Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly: Approaches, Risks and Limitations

A Unique "Galeazzi-Like" Fracture through a Vacated External-Fixator Pin Track: A Case Report

Introduction

Galeazzi fractures are fractures of the radial shaft accompanied by distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. They usually occur due to a mechanical fall or direct trauma to the wrist or forearm. Management of this serious injury varies from non-operative treatment with closed reduction and splinting to operative fixation using an external fixator (ex-fix) or open reduction internal fixation with plate and screws.

Case Report

We present a 76-year-old female who presented with a right distal radius fracture after a ground-level fall. Due to fracture displacement after initial conservative management, she was placed in an external fixator for stabilization. After removal of the ex-fix, she sustained a midshaft radius fracture with DRUJ malalignment, consistent with a "Galeazzi-like" fracture.

Conclusion

"Galeazzi-like" fractures with associated DRUJ malalignment can occur from previous external fixator pin sites and are adequately treated with standard operative fixation.

Surgical vs Non-surgical interventions for distal radius fractures: a quantitative analysis of Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation measures

Trials to assess differences in PRWE (Patient Related Wrist Evaluation) over time, for both surgical and non-surgical interventions post DRFs (distal radius fractures) are rare. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) questionnaire has been shown to be improved by a greater margin in the medium term for surgical interventions, than non surgical interventions. However, a study found that PRWE can be considered superior to the DASH questionnaire for DRFs, due to greater specificity to wrist pain and function. Conflicting data makes it difficult to determine surgical vs non-surgical superiority for DRF's over time with PRWE as a recovery metric. PubMed and Cochrane were searched for randomised controlled trials up to 31.8.23, reporting PRWE over 3, and 12 months. Data was extracted by 2 researchers. The differences in PRWE over time post surgical and non-surgical interventions was assessed using unpaired T testing. 1226 records were screened. 4 studies enrolling 817 participants met the eligibility criteria and were analysed. Significantly lower PRWE in surgical intervention has been identified at the 3 month mark (p<0.001). There was greater significant change in non-surgical intervention between months 3 and 12 (p<0.001). Change in PRWE over time may be a good indicator of functional outcomes in DRFs post surgical or non-surgical interventions. This could inform future clinical trial design and surgical decision-making. Further work is required to design even more user-friendly and digital patient- reported outcomes specifically for DRFs.

Volar Locking Plating Compared to Conservative Treatment in Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients (>60 years old): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of volar locking plating (VLP) to conservative treatment in distal radius fractures in patients aged >60 years old.

Methods

English articles were searched in electronic databases including MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Embase, Web of science, and ClinicalTrial.gov from inception to October 2020. Relevant article reference lists also were reviewed. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from trials comparing VLP to nonsurgical treatment in distal radial fractures in the elderly. Starting with 3052 citations, 5 trials (539 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, and patient-rated wrist evaluation scores, grip strength, and range of motion.

Results

All trials of this random effect meta-analysis were at a moderate risk of bias due to the lack of blinding. Differences in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score (mean difference [MD] -5,91; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8,83; -3,00), patient-rated wrist evaluation score (MD -9.07; 95% CI, -14.57, -3.57), and grip strength (MD 5,12; 95% CI, 0,59-9,65) were statistically significant and favored VLPs, however without reaching clinical significance. No effect was observed in terms of the range of motion and reoperation rates.

Conclusion

This review was not able to demonstrate any clinical benefit to the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures with VLP in patients aged >60 years old compared to nonsurgical treatment.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic I.