1
|
Fatehi N, McCannel TA, Giaconi J, Caprioli J, Law SK, Nouri-Mahdavi K. Outcomes of Glaucoma Drainage Device Surgery in Eyes with Treated Uveal Melanoma. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2019; 5:20-27. [PMID: 30675473 DOI: 10.1159/000488056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim We report patient safety and intraocular pressure (IOP) control after placement of a glaucoma drainage device (GDD) in eyes with a history of treated malignant uveal melanoma. Methods A retrospective review of the records of patients with uveal melanoma was performed. Outcomes were local tumor recurrence, rate of metastases, and to-nometric success, based on survival curves, defined as IOP < 21 mm Hg. Results Eleven eyes with choroidal melanoma, 4 with iris melanoma, and 1 with ciliary body melanoma were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 2.1 (1.1-3.2) years. Two subjects developed liver metastases; one had monosomy 3 and tumor gene expression profile class 2. The other case with ciliary body melanoma was negative for monosomy 3. There were no cases of local treatment failure. Mean preoperative IOP decreased from 30.5 ± 7.7 to 15.9 ± 8.1 mm Hg at 1 year after surgery (1-year success rate 80%). Conclusions Our case series with a median follow-up of 2 years shows that placing a GDD in patients with treated uveal melanoma does not expose patients to greater risk of local or extraocular recurrence. A larger series and longer follow-up time are required to fully evaluate the safety of GDDs in this clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nima Fatehi
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tara A McCannel
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - JoAnn Giaconi
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joseph Caprioli
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Simon K Law
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi
- Stein Eye and Doheny Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gapsis BC, Warren NA, Nutaitis MJ, Bonaparte LA, Cooper SL, Ashenafi M, Grossniklaus HE, Magrath GN. Iris melanoma presenting as childhood glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2018; 11:56-60. [PMID: 30023461 PMCID: PMC6047055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To describe the natural history and management of a rare case of iris melanoma in a pediatric patient. Observations A Caucasian female presented with left pupillary abnormalities at age 7, progressive iris changes at age 9, and markedly elevated intraocular pressure with advanced optic nerve cupping at 11 years of age. She was found to have a pigmented lesion overlying her iris and invading her angle. Trans-corneal fine needle aspirate biopsy demonstrated malignant melanoma of the iris. The patient subsequently underwent Iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy for the tumor. Conclusions and Importance: Early identification and treatment of iris melanoma may be associated with decreased risk of local progression and metastatic disease. Treatment of glaucoma in conjunction with uveal melanoma is complicated by tumor specific considerations, including treatment of the tumor and prevention of metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Briana C. Gapsis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Nichelle A. Warren
- Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Matthew J. Nutaitis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Leah A. Bonaparte
- Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Samuel L. Cooper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Michael Ashenafi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Hans E. Grossniklaus
- Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - George N. Magrath
- Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Corresponding author. Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC, 29425.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Secondary Glaucoma due to Iridescent Crystalline Particles Masquerading as Refractory Hypertensive Uveitis in an Eye With Irradiated Iris Melanoma. J Glaucoma 2018; 27:385-388. [PMID: 29394206 DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000000891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report a previously unrecognized mechanism of secondary glaucoma due to iridescent crystalline particles released from an irradiated iris melanoma. It masqueraded as refractory hypertensive uveitis following uncomplicated phacoemulsification. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 58-year-old gentleman had an iris melanoma that underwent successful regression following irradiation with proton beam radiotherapy. Three years later an uncomplicated phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant was performed and subsequently the patient presented with apparently "refractory hypertensive uveitis." Closer examination identified unique iridescent crystalline particles originating from a disintegrating tumor and dispersing within the anterior chamber and drainage angle. The patient developed a unilateral secondary open-angle glaucoma attributable to these particles. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior segment confirmed absence of tumor recurrence or intrascleral spread and systemic investigations ruled out distant metastases. RESULTS The intraocular pressure was refractory to maximal medical treatment, but was eventually controlled with trans-scleral diode laser cyclo-photocoagulation. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of a secondary glaucoma attributable to trabecular blockage with iridescent crystalline particulate material released from a disintegrating, previously irradiated, iris melanoma. Proton beam radiotherapy and possibly phacoemulsification may have played a role in triggering the release of these previously undescribed particles from the atrophied tumor surface. This unique mechanism of secondary glaucoma needs to be kept in mind in such rare cases. Trans-scleral cyclodiode laser may be used as a good initial option in such cases to minimize potential risk of tumor seeding with incisional glaucoma surgery.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dogrusöz M, Jager MJ, Damato B. Corrigendum : Uveal Melanoma Treatment and Prognostication. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2017; 6:305. [PMID: 28561548 DOI: 10.22608/apo.201734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bertil Damato
- Departments of Ophthalmology and Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Afshar AR, Stewart JM, Kao AA, Mishra KK, Daftari IK, Damato BE. Proton beam radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY 2015. [DOI: 10.1586/17469899.2015.1120671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
6
|
|
7
|
Sandinha MT, Kacperek A, Errington RD, Coupland SE, Damato B. Recurrence of iris melanoma after proton beam therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98:484-7. [DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
Proton beam radiotherapy of uveal melanoma can be administered as primary treatment, as salvage therapy for recurrent tumor, and as neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. The physical properties of proton beams make it possible to deliver high-doses of radiation to the tumor with relative sparing of adjacent tissues. This form of therapy is effective for a wider range of uveal melanoma than any other modality, providing exceptionally-high rates of local tumor control. This is particularly the case with diffuse iris melanomas, many of which are unresectable. The chances of survival, ocular conservation, visual preservation and avoidance of iatrogenic morbidity depend greatly on the tumor size, location and extent. When treating any side-effects and/or complications, it is helpful to consider whether these are the result of collateral damage or persistence of the irradiated tumor ('toxic tumor syndrome').
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Personalized treatment of uveal melanoma involves the tailoring of all aspects of care to the condition, needs, wishes, and fears of the patient, taking account of the individual's circumstances. When selecting between radiotherapy, surgical resection, and phototherapy, or when deciding how best to combine these different therapeutic modalities, it is necessary to understand the patients utilities, with respect to tumour control, visual conservation, and preservation of the eye, so as to prioritize outcomes accordingly. For example, such considerations would influence the width of the safety margins when administering radiotherapy, according to whether the patient considers it more important to conserve vision or to guarantee tumour control. With 'suspicious naevi', the choice between observation, immediate treatment, and biopsy is complicated by the lack of adequate survival data on which to base rational decisions, making it necessary for both patient and doctor to accept uncertainty. Personalized care should involve close relatives, as appropriate. It must also adapt to changes in the patient's needs over time. Such personalized care demands the ability to respond to such needs and the sensitivity to identify these requirements in the first place. Personalized treatment enhances not only the patient's satisfaction but also the 'job satisfaction' of all members of the multidisciplinary team, improving quality of care.
Collapse
|
10
|
Damato B. Progress in the management of patients with uveal melanoma. The 2012 Ashton Lecture. Eye (Lond) 2012; 26:1157-72. [PMID: 22744385 PMCID: PMC3443832 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/24/2012] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Uveal melanomas are diverse in their clinical features and behaviour. More than 90% involve the choroid, the remainder being confined to the ciliary body and iris. Most patients experience visual loss and more than a third require enucleation, in some cases because of pain. Diagnosis is based on slit-lamp biomicroscopy and/or ophthalmoscopy, with ultrasonography, autofluorescence photography, and/or biopsy in selected cases. Conservation of the eye with useful vision has improved with advances in brachytherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, endoresection, exoresection, transpupillary thermotherapy, and photodynamic therapy. Despite ocular treatment, almost 50% of patients develop metastatic disease, which occurs almost exclusively in patients whose tumour shows chromosome 3 loss and/or class 2 gene expression profile. When the tumour shows such lethal genetic changes, the survival time depends on the anatomical stage and the histological grade of malignancy. Prognostication has improved as a result of progress in multivariate analysis including all the major risk factors. Screening for metastases is more sensitive as a consequence of advances in liver scanning with magnetic resonance imaging and other methods. More patients with metastases are living longer, benefiting from therapies such as: partial hepatectomy; radiofrequency ablation; ipilumumab immunotherapy; selective internal radiotherapy; intra-hepatic chemotherapy, possibly with isolated liver perfusion; and systemic chemotherapy. There is scope for improvement in the detection of uveal melanoma so as to maximise any opportunities for conserving the eye and vision, as well as preventing metastatic spread. Patient management has been enhanced by the formation of multidisciplinary teams in specialised ocular oncology centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Damato
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Ocular Oncology Service, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot St, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|