress in this field.

Opinions on corrective refractive surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate public perception that ophthalmologists are hesitant to undergo refractive surgery by determining the personal opinions of ophthalmologists on different surgical options.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery electronic mailing list.

METHODS

An online survey administered from July to August 2014.

RESULTS

There were 396 (5.7%) respondents: 204 (51.5%) would undergo laser refractive surgery (LRS) and 192 (48.5%) would not. Of the 228 (57.6%) with refractive error, 121 (53.1%) would have LRS, with 83 (36.4%) already having had the procedure done. Top reasons against LRS include existing contraindications, worry about intolerable side effects, and worry about complications. 179 (45.3%) would undergo lenticular refractive surgery (lenRS), with 22 (12.3%) having already had this done. Among those who said yes, most preferred a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL; 59 [33.0%]), whereas those who said no thought Toric IOLs to be superior (82 [38.0%]). 184 (46.6%) would undergo femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS); the main reason against FLACS was concern regarding efficacy, followed by safety. Pearson χ² analysis found that younger age and higher number of LRS procedures performed were associated with increased willingness to undergo LRS. Furthermore, willingness to undergo LRS was positively correlated with willingness to undergo lenRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Ophthalmologists indeed are willing to undergo corrective refractive procedures. There is an approximately 50-50 divide on whether or not they would undergo LRS. Slightly less than half of ophthalmologists would personally undergo lenticular surgery, which includes cataract refractive surgery and FLACS.

Clinical Outcomes of SMILE With a Triple Centration Technique and Corneal Wavefront-Guided Transepithelial PRK in High Astigmatism

PURPOSE

To comparatively investigate the clinical outcomes, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of high astigmatism.

METHODS

This retrospective, comparative case series study included 89 eyes (89 patients) that received treatment for myopia with high astigmatism (≥ 2.50 diopters) using SMILE with a triple centration technique (SMILE group; 45 eyes) and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK (transepithelial PRK group; 44 eyes). Visual acuity measurement, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination, autokeratometry, corneal topography, and evaluation of corneal wavefront aberration were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The safety, efficacy, vector parameters, and corneal aberrations at 6 months after surgery were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

At 6 months after surgery, the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups exhibited comparable mean uncorrected distance visual acuities (-0.06 ± 0.07 and -0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively), safety, efficacy, and predictability of refractive and visual outcomes. There was a slight but statistically significant difference in the correction index between the transepithelial PRK and SMILE groups (0.96 ± 0.11 and 0.91 ± 0.10, respectively). Whereas the transepithelial PRK group exhibited increased corneal spherical aberration and significantly reduced corneal coma and trefoil, no changes in aberrometric values were noted in the SMILE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK are effective and provide predictable outcomes for the correction of high myopic astigmatism, although slight undercorrection was observed in the SMILE group. The triple centration technique was helpful in astigmatism correction by SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(3):156-163.].

Effect of Cap-Lenticule Diameter Difference on the Visual Outcome and Higher-Order Aberrations in SMILE: 0.4 mm versus 1.0 mm

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of cap-lenticule diameter difference (CLDD) on the visual outcome and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

A total of 132 patients who had bilateral SMILE for myopia or myopic astigmatism were included. The CLDD was 0.4 mm in 54 patients (group 1) and 1.0 mm in 78 patients (group 2). The refractive parameters, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and HOAs were determined preoperatively and during six months follow-up.

Results

Group 1 had better CDVA (in logMAR) compared to group 2 at day 1 (−0.07 ± 0.07 versus 0.04 ± 0.07, resp.; p < 0.001) and week 1 (−0.07 ± 0.07 versus –0.04 ± 0.07, resp.; p = 0.001). The visual acuity improved more in group 1 than in group 2. The UDVA (in logMAR) was 0.07 ± 0.07 and 0.29 ± 0.09 at day 1 (p < 0.001) and −0.08 ± 0.07 and −0.06 ± 0.06 at six months (p = 0.038) in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Group 1 was associated with significantly less induction of HOAs (0.24 ± 0.08 μm and 0.32 ± 0.26 μm, resp.; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

In SMILE, 0.4 mm CLDD is associated with better visual outcome and less induction of HOAs than 1.0 mm. Narrow CLDD should be considered in SMILE to increase the visual acuity particularly in the early postoperative period.

Predictability and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy with mitomycin C for the correction of high myopia

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictability and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) with mitomycin C (MMC) in correction of high myopia (≤-6.0 diopters [D]) as compared to low-to-moderate myopia (>-6.0 D).This is a retrospective, comparative, cohort study which included 43 eyes of 43 consecutive patients who underwent LASEK with MMC in a private hospital in Hong Kong by a single surgeon. Twenty-five eyes had high myopia (mean spherical equivalent [SE] = -8.53 ± 1.82 D) and 18 eyes had low-to-moderate myopia (mean SE = -3.99 ± 1.37 D) before surgery.In terms of refractive predictability, mean SE was significantly better in eyes with preoperative low-to-moderate myopia than high myopia at 6 months (0.04 ± 0.23 vs 0.31 ± 0.52 D, P = .035). In terms of refractive stability, between 1 and 3 months, both groups had mean absolute change of SE of around 0.25 D. Between 3 and 6 months, preoperative low-to-moderate myopia group had significantly less absolute change of SE compared to high myopia group (0.07 vs 0.23 D, P = .003). More eyes with preoperative high myopia changed SE by more than 0.25 D than those with low-to-moderate myopia between 3 and 6 months (32.0% vs 5.6%, P = .057).In conclusion, LASEK with MMC is more unpredictable and unstable in correction of high myopia than low-to-moderate myopia. The refractive outcome of most low-to-moderate myopia correction stabilizes at 3 months. Stability is not achieved until after 6 months in high myopia correction.